25
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 9 OF 2021 FROM : 16-03-2021 To 18-03-2021 COURT NO. : 3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 7130-7133/2011 XII S.V.MATHAPRASAD P. VINAY KUMAR Versus LALCHAND MENGHRAJ (DEAD) AND ORS AND ORS. S. THANANJAYAN, A. T. M. SAMPATH 2 C.A. No. 3265/2016 IV-A THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1] Versus M/S BPL LIMITED GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-1] Connected C.A. No. 3272/2016 IV-A M/S. B.P.L. LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN[P-1] Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX ANIL KATIYAR 3 Crl.A. No. 60/2009 II MUNNA VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1] Versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1] Connected Crl.A. No. 61/2009 II CHANDRA PAL AND ANR. ABHISTH KUMAR[P-1] Versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1] 4 C.A. No. 4686/2009 IV FOOD CORP.OF INDIA. AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEY Versus M/S PANNA LAL AND SONS R. NEDUMARAN[R-1] 5 C.A. No. 3127/2009 XVI UNIVERSAL PETRO CHEMICALS LTD. PARIJAT SINHA Versus B.P.PLC AND OTHERS KHAITAN & CO. Connected C.A. No. 3128/2009 XVI ARAL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Versus UNIVERSAL PETRO-CHEMICALS LD. KHAITAN & CO. 6 C.A. No. 13/2011 XIV-A THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR, [P-1] Versus M/S RADHA KRISHNA JALAN KAVITA JHA[R-1] 7 Crl.A. No. 442/2009 II RAMJI @ RAMJILAL ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY[P-1][PR] Versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR] 8 C.A. No. 7575/2009 IV MANJIT SINGH . AND ANR. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1] Versus

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 9 OF 2021 FROM : 16-03-2021 To 18-03-2021

COURT NO. : 3HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No.7130-7133/2011XII

S.V.MATHAPRASAD P. VINAY KUMAR

VersusLALCHAND MENGHRAJ (DEAD) ANDORS AND ORS. S. THANANJAYAN, A. T. M. SAMPATH

2 C.A. No. 3265/2016IV-A

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFTTAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S BPL LIMITED GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3272/2016IV-A

M/S. B.P.L. LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX ANIL KATIYAR

3 Crl.A. No. 60/2009II

MUNNA VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 61/2009II

CHANDRA PAL AND ANR. ABHISTH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]

4 C.A. No. 4686/2009IV

FOOD CORP.OF INDIA. AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEYVersusM/S PANNA LAL AND SONS R. NEDUMARAN[R-1]

5 C.A. No. 3127/2009XVI

UNIVERSAL PETRO CHEMICALS LTD. PARIJAT SINHAVersusB.P.PLC AND OTHERS KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3128/2009XVI

ARAL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

VersusUNIVERSAL PETRO-CHEMICALS LD. KHAITAN & CO.

6 C.A. No. 13/2011XIV-A

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR, [P-1]VersusM/S RADHA KRISHNA JALAN KAVITA JHA[R-1]

7 Crl.A. No. 442/2009II

RAMJI @ RAMJILAL ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

8 C.A. No. 7575/2009IV

MANJIT SINGH . AND ANR. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]Versus

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3

MANORATH SINGH KOHLI (D) THR. LRS. ANAND MISHRA[R-1][LR/S], AJITPUDUSSERY[R-1][LR/S]

9 Crl.A. No. 956/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]VersusNIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND ORS. C. L. SAHU[R-1][PR]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 957/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusBHAG SINGH ALIAS BAGGA AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN[R-1][SCLSC]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4276/2009 Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate,appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated 14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 959/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusANGREJO DEVI AND ORS. NIDHI[R-1][SCLSC]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 958/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusDULA RAM AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[R-1][PR]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 761/2014II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusDHARAM PAL AND ORS.FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1913/2014 Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate,appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated 14.08.2018.

10 Crl.A. No. 1052/2009II-B

KIRPAL SINGH JYOTI MENDIRATTAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE

11 C.A. No. 1361/2013III-A

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. ANDORS. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S BHARAT UDYAG AND ORS. JATIN ZAVERI

12 C.A. No. 7118/2009XII

PATTAPPA GOUNDER(D) BY L.RS. V. BALACHANDRANVersusS.RAGHUNATHA GOUNDER (DEAD) THRLRS SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

[ HEARING THROUGH PHYSICAL APPEARANCE ]

13 Crl.A. No.1860-1861/2009II-A

MADAN MOHAN(DEAD) THR. LRS ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1], [P-1.1], [P-1.6],[P-1.5], [P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2]

VersusKAMAL KEDARNATH GANDHI AND ANR.

14 Crl.A. No. 1008/2009II-B

RAJ SINGH SATYENDRA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR, REKHA PANDEY[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1007/2009II-B

KAKA SINGH @ KULDIP SINGH SATYENDRA KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

15 C.A. No. 9618/2010IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYARVersus

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3M/S. JANNHAVI INVESTMENTS PVT.LTD. ARUNA GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9619/2010IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. KALYANI EXPORTS ANDINVESTMENT PVT. LTD. ARUNA GUPTA

16 Crl.A. No. 745/2010II

DAYAMOY DEB SUDHA GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA[ HEARING THROUGH PHYSICAL APPEARANCE ]

17 C.A. No.7027-7028/2009XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMANJU ARORA AND ANR. I. B GAUR

ConnectedC.A. No.7150-7151/2009XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

KANTA SURI AND ANR. PIYUSH SHARMA, SARAD KUMARSINGHANIA[R-2]

18 C.A. No. 7952/2009XIV-A

EX. HAV. HANSRAJ SINGH (DEAD)THR.LR VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY ANDORS.

