32
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 5 OF 2020 FROM : 11-02-2020 To 13-02-2020 COURT NO. : 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 9863/2013 III VASUDEORAO@ DADASAHEB DESHPANDE(D)TH.LR& YASH PAL DHINGRA Versus TULSABAI (D) TH. LR. . AND ORS. SUJATA KURDUKAR Mediation Report received 2 C.A. No. 5698/2015 IV JASWANT SINGH (D) BY LRS. E. C. AGRAWALA Versus STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY GOVT. OF PUNJAB AND ANR. PURNIMA BHAT Connected C.A. No. 5681/2015 IV HARGURINDER SINGH E. C. AGRAWALA Versus STATE OF PUNJAB RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1] Connected C.A. No. 5679/2015 IV AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA Versus POONAM AND ORS. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, GAGAN GUPTA[INT][PR] FOR ON IA 54688/2010 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 3/2014 Connected C.A. No. 5682/2015 IV THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA Versus GURDEV SINGH AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA, DELHI LAW CHAMBERS Connected C.A. No. 5686/2015 IV THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA Versus SUSHMA PALTA AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA, CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, ASHWANI BHARDWAJ, JOBY P. VARGHESE[R-17.1] Connected C.A. No. 5680/2015 IV AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA Versus HARINDER SINGH CHAWLA Connected C.A. No. 5684/2015 IV THE AMRITSAR IMPORVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA Versus BALDEV SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS. MOHINDER JIT SINGH, SURYA KANT, E. C. AGRAWALA, [R-1.2], [R-1.1], DELHI LAW CHAMBERS Connected C.A. No. 5683/2015 IV AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA Versus

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 5 OF 2020 FROM : 11-02-2020 To 13-02-2020

COURT NO. : 7HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARIREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No. 9863/2013III

VASUDEORAO@ DADASAHEBDESHPANDE(D)TH.LR& YASH PAL DHINGRA

VersusTULSABAI (D) TH. LR. . AND ORS. SUJATA KURDUKARMediation Report received

2 C.A. No. 5698/2015IV

JASWANT SINGH (D) BY LRS. E. C. AGRAWALAVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB THROUGHSECRETARY GOVT. OF PUNJAB ANDANR.

PURNIMA BHAT

ConnectedC.A. No. 5681/2015IV

HARGURINDER SINGH E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5679/2015IV

AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

POONAM AND ORS. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, GAGANGUPTA[INT][PR]

FOR ON IA 54688/2010 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 3/2014ConnectedC.A. No. 5682/2015IV

THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusGURDEV SINGH AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA, DELHI LAW CHAMBERS

ConnectedC.A. No. 5686/2015IV

THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

SUSHMA PALTA AND ORS.E. C. AGRAWALA, CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI,ASHWANI BHARDWAJ, JOBY P.VARGHESE[R-17.1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5680/2015IV

AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusHARINDER SINGH CHAWLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5684/2015IV

THE AMRITSAR IMPORVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

BALDEV SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS.MOHINDER JIT SINGH, SURYA KANT, E. C.AGRAWALA, [R-1.2], [R-1.1], DELHI LAWCHAMBERS

ConnectedC.A. No. 5683/2015IV

AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7KAMLA MAKHANI CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, MINAKSHI VIJ

ConnectedC.A. No. 5707/2015IV

AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

Versus

AVTAR SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS. SATYAPAL KHUSHAL CHAND PASI, E. C.AGRAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.7850-7851/2017XVII-A

LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA

Versus

DALJIT SINGH AND ANR. BALRAJ DEWAN[alongwith the Paper Book of Civil Appeal No. 5679 of 2015 ]

3 C.A. No. 4761/2008IV-A

PRAMODA R.BHAT AND ORS. H. CHANDRA SEKHAR[P-1]Versus

M. BALAKRISHNA RAO (D) BY. LRS. ANKUR SOOD[R-1]RAJESH MAHALE[IMPL]

listed before the Hon'ble Court4 C.A. No. 7251/2018

XIIJACINDA G. BALAJIVersusJESURAJ AND ORS AND ORS. KRISHAN SINGH CHAUHANMEDIATION REPORT RECEIVED.

5 C.A. No. 9591/2011XVI

M/S MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]VersusASST.COMMNR. COMMERCIAL TAXES .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

[ AT TOP ]ConnectedC.A. No. 9593/2011XVI

M/S. MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT. COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVN . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9594/2011XVI

M/S. M.R.F. LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT. COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVISION AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9592/2011XVI

M/S. MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT.COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVN . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

6 C.A. No.5534-5594/2011XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHAND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusGOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-02-2020 } [ NOT TO BE TREATED A PART-HEARDMATTER ] SIDDHARTH BHATNAGAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE TO APPEAR AS AMICUSCURIAE TO BE ASSISTED BY MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN, ADVOCATE.

7 Crl.A. No. 1587/2008II

BIRBAL NATH P. D. SHARMAVersus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR, RISHI MATOLIYA[R-3][PR],[R-4][PR], [R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1588/2008II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[P-1]

VersusJETH NATH @ JETHU NATH . AND ORS.

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 78 C.A. No. 8512/2009

XI-ASPECIAL SEC. TO GOVT. OF ORISSA SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]Versus

BANSIDHAR NAIK (DEAD) BY LRS. ANDORS.

M. QAMARUDDIN[R-1]A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[IMPL], RAJEEVMAHESHWARANAND ROY[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], K. RAJEEV[I-3][IMPL], [I-4][IMPL],[I-5][IMPL], [I-6][IMPL], [I-7][IMPL]

FOR ON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 86972/20099 C.A. No. 7764/2014

IVRAVINDER KAUR GREWAL AND ORS. PREM MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusMANJIT KAUR AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-02-2020 }

10 C.A. No.7654-7655/2011XII-A

BONDA GAYATRI DEVI PROMILA

VersusBONDA UMA MAHESWARA RAO SRIDHAR POTARAJU{Fixed Date by Court for 11-02-2020 }

11 Crl.A. No. 987/2009II-B

RAMAN GOSWAMI ALIAS GOLDI (DEAD)AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

ConnectedCrl.A. No.989-990/2009II-B

BALJIT @ SONU ETC. D. N. GOBURDHAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 988/2009II-B

LAXMI NARAIN GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN, [R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 986/2009II-B

LAXMI NARAIN GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN, [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 5296/2012II-B

PARVEZ KHAN SANJEEV ANAND[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 8128/2009IX

PATNUS GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ANR. ABHA R. SHARMAVersusTATA POWER COMPANY LTD. . ANDORS. KARANJAWALA & CO.

