39
SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007 www.pbis.org [email protected]

SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007 [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up

George Sugai

OSEP Center on PBIS

University of ConnecticutOctober 18, 2007

www.pbis.org

[email protected]

Page 2: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

pbis.org

Page 3: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu
Page 4: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Norwell, MA

Page 5: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Agenda

• Welcome

• Team Reports

• Booster & Review Topics

• Team Action Planning

Page 6: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Big Goals of SWPBS• Improve general classroom & school climate

& community relations

• Decrease dependence on reactive disciplinary practices

• Maximize impact of instruction to affect academic achievement

• Improve behavioral supports for students with emotional & behavioral challenges

• Improve efficiency of behavior related initiatives

Page 7: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SWPBS & Achievement

Good Teaching Behavior Management

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

Increasing District & State Competency &Capacity

Investing in Outcomes, Data, Practices, &Systems

Page 8: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Agreements

Team

Data-based Action Plan

ImplementationEvaluation

GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION

PROCESS: “Getting Started”

Page 9: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

YEAR 2+ OUTCOME OBJECTIVES

• Full implementation of– Primary Intervention Tier, including SW,

nonclassroom & classroom settings

– Discipline data collection & decision making procedures, including monthly & quarterly data summaries

• Integration of behavior initiatives

• Team for developing behavior capacity at Secondary/Tertiary Intervention Tiers

Page 10: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Development “Map”

• 2+ years of team training (3x/year)

• Annual “booster” events

• Coaching/facilitator support @ school & district levels

• Regular self-assessment & evaluation data

• Development of district leadership team

• State/region & Center on PBIS for coordination & TA

Page 11: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Role of “Coaching”

• Liaison between school teams & PBS leadership team

• Local facilitation of process

• Local resource for data-based decision making

Page 12: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Leadership Team

Active Coordination

Funding Visibility PoliticalSupport

Training Coaching Evaluation

Local School Teams/Demonstrations

PBS Systems Implementation Logic

Page 13: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

RtI: Defining Features

Page 14: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

2001 Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence: Recommendations

• Change social context to break up antisocial networks

• Improve parent effectiveness

• Increase academic success

• Create positive school climates

• Teach & encourage individual social skills & competence

Page 15: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

School-based Prevention & Youth Development Programming

Coordinated Social Emotional & Academic Learning Greenberg et al. (2003) American Psychologist

• Teach children social skills directly in real context

• “Foster respectful, supportive relations among students, school staff, & parents”

• Support & reinforce positive academic & social behavior through comprehensive systems

• Invest in multiyear, multicomponent programs

• Combine classroom & school- & community-wide efforts

• Precorrect & continue prevention efforts

Page 16: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Lessons Learned: White House Conference on School Safety

• Students, staff, & community must have means of communicating that is immediate, safe, & reliable

• Positive, respectful, predictable, & trusting student-teacher-family relationships are important

• High rates of academic & social success are important

• Positive, respectful, predictable, & trusting school environment/climate is important for all students

• Metal detectors, surveillance cameras, & security guards are insufficient deterrents

Page 17: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Characteristics of Safe School Center for Study & Prevention of Youth Violence

• High academic expectations & performance

• High levels of parental & community involvement

• Effective leadership by administrators & teachers

• A few clearly understood & uniformly enforced, rules

• Social skills instruction, character education & good citizenship.

• After school – extended day programs

Page 18: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SW-PBS Logic!Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable(Zins & Ponti, 1990)

Page 19: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

2 Worries & Ineffective Responses to Problem

Behavior

• Get Tough (practices)

• Train-&-Hope (systems)

Page 20: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATASupportingStaff Behavior

SupportingStudent Behavior

OUTCOMES

Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement

SupportingDecisionMaking

4 PBS Elements

Page 21: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATA

OUTCOMES

DATA

• Clear definitions

• Efficient procedures

• Easy input/output

• Readable displays

• Regular review

Page 22: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Do we need to tweak our action plan?

• How often?

• Who?

• What?

• Where?

• When?

• How much?

If problem,

• Which students/staff?

• What system?

• What intervention?

• What outcome?

+ If many students are making same mistake, consider changing system….not students+ Start by teaching, monitoring & rewarding…before increasing punishment

Page 23: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATA

OUTCOMES

OUTCOMES

• Data-based

• Relevant/valued

• Measurable

Page 24: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATA

OUTCOMES

PRACTICES

• Evidence-based

• Outcome linked

• Cultural/contextual adjustments

• Integrated w/ similar initiatives

• Doable

Page 25: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Nonclass

room

Setting S

ystems

ClassroomSetting Systems

Individual Student

Systems

School-wideSystems

School-wide PositiveBehavior Support

Systems

Page 26: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged

• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged

• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction

• Active supervision• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors• Effective academic instruction & curriculum

ClassroomSetting Systems

Page 27: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

• Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged

• Active supervision by all staff– Scan, move, interact

• Precorrections & reminders

• Positive reinforcement

NonclassroomSetting Systems

Page 28: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

• Behavioral competence at school & district levels

• Function-based behavior support planning

• Team- & data-based decision making

• Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes

• Targeted social skills & self-management instruction

• Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations

Individual StudentSystems

Page 29: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

1.Common purpose & approach to discipline

2.Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors

3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior

4.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior

5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior

6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation

School-wide Systems

Page 30: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SYSTEMS

• Training to fluency

• Continuous evaluation

• Team-based action planning

• Regular relevant reinforcers for staff behavior

• Integrated initiativesSY

STEM

S

PRACTICES

DATA

OUTCOMES

Page 31: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Initiative, Project,

Committee

Purpose Outcome Target Group

Staff Involved

SIP/SID/etc

Attendance Committee

Character Education

Safety Committee

School Spirit Committee

Discipline Committee

DARE Committee

EBS Work Group

Working Smarter

Page 32: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Initiative, Committee

Purpose Outcome Target Group

Staff Involved

SIP/SID

Attendance Committee

Increase attendance

Increase % of students attending daily

All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee

Goal #2

Character Education

Improve character

Improve character All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen

Goal #3

Safety Committee

Improve safety Predictable response to threat/crisis

Dangerous students

Has not met Goal #3

School Spirit Committee

Enhance school spirit

Improve morale All students Has not met

Discipline Committee

Improve behavior

Decrease office referrals

Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders

Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis

Goal #3

DARE Committee

Prevent drug use High/at-risk drug users

Don

EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model

Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades

All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma

Goal #2

Goal #3

Sample Teaming Matrix

Page 33: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Primary Prevention:School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for

All Students,Staff, & Settings

Secondary Prevention:Specialized Group

Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior

Tertiary Prevention:Specialized

IndividualizedSystems for Students

with High-Risk Behavior

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

CONTINUUM OFSCHOOL-WIDE

INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR

SUPPORT

Page 34: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

Academic Systems Behavioral Systems

1-5% 1-5%

5-10% 5-10%

80-90% 80-90%

Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•High Intensity

Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•Intense, durable procedures

Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response

Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response

Universal Interventions•All students•Preventive, proactive

Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive

Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

Page 35: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

CONTINUUM SWPBS

Tertiary Prevention• Function-based support• • • •

Secondary Prevention• Check in/out• • • •

Primary Prevention• SWPBS• • • •

ACTIVITY

1.Identify existing efforts by tier

2.Specify outcome for each effort

3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness

4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes

5.Establish RtI rules

Page 36: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SW Outcomes - Examples

• Annual calendar for

– Teaching/boosters for SW expectations

– Team meetings

– Reviewing your data

• >80% of staff actively/daily acknowledging kids who display SW expectations

Page 37: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

• 80% of your students give behavior examples of SW expectation for specific setting

• Data system

– Triangle

– Modified action plan based on your SET reports

• Representative team membership

Page 38: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

• Staff members actively supervising across all school settings

• Integrated behavior initiatives

• >80% of students receive at least one positive acknowledgement daily

Page 39: SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007  George.sugai@uconn.edu

SETTING

All Settings

Hallways Playgrounds CafeteriaLibrary/Computer Lab

Assembly Bus

Respect Ourselves

Be on task.Give

your best effort.

Be prepared

.

Walk. Have a plan.

Eat all your food.

Select healthy foods.

Study, read,

compute.

Sit in one spot.

Watch for your stop.

Respect Others

Be kind.Hands/feet to self.Help/share with

others.

Use normal voice

volume.Walk to right.

Play safe.Include others.Share

equipment.

Practice good table

manners

Whisper.

Return books.

Listen/watch.Use

appropriate applause.

Use a quiet voice.Stay in

your seat.

Respect Property

Recycle.Clean up after self.

Pick up litter.

Maintain physical space.

Use equipment properly.

Put litter in garbage can.

Replace trays & utensils.Clean up

eating area.

Push in chairs.Treat books

carefully.

Pick up.Treat chairs appropriatel

y.

Wipe your feet.Sit

appropriately.

FRMS Total Office Discipline ReferralsSustained Impact

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06

Academic Years

Tota

l ODR

s

[email protected]

[email protected]

www.pbis.org