2
TexasCourtsAgainRejectImperialFinance’sAnti-CompetitiveActs Texascourts1haveonceagainrejectedImperialFinance’scontinuedattemptstost iflecompetitionandharmconsumers. Houston,TX,April25, 2012--Texascourts1h aveonceagainrejectedI mperialF inance’scontinuedattemptstostiflecompetit ionandharmconsumers.A Texascour tthismonthslammedf orthefifthtimeImperi al’santi-consumerattemp tstoprohi bitcustomersfromsel lingtheirstructuredsettlementstopersonsotherthanIm perial.Imperialsough ttoprohibititscustom ersfromreceivingcompet itivebid s,requiringthemtoacceptlowballoffersfro mImperial.ImperialHold ings,Inc .(NYSE:IFT),thepub licly-tradedparentcomp anyofstructuredsettlem entfacto ringfirm,ImperialFinanceandTrading,hasbeenunsuccessfullyurging thecour tssince2010thatonc eitsignsupacustomer ,Imperialwasprotected fromcomp etitorsmakingbetter offers,claimingsomefo rmofexclusivity.Imperi alusedt hisargumenttosupportitscontinuedoverchargingconsumers,despitebeingcite dbycourtsforchargeswhichwerenot“fairandreasonable”2. Inanunprecedentedfi fthrequestaskingTexas courtstosupportitspo sition,a Texastrialcourtear lierthismonthagainre jectedImperial’sargumen ts,telling itslawyersthatthecourt spositionwasunchangedandthatanyonecouldbidf orthepurchaseofstructuredsettlementpayments.TheargumentsofL. BradleyHan cockofGreenberg,Tra urig’sHoustonofficewe reagainrejected.Indust rysources havereportedthatthe Greenberglawfirmhas receivedmorethan$1millioninf eesinunsuccessfulat temptstostiflecompeti tiononbehalfoffactori ngindust ryparticipants,includingJ.G.Wentworthand itsPeachtreeSettlement Fundinga ffiliate,inaddition toImperial.Industryso urceshavealsoreported thatthe Greenberglawfirmencouragedthesefactoring companiestotaketheseotherwise untenableactionswith thecourts,whichresul tedinextraordinaryfees earnedb ythem.Greenberg,Traurig,whichitselfisno tfreeofcontroversyhav ingseen severalofitspartner sindictedinthepasto verbillingissuesandha vingpaid multi-milliondollar fines,3andL.BradleyHancockhavebeenmakingsimilaral legationsinothercourts,sofarwithoutsuccess. Texascourtshavecontinuedtoupholdtheannuityrecipient srighttocontinue seekingcompetitiveoffers.AccordingtoStewartFeldman,CEOofcompetitorRSL Funding,LLC:"Imperia lhasbeenclaimingthat ithasanenforceableco ntractwh eninfactitdoesnot.TheallegationsofImperial’sdeceivingcustomerscarryth roughtomultipleline sofbusinessofImperia l.Imperialhaslongused thisthr eattounderpaysellersofstructuredsettleme ntsfortheirfuturepaym ents.” “Forthefifthtime,TexascourtsagainthismonthconfirmedthatImperial scompe titorscanvieforsel lersofannuitiesandpr ovidecompetitiveoffers thatare clearlyinthecustome rs’bestinterest,”comm entedPaulMcHugh,ViceP residentofS alesandMarketingfor RSLFunding.“RSLFundi ngwillcontinuetoactivelypursueow nersofstructuredset tlementpaymentstomake competitiveoffers,leav ingthec ustomersandthecourtstoultimatelydecidewhetheritisinthepayees besti nteresttoreceivemoremoneythanless,”saysMcHugh. TherulingbytheTexa scourtonApril2,2012 comesontheheelsofa Texasapp ellatecourtruling4strikingdownanattempt byindustrycompetitorPeachtree, anaffiliateofJLLPartners ownedJ.G.Wentworth,whichhasthwartedPeachtree s attempttoimproperly stiflecompetition.Industrysourcesreportthat J.G.Wentw orth’srushtogopubl ic,expectedforthisco mingfall,mayberelated tothecon tinuedfallindiscountrateswhichmanybelievewillacceleratewitht heincrea sedindustrycompetiti onfollowingthecourts’ rulings.Industrycompet itorImperi alhasseenitsstock pricefall82%lastyear,earningaspotasthesecondwor stIPOoftheyear,ac cordingtoCNBC5.Advanc ewarningstoinvestment bankerFB Rhadgoneunheeded.

Texas Courts Again Reject Imperial Finance’s Anti-Competitive Acts

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

 

TexasCourtsAgainRejectImperialFinance’sAnti-CompetitiveActs

Texascourts1haveonceagainrejectedImperialFinance’scontinuedattemptstostiflecompetitionandharmconsumers.

Houston,TX,April25,2012--Texascourts1haveonceagainrejectedImperialFinance’scontinuedattemptstostiflecompetitionandharmconsumers.ATexascourtthismonthslammedforthefifthtimeImperial’santi-consumerattemptstoprohibitcustomersfromsellingtheirstructuredsettlementstopersonsotherthanImperial.Imperialsoughttoprohibititscustomersfromreceivingcompetitivebids,requiringthemtoacceptlowballoffersfromImperial.ImperialHoldings,Inc.(NYSE:IFT),thepublicly-tradedparentcompanyofstructuredsettlementfactoringfirm,ImperialFinanceandTrading,hasbeenunsuccessfullyurgingthecourtssince2010thatonceitsignsupacustomer,Imperialwasprotectedfromcompetitorsmakingbetteroffers,claimingsomeformofexclusivity.Imperialusedthisargumenttosupportitscontinuedoverchargingconsumers,despitebeingcitedbycourtsforchargeswhichwerenot“fairandreasonable”2.

InanunprecedentedfifthrequestaskingTexascourtstosupportitsposition,aTexastrialcourtearlierthismonthagainrejectedImperial’sarguments,tellingitslawyersthatthecourt  spositionwasunchangedandthatanyonecouldbidforthepurchaseofstructuredsettlementpayments.TheargumentsofL.BradleyHancockofGreenberg,Traurig’sHoustonofficewereagainrejected.IndustrysourceshavereportedthattheGreenberglawfirmhasreceivedmorethan$1millioninfeesinunsuccessfulattemptstostiflecompetitiononbehalfoffactoringindustryparticipants,includingJ.G.WentworthanditsPeachtreeSettlementFundingaffiliate,inadditiontoImperial.IndustrysourceshavealsoreportedthattheGreenberglawfirmencouragedthesefactoringcompaniestotaketheseotherwiseuntenableactionswiththecourts,whichresultedinextraordinaryfeesearnedbythem.Greenberg,Traurig,whichitselfisnotfreeofcontroversyhavingseenseveralofitspartnersindictedinthepastoverbillingissuesandhavingpaidmulti-milliondollarfines,3andL.BradleyHancockhavebeenmakingsimilarallegationsinothercourts,sofarwithoutsuccess.

Texascourtshavecontinuedtoupholdtheannuityrecipient  srighttocontinueseekingcompetitiveoffers.AccordingtoStewartFeldman,CEOofcompetitorRSLFunding,LLC:"Imperialhasbeenclaimingthatithasanenforceablecontractwheninfactitdoesnot.TheallegationsofImperial’sdeceivingcustomerscarrythroughtomultiplelinesofbusinessofImperial.Imperialhaslongusedthisthreattounderpaysellersofstructuredsettlementsfortheirfuturepayments.”

“Forthefifthtime,TexascourtsagainthismonthconfirmedthatImperial  scompetitorscanvieforsellersofannuitiesandprovidecompetitiveoffersthatareclearlyinthecustomers’bestinterest,”commentedPaulMcHugh,VicePresidentofSalesandMarketingforRSLFunding.“RSLFundingwillcontinuetoactivelypursueownersofstructuredsettlementpaymentstomakecompetitiveoffers,leavingthecustomersandthecourtstoultimatelydecidewhetheritisinthepayees  bestinteresttoreceivemoremoneythanless,”saysMcHugh.

TherulingbytheTexascourtonApril2,2012comesontheheelsofaTexasappellatecourtruling4strikingdownanattemptbyindustrycompetitorPeachtree,anaffiliateofJLLPartners  ownedJ.G.Wentworth,whichhasthwartedPeachtree  sattempttoimproperlystiflecompetition.IndustrysourcesreportthatJ.G.Wentworth’srushtogopublic,expectedforthiscomingfall,mayberelatedtothecontinuedfallindiscountrateswhichmanybelievewillacceleratewiththeincreasedindustrycompetitionfollowingthecourts’rulings.IndustrycompetitorImperialhasseenitsstockpricefall82%lastyear,earningaspotasthesecondworstIPOoftheyear,accordingtoCNBC5.AdvancewarningstoinvestmentbankerFBRhadgoneunheeded.

 

Forfurtherinformation,contacttheStructuredSettlementInstitute(SSI),anot-for-profitorganizationestablishedtoeducatesellersofstructuredsettlementsregardingfairandequitablepracticesamongprovidersofstructuredsettlementtransfers.

Contact:StructuredSettlementInstitute,BoyntonBeach,FL,1-800-409-1975

Contact:PaulMcHughRSLFunding,LLCTwoPostOakCentral1980PostOakBlvdSuite1900,Houston,[email protected]://www.rslfundingllc.com