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

19 C.A. No. 6629/2016XIV-A

LT. COMMANDER M.P. VERMA ALOK GUPTA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

20 Crl.A. No. 1600/2009II-B

THE STATE OF PUNJAB RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]VersusKULWANT SINGH AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

21 Crl.A. No. 626/2009II-C

SOMU @ SOMASUNDARAM V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusTHE STATE REP. BY DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

22 Crl.A. No. 660/2010II-C

JAITUN BEE GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANDORS.

SUMEER SODHI[R-1], AKSHATSHRIVASTAVA[R-2][PR], [R-3][PR]

23 Crl.A. No. 239/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersusBAJRANG LAL AND ANR. YASH PAL DHINGRA, [R-2]

24 C.A. No. 5797/2009XIV-A

AMAR NATH K J JOHN AND CO[P-1]VersusGIAN CHAND AND ANR. DEVENDRA SINGH[R-1]

25 C.A. No. 1089/2010XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH STATEINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LIMITED

BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusM/S. MANSON (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ANDORS. ANISHA UPADHYAY

26 Crl.A. No. 1076/2010II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[P-1]Versus

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3DEVILAL KUSHWAHA RAJESH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1072/2010II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[P-1]

VersusJAGDISH GAUTAM RAJESH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1065/2010II-A

STATE OF M.P. ARJUN GARG[P-1]

VersusPRAMOD KUMAR GAUTAM

27 Crl.A. No. 1858/2009II-B

DHARAMBIR @ DHARMA RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

28 C.A. No. 5274/2010XIV-A

STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH ANDANR. ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusM/S M.R.POWER PROJECTS HRISHIKESH BARUAH

29 Crl.A. No. 837/2011II-B

THANKAPPAN @ KOCHUMANI P. VINAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KERALA C. K. SASI[R-1]

30 Crl.A. No. 2003/2010II

RAGOLU MANMADHA RAO RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

31 C.A. No. 1951/2011IX

HARISHCHANDRA MOTILAL JAIN(DEAD) THROUGH HIS LEGALREPRESENTATIVES

KAUSHIK PODDAR[P-1]

VersusARUN GOVINDRAO SUTANE (DEAD)THROUGH HIS LEGALREPRESENTATIVES AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1], CHANDER SHEKHARASHRI[R-2], PAVAN KUMAR[R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6]

32 C.A. No. 818/2011IV-A

MALLANNA NARENDRA KUMARVersusSMT. SARASWATI ANJANI KUMAR JHA

33 Crl.A. No. 2010/2010II-A

PRAKASH NAYI @ SEN AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF GOA

34 Crl.A. No. 1607/2009II-B

JAFAR T. N. SINGHVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH

35 C.A. No. 2045/2011IV

DR. NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR JASPREET GOGIAVersusPARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR @ AJINDERKAUR PANESAR@ AJINDER K PANESA MADHURIMA TATIA

36 C.A. No. 50/2010III

THE COMMISSIONER.OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWAPNIL FINANCE PVT.LTD. P. S. SUDHEERFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2010

37 C.A. No.9869-9871/2014III

BAPU NATHU BORATE M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusDADASO DINKARRAO JAGDALE T. HARISH KUMAR

38 C.A. No. 3767/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJIVersusARBIND JEE LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 339 Crl.A. No. 1844/2009

II-CSITARAM DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

40 C.A. No. 556/2012IX

SHRIPATI LAKHU MANE ABHA R. SHARMAVersusTHE MEMBER SECRETARYMAHARASHTRA WATER SUPPLY ANDSEWERAGE BOARD AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI

41 Crl.A. No. 2043/2009II-A

PRAHALAD B. K. SATIJA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 983/2010II-A

MOHAN SHARMILA UPADHYAY[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]B. SUNITA RAO[IMPL]

IA No.18308/2018-impleading party42 C.A. No. 3035/2010

IV-CAJAY KASHYAP RAJESHVersusHEMLATA KASHYAP NIRAJ SHARMA

43 C.A. No. 5719/2009XII-A

PRATAPA (JAYANTHI) PADMAJA JOHN MATHEW[P-1]VersusJAYANTHI SURYA CHANDRA SHEKAR TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1]

44 Crl.A. No. 1066/2010II-A

RAM SHARAN CHATURVEDI S. JANANI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

45 C.A. No.6964-6965/2015XIV-A

SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusC.I.T.,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.6966-6967/2015XIV-A

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES BHARGAVA V. DESAI

Versus

C.I.T. NEW DELHI. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.6969-6970/2015XIV-A

C.I.T., DELHI-92 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S AIR FRANCE VINAY GARG

ConnectedC.A. No. 6968/2015XIV-A

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS)DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6972/2015XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,N.DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6973/2015XIV-A

C.I.T-XVII,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedDiary No. 12449-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 08 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3M/S SRL RANBAXY LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.58304/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

46 Crl.A. No. 754/2010II

SUBHAJOY TRIPURA . AND ANR. B. SUNITA RAOVersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1]

