Upload
hanhi
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SYNDROMES under CLIMATE CHANGE
Matthias K. B. Lüdeke and the Syndrome GroupSYNDICATE
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
The Syndrome approach
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedeke
• Task: identify relevant problems of Global Environmental Change (GEC, including Climate Change) and provide policy recommendations for the German Government to mitigate them
• GEC is understood as part of Global Change (GC) –high complexity
• Reduction: typical patterns of problematic environmental changes and their drivers (Syndromes) as units of investigation
• Intermediate functional resolution
Symptoms: Elements of GC
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedeke
BIOSPHÄRE ATMOSPHÄRE PEDOSPHÄRE
HYDROSPHÄRE WIRTSCHAFTBEVÖLKERUNG
PSYCHOSOZIALE SPHÄRE TECHNIK / WISSENSCHAFTGESELLSCHAFT. ORGANISATION
Automatisierung,Mechanisierung
MedizinischerFortschritt
Fortschritt in der Informationstechnologie
Verbesserung destechnischen Umweltschutzes
Entwicklung regenerativerEnergie und Rohstoffe
Entwicklung neuer Werkstoffe,stoffliche Substitution
Verstärkung desnationalen Umweltschutzes
Bedeutungszunahmeder NRO
DemokratisierungSoziale und ökonomischeAusgrenzung
Zunahme ethnischerund nationaler Konflikte
Institutionalisierungvon Sozialleistungen
Wissens- undTechnologietransferZunahme der internationalen
Abkommen und Institutionen
Sensibilisierung fürglobale Probleme
Ausbreitung westlicherKonsum- und Lebensstile
Anspruchssteigerung
Emanzipation der FrauIndividualisierung
WachsendesUmweltbewußtsein
Bevölkerungswachstum
Zunehmende Gesundheitsschädendurch Umweltbelastung
Urbanisierung
Erhöhung derMobilitätsbereitschaft
Landflucht
Zersiedelung
Internationale Migration
ZunehmenderTourismus
Tertiärisierung
Globalisierungder Märkte
InternationaleVerschuldung
Konversionnatürlicher ÖkosystemeFragmentierung
natürlicher Ökosysteme
Zunahme anthropogenerArtenverschleppung
Resistenzbildung
Schädigung von Ökosystem-struktur und-funktion
Verlust vonbiosphärischen Senken
Verstärkung vonbiosphärischen Quellen
Stoffliche Überlastungnatürlicher Ökosysteme
Zunehmende Übernutzungbiologischer Ressourcen
Gen- und Artenverluste
Meeresspiegelanstieg
Veränderung desGrundwasserspiegels
VerstärkterTreibhauseffekt
Troposphären-verschmutzung
Reduktionstratosphärischen Ozons
Zunehmende lokaleLuftverschmutzung
Änderung ozeanischerStrömungen
Veränderung derEiskappen und Gletscher
Süßwasserverknappung
Globaler und regionalerKlimawandel
Zunahme der internat. sozialenund ökonomischen Disparitäten
Intensivierung der
Ausbreitung derGeldwirtschaft
Zunahme umweltverträglicherWirtschaftsweisen
ZunehmenderProtektionismus
Fortschritt in der Bio- und Gentechnologie
Ausbau derVerkehrswege
WachsendesVerkersaufkommen
Rückgang dertraditionellen Landwirtschaft
Zentralisung Wirtschafts-politischer Strategien
Aufbau technischerGroßprojekte
Zunehmende Deposition undAkkumulation von Abfällen
VerdichtungVersauerung.Kontamination
Fertilitätsverlust(Humus, Nährstoffe)
Erosion,morhologische Änderungen
Versiegelung
Versalzung,Alkalisierung
Überdüngung
ZunehmendesPartizipationsinteresse
Rückgang traditionellergesellschaftlicher Strukturen
Intensivierung von Ausbildungund Qualifikation
Zunahme der strukturellenArbeitslosigkeit
Industrialisierung
Steigerung derRessourcenproduktivität
Steigerung derArbeitsproduktivität
Steigerung derKapitalintensität
Zunahme derWelthandelsströme
WachsendesTechnologierisiko
Zunahme fundamen-talistischer Strömungen
Steigerung derNahrungsmittelproduktion
Veränderung der Wasserqualität(Patogene, Nährstoffe, Toxine)
Veränderung derlokalen Wasserbilanz
Ausweitung landwirtschaftlichgenutzter Flächen
Zunehmender Verbrauch vonEnergie und Rohstoffen
Veränderte Frachten vonpartikulären & gelösten Stoffen
Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft
Symptomsammlung zum Globalen Wandel
Stand: 1999
Politikversagen
Environmental degradation by rural-poverty driven overexploitationof marginal sites
Vicious Circle: Impoverishment → Extension of Agriculture → Soildegradation → Reduction of Yield → Impoverishment
Patterns by Inspection
Originally postulated Syndromes (WBGU, 1997; Schellnhuber et al., 1997):
Local contamination of environmental assets at industrial locationsContaminatedContaminated Land SyndromeLand Syndrome
Degradation through disposal of wasteWaste Dumping SyndromeWaste Dumping Syndrome
Utilization Syndromes
Degradation through large-scale diffusion of long-living substancesSmokestackSmokestack SyndromeSyndrome
Sink Syndromes
Singular anthropogenic environmental disasters with long-term impactsDisasterDisaster SyndromeSyndrome
Destruction of landscape through planned expansion of urban infrastructures
Urban Urban SprawlSprawl SyndromeSyndrome
Socio-ecological degradation through uncontrolled urban growthFavelaFavela SyndromeSyndrome
Disregard of environmental standards in the course of rapid economicdevelopment
AsianAsian Tiger SyndromeTiger Syndrome
Degradation through the transfer and introduction of inappropriate farmingmethods
Green Revolution SyndromeGreen Revolution Syndrome
Damage of landscape as a result of large-scale projectsAral Aral SeaSea SyndromeSyndrome
Development Syndromes
Environmental destruction through war and military actionScorchedScorched Earth SyndromeEarth Syndrome
Development and destruction of nature for recreational endsMassMass TourismTourism SyndromeSyndrome
Degradation through depletion of non-renewable resourcesKatangaKatanga SyndromeSyndrome
Non-sustainable agro-industrial use of soils and water bodiesDustDust BowlBowl SyndromeSyndrome
Degradation through the abondonment of traditional agricultural practicesRuralRural Exodus SyndromeExodus Syndrome
Overexploitation of natural ecosystemsOverexploitationOverexploitation SyndromeSyndrome
Overuse of marginal landSahel SyndromeSahel Syndrome
Spatial distribution of 7 (of 16) Syndromes (1990s, about 60 indicators)
Lüdeke et al., GAIA 13 (2004) no. 1 www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedeke
Syndrome diagnosis
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedeke
How persistent is the Syndrome identification by „inspection“against changes of the expert group?
• Comparison of WBGU/PIK list of syndromes and theGEO_4/UNEP list of vulnerability archetypes
GEO_4/Chapter 8 authors:
Dhari Naser Al-Ajmi; Geoffrey Dabelko; Thierry de Oliveira; Indra De Soysa; Richard Filcak; Des Gasper; Silvia Giada; Henk Hilderink; Jill Jäger; Sylvia Karlsson; Marcel Kok; Liza Koshy; Matthias Lüdeke(Gerhard Petschel-Held); Marybeth Long Martello; Jennifer Mohamed-Katerere; Vikrom Mathur; Ana Rosa Moreno; Annet Nakyeyune; Vishal Narain; Alvaro Ponce; Sophie Strasser; Frank Thomalla; Steven Wonink.
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedeke
11 Archetypes of vulnerability Short Description Common Pool Resources Vulnerabilities that result from the over-use of Common Pool Resources (CPRs),
which happens because CPRs are difficult to protect and susceptible for overuse that diminishes resource availability for all users
Contaminated sites - Legacies of the past Potentially harmful situations that are not eliminated and where especially the poorer sections of society are vulnerable to the negative consequences of this situation.
Desertification in Drylands The vulnerability of rural populations who depend directly on the land and natural resources for their livelihoods to environmental and social change within dryland areas.
Exporting vulnerability The consequences of increasing global consumption and its harmful effects on natural systems that makes it harder for the poorest on the planet to meet their basic needs.
Global markets, local opportunities Export-crop driven land use change undermining the livelihood of ecosystem dependent communities, without sufficient alternatives for them to overcome the loss of livelihood base and little sharing of the benefits from the resource exploitation.
(Post) Conflict induced Vulnerability The vulnerabilities to human well-being presented in the post-conflict period. The breakdown of infrastructure, social order, and the rule of law in many post-conflict settings increases the vulnerability of human-environment systems.
Resource Paradox Availability of easy money for governments from resource rents drives unsustainable use of resources without commensurate welfare gains for society. Resource wealthy states tend to generate human vulnerability and ill-being through the perpetuation of poverty and bad governance
Small Island Developing States (SIDS) Vulnerability of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to climate change impacts in a broader context in which a suite of geographic, economic and social factors interplay to create disproportionate vulnerabilities for all SIDS.
Technological fixes of water problems Vulnerability induced by the bad management or failure of centrally planned, large-scale projects (like dams) involving deliberate reshaping of the natural environment. Ambivalence: providing additional resources but having severe impacts on the environment and society.
Urbanisation of the coastal fringe: balancing environmental risks and economic opportunities
Rapid coastal urbanisation in the context of increasing vulnerabilities to climate and weather-related hazards and climate change in coastal areas that are often ecologically sensitive.
Vulnerability of Energy Production and Consumption systems in Industrialised countries: the next energy crises?
The ability (or lack thereof) of the energy production and consumption systems in industrialised countries to fulfil (increasing) energy demand in a changing context of security of energy supply, liberalisation and privatisation of the sector, impacts of climate change and requirements to contribute to mitigation.
0-Draft Chapter8/GEO_4
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedeke
Waste Dumping ∪ Contaminated Land
=Contaminated sites – legacies of the past
Dust Bowl Syndrome⊂Global markets, local opportunities
Overexploitation Syndrome⊃Common pool resources
Sahel Syndrome⊂Desertification in drylands
Favela ∪ Urban Sprawl ⊂Urbanization of the coastal fringe
Aral Sea Syndrome=Technological fixes of water problems
Scorched Earth Syndrome=(Post)-conflict induced vulnerability
Syndrome, WBGU/PIKRelationVulnerability Archetype, GEO_4
Despite different groups and 10 years distance, 7/11 Archetypes can be found alomost exactly in thesyndrome list:
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedeke
Differences occur for the following archetypes (4/11)
due to actual events:• Vulnerability of Energy Production and Consumption Systems in
Industrialised countries: the next energy crises?
due to a stronger development country perspective:• Small Island Developing States
due to a stronger equity oriented perspective:• Exporting Vulnerability
due to a more economistic perspective:• Resource Paradox
Mapping of Syndromes on Climate Change
Petschel-Held et al. in: Goals and Economic Instruments for the Achievement of Global Warming Mitigation in Europe, Eds. Hacker/Pelchen, Kluwer 1999
Sahel-Syndrome: a problem – even without climate change! Regions, generally vulnerable towards the mechanism:
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedekeLüdeke et al., Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4 (1999)
Regions, presently vulnerable towards the Sahel-Syndrome mechanism
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedekeLüdeke et al., Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4 (1999)
www.pik-potsdam.de/∼luedekeLüdeke et al., Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4 (1999)Moldenhauer et al., ClimRes 21 (2002)
Regions, where a presently low disposition is very sensitive against CC
Objectives and short history of the Syndrome approach