Upload
rhoda-brown
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Super-Kamiokande
Introduction Contained events and upward mu
ons Updated results
Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events 0/ ratio 3 decay Search for leptons s
Conclusion
Y.TotsukaKamioka
Super-Kamiokande detector
50,000 ton water Cherenkov detector (22.5 kton fiducial volume)
1000m underground (2700 m.w.e.)
11,146 20-inch PMTs for inner detector
1,885 8-inch PMTs for outer detector
Atmospheric neutrinos
p, He ...
, K
e
e
L=10-30 km
L=up to 13000 km
e e
= ~ 2
e e
@ low energy (EGeV)
@ high energy
Neutrino oscillations :
e e data MC1
Error in absolute flux~20%, but /e ratio~5%
e e
Zenith angle distribution(1D)
For E> a few GeV,Upward / downward = 1 (within a few %)
Up/Down asymmetry for neutrino oscillations
Calculated zenith angle distribution
E=0.5GeV E=3GeV E=20GeV
p
p
1D
p
p
3D
3D calculation by G.Battistoni et al. (hep-p
h/9907408)
10-3–0.2 GeV 0.2-0.5 GeV
0.5-1 GeV 1-5 GeV
horizontal vertical
3D neutrino flux calculation
Contained events
Interaction in the rock
Upward through-going muons
contained
through-going muonsstopping muons
Upward stopping muons
Initial neutrino energy spectrum
How to detect atmospheric neutrinos
Contained event analysis
e or
Fully Contained (FC) Partially Contained (PC)
No hit in Outer Detector One cluster in Outer Detector
Reduction
Automatic ring fitterParticle IDEnergy reconstruction
Fiducial volume (>2m from wall, 22 ktons) Evis > 30 MeV (FC), > 3000 p.e. (~350 MeV) (PC)
Final sample: FC: 8.2 ev./day, PC: 0.58 ev./day
Evis < 1.33 GeV : Sub-GeVEvis > 1.33 GeV : Multi-GeV
Total 754 1065.0
Data MC(Honda flux)1ring e-like 626 612.8 -like 558 838.3Multi ring 1318 1648.1Total 2502 3099.1
Sub-GeV (Fully Contained) Evis < 1.33 GeV, Pe > 100 MeV, P> 200 MeV
Data MC(Honda flux)1ring e-like 2864 2667.6 -like 2788 4072.8Multi ring 2159 2585.1Total 7811 9325.5
/e Data
/e MC
= 0.638 0.050
Multi-GeVFully Contained (Evis > 1.33 GeV)
Partially Contained (assigned as -like)
/e Data
/e MC
= 0.675 +0.034-0.032 0.080
(1289.4 d (79.3 kt .y))
0.017
Fully contained event summary
Zenith angle distribution
1289 days (79.3 kt . yrs)No oscillationBest fit (m2=2.4x10-3eV2, sin22=1.00)
2(best fit) = 132.4/137 d.o.f.
2(no osc.) = 299.3/139 d.o.f.2=167
(E<1.33 GeV)
(E>1.33 GeV)
Multi-ring event analysis
1289 days (79.3 kt . yrs)
No oscillationBest fit (m2=2.0x10-3eV2, sin22=1.00)
Sub-GeV muti-ring -like sample
Zenith angle distributions
Multi-GeV muti-ring -like sample
0.6 GeV < E < 1.33 GeV
E > 1.33 GeV
The zenith angle distortion is consistent with single-ring analysis.
preliminary
cos
cos
Upward through-going muons
horizontalvertical
No oscillation:
2(shape)=18.7 / 10 d.o.f.
(prob.=0.044)
Osc. best fit (m2=5.2x10-3eV2,sin22=0.86)
Upward stopping muons
No oscillation:(Bartol, GRV94)
Oscillation
(m2=3.2x10-3eV2,sin22=1.00)
stopping through ( )Data
stopping through ( )MC
=0..016 +0.013
- 0.011 0.368 +0.049
- 0.044
0...09
=
<< 1
1416 events / 1268 days
345 events / 1247 days
Zenith angle distributions of upward-going muons
79.3 kt . yrs
Best fit : m2=2.5x10-3eV2, sin22=1.00 (2=142.1 / 152 d.o.f.)
68% C.L.90% C.L.99% C.L.
SK combined result
m2 = (1.7~4)x10-3eV2
sin22 > 0.89 (90% C.L.)
Allowed region (FC + PC + UP-thru + UP-stop)
79.3 kt . yrsBest fit : m2=2.5x10-3eV2, sin22=1.00 (2=142.1 / 152 d.o.f.)
68% C.L.90% C.L.99% C.L.
SK combined result
m2 = (1.7~4)x10-3eV2
sin22 > 0.89 (90% C.L.)
m2 (
eV
2)
sin22
unphysical region
Allowed region - II(FC + PC + UP-thru + UP-stop)
Allowed region (grand global fit)(FC + PC + UP-thru + UP-stop + multi-rings)
79.3 kt . yrs
Within physical region; x2min = 157.5/170 dofat sin22 = 1.0, m2 = 2.510-3 eV2
With unphysical region;x2min = 157.4/170 dofat sin22 = 1.01, m2 = 2.510-3 eV2
Zenith angle distributions for the best fit(grand global fit)
No oscillationBest fit (m2=2.5x10-3eV2, sin22=1.00)
Zenith angle distributions for the best fit (cont)(grand global fit)
No oscillationBest fit (m2=2.5x10-3eV2, sin22=1.00)
sterile (0 method)
(/)Data
(/)MC
> 1 for
1 for s
Data 355.2 events (BG subt.)
MC 323.2 events
(/)Data
(/)MC = 1.49 0.08(stat.) 0.11(sys.)
{
Experimental only
Using matter effect and enriched NC sample
: No matter effect
s : With matter effectNeutrino oscillation in matter:
( ) = ( cosm
s
sinm- sinm cosm ) 1
2( )sin22m
sin22=
(cos2sin22= 2 GFnnE / m2
For sin22= 1
sin22m1
~ + 1
And for E = 30~100 GeV 1 and
sin22m1Suppression !
Strategy:
Obtain allowed region using lower energy events (Fully contained sample)
Then,
Test zenith angle of NC enriched events, high energy PC and through-going muon events.
sterile (matter in earth)
Zenith angle of upward-going muon
m2 = 3 x10-3eV2
sin22 = 1
m2 = 3 x10-3eV2
sin22 = 1
s
> 45000 p.e.(E> ~ 5 GeV)<E>=~25 GeVs
Zenith angle of high energy PC events
s
Criteria> 400 MeV visible energyMulti-ring evente-like ring is the most energetic ringContentsNC : 29 %e CC : 46 % CC : 25 %
m2 = 3 x10-3eV2
sin22 = 1
Zenith angle of NC enriched events
s
sin22 = 1
s
s
Up/Down ( cos ) ratio of NC enriched multi-ring
Up/Down (cos) ratio of High Energy PC Vertical/Horizontal ratio (co
s -0.4) of up muons
Data
DataData
10-3 10-2 eV2 10-3 10-2 eV2
Ratios vs. m2
><
> 0.4<-0.4
<-0.4> 0.4
combine NC enriched, high E PC and up muons
s is excluded with 99 % C.L.
excluded
excluded
excluded
Allowed vs. excluded regions
Neutrino CC cross sections
CC
Signature of appearance:
+ N + N’ + +
CC
Expected events
Higher multiplicity of Cherenkov rings More e decay signals More spherical event pattern
ehadrons(
Search for appearance (3 methods) :(1) Energy flow and event shape analysis(2) Likelihood method using # of rings, e, max p.e.
ring and etc.(3) Neural network method
Each method is optimized using only downward going events and then looks at upward going events.(I.e. blind method to disable systematic bias.)
All
cos<-0.2
cos>0.2
~20ev./yr for 3x10-3 eV2
sin22 = 1
E(GeV) m2(eV2)
Search for leptons
All methods show ~2 excess of -like events.The result is consistent with oscillations.
MC with MC without
Likelihood method
Observed # of : 27+9-8
m2=3x10-3eV2, sin22=1.00
(expected # of : 74 events)
Efficiency for : 43.5 %
# of production: 62 -18+39
Energy flow method
+14-13
Efficiency for : 32 %# of production: 79 -40
Observed # of : 25.5
cos
Neural network method
Observed # of : 42 19 +13-13
# of production: 92 35.3 -0
+44
+14Efficiency for : 45 %
+17-16
-27+21
Zenith-angle distribution
Test oscillation with :
P()=sin22sin2(LEn) (n : parameters)
Use FC, PC, Up-through, and Up-stop data
n=-1 is the standard neutrino oscillation
index n
2
-2 -1 0 1Magnified view
n = -1.06 0.14
Probability of exotic oscillation models
Neutrino decay
Let neutrinos oscillate and decay 3 X(invis);
P( ) = sin4 + cos4 exp( )
+ sin2 exp( ) cos( )
Consider two cases;
dcy>>osc, and dcy<<osc,
wheredcy = , osc =
m3 L3 E
m3 L23 E
m2 L 2E
3E m3
4E m2
Up/down of NC enriched events (short dcy)
FC, Nring>1, Evis>400MeV, Brightest ring = e-like
Allowed from FC+PC+Upmu
Excluded from NC
The case of dcy
<<osc
is disfavored
Conclusions on atmospheric neutrinos
Oscillation parameters for : m2 = 1.7 ~ 4 x 10-3 eV2, sin22 > 0.89(90%CL)
3D flux does not change the conclusion but more precise 3D calculations are needed
s is strongly disfavored 0/ ratio is consistent with Excess from leptons ~ 2 Decay senario is disfavored with > 2
for dcy>>osc and dcy<<osc