SUNSET NS E Nettleton Road

Timber Structure UMRon Brick Pavers

UM

R

Bitumen

Nettleton Road

Brick &

Tin

(#192)

Metal

StructureC

oncrete

Rainw

ater

Tank

Native Bush

Rainw

ater

Tank

Metal

Structure

Native Bush

Native Bush

Native Bush

Native Bush

Native Bush

Gravel

Gravel

Garden

Sand

Sand

Garden

Rock

Retaining

Wall

Concrete

Concrete

Concrete

Brick & Tin

Structure on

Concrete

PoolC

oncrete

Metal Fence

1.3m H

igh in

Good C

ondition

Timber Structure UMRon Brick Pavers

UM

R

Wire Fence

1.7m H

igh in

Fair Condition

REF. SPIK

E PUT IN

SAN

D

DA

TUM

157.61m A

HD

SSM B

YF24 WA

S ESTAB

LISHED

USIN

G D

ATA

SUPPLIED

BY TH

E

GO

EDETIC

SECTIO

N O

F LAN

DG

ATE

Approx.

F.L.153.96

Approx.F.L.153.67

Native Bush

153.93153.93

157.28

158.18

159.09

156.10

155.55155.74155.88

156.43

156.15

155.67

155.04

154.93

154.32

15

3.6

5

153.6

6

154.16154.32

155.20

156.31

156.76157.48

158.27

157.58157.81

158.04

156.57

153.52 153.5

11

53

.51

153.5

7

151.95

155.32

155.02

154.18

153.91

152.72

152.25

152.44

150.76

149.85

148.78

150.11

149.01

150.41

151.88153.53

154.06

155.14

153.88

154.34

155.55

155.68

154.31

153.86153.79

154.39

153.60 15

3.8

2

15

3.9

0

153.84 153.52

15

3.5

7153.5

7

15

3.4

0

153.16

153.5

1

15

3.4

7

153.53

153.55153.55

153.5

61

53

.55

153.55 153.56

153.5

5

15

3.5

3153.92

153.9215

3.9

1

153.8

3

153.86 153.52

152.08

151.41

152.46

152.58

152.69

152.50

152.43

153.35153.26

153.23

148.65

149.26

149.21

149.61149.65

150.86

152.08

15

3.8

8153.67

153.66

153.69

153.00152.04

152.29

151.97

150.00

151.19

153.55

155.23156.31

156.9

5156.8

9

156.8

9156.9

7

157.7

7

157.44

158.12

158.2

2

158.20

159.57

159.35

158.20

157.32

157.87

157.93 157.87

151.19

152.88

153.14

153.92

155.26

157.5

4

157.34 157.4

0

156.89156.85

154.5

152.0151.5

152.5

153.0

153.5154.0

155.0

155.5 156.0 156.5 157.0

157.5158.0

158.5 159.0

151.0

157.0157.5

152.5

152.0

153.5

149.5

152.5153.0

149.0

153.5

149.0

149.5

150.0

150.5

151.0

151.5

152.0152.5

153.0

153.5

154.0

154.0

154.5

155.0

155.5

156.0

156.5

157.0

157.5

158.0158.5

159.0

159.5

158.0

156.0

156.5

154.5

155.0

155.5

157.0

157.5151.0

151.5

150.0

150.5

150.5

151.0

151.5152.0

(476.81)

74°23'41" 7.16

172°28'45"

207.8

111°32'40"

476.81

95°13'20"

316.68

87°27'19"

143.49

90°4'8"

133.98

88°52'40"

434.56

Nettle

ton R

oad

PROPOSED DOUBLESTORY DWELLING

PROPOSEDSHED

PROPOSEDSTUDIO

WINTER

SUNRISE

SUMM

ERSUNRISE

N

S

W WINTER

SUNSET

SUMM

ER

SUNSET

E

keenarchitecture

THESE DRAWINGS, DETAILS, DESIGN & SPECIFICATIONS AND THECOPYRIGHT THEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF KEEN ARCHITECTURE

PTY LTD AND MUST NOT BE USED, REPRODUCED OR COPIEDWHOLLY OR IN PART WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF

KEEN ARCHITECTURE PTY LTD.

SITE PLAN

BEN THEOBALD & TEAGAN WATSON

No. 192 NETTLETON ROAD,BYFORD, WA

1:1000

CLIENT

PROJECT ADDRESS

DRAWING JOB NO. ISSUE DATE DRAWING NO.

DRAWN SCALE OF

2101

KK

SK0210.06.2021

SK06

THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BEREAD IN CONJUNCTIONWITH "BUSHFIRE ATTACKLEVEL ASSESSMENT REPORT"CARRIED OUT BY BUSHFIRESMART DATED ....TBC....ALL CONSTRUCTION ANDMATERIALS SHALL COMPLYWITH AUSTRALIANSTANDARD 3959-2009 FORBAL-29 RATING WHETHER ORNOT NOTED, SPECIFIED ORINDICATED IN THECONTRACT DOCUMENTS.

CONCEPT DESIGN

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOT 54

AutoCAD SHX Text

A/C

AutoCAD SHX Text

A/C

AutoCAD SHX Text

METER BOX

N

BED 1CARPET

MASTER BEDCARPET

HALLWAYBRICK PAVER

ENSUITETILE

LAUDRYTILE

GUEST ENSTILE

GUEST BEDTILE

BATHTILE

RUMPUSBRICK PAVER

PDR 1BRK PAV

ROBE

S

ROBE

S

ROBE

S

LIN

EN

WM

W.I.R.CARPET

PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN1:100

ENTERTAININGBRICK PAVER

HALLWAYBRICK PAVER

BED 2CARPET

9585

19230 4620

4440

5145

1113012000720

FUTUREPOOL

FFL 153.960 FFL 153.617

FFL 153.567

FFL 153.910

ASD

ASD

1500 x 1200SOAKWELLS, ONETO EACH SIDE OFTHE RESIDENCE, TOBE A MIN OF 1.5MFROM THEDWELLING

PDR 2

PROPOSED UPPER FLOOR PLAN

BSD

KITCHENTIMB

DININGTIMB

BALCONYTIMB

PANTRYTIMB

FRG

LOUNGETIMB

W/SHOPCONC

STORETIMB

GARAGECONC

ENTRYTIMB

ALFRESCOTILE

WALKWAYTILE

11130340021006500720

1090

043

6067

0530

0021

00

1990 7330 3400 11130

5100

9585

1028

012

00

FFL 157.303FFL 156.883

FFL 157.217

FFL 157.217

FFL 157.217

ASD

ASD

WINTER

SUNRISE

SUMM

ERSUNRISE

N

S

W WINTER

SUNSET

SUMM

ER

SUNSET

E

keenarchitecture




FLOOR PLANS



1:100

CLIENT

PROJECT ADDRESS

DRAWING JOB NO. ISSUE DATE DRAWING NO.

DRAWN SCALE OF

2101

KK

SK0410.06.2021

SK06


CONCEPT DESIGN

10.1.6 - Attachment 1

Ordinary Council Meeting - 15 November 2021

PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION1:100

LL F

SECTIONAL OVERHEADDOOR

CL3

CL2DRUPPER FFL RL(157.303) -9C

-39C

-0C

PARAPET RL(159.874)

PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION/SECTION1:100

SL F

LL F

L FFL FL

CL1

CL2DR

8772

RIDG

E LI

NE

UPPER FFL RL(157.303)

PROPOSED FFL RL(153.960)

-39C

-0C

-69C

-30C

PARAPET RL(159.874)

RIDGE LINE RL(162.731) RIDGE LINE RL(162.731)

LOUNGE

DR

BAL

FLFW

AW

SL F

LF

PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION1:100

PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION(WITH SCREENS)1:100

L DR F L DRLF

F

SL F

F

DR

FUTUREPOOL

ALFRESCO FFL RL(156.883)

PROPOSED LOWER FFL RL(153.617)

-34C

-4C

-69CPARAPET RL(159.874)

-30CALFRESCO FFL RL(156.883)

PROPOSED LOWER FFL RL(153.617)

-34C

-4C

-69CPARAPET RL(159.874)

-30C

UPPER FFL RL(157.303) -39C

SL

F

PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION1:100

AW

F

F

AW

AWF

L F

FUTUREPOOL

UPPER FFL RL(157.303)

PROPOSED FFL RL(153.960)

-39C

-0C

-69C

-30C -30C

PARAPET RL(159.874)

RS

RENSCR

AW

PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION(WITHOUT SCREENS)1:100

SL F

F

DR

FUTUREPOOL

-34C

-4C

-69C

-30C

-39C

SL F SL FSL

FW

CL1

FL1

STEEL FRAMED WINDOWS PAINTED FINISHCOLOUR DULUX 'TBC'

TBC FACIAS, BARGE BOARDS AND TRIM ANDGLAV STEEL GUTTERING PAINTED FINISHCOLOUR 'TBC'.

