Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use ?
Dominique Hanssens, UCLANatalie Mizik, University of Washington
MSI Webinar
May 23, 2018
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
The 2018-2020 MSI Research Priorities
Cultivating the Customer Asset
The Evolving Landscape of Martech and Advertising
The Rise of Omnichannel Promotion and Distribution
Capturing Information to Fuel Growth
Organizing for Marketing Agility
Which research tools come to the rescue ?
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
OVERVIEW OF PRIORITIES
1. CULTIVATING THE CUSTOMER ASSET
1.1. Characterizing the Customer Journey Along the Purchase Funnel and Strategies to
Influence the Journey.
1.2 The Customer Technology Interface
1.3. Macro Trends Influencing Consumer Decision Making
2. THE EVOLVING LANDSCAPE OF MARTECH AND ADVERTISING.
2.1. Defining the Communication Message
2.2. Optimizing Media Strategy
2.3. Setting the Advertising Budget
2.4. Measuring Media Efficacy
3. THE RISE OF OMNICHANNEL PROMOTION AND DISTRIBUTION
3.1. Managing Promotion Across Channels
3.2. Managing Distribution and Demand Across Channels
3.3. Channel Structure
4. CAPTURING INFORMATION TO FUEL GROWTH
4.1. Painting a 360 degree/Holistic View of the Customer
4.2. What Key Performance Indices (KPI’s)/Metrics Should Be Measured and How?
4.3. Assessing Causality
4.4. Approaches to Ingesting and Analyzing Data to Drive Marketing Insights
5. ORGANIZING FOR MARKETING AGILITY
5.1. Internal Organization
5.2. External Organization
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Marketing Science has developed a number of practical implementable research tools
https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/handbook-of-marketing-analytics© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
64 authors contributed to the Handbook
Angela Y. Lee • Alice M. Tybout • Anja Lambrecht • Catherine Tucker • Olivier Toubia •
Marnik G. Dekimpe • Dominique M. Hanssens • Natalie Mizik • Eugene Pavlov •
Peter E. Rossi • John Roberts • Denzil G. Fiebig • Greg M. Allenby • Pradeep K. Chintagunta •
Dawn Iacobucci • Daria Dzyabura • Hema Yoganarasimhan • Asim Ansari • Yang Li •
Donald R. Lehmann • Murali K. Mantrala • Vamsi K. Kanuri • Vithala R. Rao • Koen Pauwels •
Robert Jacobson • Jorge Silva-Risso • Deirdre Borrego • Irina Ionova • Daniel M. Ringel •
Bernd Skiera • Michael Trusov • Liye Ma • Marc Fischer • Sönke Albers • Klaus Wertenbroch •
Zoë Chance • Ravi Dhar • Michelle Hatzis • Michiel Bakker • Kim Huskey • Lydia Ash •
Noah J. Goldstein • Ashley N. Angulo • Avi Goldfarb • Keiko I. Powers • Paulo Albuquerque •
Bart J. Bronnenberg • Rebecca Kirk Fair • Laura O’Laughlin • Joel H. Steckel •
T. Christopher Borek • Anjali Oza • Alan G. White • Rene Befurt • Sean Iyer •
Michael Akemann • Rebecca Reed-Arthurs • J. Douglas Zona • John R. Howell • Rahul Guha •
Darius Onul • Sally Woodhouse • Vildan Altuglu • Rainer Schwabe© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
I. Experimental Designs 1. Laboratory experiments (Angela Y. Lee & Alice M. Tybout)
2. Field Experiments (Anja Lambrecht & Catherine Tucker)
3. Conjoint analysis (Olivier Toubia)
Applications:
• Mktg: Industry applications (Chapter 15)
• Policy: Consumer (mis)behavior and public policy intervention (Chapter 22)
• Policy: Nudging healthy choices (Chapter 23)
• Policy: Promoting environmentally friendly consumer behavior (Chapter 24)
• Policy: Regulation in Online Advertising Markets (Chapter 25)
• Litigation: Avoiding bias in surveys (Chapter 28)
• Litigation: Experiments in litigation (Chapter 29)
• Litigation: Conjoint analysis in litigation (Chapter 30)
• Litigation: Conjoint applications in antitrust (Chapter 31)
• Litigation: Feature valuation using equilibrium conjoint analysis (Chapter 32)© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
II. Classical Econometrics
4. Time-series models (Marnik G. Dekimpe & Dominique M. Hanssens)
5. Panel data models (Natalie Mizik & Eugene Pavlov)
6. Causality and Endogeneity (Peter E. Rossi)
Applications:
Mktg: Online and offline funnel progression (Chapter 16)
Mktg: Effectiveness of direct-to-physician pharmaceutical marketing (Chapter 17)
Policy: Narcotics use and property crime (Chapter 26)
Litigation: Evaluating harm in a breach of contract (Chapter 33)
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
III. Discrete Choice Modeling
7. Choice models (John Roberts & Denzil G. Fiebig)
8. Bayesian econometrics (Greg M. Allenby & Peter E. Rossi)
9. Structural Models (Pradeep K. Chintagunta)
Applications
Mktg: Automakers’ pricing and promotion planning (Chapter 18)
Policy: Impact of the “Cash for Clunkers” policy (Chapter 27)
Litigation: Feature valuation using equilibrium conjoint analysis (Chapter 32)
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
IV. Latent Structure Analysis V. Machine Learning and Big Data
10. Latent structure analysis (Dawn Iacobucci)
11. Machine Learning (Daria Dzyabura & Hema Yoganarasimhan)
12. Big Data (Asim Ansari & Yang Li)
Applications
Mktg: Visualizing competitive market structure (Chapter 19)
Mktg: User profiling in display advertising (Chapter 20)
Policy: …
Litigation: Avoiding bias in surveys (Chapter 28)
Litigation: Surveys in trademark infringement (Chapter 34)
Litigation: Surveys to evaluate a claim (Chapter 35)
Litigation: Machine Learning in litigation (Chapter 36)© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
VI. Generalizations and Optimizations
13. Meta-Analysis (Donald R. Lehmann)
14. Optimization (Murali K. Mantrala & Vamsi K. Kanuri)
Applications
• Mktg: Generalizations in eight marketing areas (Chapter 13)
• Mktg: Online and offline funnel progression (Chapter 16)
• Mktg: Optimization for marketing budget allocation at Bayer (Chapter 21)
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Key challenge: connecting the marketing questions with the right data and methods• Data sources: primary or secondary• Which data would you need for
• RP 1.3. Macro Trends Influencing Consumer Decision Making ?• RP 2.3. Setting the Advertising Budget ?• RP 4.1. Painting a 360 degree/Holistic View of the Customer ?
• We pick two scenarios to illustrate • Assessing causality (RP 4.3)
and• Defining the communication message (RP 2.1)• Optimizing Media Strategy (RP 2.2)• Capturing Information to Fuel Growth: Approaches to Ingesting and Analyzing Data
to Drive Marketing Insights (RP 4.4)
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Scenario 1: Assessing causality
• Why important ? Because at its core, many marketing decisions involve counterfactual reasoning
• “What if customer X had NOT been exposed to our ad ?”
• “What if the economy hadn’t tanked just as we were introducing our new product?”
• Case study: the (non-)impact of changing ad agencies
• Two different approaches : experiments (A/B testing) and models on historical data
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Assessing causality from experiments
• Field experiments vs. lab experiments
• Key advantages: • randomization of treatment • easily understood results communication • easier to implement in the digital world
• Limitations and challenges • Full response function is not revealed • Which marketing activities are experimented on? • Is anyone building a master database of results ?
• A “culture of experimentation” needs to be developed
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Assessing causality from models on historical data
• On time-series data, cross-sectional data, panel data
• Key advantages: • Can reveal the entire response function, across the marketing mix • Value increases as data quality and quantity improve • Lends itself to machine learning, AI
• Limitations and challenges • Selection bias, endogeneity • Results are not as easily communicated → choice of response metrics • Scepticism in executive ranks → prove prediction accuracy
• Towards a data-driven culture: a database is a set of answers, waiting for questions to be asked
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
The power of empirical generalizations
• When a model or an experiment is run, store the response results→develop meta-analyses of marketing impact
• Examples from marketing science: • Price elasticities average -2.6
• Advertising elasticities average 0.11
• We know conditions that either increase or decrease the effect in any given situation
• The meta-database becomes the quantitative repository of the firm’s collective marketing experiences
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Eugene Pavlov, Natalie Mizik
16
Increasing Consumer Engagement with
Firm-Generated Social Media Content:
The Role of Images and Words
Scenario 2: New Tools for Capturing Information to Drive Marketing Insights: Defining the Message and
Optimizing Media Strategy
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Motivation
• 90% of marketers would like to increase engagement with their content Stelzner’16
• 34% of 2016 annual marketing budgets earmarked for creating, producing, and publishing visual content, up from 26% in 2014, Koshy 2016
• 72% believed that Visual is more effective than Text-based mktg, Gujral 2015
17
Why imagery?
• Distinct brain areas are activated when processing text vs image, Khateb et al. (2002)
• Images are processed quicker and more automatically, Luna and Peracchio 2003
• Images are more effective in eliciting emotional processing, Hsee and Rottenstreich 2004; Lee, Amir, and Ariely 2009; Lieberman et al. 2002
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Previous literature: focus on Text
• High emotional activation helps to make NYT articles viral, Berger and Milkman (2012)
• Emotional ads with brand as an integral part of the ad increase both ad virality and sales, Akpinar and Berger (2017)
• Emotional text content, banter, humor, and philanthropy increases reach of ads on FB, Lee, Hosangar, and Nair (2017)
• Outrageousness of ad increases sharing, humor increases both sharing and persuasiveness, Tucker (2014)
• Other Text UGC-focused research: Reviews, Chevalier and Mayzlin 2006; Online chatter, Borah and Tellis 2016, Tirunillai and
Tellis 2014; Forums, Netzer et al. 2012; Blogs, Mayzlin and Yoganarasimhan 2012; Networks, Shriver et al. 2013; Corporate communications, A. Kumar et al. 2016
No research on Visual content • but industry reports suggest it is important
• Image increases retweets by 35%, Video by 28%
18© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
To understand the impact of Text vs. Imagery
1. Assess the value of Visual Rhetoric in social media
2. Examine effectiveness of persuasion of Text vs. Image• Resistance to persuasion: Friestad and Wright’s (1994)
persuasion knowledge model• Campbell and Kirmani’s (2000) tests of the persuasion
knowledge with busy targets
19© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
• Develop a tool to predict emotional loading of an image, and lab-validate• Dimensions: sentiment and arousal
• Setup a tool to predict emotional loading of text• Models developed in NLP and computer science
• Apply the two tools to empirical analysis of user engagement with twitter content created by 656 brands over 11 years• Use Double machine learning framework to check robustness
20© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Text of brand tweet
Visual of brand tweet
Outcome engagement metrics
Brands on Social Media
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Russell (1980) Model of Affect: 2-D Valence-Arousal map of emotions
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Want to place both Text and Image in this space
Tools for text exist.
Extracting emotional content from an image requires a dataset of images that are pre-labeled on Sentiment and Arousal dimensions by human subjects. No such pre-labeled dataset exists.
Solution: develop a model that links image features to emotions the image evokes.
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Computer Vision: Image Features
•Digital image = array of numbers•Standard image features (elements of design): (Shapiro and Stockman
2000, Szeliski 2010)
•8 features relevant to analysis of image aesthetics (Datta et al. 2006)
• Color• Texture• Shape• Lines, curves• Corners • Edges• Orientation• Size and aspect ratio
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Color features: HSB Hue, Saturation, Brightness
• Each pixel has a value of Hue, Saturation, Brightness
• Count pixels which have low,… medium,...,high amount (20 levels) of Hue to get a histogram of Hue• Repeat for Sat and Brightness
• 20 bins × 3 channels = 60 variables© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Other Features: edges, corners, lines, texture, orientation
• Number of edges, corners:
marks smoothness of textureLine orientation:horizontal/ vertical, 45/135-degree
Canny edge detector, Harris corner detector Variance of Sobel / Laplacian gradients© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Data source• Online community, large art display/social networking service since 2000
• 13th largest social network with 3.8 million weekly visits
• Categories include photography, digital art, traditional art, etc.
• 1.5 million comments and 140,000 art submissions daily
Two types of data on the website:1. Images provide visual features2. Text by users (image title, description, tags and comments) provides emotional labels
• Scrape digital images and mine labels for emotions• Use a dictionary of keywords: ANEW data.
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) Dictionary. The ANEW provides a set of normative emotional ratings for a large number of words in the English language.
FALSE
absurd
abundance
abuse
acceptance
accident
ace achievement
admired
adultadvantage
adventure
affection
afraid
aggressive
agreement
air
alert
alien alive
alone
ambition
angel
anger
angry
answer
anxious
applause
arm
army
aroused
art
assault
autumn
avenue
baby
bakebar
barrel
basket
bastard
bathbathroom
beach
beautiful
beauty
bed
bees
bench
bird
birthday
blackblind
blond
blue
board
body bold
bomb
book
bored
bottle
bowl
boy
brave
breast
breeze
bridebrightbroken
brother
building
bullet
burial
burn
bus
butter
cabinet
cancer
candy
cane
capable
car
cash
cell
cellar
cemetery
chair
champion
chance
chaos
charm
child
chin
christmas
church
circle
city
cliff
clock
clothing
clouds
coast
cold
color
column
comedy
comfort
computerconcentrate
confidentconfused
contempt
contents
controlling
cook
corner
corridorcottage
couple
cow
crash
crime
criminal
crisis
crown
crude
cruelcurious
custom
cut
damage
dancer
danger
darkdawn
daylight
dead
death
debt
defeated
delayeddelight
dentist
depresseddepression
desire
destroy
destruction
detacheddetail
devil
devoteddinner
dirt
dirty
disaster
discouraged
divorce
doctor dog
dollar
door
dream
dressearth
easy
eateducation
egg
elegant
elevator
employment
engaged
engine
enjoymentevent
evil
excellence
excitement
excuse
execution
exercise
fabric
facefailure
fall
fame
family
famous
fantasy
farm
fat
father
fault
favor
fear
fearful
feverfield
fight
finger
fire
fish
flag
flood
flower
foam
food
foot
fork
free
freedomfriend
friendly
fun
funeral
fur
game
garden
gentle
gift
girlglass
gloom
glory godgold
good
gossip
graduate
grass
grateful
green
grin
guilty
gun
habit
hand
handsome
happy
hard
hat
hate
hatred
hawk
hay
health
heart
heavenhellhelpless hide
highway
history
hit
holiday
home
honest
honey
honor
hope
hopeful
horror
horse
hospital
hostile
hotelhouse
humble
humor
hungry
hurt idea
identity
ignorance
illness
imagine
impressed
improveincentive
indifferent
industry
infant
injury
innocent
insane
insect
inspired
interest
intimate
iron
item
jail
joke
journal
joy
justice
key
kick
kids
killer
kind
king
kiss
knifeknowledge
lakelamp
lantern
laughter
lawn
leader
learn
legendletter
liberty
lie life
lightning
lion
lively
lonely
lost
loveloved
loyal
lucky
luxury
machine
mad
magical
man
manner
marketmaterial
medicine
melody
memories
memory
metal method
mighty
milk
mind
miracle
misery mistake
modestmoldmoment
money
month
moral
mother
mountain
movie
murderer
muscular
museum
music
naked
namenatural
nature
needle
neglect
nervous
news
nicenonsense
nude
nurse
nursery
ocean
oddoffice
opinion
optimism
orchestra
outstanding
pain
paint
palace
panic
paper
paradise
part
party
passage
passion
patent
patient
peace
penalty
pencil
peopleperfection
personphase
pie
pistol
pityplain
plane
plant
pleasure
poetry
poverty
power
powerful
prairie
present
pressureprestige
prettypride
priest
prison
privacy
profit
progress
promotion
protected
proud
punishmentpython
quality
quarrel
queen
quick
quiet
rabbit
radio
rage
rain
razor red
rejected
relaxed
rescue
reserved
respectrestaurant
reunion
revolver
reward
rifle
rigidriverrock
romantic
rough
sadsafe
saint
satisfiedsave
scared
scholar
scream
seatsecure
sentiment
serious
severe
sex
shadow ship
shy
sick
silk
sillysin
sky
slave
sleep
slow
smooth
snake
snow
social
soft
solemn
song
space
sphere
spirit
spray
spring
square
star
startled
statue
stiffstomach
storm
stove
street
stress
strong
stupid
success
sugarsuicide
sun
sunlight
sunset
surprised
suspicious
swift
table
talent
tank
taste
taxi
teacher
tender
tennis
tense
terrible
theorythought
thoughtful
timetobaccotomb
tool
tower
tragedy travel
treat
tree
triumph
trouble
troubled
truck
trust
truth
tumor
ugly
unhappy
unit
upset
useful
useless
vacation
vehicle
victim
victory
vigorous
village
violent
violin
virgin
virtuevision
voyage
wagon
war
warmth
waste watch
water
wealthyweapon
weary
wedding
white
wife
win
window
wine
wise
wish
witwoman
wonder
world
writeryellow
youngyouth
24
68
Aro
usal
, m
ean
=5.1
1, S
D=
1.05
2 4 6 8 10
Valence, mean= 5.14, SD=1.99
1 {positive V, high A} 2 {negative V, high A}
4 {positive V, low A} 3 {negative V, low A}
Data: Bradley & Lang 1999© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Classification results: Image Sentiment
Arousal
Sen
tim
ent
— +
Drivers of positive visual Sentiment:• Horizontal or 135-degrees orientation• Green, blue, orange• High brightness• Color variety• Less smooth texture
Drivers of negative visual Sentiment :• Vertical or 45-degrees orientation• Red• Presence of dominant color• Low brightness and/or saturation• Concentrated brightness and/or
saturation© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Classification results: Image Arousal
Drivers of HIGH visual arousal:• Vertical or 45 degree orientation• Many corners• Deep red, yellow, pink
Drivers of low visual arousal :• Blue• Black and white• Many edges• 135 degree orientation
Arousal
Sen
tim
ent
— +
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Emotional content of Text
Text Sentiment:• Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoning (VADER) optimized specifically for twitter posts, Hutto and
Gilbert 2014
[-] “Mesothelioma is a rare but fatal form of cancer that is often difficult to diagnose” vs.
[+] “Waffles make people happy. Like, really happy. Like, best way to start your day happy”
Text Arousal:• Usage of punctuation (!, ?) and upper-case, Barbosa & Feng 2010
• Usage of “call-to-action” verbs, Naveed et al. 2011
[High] “ITS NATIONAL CHOCOLATE DAY! DROP EVERYTHING AND EAT CHOCOLATE!“ vs.
[Low] “Beer at the end of a long day makes everything better.”
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Emotional Content of TextAnalyzed with VADER (2014) lexicon optimized for twitter
Emotional Content of Image images + video thumbs: analyzed with our model
Outcome engagement metric: Cumulative number of retweets
Brands on Social Media
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Promo keywords effect over time (𝛾𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟)
33© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Text sentiment/arousal effect over time (𝛽𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟)
• Consumers became significantly more resistant to persuasion through positive, high motivation-to-act text.
• Also became more resistant to text promo keywords which used to work
34© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Relative impact, text vs image
Text effects Image effects
35© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Industry heterogeneity
36Charity / nonprofit Quick-service restaurants Health and beauty© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.
Conclusions
• The marketing analytics discipline has developed a wide array of available research methods
• It is important to match the research method with the marketing question at hand
• Experimental (primary) and historical (secondary) methods have different strengths and weaknesses
• Either way, building a master database of results creates a new strategic asset for the firm
• New tools (machine learning, artificial intelligence) generate knowledge that could not have been developed before
© 2018 Dominique M. Hanssens and Natalie Mizik at MSI Webinar “Tackling the MSI Research Priorities: Which Methods to Use? on May 23, 2018. All rights are reserved.