47 C.A. No. 10077/2010XVI

LOPAMUDRA DASGUPTA SANDEEP NARAINVersusDIPANKAR DASGUPTA RANJAN MUKHERJEE

48 Crl.A. No.2157-2159/2013II

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[P-1]

VersusSURAJ NIDHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2160/2013II

MUNNU SYED MEHDI IMAM[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1]FOR GRANT OF PAROLE ON IA 86878/2019

49 Crl.A. No. 2286/2010II-B

JASBIR SINGH RAJIV MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

50 C.A. No. 9334/2010III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusRAM BAHADUR YADAV ANKUR YADAV[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 4387/2010XIV-A

R.P.SINGH CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIVersus

M/S. DHIMAN RICE MILLS AND ORS.BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[R-1], NARESH K.SHARMA[R-2], NIRNIMESH DUBE[R-3], [R-4]ASTHA SHARMA[IMPL]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1223/2019 in C.A. No.4387/2010XIV-A

PURAN CHAND JUNEJA AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE[P-1]

Versus

R.P. SINGH

IN C.A. No. - 4387/2010, FOR ADMISSION52 Crl.A. No. 1472/2010

II-CAMIR HAMZA ANSARI AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

53 Crl.A. No. 1388/2010II

ALLURI SRINIVASA RAO Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1389/2010II

JANGAM KUMAR SWAMY Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

54 Crl.A. No. 513/2011II

ANIL HALDAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH[P-1]Versus

MONINDER SINGH PANDHER AND ORS.MADHU MOOLCHANDANI[R-1], SARVESHSINGH BAGHEL[R-3], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-4]

55 C.A. No. 6310/2010IV

M/S. SONALIKA AGRO INDUSTRIESCORP. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

Versus

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3M/S. LOTIA AUTO INDUSTRY S. S. SHROFF

56 Crl.A. No. 1855/2011II

ANIL KUMAR JAIL PETITION[P-1], SHASHI BHUSHANKUMAR[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]

57 Crl.A. No. 1181/2010II

KUDUMULA VENKATAIAH SANGEETA KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-1]

58 C.A. No. 6240/2011III-A

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CHIEFSECURITY COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusJAIBEER SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

59 C.A. No. 3532/2011XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusNIHAL AHMAD KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED

60 Crl.A. No. 1926/2010II-C

KRISHNARAJ V. G. PRAGASAMVersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 468/2013II-C

KATHIRESAN SAMIAR K. RAJEEV

VersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PANRUTISUB DIVISOIN

M. YOGESH KANNA

61 Crl.A. No. 1452/2011II-C

KAPIL SATNAMI E. R. SUMATHY[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 3514/2011 AND PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON I.A. NO. 10437/2015

62 Crl.A. No. 569/2013II-A

RAMESHWAR RAM AND ANR. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

63 Crl.A. No. 190/2011II-C

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]VersusM.S.MANDER RAM NARESH YADAV[R-1]

64 Crl.A. No. 1044/2011II-B

BASTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]

65 Crl.A. No. 1908/2011II-A

SHIVRAJ SINGH NILOFAR KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

66 C.A. No. 279/2016III

MAHARASHTRA STATE FIN.CORPN. PRAMIT SAXENAVersusDILIP KUMAR G. BADLANI . AND ORS. R. N. KESWANI

67 Crl.A. No. 566/2012II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusKISHAN LAL . AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[R-3], [R-4]

68 C.A. No. 812/2011XVII

ARUN KHOSLA M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]VersusGURUCHARAN SINGH

69 Crl.A. No.1298-1299/2011II-B

GURMUKH SINGH @ BINDA AND ORS. GOPAL PRASAD

Versus

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3THE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

70 C.A. No.1663-1664/2012XI-A

M/S. MANJOO AND COMPANYREPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR M. P. VINOD

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KANNUR ANIL KATIYAR

71 C.A. No. 2888/2012XI-A

A.J. MICHAELVersusBEXY MICHAEL A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

72 C.A. No. 5828/2019XI-A

KONNAPALAM KANDI P.K.V.CHOYICHI(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. RANJITH K. C.[P-1]

VersusKUNHALI AND ORS. MALINI PODUVAL, RENJITH. B, K. RAJEEV

ConnectedC.A. No. 5829/2019XI-A

KINARULLA PARAMBATH UPPENNUAND ORS. K. RAJEEV

VersusKUNHALI AND ORS. MALINI PODUVALFOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 123898/2019 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 123900/2019

73 C.A. No. 2784/2012XVI

LALTI DEVI T. MAHIPALVersusSURESH KUMAR LAL SHEKHAR KUMAR

74 C.A. No.6886-6887/2011XVII

MANISH KUMAR RAI VINEET BHAGAT

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

75 Crl.A. No. 1651/2012II-A

KAMADEO MAHARA T. MAHIPAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR NOW THE STATEOF JHARKHAND ABHISHEK[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 2331/2015II-A

DUKHI MAHARA AND ANR. JAIL PETITION

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD[R-1]MS. DEEP MALA IS APPEARING AS AMICUS CURIAE

76 Crl.A. No. 2010/2011II-A

BHAGWAT CHAITRAM TALTE K. RAJEEV[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

77 C.A. No. 5166/2012III-A

STATE OF U. P. THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusCOMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT THR.ITS SECRETARY/MANTRI AND ANR. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1]

78 C.A. No. 2606/2012XIV-A

EX.CT. MAHADEV RUNAMONI BHUYAN[P-1]VersusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDERSECURITY FORCE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

79 Crl.A. No. 720/2012II-C

JITENDER KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

80 Crl.A. No. 1402/2014II-C

ROOPLAL VERMA JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 20585/2012 THE NAME OF MR. JEETENDRA SINGH,ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUS CURIAE

81 Crl.A. No. 1635/2013II

G.SUDHAKAR NAIDU M. VIJAYA BHASKAR[P-1]Versus

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. D. MAHESH BABU[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1634/2013II

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

VersusMOTUPALLE VENUGOPAL NAIDU GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

82 Crl.A. No. 1614/2014II-C

TAMESHWAR PATEL RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH NISHANTH PATIL[R-1][GR]

83 C.A. No. 8773/2012XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusCAMRUS ZAMAN GHAFOOR PARIAT (D)THR.LRS RISHI MALHOTRA[R-1]

84 Crl.A. No. 392/2012II-B

VINUBHAI SHANABHAI VANKAR TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

85 C.A. No. 1189/2015III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]VersusURMILA KOHLI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. REETU SHARMA[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1]

86 C.A. No. 8000/2015XVI

ARVIND KUMAR SINHA ARUP BANERJEEVersusSADHANA SINHA ARUN K. SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8301/2015XVI

ARVIND KUMAR SINHA ARUP BANERJEE

VersusSADHANA SINHA ARUN K. SINHA

87 C.A. No. 7408/2012XII

R.VIJAYAKUMAR K. K. MANIVersus

THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[CAVEAT], PRABHASWAMI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.10876-10878/2013XII

R. VIJAYAKUMAR K. K. MANI

Versus

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURTMADRAS AND OR SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, B. BALAJI

88 Crl.A. No. 976/2012II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[P-1]VersusRAIS @ BEHRA AND ANR.please show the name of mr. pradeep kumar Adv. (AC) Non A.O.R. in the causelist.

89 C.A. No.8151-8181/2013XII-A

GOVT.OF A.P.& ORS.ETC.ETC. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

Versus

GOVT.OF A.P..ETC.ETC. AND ORS.

LAWYER S KNIT & CO[CAVEAT],VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU, NAVINPRAKASH, G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, G.MADHAVI, E. R. SUMATHY, D. BHARATHIREDDY[CAVEAT], C. S. N. MOHAN RAO, BIJOYKUMAR JAIN, A. V. RANGAM[CAVEAT]

and IA No.107111/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No.8314-8315/2013XII-A

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INST.OF TECHYAND ORS.

Versus

STATE OF A.P. . AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH, LAWYER S KNIT & CO,[CAVEAT], VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 154/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE OFTECHNOLOGY LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORYCOMMITTEE GOPAL SINGH, G. N. REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 155/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATI EDUCATIONALSOCIETY AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORYCOMMITTEE G. N. REDDY, HARISH PANDEY[R-5]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 567/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTT. OFTECH. AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 547/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATI EDUC.SOCITY .AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY

90 C.A. No. 2986/2012XIV-A

CONST. AMAR SINGH RAJ SINGH RANA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

91 Crl.A. No. 1398/2012II-C

P. RAMA RAO LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusTHE STATE (THROUGH CBI) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1399/2012II-C

RUNU GHOSH ANIL NAG[P-1]

VersusC.B.I MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1400/2012II-C

SUKH RAM AJIT SHARMA[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]IA FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 30997/2018

92 Crl.A. No. 1310/2012II-A

SURESH MENDE NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

93 C.A. No. 9105/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.,NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICALSINDUSTRIES LIMITED. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8755/2017III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBANK OF INDIA JAY KISHOR SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 9107/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3M/S. CHEIL COMMUNICATIONS INDIAPVT LTD PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9109/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DOUBLE DOT FINANCE LTD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9110/2017XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWARNA ADHARA IJMII INTEGRATEDTOWNSHIP DEV. PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9112/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusVISISTH CHAY VYAPAR LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9113/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. (NOWBHARTI AIRTEL LTD.) KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9887/2018III

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT)-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BLACK VEATCH PRICHARD, INC. KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

94 Crl.A. No. 1008/2012II-B

SHAILESH @ MUKESH RADKABHAIKOLI PATEL RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

95 C.A. No. 8545/2015XII-A

DURGAM ANITHA AND ANR. T. V. RATNAMVersusSTATE BANK OF HYDERABAD AND ORS. A. V. RANGAM, ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-2]

96 C.A. No. 5673/2012XVII

HARMEET SINGH BALRAJ DEWANVersusP.K. BHARDWAJ ALIAS SHRIPUSHPENDER KUMAR

97 Crl.A. No. 1645/2012II-A

NANABHAU MALHARI KOTKAR MANJU SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

98 C.A. No.3418-3420/2017III

MANISH SONI AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAMINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

99 C.A. No. 1277/2016XIV-A

C.I.T-II ANIL KATIYARVersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 9185/2019XIV-A

THECOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSAT CORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.171541/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 44662-2018XIV

COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3NEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. KISHORE KUNAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.177902/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 169/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1], [R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.177532/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 5973/2019XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC CO LTDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.104631/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.104633/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28186/2016XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1380/2016XIV-A

DIR.OF I.T-II (INTERNATIONAL TAXN) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 1381/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 1386/2016XIV-A

DIR.OF INCOME TAX-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 11198/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE BV KISHORE KUNALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.161165/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29612/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE BV KISHORE KUNAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.152234/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 10845/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE BV KISHORE KUNAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151404/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1383/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX II(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 9962/2014XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-II,NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3NEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. THROUGHMANAGING DIRECTOR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1385/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF I.T.-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V. SUNIL FERNANDES

ConnectedC.A. No. 8018/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE B. V. KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 11197/2018XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V. KISHORE KUNALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.161574/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 2005/2020XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. INTELSAT CORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.28709/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 2431/2020XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusINTELSAT CORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION

100 C.A. No. 2413/2016IV

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL ANDINFRASTRUCTURE DEV. CORPN. ANDANR.

SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusM/S. LOS ANGELES FOOD PROCESSINGLTD. AND ANR. ANUP KUMAR

101 Crl.A. No. 1245/2013II

DAYA SHANKARVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

102 C.A. No. 1656/2015IV-C

NORTHERN COALFIELDS LTD.. ANDORS. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSUSHEE HI TECH CONSTRUCTIONSP.LTD. S. C. BIRLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1658/2015IV-C

SUSHEE HI TECH CONSTRUCTIONSP.LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS SUSHEE INFRAPRIVATE LIMITE)

S. C. BIRLA

VersusNORTHERN COAL FIELDS LTD.. ANDORS. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

103 C.A. No.3761-3762/2017XIV-A

DHARAM SINGH VAID KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusM.A.BHARTI (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

104 Crl.A. No.598-600/2013II

AJAI ALIAS AJJU AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedCrl.A. No. 337/2014II

MUKESH JAIL PETITION

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPlease show the name of Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati,Advocaste Amicus Curiae in thecause list on behalf of the Appellant in Jail Petition.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.745-748/2015II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[P-1]

VersusAJAI @AJJU RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]ready

105 Crl.A. No. 282/2016II

JAGADAMBA PRASAD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 283/2016II

GAJRAJ @ HAJJI AND ANR. ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

106 C.A. No. 9720/2014IV-A

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ABHIJIT SENGUPTAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXBANGALORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

107 Crl.A. No. 1679/2012II

RAM KALP CHAUDHARY V. MAHESHWARI & CO.VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1]

108 C.A. No.3312-3314/2017XIV-A

M/S NAVSHAKTI INDUSTRIES P.LTD. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No.3315-3317/2017XIV-A

M/S NAVSHAKTI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

109 Crl.A. No. 170/2014II-A

UMANAND MEHTA DIPAK KUMAR JENA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1]

110 Crl.A. No. 699/2013II

GODE YESU R. V. KAMESHWARANVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

111 Crl.A. No. 1866/2013II-B

LAKHWINDER SINGH AMITA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSURJIT SINGH AND ORS. RITESH KHATRI, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2197/2014II-B

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]

Versus

SURJIT SINGH . AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

FOR ISSUE OF BAILABLE WARRANT OF ARREST ON IA 10811/2013 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 10812/2013

112 C.A. No. 2830/2016XVI

BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD MEERA MATHURVersusC.I.T. KOLKATA-IV AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4241/2020III

MAX VIGIL SECURITY PVT. LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.ConnectedSLP(C) No.4971-4973/2020XI-A

HARRISONS MALAYALAM LTD. RADHA SHYAM JENA

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23295/2019III

SUZLON ENERGY LIMITED ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA

VersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23388/2019III

SUZLON ENERGY LIMITED ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA

VersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17739/2019III

ASK ME LAB CON SERVICES PVT. LTD. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1)(4) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3250/2019III

MAX VIGIL SECURITIES PVT. LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.11547/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.11549/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.11548/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1358/2019XI-A

M/S POPULAR VEHICLES ANDSERVICES PVT. LTD. RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.185472/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 159/2019III

DHRUVI PHARMA PVT. LTD., THROUGHITS DIRECTOR MOHIT D. RAM

VersusJOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(OSD)

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25483/2019XI-A

KERALA STATE WAREHOUSINGCORPORATION JUDY JAMES

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32361/2015XI-A

M/S. MERCHEM LIMITED MALANKARACENTRE, M.G. ROAD KOCHI-682035 RADHA RANGASWAMY

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24548/2016XI-A

KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIESCORPORATION LTD. RAMESH BABU M. R.

Versus

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2832/2016III

M/S.JMC PROJECTS (I) LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusC.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2831/2016III

GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPN. NACHIKETA JOSHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II,AHMEDBAD ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2833/2016III

CHECKMATE SERVICES P LTD AARTHI RAJAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR, [R-1]

113 Crl.A. No. 576/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SUNNY CHOUDHARY[P-1]VersusUDAY SINGH JAIN

114 C.A. No. 9829/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. .AND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusSATYASAI MINES AND MINERALS LTD. .AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE, [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9677/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTDAND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

VersusM/S MAA VAISHNNAVI SPONGE LTDAND ANR. ANINDITA PUJARI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9830/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. .AND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusM/S ADITYA SPONGE AND POWER (P)LTD. . AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE, [R-2]

115 Crl.A. No. 1923/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusKUNTHI BAI AFTAB ALI KHAN[R-1]

116 Crl.A. No. 721/2014II

VIRENDRA GUPTA ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA

117 Crl.A. No. 160/2014II

KRISHNA KANT CHATURVEDI SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SRISHTI SINGH[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 7756/2017 ONLY IA 7756/2017 TO BE LISTED.