[ TO RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

13 C.A. No.7308-7309/2010X

SHABIR HUSSAIN (D) BY LRS. P. NARASIMHAN

VersusKESHAV CHAND (D) BY LRS.

14 C.A. No. 54/2009XIV-A

ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTERSOFTWARE EXPORT PROMOTIONCOUNCIL

SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

VersusCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS REGISTRAR AND ORS. ASHA JAIN MADAN

15 C.A. No.2360-2376/2009XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S D.L.STEELS THROUGH ITSMANAGER RUPESH KUMAR

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 716 C.A. No. 6267/2010

XVISUBORNO BOSE DINESH CHANDRA PANDEY[P-1]VersusENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ANDANR ANIL KATIYAR

17 C.A. No. 1000/2012XI-A

RAMAN NAMBOODIRI E. M. S. ANAMVersusNEELI ANTHARJANAM (DEAD) THR.LRS. . AND ORS. K. RAJEEV

18 C.A. No. 4443/2010XI-A

M/S.TRAVANCORE TITANIUMPRODUCTS LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R. SATHISH, C. K. SASI

19 C.A. No.9212-9213/2012XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDANR.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[P-2]

VersusTHE RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBTRECOVERY TRIBUNAL AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.8980-8981/2012XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. PROMILA[P-1]

VersusM/S A. J. INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.AND ANR.

A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1], SANJAYKAPUR[R-2]

20 C.A. No. 5982/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S JAGATPAL PREM CHAND LTD. REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR R. GOPALAKRISHNAN[R-1]

21 C.A. No. 5184/2011XII

SARASWATHI (DEAD) BY LRS AND ORS.AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusS. A. PALANISAMY AND ORS. AND ORS. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

22 C.A. No.3132-3137/2009XVII-A

COMMR.OF CEN.EXCISE,ALLAHABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S VARANASI BOTTLING CO. PVT.LTD.AND ORS. M. P. DEVANATH

23 C.A. No. 2944/2009XVII-A

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE.DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S VISHAL BEVERAGES(P) LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

24 C.A. No.6387-6391/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICAL IND. LTD. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

25 C.A. No. 8620/2011XIV-A

M/S ANKIT EXIM PVT.LTD. PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

26 C.A. No. 4432/2009III

MANISHA PHARMO PLAST PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTORAND ANR.

ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7

27 C.A. No. 7389/2009XVII

PROJECT OFFICER,U.O.C.C.OFM/S.COAL.LTD. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAND . AND ORS. RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI

28 C.A. No. 32/2010III-A

SUBEY RAM RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-4]

29 C.A. No. 4831/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT)MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWNS AS KASCELLIMITED)

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.5989-5990/2012IV-A

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED .ETC M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,BANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8512/2012IV-A

M/S MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

FOR [APPLICATION FOR DE TAGGING] ON IA 4/2016ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17947/2014IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 7613/2014III

JABIL CIRCUIT INDIA PVT. LTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PUNE-III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3347/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELEMEDIA LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.9201-9202/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S. MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5376/2016XII-A

M/S. SURANA TELECOM LTD. (NOWKNOWN AS M/S. SURANA TELECOMAND POWER LTD.) THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRE

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5368/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.)

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedC.A. No. 5369/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.) THORUGH ITS MANAGINDIRECTOR

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, GOA.

ConnectedC.A. No.11078-11083/2018XVII-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 17260/2019ConnectedC.A. No. 5863/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOM LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSBANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.110020/2019-STAY APPLICATIONConnectedC.A. No. 5860/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOMS LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE BANGALORE IFOR ADMISSION and IA No.109914/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

30 C.A. No. 6551/2010XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusM/S. GILLETE INDIA LTD. AND ANR. MANIK KARANJAWALA[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4006/2011X

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BAJAJ AUTO LTD. THR. ITS SENIORMANAGER AND ORS. K J JOHN AND CO, RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-2]

31 C.A. No. 10458/2010IV-A

IQBAL AHMED AND ANR. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR[P-1]VersusABDUL SHUKOOR MD. FARMAN[R-1]

32 C.A. No. 1353/2010IV

MOHAN RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusRATTAN SINGH PREETI SINGH[R-1]

33 C.A. No. 7412/2009IV-A

SYED ALI AHMAD HUSSAINI AND ORS. R. R. DESHPANDEVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

34 C.A. No.10509-10510/2013XVI

BIDYUT SARKAR AND ANR. SHIPRA GHOSE

VersusKANCHILAL PAL AND ANR. BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH

35 C.A. No. 1303/2010IV-A

S.V.GURURAJ NANDA KISHOREVersusK.G.SRINATH PRABHU . AND ORS.

36 C.A. No. 7561/2009III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S HINDALCO INDUSTRIESLTD.(FOILS DIVISION) THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 5205/2013III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.& CUS.THANE-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S PLUSPACK CONTAINERS(P) LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.7552-7555/2013XVII-A

CCE JAIPUR-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

S.R. FOIL AND TISSUES LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS R.S. HYGIENEPVT. LTD.) AND ORS.

