Upload
jawadabiakl
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mid-Rise Buildings on Toronto’s Avenues
City Planning2011 CIP/API Conference, St. John’s NL
Lorna Day, City of Toronto
Bloor Street West
R FreedmanR Freedman
This is Toronto…
and this is Toronto…
and so is this…
Challenge: Mid-Rise Urbanism
The Avenues vision calls for beautiful tree-lined streets and sun-lit
sidewalks, framed by carefully articulated mid-rise buildings providing
a variety of retail and community uses at the sidewalk level, with
residential and commercial units above. . Combined with investments
in the streetscape and public realm, the setting for a vibrant
community life will emerge.
Canada’s Largest City
POPULATION
Ontario: 12.5 M 39%
GTA: 5.5 MToronto: 2.5 M
Almost half of Toronto’s population is foreign-born (2006 census)
POPULATION
Population Growth / Immigration:
Annually, almost half of all immigrants to Canada settle in the GTA
United Nations Development Program ranked Toronto second,
behind Miami, Florida, in its list of the world’s cities with the
largest percentage of foreign-born population (2004)
Greater Toronto Area
GTA
Amalgamated
City of Toronto
USA
Canada
Lake Ontario
Introduction:
Design City Toronto – A Work In Progress
B. Designing the Public Realm
1. Great Streets Make Great Cities
C. Design Action
1. Competitions & Charrettes
2. City-Wide Design Initiatives:
Mid-Rise & the Avenues
Transit City
Tower Renewal
A. Design Policy
1. Culture of Design
2. Urban Design Policy / Development Review
3. Design Review Panel
40 km
20 km
162 kms of Avenues
Toronto’s Geography
1998 Amalgamation & Ward Politics
Amalgamation: 10 years laterControversial union promised savings – instead it set
city on path to fiscal failure.
BY ROYSON JAMES CITY COLUMNIST –
The Toronto Star
The Toronto Megacity 10 Years Later Wendell
Cox
Ten years ago, the Mike Harris government forced six
municipalities to amalgamate into the megacity of
Toronto. What drove the Harris government’s policy is
still a matter for debate.
Pre-war fabric
Dundas St. W Queen St. W
St. Clair Ave. W Yonge St.
1911 Civic Improvements Committee
1943 Master Plan
1991 Housing on Main Streets
Post-war fabric
Kingston Rd.
Sheppard St. W Wilson Ave.
Eglinton Ave. W
Outer suburbs
Short History Lesson
• Amalgamation – January, 1998
• City’s Official Plan adopted – November 2002, July,
2006
• Ontario Places to Grow – June 2005
• Mid-Rise Building Symposium – November 2005
• Avenues & Mid-Rise Building Study 2008-10
• Streetscape Manual Online – June 2010
Emergence of the Greater Golden Horseshoe
Intensification Corridor
policies to achieve
increased residential and
employment densities
Mobility Hubs…linking
transportation and land use
Avenues & Higher Order Transit
(2002) 2006 Official Plan
A. Protect Neighbourhoods
B. Balance Growth
C. Provide Transportation Options
Understanding the OP
Land Use – Open Space
Land Use – Institutional Areas
Land Use – Employment Areas
Land Use – Mixed Use
OP Map 2 - Urban Structure
Avenues: Reurbanizing Arterial Corridors
Toronto’s Avenues:
• are selected corridors along major
transit routes where transit-supportive
reurbanization is encouraged
• is intended to create new jobs and
housing while improving local
streetscapes, infrastructure and
amenities.
• intended to gradually accommodate
development as Toronto continues to
grow
• framework for change established to
through preparation of local Avenue
Studies that involve local residents,
business and other stakeholders
Mid-Rise Objective: Intensification/Reurbanization
Streets as vibrant urban places/neighbourhood Centres
Strengthen neighbourhood retail/restaurants
Support transit & other forms of transportation
- A City where you don’t feel disadvantaged if you don’t own a car
Create Urban Housing options – Condos, NORCs
Mid-Rise defined
• 1:1 maximum height to Right-of-way width ratio
(Most Avenues fall within 20, 27, 30 or 36m R.O.W. width)
• 10.5 metre and 3-storey minimum height
(Number of storeys varies with building use, generally between 3-11 storeys)
Avenue Studies
• 19 Studies to date
• 17 Completed
• 38.4 Km (24%) studied
Avenue Study Example: The Queensway - 2003
The Queensway Ro
ya
l Yo
rk
F. G. Gardiner Expressway
Islin
gto
n
Kip
lin
g
The Queensway - Vision
July 2008 - The Queensway - Reality
Avenues & Mid-Rise Buildings Study
City Wide Study to look at
162 kms of Avenues
• more and better designed
mid-rise buildings
• clarity of Council’s vision
• more as-of-right zoning
Avenues & Mid-Rise Buildings Study
Consultant Study initiated in October 2008:
• Brook Mcllroy Planning + Urban Design/Pace
Architects with E.R.A. Architects, Quadrangle
Architects Limited and Urban Marketing
Collaborative
Staff Report adopted by City Council July 2010:
• http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/background
file-29910.pdf
Study Components
• City Planning Staff
• Interdivisional Staff (Fire, Buildings, Technical
Services, etc)
• Industry Stakeholders
• Public consultations
The St. James SAS InstituteFallingbrook
Table of Contents
Commercial – Retail at Grade Required
Character Areas
19 Performance Standards
Intent of the PS – 3 Scales
1. Pedestrian (Eye) Level - Grade Related
• sidewalk zone
• street trees
• building entrances
• façade treatment
Intent of the PS – 3 Scales
2. Continuous Streetwall
• Up to 6 storeys
• Continuous street wall
• Contextual stepbacks
• Façade alignment, design &
articulation
• Balconies and projections
• Consistent cornice lines
3. Shadow, Transition and Skyview
• Upper storeys setback
from front, rear and sides
• Mechanical penthouse
• Angular planes
• 5 hours of sunlight
Intent of the PS – 3 Scales
Key Components
20 metre R.O.W. ….today
Illustration of the potential evolution of a 20 metre wide Avenue through mid-rise built form.
20 metre R.O.W. …short term
Illustration of the potential evolution of a 20 metre wide Avenue through mid-rise built form.
20 metre R.O.W. …long term
Illustration of the potential evolution of a 20 metre wide Avenue through mid-rise built form.
Implementation and Next Steps
• Ontario Building Code changes:
• Official Plan Review
• Report back to Council
Implementation
paving trees medians lighting furniture
Streetscape Manual
Implementation 1:50
City of Toronto’s Design Review Panel
Goals:
• Design Excellence
• Creative Design
• Public Discussion
• Quality of Life
March 8, 2011:
PANEL’S KEY COMMENTS
“The panel felt the study was of very high
quality and should become a very useful tool for
the development of the main streets in a
coherent, humane and predictable way. A well
constructed well designed document.”
How are we doing so far?
32 %
28 %
20 %
10 % 10 %
* Between June 2006 and December 2010
*
• November 2002 - Council adopted the new Official Plan
• Dec 2004 City received 1300 residential or mixed use applications
• Good News: 91,600 units = 18% of all residential applications on the Avenues.
• However – much of this development = Townhouses – not Mid Rise Buildings
Applications Along the Avenues: 2002 -2004
It’s about getting to….
In the news….
The right form for Toronto?
Proposed Mid-Rise
Urban Design Awards
14 Mid-Rise Submissions for 2011
Built Mid-Rise
http://www.toronto.ca/planning/midrisestudy.htm
The End