118 C.A. No. 981/2014III-A

NOORUL SUBAH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDANR. JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

VersusVIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA MANJU JETLEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 3828/2014III-A

BRIJNANDAN (D) THR. LRS. S. K. VERMA

VersusZIAUL HAQ THROUGH MUTUWALINUKUL SHUBAH (D) THR. LRS. ANDANR.

JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

119 Crl.A. No. 392/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusRAGHVENDRA VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-1]

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3120 Crl.A. No. 1645/2013

II-CSANJAY PUNEET TANEJA[P-1]VersusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

121 Crl.A. No. 2016/2013II

MEKALA SIVAIAH RAVINDRA S. GARIAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

122 C.A. No. 8731/2017IV-C

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[P-1][GR]VersusM/S S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. THR. DIRECTOR LIZ MATHEW[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8732/2017IV-C

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SHRI NIWASA CONST.COMP.ENG. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1]AS FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 3/2016

123 Crl.A. No. 808/2014II

RAJESHWAR VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKUR PRAKASH[R-1]

124 Crl.A. No. 957/2014II

RAM KARAN ANKIT GOEL[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

125 C.A. No.9108-9109/2014III

UNION OF INDIA RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]

Versus

RAJENDRA N SHAH AND ANR. V. K. MONGA[R-1], ANUP JAIN[R-1], ANJANIAIYAGARI[R-1]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13329/2018III

MEHSANA DISTRICT CO OPERATIVEMILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. MOHIT PAUL

Versus

THE REGISTRAR AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13215/2018III

ASHABEN MAHIPALSINH THAKOREAND ORS. MOHIT PAUL

VersusTHE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVESOCIETIES GUJARAT STATE AND ANR.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 282/2020III

MEHSANA DISTRICT CO OPERATIVEMILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. MOHIT PAUL

VersusRAJENDRA N SHAH AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-3]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.42321/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.42323/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.42320/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.42322/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING andIA No.42324/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

ConnectedC.A. No. 281/2020III

ASHABEN MAHIPALSINH THAKOREAND ORS. MOHIT PAUL

VersusRAJENDRA N SHAH AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-3]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.42312/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.42314/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.42311/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.42313/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING andIA No.42315/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedSLP(C) No. 14227/2020III

ASHABEN MAHIPALSINH THAKOR ANDORS. MOHIT PAUL

VersusTHE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVESOCIETIES, GUJARAT STATE AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.121597/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.121598/2020-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.121599/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IANo.121595/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and IANo.121594/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

126 C.A. No. 4071/2014XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusPSA SICAL TERMINALS LTD THROUGHITS DIRECTOR NARESH KUMAR

127 C.A. No. 7910/2015XII-A

SALADI MAMILLAIAH SUDHA GUPTAVersusTAMMINISETTI NAGARATHNAM GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7911/2015XII-A

SALADI MAMILLAIAH SUDHA GUPTA

VersusTAMMINISETTI NAGARATHNAM GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

128 Crl.A. No. 149/2015II

KRISHNA PAL @ KRESH PAL ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ANR.

ANKUR PRAKASH[R-1], GP. CAPT. KARANSINGH BHATI[R-2]

129 Crl.A. No. 596/2014II

RAGHAV PRASAD AND ORS. MANJU JETLEY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

130 C.A. No. 11287/2013XVII

K.S. SAHU DEEPAK GOELVersus

UOI . AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

and IA No.1402/2018-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION131 C.A. No. 618/2015

XIV-AR.S.AZAD RANA RANJIT SINGHVersusM/S.MAHABIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS . PRAVIR KUMAR JAIN[CAVEAT], [R-2][CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 619/2015XIV-A

HARPAL SINGH RANA RANJIT SINGH

VersusM/S MAHABIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS . PRAVIR KUMAR JAIN[CAVEAT], [R-2][CAVEAT]

132 C.A. No. 3800/2017XIV-A

ASHOK KUMAR CHOUDHARY AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

133 C.A. No.5962-5963/2014XIV-A

BANSAL COMMODITIES AND ORS. SUBODH S. PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2]

134 C.A. No.1134-1135/2016XVI-A

SNEH LATA SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[P-1]

Versus

RATNO DEVI AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

135 C.A. No.4374-4375/2016XI-A

KIRAN KUMAR PARIDA RAJ KAMAL[P-1]

Versus

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3PRAVEENA SAMAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1]

136 C.A. No.9506-9507/2017IV

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE UNIONHOME SECRETARY, MINISTRY OFHOME AFFAIRS, GOVT OF INDIA NORTHBLOCK AND ORS.

KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-2][GR], [R-3][GR], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1][GR], [R-4][GR]

137 C.A. No. 10503/2014XII-A

MATTAPALLI LAXMI NARASIMHAINDUSTRIES SRIDHAR POTARAJU

VersusANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIALCORPORATION AND ANR.

Y. PRABHAKARA RAO, VENKATESWARA RAOANUMOLU

138 C.A. No.9831-9832/2014XVII

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusEX. CORPORAL PRAVEEN KUMARMISHRA RABIN MAJUMDER

139 C.A. No. 9526/2017XII-A

LINGALA SATHYANARAYANA DEAD BYLR. VINOD KUMAR TEWARI

VersusKOYYADA ANDALU ANNAM D. N. RAO[CAVEAT]

140 Crl.A. No. 1551/2014II

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusBABU LAL AND ORS.

141 C.A. No. 4287/2017IV

AJAY MAHAJAN @ AJAY GUPTA S. N. BHATVersusNAJAR SINGH AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

142 Crl.A. No. 590/2017II

MUJAMMIL AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[P-1], [P-2]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHAKEEL AHMED[COMP], VISHWA PALSINGH[R-1]

143 Crl.A. No. 736/2017II

KOVELAMUDI SEETHARAMAIAH K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI[P-1]Versus

S V S RAVI KRISHNA AND ORS.G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], TATINIBASU[R-2], [R-3], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]

144 C.A. No. 5525/2016XVI

BINA BASAK AND ORS DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusSRI BIPUL KANTI BASAK AND ORS ABHISHEK SINGH[R-1]

145 C.A. No.2665-2666/2016XII-A

BOYAPATI SRINIVASA APPA RAO ANDANR. SRIDHAR POTARAJU[P-1]

Versus

V KAMESWARA RAO AND ORS. SURESHAN P.[R-1], C. K. SASI[R-1], K. SHIVRAJCHOUDHURI[R-5]

146 SLP(C) No. 2851/2015IV-C

ANURAG MODI PYOLI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS.

SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-1], MISHRA SAURABH[R-1]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

147 C.A. No. 359-365/2017IV-A

M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITYOF INDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusGANGADHARAYYA PATTADSWAMYHIREMATH ETC. ETC. AND ANR. BANKEY BIHARI

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3148 C.A. No. 10527/2017

XII-AM/S GULF OIL CORPORATION LTD. A. SUBBA RAOVersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

149 C.A. No. 3503/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMOODYS ANALYTICS KNOWLEDGESERVICE RESEARCH (MAURITIUS)LIMITED

BHARGAVA V. DESAI

150 C.A. No. 3718/2015XVII

SEBI SRIRAM KRISHNA[P-1]VersusDLF LIMITED AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 3897/2015XVII

SEBI SRIRAM KRISHNA[P-1]

VersusMR. RAJIV SINGH S. S. SHROFF[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR [directions] ON IA 4/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 3875/2015XVII

SEBI SRIRAM KRISHNA[P-1]

VersusK. P. SINGH S. S. SHROFF[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR [directions] ON IA 3/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 3895/2015XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA SRIRAM KRISHNA[P-1]

VersusPIA SINGH S. S. SHROFF[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR [directions] ON IA 4/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 4562/2015XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA SANTOSH KRISHNAN

VersusKAMESHWAR SWARUP DIVYAM AGARWAL{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 4400/2015XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA SRIRAM KRISHNA[P-1]

VersusT.C. GOYAL S. S. SHROFF[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 4826/2015XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA SRIRAM KRISHNA[P-1]

VersusRAMESH SANKA S. S. SHROFF[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }

151 C.A. No. 11268/2016XVI

STOCK HOLDING CORPORATION OFINDIA LTD. MOHINDER JIT SINGH

VersusINDUSIND BANK LTD. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.[CAVEAT]

152 C.A. No.3022-3023/2019XII

LAKSHMI P. V. YOGESWARAN

VersusKASIAMMAL (D) THROUGH LRS.N.SURIYA DEEPAN S. RAJAPPA

153 C.A. No. 11806/2018XIV-A

M/S. MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]VersusKANTA MEHTA AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 11807/2018XIV-A

M/S. MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]

VersusEINO S. MEHTA AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

154 C.A. No.14970-14971/2017XVI-A

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE KATRA ANDORS. M. SHOEB ALAM[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

ASHWANI KUMAR SUNIL FERNANDES[R-1], SAKSHIKAKKAR[R-1]

155 C.A. No. 3672/2017XIV-A

SANJEEV KUMAR RAMPAL AND ORS. FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], DEEPAKGOEL[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], NEERAJSHEKHAR[R-7], [R-8]

156 C.A. No. 2978/2016XV

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OFINDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusM/S. PERFECT THREAD MILLS LTD. .MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR. D. K. DEVESH[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10573/2019XV

M/S MAHIMA MINES AND MINERALSPVT. LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR K. PAARI VENDHAN

VersusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA AND ANR. M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FORConnectedC.A. No.2004-2005/2019XV

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OFINDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusM/S. ARIHANT TILES AND MARBLESPVT. LTD. K. PAARI VENDHAN[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2003/2019XV

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OFINDIA AND ANR. M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusM/S. JAIN GRANI MARMO PVT. LTD. K. PAARI VENDHAN[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.2825/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.11821-11823/2019XV

M/S ARIHANT TILES AND MARBLESPVT. LTD. K. PAARI VENDHAN

VersusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA AND ANR. M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11144/2019XV

M/S JAIN GRANI MARMO PVT. LTD. K. PAARI VENDHAN

VersusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA AND ANR. M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FORConnectedC.A. No.2001-2002/2019XV

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OFINDIA AND ANR. M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusM/S. MAHIMA MINES AND MINERALSPVT. LTD. K. PAARI VENDHAN[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.1633/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