M. P. DEVANATH

37 C.A. No. 8426/2011XVII

JHARKHAND STATE ELECT.BAORD HIMANSHU SHEKHARVersusM/S.STAN COMMODITIES PVT.LTD. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

38 C.A. No.6033-6035/2009III

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No.10825-10826/2010III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,RAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No. 5714/2011III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AND SER TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

39 C.A. No.6228-6229/2009IX

C.C.E.,MUMBAI, THANE-II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.CONWOOD PRE-FAB PVT.LTD. THR.ITS. M.D. AND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA

40 C.A. No. 8829/2010XVII

HAR NARAYAN TEWARI (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[P-1]

VersusCANTONMENT BOARD,RAMGARHCANTONM.. AND ORS. MADHURIMA TATIA[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ON IA 70392/2009 FOR ON IA 61341/201041 Crl.A. No. 319/2011

II-ARAM SEVAK MODI SHANKAR DIVATE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

42 C.A. No. 1599/2011IX

PRABHAT GEN.AGENCIES AND ORS..AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

THE JAMMU AND KASMIR BANK LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

RAJENDER PD. SAXENA, VIKAS SINGHJANGRA, PAREKH & CO., MAHESHTHAKUR[R-5]

43 C.A. No.3852-3853/2017XI-A

A.M.PADMINI AMMA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

V.P.MURALEEDHARAN . AND ORS.VIPIN NAIR[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.,SURESHAN P., SUBHASISH BHOWMICK, P. V.DINESH, ABHIJEET SINHA

44 C.A. No. 9546/2010IV-A

ASHA JOHN DIVIANATHAN S. NARAIN & CO.VersusVIKRAM MALHOTRA . AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7

45 C.A. No.3646-3647/2017III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED

VersusKRISHNA DULARI (D) THR LRS. ANDORS.

ANURAG KISHORE, GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO

46 C.A. No. 9643/2013XII

B. RAJAM AMMAL (D) BY LRS. K. K. MANIVersusLAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK ANDORS. AND ORS. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2][GR]

47 C.A. No. 1957/2011XII-A

NASEEM KAHNAM AND ORS. PRABHA SWAMIVersusZAHEDA BEGUM (D) BY LR. AND ORS. ANU GUPTA, S. MAHENDRAN

48 C.A. No. 7923/2013XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusCOLLECTOR LAQ BUDGAM COLLECTORAND ORS.

M. SHOEB ALAM, D. MAHESH BABU[R-2],[R-3], [R-6]

49 C.A. No. 3548/2017XIV-A

M/S K.P.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIKVersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3554/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3549/2017XIV-A

M/S. SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN LTD .AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3551/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3552/2017XIV-A

SANJIB KAKATY R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO. LTD. ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3556/2017XIV-A

M/S MOTLIB ALI SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3560/2017XIV-A

M/S. JAY KUMAR JAIN SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3558/2017XIV-A

M/S D.P.AGARWALA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 3550/2017XIV-A

DIPAK NATH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3553/2017XIV-A

M/S PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT PROP.SHRI PURANJOY BARUAH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3555/2017XIV-A

M/S K.C.CHHAWACHARTYA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3561/2017XIV-A

M/S. SHIV KUMAR AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3562/2017XIV-A

M/S P.M.AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3564/2017XIV-A

M/S B.K.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3563/2017XIV-A

M/S DIPAK NATH SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3559/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3557/2017XIV-A

M/S ECOS ENGINEERS SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3565/2017XIV-A

PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.3566-3569/2017XIV-A

GHANA GOGOI AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

Versus

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3570/2017XIV-A

M/S. N.K.SHARMA AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

Versus

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, SHUVODEEPROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3571/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPSOC.LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD. ANDORS. PRERNA MEHTA, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3572/2017XIV-A

M/S JYOTI PRASAD BORGOHAINTHROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. JYOTIPRASAD BORGOHAIN (DEAD) TH. LRS.AND ORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN.LTD.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7954/2012XIV-A

M/S SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8714/2012XIV-A

M/S J.K JAIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3573/2017XIV-A

M/S BISWAJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3575/2017XIV-A

M/S. PROSENJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. CORPORATE LAW GROUP, SHUVODEEP ROY,KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3574/2017XIV-A

M/S. RANAJIT BHUYAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3577/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEYCONSTRUCTION AND SUUPLIERSREPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRIMRIDUL KUMAR ADH

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMEN AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8705/2012XIV-A

M/S DIPAK MECH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3576/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY CONST.AND SUPPLIERS RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY, KAMLENDRA MISHRA

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 3579/2017XIV-A

MRIDUL KUMAR ADHYAPAK RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. ANDORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8710/2012XIV-A

M/S. R.P. KAKOTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAMAND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3578/2017XIV-A

M/S PURANA AMULAPATTY JUBAKSOMABAI SAMITY LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8693/2012XIV-A

M/S ROBIN BORDOLOI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4658/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9291/2012XIV-A

M/S. P.K.AGARWALA MOHAN PANDEY[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8715/2012XIV-A

M/S. D.P AGARWAL MOHAN PANDEY, [P-1]

Versus

O.N.G.C. LTD. AND ORS.KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-4], [R-5], SHUVODEEPROY[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4657/2013XIV-A

M/S ALI BROTHERS ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4659/2013XIV-A

MOTILIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR EASTERN REGION ONGCNAZIRA AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4662/2013XIV-A

MOTLIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4661/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 4660/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 383/2013XIV-A

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 3580/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S ALI BROTHERS AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

50 C.A. No. 8821/2011IX

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. SACHIN PATIL[P-1]VersusNATIONAL ORGANIC CHEMICALINDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR.

51 C.A. No. 6222/2014XII

SELVRAJ @ URKAVALAN G. BALAJIVersusALAGAR AND ANR. AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

52 C.A. No. 5345/2013III-A

M/S SHEETALA BARA LALAPURCHANDMORI AND ANR. YUGANDHARA PAWAR JHA[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

ARUN K. SINHA[R-3], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-4]

53 C.A. No. 614/2013III-A

M/S PRATAP PHARMACEUTICALS AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SECRETARYFINANCE CIVIL SECRETARIAT AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

54 C.A. No. 3597/2012XIV-A

KUNTI DEVI BIMAL ROY JADVersusDEEP KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2], [R-3]

55 C.A. No.8075-8076/2010XII

AMBALAVANAR TRUST BOARDTR.TRUSTEE BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusK.THIRUNAVUKKARASU MUDALIYARAND ORS.

