17
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel Technology Acceptance Model Sherif Kamel The American University in Cairo
Technology Acceptance Model
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
a presentation on TAM
Citation preview
The Use of IT in Schools in Egypt2.bin
Emerging information technology can not deliver improved
organizational effectiveness if it is not accepted and used by
potential users.
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is one of the most successful
measurements for computer usage effectively among practitioners and
academics.
TAM is consistent with Everett Rogers (1983) theory on diffusion of
innovation where technology adoption is a function of a variety of
factors including
Relative advantage
Investments in computer-based tools to support planning, decision
making and communication processes are usually risky
Role of a champion
Change management
Recognizing the difficulty of specifying the right systems
requirements based on their own preferences and logic, systems
builders always seek methods for evaluating the acceptability of
systems as early as possible
Need to know why people resist computers? Predicting how users will
respond? Attempt to improve users response
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Challenges faced
Understanding why people accept or reject computers had proven to
be one of the most challenging issues in information systems
(Swanson, 1988)
Users beliefs and attitude is a major determinants
Satisfaction measures are also important
Adaptation to change
Role of culture
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Theory of Reasoned Action
TAM is an adaptation of the Theory of Reasoned Action
TRA is a widely studied model from social psychology which is
concerned with the determinants of consciously intended behavior
(more general theory)
According to TRA, a person’s performance of a specific behavior is
determined by his/her behavioral intention (BI) to perform the
behavior and BI is jointly determined by the person’s attitude (A)
and subjective norm (SN) concerning the behavior in question
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Actual
behavior
Attitude
towards
behavior
Subjective
norm
Technology Acceptance Model
Introduced by Fred Davis in 1986 – an adaptation of TRA and
specifically tailored for modeling user acceptance of information
systems
TAM is based on two main assumptions:
Perceived usefulness (PU)
Perceived ease of use (PEOU)
TAM attempts not only for prediction but also for explanation to
help researchers and practitioners identify why a particular system
may be unacceptable and pursue appropriate steps
Copyright © 1986 Fred D Davis
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Technology Acceptance Model
Purpose of TAM is to assess the user acceptance of emerging
information technology
TAM is more specific and applies only to the use of computers
(usage behavior)
TAM addresses the human-computer interface (HCI)
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Technology Acceptance Model
An important factor in TAM is to trace the impact of external
factors on internal beliefs, attitudes and intentions.
Two particular beliefs are addressed through TAM
Perceived usefulness (PU)
Prospective user’s subjective probability that using a specific
application system will increase his or her job performance within
an organizational context
Perceived ease of use (PEOU)
Degree to which the prospective user expects the target system to
be free of effort.
Copyright © 1986 Fred D Davis
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
PU and PEOU Scales
Behavioral Intention to use
Attitude
toward
using
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
I would find it easier to create and edit documents
My documents would be of a better quality
I would not use alternative presentation packages
I would experience problems gaining access to the computing center
due to crowds
I would become dependent on PowerPoint
I would not use PowerPoint after I leave my current employer
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Determinants of managerial computer use
People’s computer use can be predicted reasonably well from their
intentions
Perceived usefulness is a major determinant of people’s intentions
to use computers
Perceived ease of use is a significant secondary determinant of
people’s intentions to use computers
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Early warning techniques
Continuous exposure, usage and assessment during systems
development phases
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel
Relationship between ease of use, usefulness and usage
Everett Rogers claims that adoption of innovation is a function of
a variety of factors including
Relative advantage
Ease of use of the innovation itself
It is important to note whether the use of the innovation is
a…
Job requirement
Conclusion
There is no absolute measure to ease of use or usefulness
User perceptions of these constructs may vary with time and
experience for any given application
Technology innovation and frequent use are important elements