157 C.A. No. 4390/2016XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), HYDERABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusC. SWAPNA A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7328/2016XII-A

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL LABOUR COURTCOMMISSIONER

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusG VENKATA LAKSHMI A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 10452/2016XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) HYDERABAD. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusC. SWAPNA A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 1512/2018XII-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) HYDERABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusG. SANJAY CHOWDHARY A. SUBBA RAO

158 C.A. No. 7326/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 1 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

ANSAL LANDMARK TOWNSHIP (P) LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1], K. V.MOHAN[R-1][IMPL]

FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 30250/2017 FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT]ON IA 30251/2017 FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 30253/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 7998/2019XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

CAPARO INDIA LTD. PUNEET SINGHBINDRA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8005/2019XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NOIDA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGYPARTK LTD.IA No.152673/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.152675/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 214-216/2020XI-A

THOMAS MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM , KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 217-218/2020XI-A

THOMAS GEORGE MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM, KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 219-221/2020XI-A

THOMAS JOHN MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM, KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 222-223/2020XI-A

M/S. HAMEED & CO. ENGINEERS PVT.LTD. PRAKASH RANJAN NAYAK[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 224/2020XI-A

THOMAS JOHN MUTHOOT K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOTTAYAM, KERALA ANIL KATIYAR

159 Crl.A. No.1742-1743/2017II

INDRAJIT MALLAH KRISHNA PAL SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SPECIAL SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESHFOR ON IA 16298-99/2016-Application for juvenilety

160 Crl.A. No. 1500/2017II-C

RAVI YADU B. RAMANA MURTHY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }

161 C.A. No. 6419/2017III

SANJAY KUMAR RAI G. BALAJIVersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOMEAFFAIRS THE SECRETARY AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

162 C.A. No.7953-7954/2019XIV-A

GOPAL KRISHNA KAPOOR AND ORS. BINA GUPTA

VersusR.S. CHHABRA . AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL[I. A. No. 111030/2017 FOR VACATING STAY IS TO BE LISTED ALONG WITHAPPEALS AS PER ORDER DATED 26.02.2021]

ConnectedC.A. No.7955-7956/2019XIV-A

SHRI GOPAL KRISHNA KAPOOR ANDORS. BINA GUPTA

VersusR.S. CHHABRA AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL

163 C.A. No. 4585/2018XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersus

PROBIR GHOSH AND ORS.

DIKSHA RAI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-11], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17],[R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-22], [R-23], [R-24],[R-26]D. BHARATHI REDDY[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.30408-30409/2019XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Versus

VINOD BHANDKOLIYA MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 191684/2019

ConnectedC.A. No.4586-4587/2018XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Versus

BITUPAN RABA AVIJIT ROY[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA134331/2017

164 C.A. No. 6838/2017XVII

EX. JWO VISHNU DEO TIWARI TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

FOR ON IA 1/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON ON IA2/2017

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3

165 C.A. No. 10258/2017III-A

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD ANDORS. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusYASH PAL SINGH AND ORS. GORKELA LAW OFFICE[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7406/2018III-A

U. P. POWER CORPORATION LIMITEDAND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA

VersusSHIV RANSHU CHHUNEJA AND ORS. HIMANSHU BHUSHAN[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.25680-25681/2018XI

SHIV RANSHU CHHUNEJA HIMANSHU BHUSHAN

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 721-722/2021III-A

DAKSHINANCHAL VIDYUT VITRANNIGAM LTD. AND ANR. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusBHEEM SEN AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.23331/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.23334/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

166 Crl.A. No. 1394/2017II

GOVERDHAN PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

167 C.A. No. 21769/2017III

MAHARASHTRA HEAVY VEHICLES ANDINTERSTATE CONTAINER OPERATORSASSOCIATION AND ANR.

KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN[CAVEAT], P. N.PURI[R-1]

168 Crl.A. No.1964-1968/2017II-A

RAM VILAS PASWAN JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], PRANABPRAKASH[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], HARSHPARASHAR[R-6]

169 C.A. No. 1614/2018XII-A

ANDHRA BANK THROUGH ITSAUTHORISED OFFICER AMAN GUPTA

VersusK. V. KRISHNA REDDY ANJANI AIYAGARI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1615/2018XII-A

NALLAMILLI BHEEMESWARA REDDY ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusK.V. KRISHNA REDDY AND ORS. ANJANI AIYAGARI[CAVEAT], [R-1]

170 Crl.A. No. 244/2018II-A

BALAJI GANPAT GIDDE JAIKRITI S. JADEJAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 669/2018II-A

HANMANT GANPAT GIDDE JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[INT]FOR FOR [I/A FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS] ON IA89011/2018 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION ON IA17675/2019

171 Crl.A. No. 326/2019II-B

ANRABHAI @ ANDU DEVLABHAIRATHAVA KAMAKSHI S. MEHLWAL[P-1][SCLSC]

Versus

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

COURT NO. : 3THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

172 C.A. No. 2702/2019III

MAHESH C MATHUR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR[P-1]VersusROHINTON ERUCH SHROFF AND ORS. K J JOHN AND CO[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

173 C.A. No. 98/2019XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.2934-2935/2019XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

RAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD

ConnectedDiary No. 13648-2019XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA69181/2019 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 69182/2019

NEW DELHI12-03-2021 14:00:09

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR