Upload
rajeev-chauhan
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
1/23
SUMMER TRAINING
PROJECT REPORT ON
HOW SHOULD MANAGERS BEHAVE WITH LITERATE AND ILLITERATE?
PROJECT REPORT UNDER SUPERVISION
OF
Mr. Akshay Arora & Mr. Rishikant
Submitted by: Rajeev kumar Chauhan
TAXILA BUSINESS SCHOOL Contents
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
2/23
S.N. Contents Page no.
1 Literate and Illiterate 3
2 Problems with illiterate people 4
3 Workplace Illiteracy 5
4 Survey on illiterates behavior 19
5 Conclusion 26
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
3/23
Literate and illiterateLiteracyhas traditionally been described as the ability to read and write. It is a concept claimed and
defined by a range of different theoretical fields.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defines literacy as the
"ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute and use printed and written
materials associated with varying contexts. Literacy involves a continuum of learning in enabling
individuals to achieve their goals, to develop their knowledge and potential, and to participate fully in their
community and wider society."
Illiteracy The state of being illiterate, or uneducated; want of learning, or knowledge; ignorance;
specifically, inability to read and write; as, the illiteracy shown by the last census.
The exact nature of the criterion varies, so that illiteracy must be defined in each case before the term
can be used in a meaningful way. In 1930 the U.S. Bureau of the Census defined as illiterate any person
over ten years of age who was unable to read and write in any language. By the next census (1940),
however, the concept of "functional" illiteracy was adopted, and any person with less than five years of
schooling was considered functionally illiterate, or unable to engage in social activities in which literacy is
assumed.
Since that time, the concept of functional illiteracy has grown in popularity among American educators,
but the standards of definition have changed with the increasing complexity of most social activities.
Thus, by 1970, the U.S. Office of Education considered at least six years of schooling (and sometimes as
many as eight) to be the minimum criterion for functional literacy. In 1990 over 5% of the adult population
living in the United States did not meet that criterion
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
4/23
Problem with illiterate employee
Have the supervisor hold a group meeting with his/her employees, including the one who is illiterate, andverbally discuss the new policy before it goes into effect.
After the policy goes into effect, do the same thing again.
Try not to single the employee out, but do reinforce the message verbally.
You also could ask the employee if he/she needs accomodation, such as a coach or reader to assistthem. Or, if this disability is already known to the supervisor, maybe the employee has a trusted friendand you could email the policy for the friend to explain to your employee.
Basically, think about ways you would do this if the employee was blind. Make sure you do this privately ifthe illiteracy is not known to other employees.
Also, look into courses maybe at your local high school or community college where the employee couldget help learning to read and offer to pay for the tuition. You would vastly improve their skills, and get aloyal employee too.
Decision making and coping of functionally illiterate consumers
A study of the decision making and coping of functionally illiterate consumers reveals cognitivepredilections, decision heuristics and trade-offs, and coping behaviors that distinguish them from literate
consumers. English-as-a-second-language and poor, literate consumers are used as comparison groups.
The strong predilection for concrete reasoning and overreliance on pictographic information of
functionally illiterate consumers suggest that companies should reconsider how they highlight the added
benefits of new products or the differentiating aspects of existing product offerings across channels
such as advertising, in-store displays, and positioning. Concrete reasoning also has strong implications
for the execution and presentation of price promotions through coupons and in-store discounts, because
many consumers are unable to process the information and thus avoid discounted products. Finally, theelaborate coping mechanisms identified and the loyalty that functionally illiterate consumers display
toward companies that are sensitive to their literacy and numeracy deficiencies reveal a potential for
loyalty programs aimed at this population that do not involve price discounts
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
5/23
Workplace Illiteracy
A Growing Workforce Challenge
Second in a Series of Workforce Development Board Position Papers on
Barriers to Successful Employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Approved by the Board June 25, 2001
Barriers to Successful Employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburgployees and Employers
Position of the Workforce Development Board:The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Workforce Development Board (WDB) has identified illiteracy as one of thetop barriers to employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Board recognizes that workers who cannotread, write or perform other basic skills will find it increasingly more difficult to survive in the workplaceas technology and other changes occur over the next decade.The Board has been instrumental in drawing attention to illiteracy and its impact on the workforce andhas joined efforts with the Charlotte Chamber, Central Piedmont Community College, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools and others to support Charlotte Reads, a major initiative of Advantage Carolina toimprove literacy levels in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. In alignment with this initiative, the WDB believesthat Charlotte-Mecklenburgs current school-based literacy must become a higher priority and effortsstepped up to ensure that the future workforce has the basic skills necessary to meet the demands of the
rapidly changing workplace---beginning at an early age. Regarding the current workforce, in which oneout of five workers is considered functionally illiterate; the Board believes that for local employers toremain competitive, they will have to assume greater responsibility in reducing employee illiteracybecause:
Incumbent workers, or those already in the workforce, will comprise the
majority of the
workforce for the next several decades.We have to work with who we already have.
As Charlottes international population grows, an increasing number of workers
will not be
able to speak English, which is a form of illiteracy. More and more businesses are relying on
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
6/23
the international population to fill vacant positions.
Many low-skilled workers are working several jobs or have other obligations
that make it
difficult for them to take classes or training after work or on weekends. Ifopportunities are not
made available at the work-site or through other work sponsored training that is convenient to
workers, it is unlikely that many workers will obtain the basic skills training they need.
Investing in literacy/basic skills training is a strategic business investment. Over
time, the costswill be recouped in increased employee productivity, reduced turnover and replacement costs,greaterloyalty from employees who have received training and cost reductions resulting fromfewer on-the-jobmistakesTo help employers better understand workplace illiteracy and what is being done locally andacrossthe country to deal with it, the WDB has developed this position paper as part of a series of paperson
barriers to successful employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. It provides an overview of:1) The impact of workforce illiteracy on employers;2) A definition of workplace literacy;3) Types of workplace literacy training and delivery;4) The value of workplace literacy training to employers;5) Potential challenges/obstacles to implementing workplace literacy training; and6) Guidance for employers interested in workplace literacy training.
Barriers to Successful Employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Workplace Illiteracy
A Growing Challenge to Employees and Employers
According to the National Institute for Literacy, as 20% of the American workforce may befunctionallyilliterate. This means that one in five workers may not be able to write letters, read
instructions, add andsubtract or perform other basic tasks necessary to fully function on the job. It also
means the chance formistakes---some which can be costly---may be high in many workplaces. The
Institute reports that
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
7/23
American businesses are estimated to lose over $60 billion in productivity each
year due toemployees lack of basic skills.
The American Management Association (AMA) indicates that illiteracy among adults seeking
employment may be even higher. In a 1999 survey of over 2,000 U.S. corporations, the AMA found that38% of job applicants tested for basic skills lacked the necessary foundational skills such as reading,writing and math to do the jobs they sought. In 1997, the same survey revealed that nearly 23% of jobapplicants lacked basic skills, indicating a fairly significant rise over the three-year period.Illiteracyintheworkplace not only affects the ability of businesses to compete in the global economy, italsoimpedesworkers ability to obtain decent paying jobs and/or to advance to higher paying positions,oftenkeepingworkers and their families trapped in poverty conditions. The AMA survey revealed that85% of thecompanies that test applicants skill levels said they do not hire skill deficient applicants.
Only 5% hire them and offer remedial training. With the fast paced technological changes continuouslytaking place in the workplace, employers in all industries are scrambling to find workers who can quicklyadapt to new tasks and demands in the market. Low skilled workers are finding themselves in anincreasingly vulnerable position because of this growing demand for higher skilled, adaptable workers.The distressing truth is that if employees cannot read, write or perform other basic tasks, they will neverhave the opportunity to obtain the skills that will allow them to compete in the workplace. Their value toemployers will always be limited.With more than 20% of adults in Charlotte-Mecklenburg estimated to have extremely limited literacyskills,workforce literacy is an issue local corporate, education and community leaders have begun to
collectivelyzero in on and address as part of a community-wide effort to address illiteracy. In August2000, CharlotteReads, a five-year literacy development plan, was adopted as a priority initiative of Advantage Carolina,
aneffort spearheaded by the Charlotte Chamber to address economic growth and development issues in
the region. This literacy plan centers on three main goals:
1) Every child in Charlotte-Mecklenburg will start kindergarten with the age-appropriate skills
andexperiences necessary to be successful in school;
2) Children will be reading at or above grade level at each of the key educational gateways (3rd, 5th,8th,
and 10th grades); and
3) Charlotte-Mecklenburg will have a workforce that has the basic communications skills necessaryto
contribute to a rapidly changing workplace.
Implementation of the plan focuses, to a great extent, on addressing literacy needs of young people
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
8/23
through expansion of the Bright Beginnings, Reach Out and Read and Family Literacy programs. Theseefforts will be vital to preventing illiteracy in future generations of workers. But what about illiteracy in
Barriers to Successful Employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg
the current workforce? Charlotte Reads advocates expansion of Central Piedmont CommunityColleges(CPCC) Work-site Training Program to help increase literacy skills of todays workers. This
programestablishes workplace partnerships between CPCC and businesses to improve basic skills of
workers andenhance their performance on the job. Over the next five years, the plan proposes increasing
the numberof individuals receiving workplace basic skills training to 1,800 participants annually, five
times thenumber of people participating in CPCCs Work-site Training Program in 2000. CPCC is
currentlyworking with approximately 20 local companies with this program.Without a doubt, improving
the quality of the current workforce will depend largely on the willingness ofCharlotte-Mecklenburgs
employers to invest in training opportunities for their current employees. Whileyounger workers will bemoving into the workforce over the next ten to twenty years, incumbent workers,or those currently in the
workforce, will comprise the largest segment of the available labor pool for thenext several decades.
Therefore, it is prudent for businesses to invest in improving the basic skills ofthose already on the job.
Blaming employees for poor educational standards and expecting them to learnon their own wont help
employers solve the workforce crisis. To remain competitive, employers musttake greater responsibility
for reducing illiteracy in the workplace, not only by providing trainingopportunities for their employees,
but by helping motivate workers to want to devote the time and energyto learning. Research shows that
many companies recognize the problem of workplace illiteracy, but relatively feware providing basic skillstraining for their employers. In a study conducted by the W.E. Upjohn Institutefor Employment Research, it
was reported that 25-40% of workers in small and medium sized businesseshave low enough levels of
basic skills to impede job performance, yet only a small minority of firms---between 1 and 3%---offer any
type of formal basic skills training. Much of the training that is providedfor workers in all sizes of
companies is oriented toward specific job skills or tasks, not the foundationalbasic skills.Results of a
recent Charlotte Chamber survey of local workforce needs, conducted by the UNC UrbanInstitute and
Central Piedmont Community College, show that a high percentage of local employers(92.5%) recognize
the need to provide more employee training and plan to do so over the next five years.In the survey,companies also indicated that in-house training will be the primary method of providingtraining. From
this, it can be assumed that much of the training will be specific job or task relatedtraining. It is not clear
whether basic training such as reading, math or General Education Development(GED) Diploma
preparation is being considered. Typically outside expertise, whether through thecommunity college or
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
9/23
other community-based training entity, is called upon for such basic skills training.The survey also
revealed that the top six training needs cited by employers are for soft skills including:
1) teamwork ability; 2) communication; 3) interpersonal skills; 4) self-initiative; 5) leadership ability; and
6) listening
Employers perceive, however, that over the next five years, the greatest increase in trainingneeds
needwill be for English language skills, reading skills, understanding graphs and charts andworking with
diverse cultures, all of which can be considered aspects of workplace literacy.
What is Workplace LiterWorkplace literacy encompasses the basic and higher order skills individuals
need to function in theworkplace. As defined by the National Literacy Act of 1991, an individual who is
considered workplaceliterate is someone who has the ability to read, write and speak in English, as well
as compute and solveproblems at levels of proficiency necessary to function on the job. The U. S.
Department of Labor and theAmerican Society for Training and Development has expanded upon this
definition to include the following
Barriers to Successful Employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg
list of basic skills that employers believe are important and part of what it means to be literate in
theworkplace:
knowing how to learn
reading, writing and computation
listening and oral communication
creative thinking and problem solving
self-esteem, goal setting/motivation, and personal/career development
interpersonal skills, negotiation and teamwork
organizational effectiveness and leadership
Local education and workforce development specialists concur that all of the above are dimensions of
workplace literacy, along with the ability to understand and use computers, which is increasingly
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
10/23
becoming an essential skill needed in all aspects of the workplace. Contrary to popular belief, literacy
now embodies much more than the ability to read and write.The trend in basic skills training for
incumbent workers is clearly moving away from subject-driven, offsiteclassroom-style education or
training sessions which can be very time consuming and inconvenient toworkers. While employers alwayshave the option of sending their employees to classes at thecommunity college or other off-site location,
more innovative training methods that bring the training to the worker are being employed. In-house staff
of most companies, particularly small and medium sized ones, generally are not equipped to provide basic
skills training to employees. Consequently, most human resource managers and/or business owners are
seeking the help of outside training experts whenthey decide to offer such training opportunities. In
Charlotte, Central Piedmont Community College isthe primary source of most of the basic work-site skills
training offered. The college will work closely with businesses to customize training to meet the specific
company needs.Some of the types of training offered at the work-site include:
Classes to help workers prepare for and acquire their GED
English as a Second Language (ESL) classes and tutoring
Basic reading, writing and math classes
Basic computer skills classes
The amount of time workers need to devote to such classes varies. Typically training ranges
from two to six hours a week of instruction and/or lab work. The overall duration for any
one class varies depending on the needs of the worker. For example, for some pursuing their
high school diplomas through the GED program, it may take six months. For others, it might
take two years. Many of the classes are self-paced with training modules, so participants
can fit the training into their work schedules and go at a pace thatmeets their individual
needs.Technology is also allowing greater flexibility in providing convenient and effective
training to workers.
For example, CPCC is currently pursuing funds to provide a mobile wireless laptop lab loaded
various basic skills software to take into the workplace as part of its Work-site Training
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
11/23
Program offerings. This would allow each employee to study Adult Basic Skills subjects while
filling the need of introducing students to the use of the computer. The mobile laptop lab is
designed for teaching in business and industry; it would fill the gap between holding single
subject classes on site or hoping that Barriers to Successful Employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg workers go to local education centers. This portable computer classroom,
capable of a wide range of software applications, would accomplish what traditional
classrooms cannot. Online training also is increasingly becoming more popular for
employees and employers. It is convenient and can be effective for students at the work-site
or at home and doesnt require any additional investment of infrastructure. It simply
involves having a connection to the Internet and using a web browser. True web-based
training includes all lessons, exercises and collaboration within the web browser. The majordrawbacks are limited access to computers and the inability of workers to read and/or use
a computer. Training to overcome some of the basic illiteracy issues would need to be
addressedbefore online training could even be considered for a segment of the workforce.
For those who can read and use a computer, however, online training is an option companies
should at least consider. Teaching methods change, and computers provide the opportunity
to help employees learn in different ways and at their level of comprehension. Computers
offer learner-centered methods for individualized education. The students have access tofeedback that informs them of their progress. At the same time, it is possible to use group
instruction to assist the visual learners in the group grasp the material. Audio and visual
combinations add to the educational dimensions. Students who are faster or slower than the
group can advance at their own pace. With the teacher available to facilitate at al levels,
students will find it possible to progress unhampered by the usual classroom
constraints.Employers may be challenged to identify a specific monetary return on their
investment for providing basic skills training opportunities for their workers. However,research on the success of such training and reports from local human resource
professionals who work with companies that provide basic skillstraining report favorable
results that can translate into financial gains. The major outcomes reportedinclude:
Increased productivity
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
12/23
Reduction in employee turnover and employee replacement costs
Loyalty from employees who have received training
Fewer mistakes, thus creating a safer work environmentWorkers who feel better about themselves and become better employees
The report, Turning Skills Into Profit: Economic Benefits of Workplace Education Programs,
includes asurvey of more than 40 private and public sector workplaces from a cross-
section of economic sectors throughout the U.S. Findings of the report indicate that 87% of
employers surveyed cite improved morale as an organizational benefit gained through basic
skills workplace education programs. Increased quality of work, better team performance,
and improved capacityto solve problems were cited as organizationalbenefits by 82% of theemployers surveyed. Three-quarters of survey respondents cite improved capacityto cope with change in
the workplace. Other organizational benefits cited by employers were highersuccess rates in promotingemployees (71%); improved effectiveness of supervisors (69%); improved labor-management relations
(65%); increased output of products and services (65%); increasedprofitability (56%); reduced error
rate (53%); better health and safety record (51%); increased customerretention (42%); and increasedemployee retention (40%). Workplace education also helps employees develop positive attitudes about
their work and ability toembrace change. Eighty-five percent of employers surveyed cite greaterwillingness and ability to learnfor life as a skill gained through workplace education programs. Eightyfour percent cite improved ability
Barriers to Successful Employment in Charlotte-Mecklenburg
to listen, to understand, learn, and apply information and analysis, as well as improved understanding and
ability to use documents, as skills they obtained from such programs. Other skill improvements reported
because of workplace education programs were a more positive attitude toward change (84%); better
ability to work in teams (80%); increased understanding of and ability to use numbers (76%); improved
capacity to think critically and act logically (73%); improved ability to use computers and other
technology (65%); heightened understanding and willingness to work within the group's culture (65%);
stronger understanding of and ability to use prose (53%). (Source:Turning Skills Into Profit: Economic
Benefits of Workplace Education Programs, Office of Vocational and Adult Education, 1999.)
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
13/23
Some of the main challenges or obstacles that have been identified through studies on workforce literacy
training and from first-hand experience of local employers and educators are: 1) workers embarrassment
about being illiterate; 2) employers fear of losing their investment in training if employees leave
aftertraining; 3) keeping employees motivated to stay with a training program once they start; and 4)
concerns about the cost of training. A brief discussion of some of the issues relating to eachis providedbelow.
Workers Embarrassment About Illiteracy
One of the greatest challenges employers face in providing literacy or basic training is getting
participation from workers who are reluctant to admit they cant read or write or have no high school
degree. Such workers often fear being made fun of or being considered stupid by the rest of the
workforce or being thought less of by their employer. Unless employers are sensitive to the signs of
illiteracy, they may not even be aware an employee has a problem. Workers may memorize information or
bring work home to have a spouse or their children help them with it so their secret is not revealed.
They may also continually forget to bring their reading glasses with them, a common tip off to
employers that poor eye sight is not the workers real problem. An estimated 10% of the illiterate
population in the U.S. wont participate in literacy programs because of the stigma people may attach to
it. To some who cannot read or write, being illiterate is considered a character flaw that needs to be
hidden. Consequently, for companies to be successful in getting participation from hesitant participants,
they must present the opportunities in a sensitive way and ensure that participating workers are not
singled out or identified to the rest of the workforce, unless they want to be. A human resource director
from one large company in Charlotte says that her company never identifies a class as a GED or basic
reading class, but rather lumps all the training into the basic skills category. Everyone can improve
their basic skills, she adds, so the stigma isnt the same.
Employers Fear of Losing Employers Once They Improve Their Skills
Many employers are concerned about their return on investment for training. They fear if they provide
opportunities for their employees to enhance their basic skill levels, the workers may leave once theycomplete their training. This is always in the back of my mind, says one Charlotte HR director who
provides worksite-training opportunities, but that hasnt been the case for us. She and others who have
been providing basic skills training indicate that employers report that providing training opportunities
such as GED preparation are paying off with good retention rates. Employees view the
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
14/23
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
15/23
for testing and evaluating employees. (Pre-assessment takes approximately two hours to complete.)
Generally, books and instructional materials cost $14 per employee. CPCC has a minimum class size of 10
students. Smaller size companies that may not be able to fill a class are known to collaborate with other
small companies to meet the minimum class size requirement and share the hourly instructional cost,
making the cost to employers even more affordable. Employers considering providing or expandingworkplace literacy training opportunities should consider
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
16/23
Survey on managers behavior with literate and
illiterate
63.33
36.66
Q.1- As a manager would you like to hire an
illiterate?
yes
no
5050
Q.2- Do you think literacy is compulsory for
smooth running of undertaking?
yes
no
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
17/23
43.33
35
11.6
Q.3- How do you like to transfer the
information to an illiterate employee?
verbal
written
other way
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
18/23
38.33
60
1.66
Q.4- Do you think non verbal communication
is effective for illiterate workers?
yes
no
unanswered
58.33
30
11.66
Q.5- According to you who is more reliable?
literate
illiterate
unanswered
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
19/23
28.33
45
26.6
Q.6- what is the behavior of illiterate person?
simple
complex
uncontrollable
48.3331.6
8.33
1.2
Q.7- what is the behavior of literate person?
simple
complex
uncontrollable
unanswered
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
20/23
56.66
43.33
Q.8 - Do you think illiteracy is a barrier in
improving staff relationship?
yes
no
61.66
38.33
Q.9-What are the criteria you chose to judge
an illiterate person?
communication
behavior
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
21/23
55
43.33
1.66
Q.10- How do you get response from
illiterate employee?
oral
written
unanswered
61.66
36.66
1.68
Q.11-Can a literate and illiterate performteamwork together?
yes
no
unanswered
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
22/23
Conclusion
Illiterates are simply those who cant learn, read or write. But does that translate into those who cant
learn, earn, read, breed; that those who cant write are never right?
Why do many poor children not attend school? The response usually heard is that their families are toopoor afford the education, and that the Government has been lax in establishing free education facilitiesat the primary level. Undoubtedly, these are responsible, but a little piece of news doing the rounds is thatmillions of kids are out of school because the places reserved for them by law were instead given toothers like you and me. Although poverty and illiteracy have come down percentage-wise, the number ofpoor and illiterate people is going up, primarily because of unchecked population growth. Lowproductivity, ignorance and superstitions are the other causes.
Think about what you would miss if you could not decipher what was on the side of your medication; knowwhat television show is coming up on your cable, or even read the daily news. The loss is insurmountable.
Poverty and illiteracy are linked to each other. The more the illiteracy, the more will be unemployment,which in turn, would encourage child labour. How many jobs can you think of, that do not require you toread or write? This is like carnaging the mass without any weapons.
Effective learning and communication in this computer age is difficult without literacy, so is acquisitionand sharing of knowledge and information. Literacy empowers the citizens of the country with weapons of
rational thinking, liberty, cohesiveness and mutual understanding.Literacy is a big force in alienating undemocratic forces and social and economic problems liketerrorism, communalism etc.
Etiquettes are also closely related to literacy. Youre likely to behave in an organized and decent mannerif you know when to do what. This creates a distinct line between the illiterate and the literate.
World Bank studies have established the direct and functional relationship between literacy andproductivity on one hand, and li teracy and the overall quality of human life on the other. I feel that,
Progress = Successful people/Total Population.
So people are the common denominator of progress. In fact, literacy is considered a pre-requisite for thephysical and mental growth of people and the development of the nation as a whole. It is high time peoplein power realize the urgency to act now to solve the problems.
8/6/2019 Summer Training2
23/23
A certain percentage of seats should be set aside for indigent children and their education should befunded by government. Schools should be allowed to simply buy off the land allotted to them at marketrates, and extricate themselves from the burden of having to provide free education. Elementaryschooling should be made universal. A new Gurukul scheme needs to be implemented shifting the
initiative to single-teacher schools in every street. NGOs can be involved in this project to identify theeligible children and enroll them in schools. Free food and books can be distributed through the NGOs. Inconclusion, Literacy is not a luxury; it is a right and a responsibility. If our world is to meet thechallenges of the twenty-first century we must harness the energy and creativity of all our citizens. Former US President Bill Clinton