CLADDING TBC.

BAL STEEL BALUSTRADE COLOURBOND FINISHCOLOUR 'TBC'.

FINISHES SCHEDULE

DECK TIMBER VERANDAH FLOOR TBC.

RS1 ROOF SHEETING TBC.

CL2 CLADDING TBC.

CL3 CLADDING TBC.

REN RENDER TBC.

keenarchitecture




ELEVATIONS



1:100

JOB NO. ISSUE DATE DRAWING NO.

DRAWN SCALE OF

2101

KK

SK0510.06.2021

SK06


CONCEPT DESIGN

FFL: RL(149.000) SLF

AW

2400

4552

AW

AW

PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION1:100

PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION1:100

2400

4552

26k TANK

4500

6350

ROOF SHEETING TBC.

ROOF SHEETING TBC. VERTICAL SHEETING TBC.

HORIZONTALCLADDING TBC.

ALUMINUM FRAMEDWINDOWS

15° ROOF PITCH

6400

4650

STUDIO FCL: RL(151.400)

SHED RL(153.650)

570

699

28° ROOF PITCH

PERGOLA2° MIN PITCH

DR

SL F

AW

F L

PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION1:100

PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION1:100

26k TANK

2400

4552

6350

15° ROOF PITCH

4650

FFL: RL(149.000)

STUDIO FCL: RL(151.100)

SHED RL(153.650)

ROOF SHEETING TBC.VERTICAL SHEETING TBC.

DR

2100

OLITIMB

BED 1TIMB

FRG

FIRE

LOUNGE &DINING

BATH

LIN

EN

KITCHEN

SHED

20000

1260

0

7200

10710

DECK &VERANDAH

26k TANK

PROPOSED STUDIO & SHEDFLOOR PLAN1:100

WINTER

SUNRISE

SUMMERSUNRISE

N

S

W

WINTERSUNSET

SUMMER

SUNSET

E




STUDIO & SHED



1:100

JOB NO. ISSUE DATE DRAWING NO.

DRAWN SCALE OF

2101

KK

SK0623.07.2021

SK06

keenarchitecture


CONCEPT DESIGN

Bushfire Management Plan (DA)

Property Details and Description of Works

Address Details

Unit no Street no Lot no Street name / Plan Reference

192 54 Nettleton Road

Suburb State Postcode

Byford WA 6122

Local government

area Shire of Serpentine – Jarrahdale

Main BCA class of

the building Class 1a

Use(s) of the

building Residential Dwelling/s

Description of the

building or works Extension/Renovations to existing Primary Building & Construction of Ancillary Dwelling

Report Details

Report / Job Number 21-8682

Report Version

2 Assessment Date

1 April 2021 Report Date

18 July 2021

BPAD Accredited Practitioner Details

Name Nathan Peart

Authorised Practitioner Stamp

Company Details 08 9555 9444

[email protected]

Address: 71 Allnutt Street, Mandurah, 6210

Postal: PO Box 4160, Mandurah North, WA, 6210

Reliance on the assessment and determination of the Bushfire Attack Level contained in this report should not extend beyond a period of 12 months from the date of issue of the report. If this report was issued more than 12 months ago, it is recommended that the validity of the determination be confirmed with the Accredited Practitioner and where required an updated report issued.



mailto:[email protected]

08 9555 9444 [email protected]




Disclaimer and Limitation

This report is prepared solely for the client, any future landowners of the subject lot and is not for the benefit of any other person and may not be relied upon by any other person. Bushfire Smart accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. The mitigation strategies contained in this report are considered to be prudent minimum standards only, based on the writer’s experience as well as standards prescribed by relevant authorities. It is expressly stated that Bushfire Smart and the writer do not guarantee that if such standards are complied with or if a property owner exercises prudence, that a building or property will not be damaged or destroyed by bushfire or that lives will not be lost in a bush fire. Fire is an extremely unpredictable force of nature. Changing climatic factors (whether predictable or otherwise) either before or at the time of a fire can also significantly affect the nature of a fire and in a bushfire prone area it is not possible to completely guard against bushfire. Further, the growth, planting or removal of vegetation; poor maintenance of any fire prevention measures; addition of structures not included in this report; or other activity can and will change the bushfire threat to all properties detailed in the report. Further, the achievement of the level of implementation of fire precautions will depend on the actions of the landowner or occupiers of the land, over which Bushfire Smart has no control. This report does not negate the need to follow Local government authority requirements for Firebreak and Fuel Hazard Reduction. The client agrees that in submitting this report they approve of and will comply with all requirements detailed.

Author

Nathan Peart BPAD 38808 Level 2 Bushfire Planning and Design (BPAD) Accredited Practitioner

E: [email protected] Ph: 9555 9444








Table of Contents

1. BUSHFIRE ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 4

1.1 PROPOSAL DETAILS .......................................................................................................................................... 4

1.2 SITE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 4

2. ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE BUSHFIRE PROTECTION ......................................................................................... 13

2.1 COMPLIANCE TABLE ....................................................................................................................................... 13

2.1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 14

3. GENERAL REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 14

4. ONLINE REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................... 14

5. APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................................................... 15

Table of Figures Figure 1: Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 4

Figure 2: Vegetation Classification ............................................................................................................... 5

Figure 3: Spatial Representation of proposed risk management measures. ................................................ 16








1. Bushfire Assessment

1.1 Proposal Details

Lot 54 (#192) Nettleton Road, Byford (subject lot) is a 11.9 ha parcel presently with one residential dwelling,

water tanks and several sheds. The proposal is to construct a Primary residence and Ancillary ‘studio’.

Figure 1: Site Plan

1.2 Site Assessment

The assessment of this site/development was undertaken on 1 April 2021 by a BPAD Accredited Practitioner

for the purpose of determining the Bushfire Attack Level in accordance with AS 3959-2018 Simplified

Procedure (Method 1).








Figure 2: Vegetation Classification Legend

Lot 54 (#192) Nettleton Road, Byford

Assessment Date: 1 April 2021 Prepared by: Nathan Peart Accreditation Level: 2 Accreditation Number: 38808








Vegetation Classification

All vegetation within 100m of the site / proposed development was classified in accordance with Clause 2.2.3

of AS 3959-2018. Each distinguishable vegetation plot with the potential to determine the Bushfire Attack

Level is identified below.

Photo ID: 1 Plot: 1

Vegetation Classification or Exclusion Clause

Class A Forest - Open forest A-03

Description / Justification for Classification

Low lying foliage – mixed shrub/scrub species (Xanthorrhoea in abundance) with unmanaged grasses (over 100mm) and leaf litter fuel loads present. Average tree height of 12m, dominated by Eucalyptus (juvenile & mature) with foliage cover approximately 50%

Photo ID: 2 Plot: 1





Photo ID: 3 Plot: 2












Photo ID: 4 Plot: 2





Photo ID: 5 Plot: 3





Photo ID: 6 Plot: 3












Photo ID: 7 Plot: 4





Photo ID: 8 Plot: 4





Photo ID: 9 Plot: -


Excludable - 2.2.3.2(e) Non Vegetated Areas & (f) Low Threat Vegetation


Part APZ – managed garden beds, cleared areas – prepared for building, grasses less than 100mm with trees managed and under pruned and reduced fuel loads.








Photo ID: 10 Plot: 5












Relevant Fire Danger Index

The fire danger index for this site has been determined in accordance with Table 2.1 or otherwise determined in

accordance with a jurisdictional variation applicable to the site. All vegetation within 100 metres of the site was

classified in accordance with clause 2.2.3 of AS3959-2018.

Fire Danger Index

FDI 40 Table 2.7

FDI 50 Table 2.6

FDI 80 Table 2.5

FDI 100 Table 2.4

Potential Bushfire Impacts – BUILDING A

The potential bushfire impact to the site / proposed development from each of the identified vegetation plots are

identified below.

Plot Vegetation Classification Effective Slope Separation (m) BAL

1 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 11 BAL – FZ

2 Class A - Forest 11.5° Downslope 13.9 BAL – FZ

3 Class A - Forest 20° Downslope 9.5 BAL – FZ

4 Class A - Forest Upslope 37.4 BAL – 19

5 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 105.5 BAL – LOW

- Excludable – Clause 2.2.3.2(e)(f) N/A N/A BAL – LOW Table 1: BAL Analysis

Determined Bushfire Attack Level (BAL)

The Determined Bushfire Attack Level (highest BAL) for the proposed development has been determined in

accordance with clause 2.2.6 of AS 3959 – 2018 using the above analysis.

Determined Bushfire Attack Level BAL – FZ

Potential Bushfire Impacts – BUILDING B


1 Class A - Forest Upslope 0 BAL – FZ

2 Class A - Forest 11.5° Downslope 0 BAL – FZ

3 Class A - Forest Upslope 139.9 BAL – LOW


5 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 0 BAL – FZ

- Excludable – Clause 2.2.3.2(e)(f) N/A N/A BAL – LOW Table 1: BAL Analysis

Determined Bushfire Attack Level (BAL)

The Determined Bushfire Attack Level (highest BAL) for the proposed development has been determined in

accordance with clause 2.2.6 of AS 3959 – 2018 using the above analysis.

Determined Bushfire Attack Level BAL – FZ








Indicative Bushfire Attack Level (BAL) – BUILDING A

The Bushfire Attack Level (highest BAL) for the proposed development can be reduced to the level indicated

below with the inclusion of an Asset protection Zone as prescribed in this report as shown in the following

table.


1 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 33 BAL – 29

2 Class A - Forest 11.5° Downslope 42 BAL – 29



5 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 105.5 BAL – LOW Table 2: BAL Analysis with APZ requirements

Indicative Bushfire Attack Level BAL – 29

NOTE: The indicative APZ clearing required has been demonstrated on the Figure 1 with the Blue Line

around the Proposed Development.

Indicative Bushfire Attack Level (BAL)



table.






5 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 105.5 BAL – LOW Table 2: BAL Analysis with APZ requirements











Indicative Bushfire Attack Level (BAL) – BUILDING B



table.


1 Class A - Forest Upslope 21 BAL – 29




5 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 33 BAL – 29 Table 2: BAL Analysis with APZ requirements




Indicative Bushfire Attack Level (BAL)



table.


1 Class A - Forest Upslope 16 BAL – 40




5 Class A - Forest 8° Downslope 26 BAL – 29 Table 2: BAL Analysis with APZ requirements











2. Assessment against the Bushfire Protection

2.1 Compliance Table

The following table summarises the compliance with SPP 3.7 and the Guidelines to Planning in Bushfire

Prone Areas V1.3-Dec2017 Text. All references to Acceptable Solutions in the compliance notes can be read

in detail from the Guidelines to Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas V1.3-Dec2017

Elem

ent

Acceptable Solution

Able to meet

acceptable solution?

Compliance notes.

1:

Lo

cati

on

A1.1 Development location

YES

The development is within a rural living area classified as an extreme bush fire hazard level. This development attains a determined BAL-FZ with the possibility of an indicative BAL-29 with the establishment of an Asset Protection Zone as per requirements of this Bushfire Management Plan.

2: S

itti

ng

A2.2 Asset Protection Zone(APZ)

YES

An APZ should be created by builder at site development stage to achieve a maximum BAL - 29. It is the responsibility of landowners to re-establish the APZ before occupation of the building and maintain the APZ throughout the life of the building. The APZ must extend 52 metres (South) and be maintained. – See Spatial Representation (Appendix A). Whist the size of the property allows for a BAL-29 APZ to be established, due to various issues on the site such a slope, vegetation type and erosion risk, this may not be logistically viable. Consultant with the relevant authorities is recommended to determine best course of action – a BAL- 40 may be more achievable for the development.

3: V

ehic

ula

r A

cces

s

A3.1 Two access routes YES

Two access routes are available, via Nettleton Road in a western direction towards South Western Highway or in a Easterly direction on Nettleton Road to Jarrahdale Road. Both South Western Highway and Jarrahdale Roads are main roads with public access at all times.

A3.2 Public roads YES Public Roads comply with Table 6 of Element 3 of the Guidelines.

A3.3 Cul-de-sacs N/A The development will not include installation of new cul-de-sacs.

A3.4 Battle axes N/A The development will not include installation of new Battle Axe Blocks.

A3.5 Private driveways

YES

The driveway is greater than 50 metres and must comply with Table 6 of the guidelines and including the installation turn around bays within 50m of the house, passing bays every 200m and a 4m trafficable surface. The current driveway in place will require upgrading and modifications to ensure compliance to specifications.

A3.6 Emergency access ways

N/A The development will not include installation of new Emergency Access Ways.

A3.7 Fire service access routes

N/A Fire Service access routes are supplied by existing public roads.

A3.8 Firebreak widths

YES The property is required to comply with Firebreaks requirements of the Shire of Serpentine - Jarrahdale attached as appendix C to this report








4: W

ate

r

A4.1 Reticulated Areas NO

The site is not serviced by a reticulated, the closest water hydrant is located directly adjacent to Lot 209 (2) Henry George Close, which is approximately 150m south of the subject lot.

A4.2 Non -Reticulated Areas

N/A The subject lot is non-reticulated.

A4.3 Individual Lots within non-reticulated areas YES

The subdivision is non-reticulated and requires a water tank with a minimum capacity of 10,000 litres for firefighting purposes. Hardstand and turnaround with a minimum diameter of 17.5 metres, to be provided and maintained within three metres of the tank. There are currently tanks on site which may require upgrading to be compliant to specifications, an additional tank has also been indicated at proposed Building B.

Table 3: Assessment against the Bushfire Protection Criteria

2.1 Acknowledgement

Acknowledgement - Proponent

The proponent acknowledges the responsibilities as listed above and the requirement to ensure that should the land

transfer to a new owner, that the new owner is aware of the BMP and their ongoing responsibility.

3. General References

WA Department of Planning 2016, Visual Guide for bushfire risk assessment in Western Australia

Standards Australia 2009, AS 3959-2018 Construction of buildings in bushfire-prone areas, Sydney

Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) 2015, State Planning Policy 3.7 Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas,

Western Australian Planning Commission, Perth, Perth

Western Australian Planning Commission and Department of Fire and Emergency Services (WAPC and DFES) 2017,

Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas Version 1.3, Western Australia

4. Online references

Office of Bushfire Risk management (OBRM) 2017, Map of Bush Fire Prone Areas, Viewed April 21, <

https://maps.slip.wa.gov.au/landgate/bushfireprone/>

Office of Bushfire Risk Management (OBRM), Bushfire Risk Management (BRM) Plan Guidelines, Viewed April 21.

WA Local Government Association (WALGA), Environmental Planning Tool, Viewed April 21, <

pbp.walga.asn.au/Tools/EnvironmentalPlanningTool.html>








5. Appendices

Appendix A: Spatial Representation of proposed risk management measures (Next Page)








Legend

Bushfire Protection Criteria 1. Forest at 20º downslope is the primary vegetation. 2. For a BAL-29 for building A, a maximum 52 metre asset

protection zone is required to comply with schedule 1 element 2 of the guidelines. For a BAL-29 for building B, a maximum 42 metre asset protection zone is required to comply with schedule 1 element 2 of the guidelines.

3. Driveway is greater than 50 metres, therefore must comply with Acceptable Solution A3.5 of Element 3 in the appendices to the guidelines, including but limited to; passing bays at a maximum of every 200m and a turnaround circle within 50m of the house.

4. Water tank is to be fitted with firefighting fittings and have 17.5m turnaround bay within 3 metres.

NOTE: Due to the level of clearing required and the slope on the property a BAL-29 may not be logistically attainable. A BAL-40 has therefore also been demonstrated in this circumstance.

Figure 3: Spatial Representation of proposed risk management

measures.

Lot 54 (#192) Nettleton Road, Byford

Assessment Date: 1 April 2021 Prepared by: Nathan Peart Accreditation Level: BPAD Level 2 Accreditation Number: 38808 Accreditation Expiry: May 2022








Appendix B: Asset Protection Zone Standards








Appendix C: Firebreak Notice – Shire of Serpentine - Jarrahdale




Documents

SUNSET NS E Nettleton Road