Upload
griffin-hart
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLICIT AND
EXPLICIT CF ON THE ACQUISITION OF
JAPANESE PARTICLES Takehiro Iizuka
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK (CF) CF has significant and durable effects on
target language development (Lyster & Saito, 2010)
What type of CF benefits L2 acquisition??
PREVIOUS STUDIES Ellis, Loewen and Erlam (2006) Li (2010)
ELLIS ET AL. (2006)
Implicit CF in the
form of recast
Explicit CF in the
form of metalinguistic
explanation
Clear advantage of explicit CF over implicit CF for both the delayed oral imitation and grammaticality judgment posttests
LI (2010) - META-ANALYSIS
Explicit CF was more effective than implicit CF on the immediate and short-delayed posttests, but the opposite was true on the long-delayed posttests.
Implicit CF
Explicit CF
CONTRADICTION Ellis et al. (2006)
Explicit CF is better for developing implicit knowledge
Li (2010)
Implicit CF is better for developing implicit knowledge
TIMING OF POSTTESTImmediate posttests
Delayed posttests
Ellis et al. (2006
)
Li (2010
)
1 day
2 week
s
Immediate posttests
Short-term delayed posttests
Long-term delayed
posttestsless
than 7 days
8-29 days
30 days
or later
???
RESEARCH QUESTIONS1. Is implicit oral corrective feedback in
the form of recast more effective in the long run than explicit oral corrective feedback in the form of metalinguistic explanation for building up implicit knowledge of Japanese locative particles?
NATURE OF LEARNER PARTICIPATION
T
S
S
SS
S
S
SCF
AddresseeAuditors
IncidentalRecast
OHTA (2001) Incidental recasts are available to the
learner by attending to classroom interaction in the role of auditor or overhearer.
Auditors may have greater resources available in working memory than addressees, who may be occupied with formulating a response.
HOWEVER… “The target of corrective feedback is more
accurately understood by learners when the feedback is directed to them as opposed to their classmates” (Mackey, Al-Khalil, Atanassova, Hama, Logan-Terry & Nakatsukasa, 2007)
“(The participant) tended not to listen to the conversation when the interaction took place between the teacher and another student during teacher-fronted activity.” (Nabei & Swain, 2002)
RESEARCH QUESTIONS2. How much learning occurs to the
learners who directly received each type of feedback?
3. How much learning occurs to the learners who indirectly received each type of feedback?
VARIABLES OF THIS STUDY Type of CF: implicit (recast) vs. explicit
(metalinguistic explanation) Nature of learner participation:
addressee (those directly received CF) vs. auditor (those indirectly received CF)
PARTICIPANTS JFL students who enrolled in the second
semester beginning course at Texas Tech University (N = 15).
TARGET LINGUISTIC FEATURES Japanese locative particles: de and ni;
specifically…a) de: /place noun X/ + de + /predicate of activity Y/ e.g. Toshokan de hon o yomimashita. (I read a book at the library)
b) ni: /place noun X/ + ni + /predicate of motion Y/ e.g. Toshokan ni ikimashita. (I went to the library.)
c) ni: /place noun X/ + ni + /predicate of static, inactive location Y/ e.g. Makudonarudo wa ginkou no tonari ni arimasu. (McDonald’s is next to the bank.)
TREATMENT Picture Description Task
Metalinguistic Feedback Group (N = 8) vs.
Recast Group (N = 7)
35 minutes
METALINGUISTIC FEEDBACK Output-prompting
Output Hypothesis (Swain, 1985)
The increase of control of partially acquired forms
Prompts are more effective than recasts because they induce learners to self-
correct. (Lyster, 2004)
METALINGUISTIC CF EPISODE EXAMPLES13: Mearii-san wa gogo goji de.. goji ni
uchi de [incorrect form] kaerimasu. (Mary goes home at 5 p.m.)
T: Etto, kaeru wa movement desu. (Well, “go” is movement.)
S13: Uchi ni [correct form] kaerimashita. ((She) went home.)
RECAST Input-providing
Recasts free attention needed for processing the linguistic contrasts. (Ohta, 2001)
The learning of new forms
Negotiation involving recasts is especially facilitative of
acquisition because they provide learners with both negative and positive evidence. (Long, 2008)
RECAST CF EPISODE EXAMPLES6: Uchi de [incorrect form] kaerimashita.
((She) went home.) T: Hai, uchi ni kaerimashita. (Yes, (she) went home.)S6: Uchi ni [correct form] kaerimashita. ((She) went home.)
TREATMENT PROCEDURE
ASSESSMENT Timed Picture Description Test
(for implicit knowledge) Untimed Grammaticality Judgment Test
(for explicit knowledge)
TIMED PICTURE DESCRIPTION TEST 10 target items (6 old items & 4 new
items) 5 distractors
10 seconds for each description
UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENT TEST 5 target items (3 old items & 2 new
items)10 distractors
PROCEDURE
pretest(2 days
before T)treatment
immediate posttest
(1 day after T)
delayed posttest(4 weeks after T)
RESULTS
PRETEST: UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENT TEST
N = 15
Mean 3
Mode 4
Median 3
Min 1
Max 4
SD 1.13
Key 5
PRETEST: TIMED PICTURE DESCRIPTION TESTN = 15
Mean 2.5
Mode 0
Median 2
Min 0
Max 7
SD 2.26
Key 10
TREATMENTMetalinguistic
FeedbackGroup (N = 8)
RecastGroup (N = 7)
Number of target CF episodes
16 19
Number of CFE: Activity
6 6
Number of CFE: Movement
3 4
Number of CFE: Static Location
7 9
IMMEDIATE POSTTEST: UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENT TEST
N = 15 (pretest)
Mean 2.7 (3)
Mode 2 (4)
Median 2 (3)
Min 0 (1)
Max 5 (4)
SD 1.53 (1.13)
Key 5
IMMEDIATE POSTTEST: TIMED PICTURE DESCRIPTION TEST
Metalinguistic Feedback
Group (N = 8)(pretest)
RecastGroup (N = 7)
(pretest)
Mean 4.13 (2.75) 4.14 (2.28)
Mode 2 (0) 4 (0)
Median 3 (2.5) 4 (2)
Min 0 (0) 0 (0)
Max 10 (7) 8 (5)
SD 3.52 (2.49) 3.02 (2.14)
Key 10 10
ADDRESSEE VS. AUDITOR
Addressee Auditor
Total 40%(4/10)
24%(10/41)
Metalinguistic CF 50%(3/6)
28%(7/25)
Recast 25%(1/4)
19%(3/16)
DISCUSSION No improvement of explicit knowledge Some gains in implicit knowledge No difference was found between the
two groups (Metalinguistic vs. Recast) Those who directly received CF
(addressees) benefited from the feedback more than those who indirectly received CF (auditors)
LIMITATIONS Small number of participants Short length of treatment Small number of test items Test repetition effects