KARUNAKAR MAHALIK[R-1], NARESHKUMAR[R-2], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15148/2011XII

R. PARTGIBAN AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusAMBALAVANAR TRUST . AND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[CAVEAT]and IA No.120464/2017-IA FOR BRINGING LRS ON RECORD ALONG WITHAFFIDAVIT and IA No.120470/2017-IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALDEATH CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER NO 2 and IA No.120473/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IA No.120477/2017-IA FOR SETTING ASIDE ABATEMENTAGAINST THE DECEASED and IA No.120479/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING(Case is to be listed alongwith CA 8075-8076/2010)

56 Crl.A. No. 10/2011II-B

HARJINDER SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 371/2013II-B

MANJIT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA, [R-1]

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.2787-2788/2016II-B

SATWANT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 5355/2016 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 5359/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6126/2016

57 C.A. No. 8826/2011IV-A

GURAPPA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONOFFICERList before court/bench [in its own turn]

58 C.A. No. 1958/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusANU MEHRA MOHINDER JIT SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11426/2012XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI

VersusVIKAS JAIN AND ANR.

59 C.A. No.10159-10161/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AHMEDABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S URMIN PRODUCTS P.LTD. . ANDORS. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 5146/2015XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHANDIGARH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. FLAKES-N-FLAVOURZ M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 959/2019XVII-A

C.CE S.T. ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTARA CHAND NARESH CHAND RAJAT MITTAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.170411/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.170409/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 6938-2019XVII-A

C.C.E AND S.T. JAIPUR I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S A.M PRODUCTS AJAY CHOUDHARY[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.41836/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.41835/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 14581-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX MEERUT II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SOM PAN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD M. P. VINOD[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84500/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.84501/2019-STAY APPLICATION

60 C.A. No.10180-10181/2010XII-A

RAMANAVARAPU SAMPATH KUMAR G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

VersusPIDIKITI VENKATARATNAM (D) BY LRS. DUA ASSOCIATES[CAVEAT], SATYA MITRA

61 C.A. No. 6515/2012IV

M/S. KARNAL MILK FOODS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1], PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL[INT]

IA No.67821/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION ONLY IN C.A. NO. 6515 OF 2012and IA No.89861/2017-XTRA

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 6522/2012IV

M/S. BHARAT DAIRY UDYOG AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6520/2012IV

M/S. DAILY FOODS (INDIA) AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA ANIMALHUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6525/2012IV

M/S. KWALITY DAIRY INDIA LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6530/2012IV

M/S.G.K.DAIRY AND MILK PRODUCTSPVT. LTD AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6523/2012IV

M/S STERLING AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD. M. P. DEVANATH, R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6524/2012IV

M/S MODERN DAIRIES LTD. AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], M. P.DEVANATH[P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6528/2012IV

M/S. SMRITI PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6527/2012IV

M/S HARYANA MILK FOODS LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6518/2012IV

M/S GOLDMINE MILKFOOD .LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6519/2012IV

KMG MILK FOOD LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11193/2014IV

M/S MEHSANA DISTRICT COOPERATIVEMILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

62 C.A. No. 5593/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.SECRETARY AND ORS. ANUVRAT SHARMA

Versus

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR, A. VENAYAGAM BALAN,[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5594/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANUVRAT SHARMA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAVINDRA KUMAR, [R-5]

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.267/2011 In C.A. No.5593/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

D.AGGARWAL . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10262/2016XI

AJEET SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P ANUVRAT SHARMA

63 C.A. No. 8777/2012IX

MAHADEO BALIRAM NAWALKAR(DEAD)THROUGH LRS. NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

Versus

AMBADAS AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

64 C.A. No. 7238/2011XIV-A

PRITHI SINGH AND ANR. EJAZ MAQBOOL[P-1]VersusSURINDER SINGH AND ORS. ASHWANI KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

65 C.A. No. 1392/2011XI-A

MADHAVAN (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. ANDANR. KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

VersusKANAKAVALLY JOGY SCARIA[R-1]I.A.NO. 2 : APPLICATION FOR VACATING STAY

66 C.A. No. 9485/2013XI-A

VELAYUDHAN NADAR NARAYAN NADAR SUMITA HAZARIKAVersusB.K.THANKAPPAN AND ORS. M. P. VINOD

67 C.A. No. 10215/2011IV-A

SHIVSHANKARA AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[P-1]VersusH.P.VEDAVYASA CHAR RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY[R-1]

68 C.A. No. 6667/2013XII-A

PYLA DEMUDAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersusCHEEPURUPALLI CHANDRAMMA ANDORS. AND ORS.

M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

IA No.89692/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and69 C.A. No. 886-887/2016

IV-ASHARANABASAPPA LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusNAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22517/2011IV-A

NAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSHARANABASAPPA . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

70 C.A. No. 4290/2017XVI

BHUPAL SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS. T. MAHIPAL

Versus

GANESH AHIR . AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA, KIRAN KUMARJAIPURIAR

IA No.62636/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.59809/2017-XTRA and IA No.62630/2017-DELETION THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO, 25 andIA No.62635/2017-IA FOR DELETION THE NAME OF RESP. NO. 73 and IANo.64835/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.64840/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69892/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD and IA No.70060/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.70062/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.78896/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.78898/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

71 C.A. No.12048-12049/2018IV-A

SINGAMASETTY BHAGAVATH GUPTHAAND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO

Versus

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS./ALLAMDODDABASAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, ABDUL AZEEMKALEBUDDE[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

ConnectedC.A. No.12050-12053/2018IV-A

ALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS. ANDORS. .ETC .ETC ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

VersusSINGAMASETTY VENKATARAMAIAH .AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE

72 C.A. No.8220-8221/2012IX

MARMAGOA STEEL LTD. .AND ANR. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI

73 Crl.A. No. 818/2014II

NARAYAN DUTT JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATEOF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

74 C.A. No. 9358/2011IX

JAMA CORPORATION PVT. LTD. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORTS) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

LIST IN THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE AN APPRPROPRIATE BENCHAS PER R/P DT. 5.12.2019

75 C.A. No.7825-7828/2013XII

V.N.A.S.CHANDRAN ZOHEB HOSSAIN[P-1][PR]

Versus

MRS. S. VENILLA AND ORS. AND ORS. ARAVINDH S.[R-1], R. AYYAM PERUMAL[R-2],[R-2], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-3]

76 Crl.A. No. 1856/2012II-C

RAJRANI ARJUN GARGVersusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW STATE OFCHHATISGARH) PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1]

77 C.A. No. 2614/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusTEXMACO LIMITED . AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

78 C.A. No. 928/2016IV-A

RAMKALI SONI AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]VersusMUKTA SONI AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1]

79 C.A. No. 2920/2014IV

SATYA PAL SHARMA AND ANR. ROHIT KUMAR SINGHVersusASHA VERMA (D) THR. LRS. PIYUSH SHARMA

80 C.A. No.3405-3407/2012III

COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAXRAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusNARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . AND ORS. NIKHIL JAIN[R-1]

81 Crl.A. No.1358-1359/2012II-B

SUBRAN ANKUR S. KULKARNI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, [R-1]

82 C.A. No.4670-4671/2012XII-A

DASTGIR AHMED VADIVELU DEENADAYALAN[P-1]

VersusKHAIRUNNISA RAHANA AND ANR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

83 Crl.A. No. 794/2013II-B

BHAG SINGH J. P. DHANDA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 784 C.A. No.

7791-7796/2013III

KALUBHAI KHATUBHAI AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

85 C.A. No. 7283/2012IV-A

M/S SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE . AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.5066-5073/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SHREE RENUKA SUGAR LTD. ETC.ETC.

KUSH CHATURVEDIHARISH PANDEY[INT]

86 C.A. No. 4750/2013III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusTEJPAL SINGH CHAUHAN (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1]

87 C.A. No. 8903/2012XIV-A

BISHAN DEVI (D) TR. LRS. MOHIT D. RAMVersusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANDORS.

SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8904/2012XIV-A

M/S GUPTA MACHINE TOOLS LTD. MOHIT D. RAM

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5538/2017XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusHARSH GUPTA . AND ORS. MOHIT D. RAM, ATUL KUMAR

88 C.A. No. 9145/2012XIV-A

NARAYAN SINGH(D) THR LRS. BANKEY BIHARIVersusSH. BHULLE AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.28238-28243/2012XIV

PREM PRAKASH(D) TR.LRS. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

SARLA SHARMA(D) TR.LRS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], AMIT ANAND TIWARI[R-7]

89 Crl.A. No. 1594/2013II

KALAWATI AND ANR. TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. (NOW STATE OFUTTARAKHAND) KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1595/2013II

MANVENDRA SINGH TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND FARRUKH RASHEED[R-1][GR]UID FOR [I A FOR BAIL] ON IA 58393/2017 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATIONON IA 104936/2018

90 Crl.A. No. 762/2015II

IRFAN S. S. NEHRA[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]IA No.108849/2017 APPLICATION FOR BAIL IA No.108852/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. IA No.18562/2015 APPLN. U/S 7A OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ACTETC. IA No.18563/2015 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 791 Crl.A. No. 1348/2014

IINITYA NAND P. K. JAIN[P-1]Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]MANJU JETLEY[IMPL]

92 C.A. No. 8880/2014XII

J.K.TYRE TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LTD.THR. GENERAL MANAGER (LEGAL) BINA GUPTA

VersusMICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISESFACILITATION COUNCIL AND ORS. THR.CHAIRMAN

PRABHA SWAMI[CAVEAT], SHASHI BHUSHANKUMAR

MEDIATION REPORT RECEIVED IN C.A NOS. 8880, 8881, 8885-86, 8888ConnectedC.A. No. 8881/2014XII

J.K. TYRE INDUSTRIES LTD. BINA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusMICRO AND SMALL INDUSTRIESFACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANR. PRABHA SWAMI[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-1]

FOR FOR ON IA 25514/2013 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 19592/2018ConnectedC.A. No.8885-8886/2014XII

M/S TAMIL NADU MEDICINAL PLANTFARMS AND ETC. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[P-1][GR]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS. PRABHA SWAMI[R-1], KAUSHAL YADAV[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8884/2014XII

M/S CEMENT CORP. OF INDIA ANIRUDH SHARMA[P-1]

VersusM/S MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISESAND ANR.

PRABHA SWAMI[CAVEAT], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1]

FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 102564/2019ConnectedC.A. No. 8888/2014XII

PRIME TECHNOLOGIES PARTHA SIL

VersusHAMSA WATCH GLASS PVT. LTD. PRABHA SWAMI[CAVEAT]IA FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 23468/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 8891/2014XII

M/S SPML INFRA LIMITED UDAYADITYA BANERJEE[P-1]

VersusTHE MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISESFACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANR. PRABHA SWAMI[R-1]

and FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 133784/201793 C.A. No. 1966/2013

IV-ATHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]Versus

B.R MURALIDHAR AND ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-2], PRITHASRIKUMAR[R-3], LAWYER S KNIT & CO[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18942/2013IV-A

M/S CHANDRA SPINNING ANDWEAVING MILLS PVT. LTD. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, JOSEPH ARISTOTLES.[R-3]

94 Crl.A. No. 257/2013II-A

FIROZ KHAN AKBARKHAN VIPIN KUMAR JAI[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

95 C.A. No. 6859/2014IV-A

PARVATHI NAIRTHI (DEAD) AND ORS. BINA GUPTAVersusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1.3], [R-1.2]

96 C.A. No. 3312/2015XII-A

GUNDLURI GOVINDA REDDY SESHATALPA SAI BANDARUVersus

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7MALLU VENKATARAMANA REDDY ANDORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO[CAVEAT]

97 Crl.A. No. 2206/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusLAXMAN AND ORS.

98 C.A. No.14053-14054/2015XII

S. SHIVAKUMAR PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

VersusS. VALLIKANNU @ VALLIAMMAL ANDORS S. MAHENDRAN

99 Crl.A. No. 549/2015II-B

RAJINDER SINGH @ RAVINDER SINGH VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

100 Crl.A. No. 1320/2014II-A

KISHORE SHANKAR PATIL ADITYA SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

101 Crl.A. No. 1529/2014II-A

HARJITSINGH RAJ KAMAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1539/2014II-A

RAMAKANT RAMRAO DENGALE ANDANR. AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1530/2014II-A

TUKARAM V. K. SIDHARTHAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1541-1544/2014II-A

RAJENDRA SHIVAJIRAO THORAT ANDANR. UDAY B. DUBE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1531/2014II-A

ABA @ DNYANDEO TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1545-1547/2014II-A

ABDUL HAQ FAKIR MOHAMMADKURESHI SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1534/2014II-A

HARDIK SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1533/2014II-A

BALKISAN SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1532/2014II-A

RUCHIN SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS ON IA 114874/2018

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2014II-A

AJAY AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1535/2014II-A

VASANT ASTHA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1536/2014II-A

RAGHUNATH RAMNATH ZOLEKAR KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1540/2014II-A

AKASH SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1548/2014II-A

CHETAN RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2161-2164/2014II-A

ASHOK ARVIND S. AVHAD[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.705-706/2015II-A

VILAS SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

102 C.A. No.9228-9231/2013XII

LAKSHMI MOHAN AND ANR. SHAKUN SHARMA

VersusM/S. AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD. AND ANR.

V. BALACHANDRAN[CAVEAT], M. A.CHINNASAMY[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.1441-1446/2014XII

M/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENG. PVT LTD V. BALACHANDRAN, [CAVEAT]

Versus

LAKSHMI MOHAN & ORS SHAKUN SHARMA, M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-3]

ConnectedDiary No. 31322-2018XII

THE CHIEF MANAGER ANDAUTHORIZED OFFICER M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusM/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.136132/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

103 C.A. No.5667-5668/2014IV-A

M LAKSHMANA RAO AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYAL

VersusS NARAYANA RAO AND ORS. ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

104 C.A. No. 455/2015III-A

JAI PRAKASH GAUR K. S. RANAVersusBUDHA DEVI AND ORS. RABIN MAJUMDER, JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

105 Crl.A. No. 386/2015II

UMED SINGH . AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7106 Crl.A. No. 1304/2014

II-CJAGA ALIAS JAGDISH S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2423/2014II-C

H.R.GANESH RAJESH SRIVASTAVA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

107 C.A. No. 35/2019XIV-A

HAROLI BLOCK INDUSTRIESASSOCIATION DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4], ANIL KATIYAR[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 36-38/2019XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH VYAPAR MANDAL SIDDHARTH SINGLA[P-1], SANTOSHKRISHNAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3], ANIL KATIYAR[R-6], MANSOORALI[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 39/2019XIV-A

SANYUKT VYAPAR MANDAL RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ANILKATIYAR[R-4], MANSOOR ALI[R-5]KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 40/2019XIV-A

RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA NIHARIKA AHLUWALIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 43/2019XIV-A

NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONOF INDIA KUNAL VERMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 44-46/2019XIV-A

INDIAN CONFECTIONERYMANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION DUA ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 41-42/2019XIV-A

BRANDED EDIBLE OIL MANUFACTURESASSOCIATION AND ANR. DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

Versus

SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-2], [R-3], [R-9], [R-10], ANILKATIYAR[R-7], [R-11]

108 C.A. No. 15098/2017XIV-A

M/S AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETCOMMITTEE AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusMAHESH UDYOG MANAGED BY M/SSHANKAR TRADING CO. LTD AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2]

109 C.A. No.6325-6326/2015XII-A

AKELLA LALITHA SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA

VersusKONDA HANUMANTHA RAO AND ANR.

110 Crl.A. No. 531/2017II-A

SAMABAI BHANUDAS KSHRISAGAR DR.RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusTUKARAM GANGARAM KSHIRSAGARAND ANR. GEETHA KOVILAN[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-3]

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7111 Crl.A. No. 521/2015

II-ASURESH DNYANDEO KATE ATUL BABASAHEB DAKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

112 C.A. No. 9253/2017III

MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD(NOW KNOWN AS UNITED SPIRITSLIMITED)

KHAITAN & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

113 C.A. No. 9725/2014IV-A

M/S. MARUTI ISPAT AND ENERGY PVTLTD.Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]VIKAS MEHTA[INT], RANJAN KUMAR[P-1],[INT], E. C. AGRAWALA[INT]

IA No.140166/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No.21230/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No.10355-10357/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10497/2014IV-A

DAVANGERE SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 523/2015IV-A

HIRANYAKESHI SAHAKARI SAKKAREKARKHANE NIYAMIT M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGLORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9271/2014IV-A

M/S ZUARI CEMENT LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 10299/2014IV-A

DECCAN CEMENTS LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMIISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 429/2015IV-A

M/S AGARWAL COAL CORPORATION PVTLTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 7/2015IV-A

TOPWORTH STEEL AND POWERPVT.LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISIONER OF CUSTOMS,VISHAKAPATNAM AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 430-432/2015IV-A

M/S SWASTIK COAL CORP. PVT LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3131/2015IV-A

M/S. KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,GUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3769/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S DEVANGERE SUGAR COMPANYLTD. MEERA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.5999-6000/2015III

M/S. WEST COAST PAPER MILLS LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.5722-5723/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE CUSETC. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSWASTIK COAL CORPORATION PVT.LTD. ETC. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2638/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5877/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.8916-8917/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

ZUARI CEMENT LTD AND ANR. MEERA MATHUR[R-1], CHARANYALAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3118/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSVIJAYAWADA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSHREE JAYAJOTHI CEMENTS LTD RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2016IV-A

ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD. HARISH PANDEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDSERVICE TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedDiary No. 9241-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSKANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ORIENT ABRASIVES LTD. ANEESH MITTAL[R-1]

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7IA No.78833/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.78836/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.78835/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.78834/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 12289-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSJAMNAGAR (PREV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S AQUAGEL CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.IA No.73729/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.73728/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.73727/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

114 C.A. No. 10292/2014IV-A

VIBGYOR SCHOOL, N S PALYA AND ORS. M. RAMBABU AND CO.VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10293/2014IV-A

CHRIST SCHOOL (ICSE) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10294/2014IV-A

ST. MIRAS SCHOOL PRABHA SWAMI

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No.21715-21717/2018III

RAJKOT KELAVANI SAMAJ (ST. MARYENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL MORBI )THROUGH PRINCIPAL DAVIS MANJALY

GAUTAM TALUKDAR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22396/2018III

AYYAPPA EDUCATION CENTRE(SABARIVIDYALAYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116654/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155917/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23243-23244/2018III

JAMNAGAR EDUCATIONAL ANDCHARITABLE TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA120296/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155937/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23035/2018III

STELLA MARIS TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 156008/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.22368-22370/2018III

MAR GREGORIOS ORTHODOX SYRIANCHURCH BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116486/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155959/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23227/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

Versus

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 155870/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23037/2018III

BASIL TRUST BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118805/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155895/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23173-23174/2018III

SACHIDANANAD VIDYALAYA TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119734/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30083-2018III

ASHADHAMSEVA MANDAL VAPI (ST.XAVIERS SCHOOL KHILODA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118455/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118459/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30108-2018III

MATRU JYOTHI EDUCATIONALTRUST(SCHOOL JAM KAMABALIYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118749/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118750/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30117-2018III

ST. ANNES HIGH SCHOOL TRUST (STANNES SCHOOL NADIAD) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 116907/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30122-2018III

THE PROVINCIAL SOCIETY OF THECONGREGATION OF JESUS AND MARY(CONVENT OF JESUS AND MARY GIRLSSCHOOL

JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118759/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118760/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30160-2018III

AUXILIUM SOCIETY (AUXILIUMCONVENT SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118761/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118762/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155970/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30164-2018III

DAKOR SALESIAN SOCIETY (DONBOSCO ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118499/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118500/2018

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22983/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS AND ANR. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118414/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30413-2018III

DIVINE CHILD SEVA KENDRA AND ORS. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 119622/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119627/2018

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 581/2019X

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

115 Crl.A. No. 2555/2014II-C

ATMARAM NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

116 C.A. No. 6282/2015XII

THE STATE INDUSTRIES PROMOTIONCORP. OF TAMIL NADU LTD SUDARSH MENON

VersusT. H. INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ANDANR. P. S. SUDHEER, GARIMA PRASHAD

117 Crl.A. No. 1265/2015II

RAM BETI C. K. RAI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GARVESH KABRA[R-1]

118 Crl.A. No. 1962/2017II-A

M/S. KITPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1], AMIT K. NAIN[R-2],ASHISH RANA[R-3]

119 Crl.A. No. 1683/2017II-C

SURESHA AND ORS. DEVASA & CO.[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI, [R-1], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1684/2017II-C

PRABHUSWAMY RAJESH MAHALE

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S., , MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

120 C.A. No. 372/2018IV

M/S. ALPHA G. CORP. DEVELOPMENTPVT. LTD. SUPRIYA JUNEJA[P-1]

VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION AMRITSARAND ORS. P. N. PURI[R-1]

121 C.A. No.5094-5098/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, DAMAN B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. WELLKNOWN SYNTHETICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS GENERALMANAGER

RAHUL GUPTA[R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 820-823/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS & SRVICE TAX, VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S BHILOSA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .AND ORS. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 9/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 88605/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.9214-9235/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,SURAT - I, (GUJRAT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 45/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 7240/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015ConnectedC.A. No.1111-1117/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BEEKALYON SYNTHERICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

RAHUL GUPTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 15/2016

122 C.A. No.9269-9275/2017III

STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusB.G. EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTIONINDIA LIMITED AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

K. R. SASIPRABHU[CAVEAT], HARISHPANDEY[CAVEAT], JURIS CORP.[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9264/2017III

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD THRU ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU, [CAVEAT]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedC.A. No.9265-9268/2017III

B.G. EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTIONINDIA LTD. HARISH PANDEY

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedC.A. No. 11114/2017III

THE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONAND ANR. JURIS CORP.[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.51744/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28957/2017III

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

VersusO.N.G.C. LTD. AND ANR. JURIS CORP.[R-1]IA No.105949/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.105952/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

123 Crl.A. No. 1418/2015II-A

TALASHO DEVI @ TARAWATI DEVI SUBHRO SANYALVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7124 C.A. No. 14622/2015

XVITHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusRAM GOPAL AGARWALA . AND ORS. DHEERAJ NAIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 14623/2015XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

VersusBRC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT.LTD. . AND ANR. APARNA SINHA[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 39165/2019125 Crl.A. No. 1067/2017

IIHANSRAJ LAXMIDAS MERCHANT P. V. DINESH[P-1]VersusRAJESH RATHI AND ORS. PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2]

126 C.A. No. 720-722/2019XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMADVersusJ.K. TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LIMITEDFORMERLY KNOWN AS J.K. INDUSTRIESLIMITED

G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

127 C.A. No.23986-23987/2017IV

SUSHIL KUMAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH

VersusTAPTESH KAUR @ TAAPTESH KAURAND ANR. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI

128 Crl.A. No. 588/2016II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN D.S.K. LEGAL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 589/2016II-A

FIROZ SHAIKH AND ANR. VIPIN NAIR

VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN . AND ANR. D.S.K. LEGAL

ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No. 48/2016PIL-W

PT. PARMANAND KATARA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

129 C.A. No. 10020/2017IV

SEEMA DAHIYA AND ANR. GAUR & NEHRA LAW FIRM[P-1]Versus

COL. DHARAMPAL (RETD.) AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR[R-1][PR], HARSH V.SURANA[R-2][PR]

and IA No.128745/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.128746/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.129743/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR ON IA 1/2016 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 3/2017

130 C.A. No. 5957/2016XVI

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusCOMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAXBHUBANESWAR II

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

131 Crl.A. No. 230/2017II-A

KAMLESH PRASAD FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1]and IA No.88981/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

132 Crl.A. No. 901/2016II-B

MAINUDDIN GAZI SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7

133 C.A. No. 8202/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL COMMUNICATION PVT LTDTHR. FINANCIAL ADVISOR

ConnectedDiary No. 9270-2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI-IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL INDUSTRIESIA No.42446/2017-STAY APPLICATION

134 C.A. No. 20903/2017XIV-A

MANOJ CHATURVEDIVersusSANGEETA CHATURVEDI SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

135 Crl.A. No.592-593/2017II-C

SRI M. H. SURESHA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

136 C.A. No.10624-10625/2017IV-A

SRINIVASAIAH, (D) BY LRS AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusA C PUTTASWAMY (DEAD) BY LRS ANDORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

137 Crl.A. No. 60-63/2017II-A

HIRA MANDAL ANIL K. CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], AJAY KUMARTALESARA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

138 Crl.A. No. 281/2017II

KAILASH CHANDRA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

139 C.A. No. 1344/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusINSTAKART SERVICES PRIVATELIMITED RONY OOMMEN JOHN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1346/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusWS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5379/2017III

M/S AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PVT.LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15149/2017IV-A

M/S. INSTAKART SERVICES PVT. LTD. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[P-1], [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

140 C.A. No. 6077/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION THROUGH ITSCOMMISSIONER

VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ADVOCATE ABHAY KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ABHAY KUMAR

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7

141 C.A. No. 3918/2017IV

ATMA RAM (DECEASED) THR LEGALREP. DHARMPAL GOYAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1][GR], BIRENDRAKUMAR MISHRA[R-2][GR], RAM NARESHYADAV[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

142 C.A. No. 19652/2017XIV-A

PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ADITYA VERMAVersusKAVERI SEED COMPANY LIMITED ANDOTHERS RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.19653-19654/2017XIV-A

REGISTRAR OF PLANT VARIETIES ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPRABHAT AGRI BIOTECH LIMITED ANDORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3]

IA No.53223/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.53227/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

143 C.A. No. 7269/2018XVI-A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAMVersusTHE JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATEACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION ANDORS.

SATYA MITRA[R-1], [R-2]

144 C.A. No. 3021/2019XV

BRIJ BIHARI AGARWAL (BHAGAT) ANDANR. SHOBHA GUPTA

VersusSUNIL CHAND KOTHARI B. S. BANTHIA[R-1]

145 C.A. No. 454/2018III

NABABAI DEVCHAND SHINDE AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSUREVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

146 Crl.A. No. 660/2019II-A

ARUN KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], LIZ MATHEW[R-2]

147 C.A. No. 10329/2018III

INDUS TOWER LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHARVersus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], [R-5], HEMANTIKAWAHI[R-1], [R-3], [R-4]

148 Crl.A. No. 703/2019II-A

SADHU DAS RAKESH KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND TAPESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

149 C.A. No.6053-6054/2014IV-A

M/S. I.C.D.S. LIMITED K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXMANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

[ AT TOP ]

150 C.A. No. 1764/2010XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXUDAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CHETAK ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. RANI CHHABRA[ AT TOP ]

151 C.A. No. 4088/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMITED KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS[ AT TOP ]

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 4089/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIOSNER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS

152 C.A. No. 8589/2010III

ADDL.DIR.OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT B. V. BALARAM DASVersusSUVIDHA ASSOCIATION THR.ITSPRESIDENT BHARGAVA V. DESAI

[ AT TOP ]153 C.A. No. 4537/2014

XIIANSALDO ENERGIA SPA ANIL SHRIVASTAV[P-1]VersusC.I.T AND ANR. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR], [R-2]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-02-2020 } [ NOT TO BE TREATED AS PART-HEARD ]..[ AT TOP ]FOR DIRECTIONS

ConnectedC.A. No. 4538/2014XII

ANSALDO ENERGIA SPA ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusC.I.T AND ANR. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-02-2020 }

154 C.A. No.6262-6263/2011XVI

MAURYA REALTORS PVT.LTD. RANI CHHABRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[ AT TOP ]

155 C.A. No.5256-5259/2010IV-A

HUKUM CHAND JAIN(DEAD) ETC. ETC. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusASST.COMMR.OF I.T.CIRCLE-I,RAIPUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

156 C.A. No. 2702/2011IV-A

SIR M.VISVESWARAYA EDUCATIONTRUST SATYA MITRA GARG

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

[ AT TOP ]

157 C.A. No. 143-146/2011XIV-A

ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTIONLTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX[ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1378/2011XIV-A

ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTIONLTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 2476/2018XIV-A

ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTIONLTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX

158 C.A. No. 8937/2010IX

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI AND ANR. SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

VersusJAYANTILAL SHANTILAL JOBALI RASHMIKUMAR MANILAL VITHLANI[ AT TOP ]

159 C.A. No.1206-1207/2011IV-A

INTEL TECHNOLOGY INDIA P.LTD,BANGALORE RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …jabil circuit india pvt. ltd. pawanshree agrawal versus commissioner of central excise, pune-iii b. krishna prasad connected slp(c)

COURT NO. : 7COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,BANGALORE AND ANR.

B. V. BALARAM DAS

[ AT TOP ]ConnectedC.A. No.1208-1211/2011IV-A

SOFTWARE AND SILICON SYSTEMSINDIA PVT. LTD. BANGALORE RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,BANGALORE AND ANR.

B. V. BALARAM DAS

160 C.A. No. 5155/2012XIV-A

SPLENDOR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. M. P. VINODVersusINCOME TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5156/2012XIV-A

SPLENDOR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD. M. P. VINOD

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

161 C.A. No. 1636/2010XVII

TATA MOTORS LTD.FORMERLY KNOWNAS M/S TATA ENGINEERING ANDLOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LTD.

MANIK KARANJAWALA

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAN(FOR.KNOWN.ASTHE STATE OF BIHAR)

GOPAL PRASAD, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-3], [IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-02-2020 } list in the first week of february 2020

162 Crl.A. No. 2151/2010II-A

SOU. DHONDABAI BALKRISHNACHINCHANE RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-02-2020 }

163 C.A. No. 6380/2012III

KAPILABEN AMBALAL PATEL HEIRS OFDECEASED AMBALAL P. PATELTHROUGH ATTORNEY RAJESHBHAIRAMANBHAI PAT AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11],[P-12], [P-13], [P-14], [P-15], [P-16], [P-17],[P-18], [P-19]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT REVENUEDEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARYAND ANR.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-02-2020 }

NOTE:-THE MATTERS WHICH MAY NOT BE TAKEN UP ON 11.02.2020 WILLBE TAKEN UP BY THE BENCH PRESIDED OVER BY HONBLE MR.JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR ON 12.02.2020 AND 13.02.2020

NEW DELHI07-02-2020 17:35:42

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR