Upload
gary-neal
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The summer of 1914 marked a watershed in world history:
For the first time ever, a world war began Since 1914, we’ve experienced 4 world wars They are historically connected with each other –
like links of a chain They may be viewed as 4 stages of one continuous
period of global conflict
What made world wars possible: 1. An integrated world – globalization 2. Struggle for power within countries acquires
international dimensions 3. Availability of economic resources 4. Development of military technologies 5. The culture of war
New rationalizations of war The idea of total war
World War I: 1914-1918
Resulted from: - -Rivalries between states (Germany-Britain, France-
Germany, Russia-Austria, Russia-Turkey, etc.)- -Social tensions within states- -Nationalist struggles against empires
The war for power and influence inside the global capitalist system
Expected to be brief The reality: a bloody 4-year stalemate Ended by revolutions in Russia (1917) and Germany (1918) 15 mln. deaths, incl. 9 mln. combat The flu pandemic of 1918-1919: 20-40 mln. deaths: a direct
environmental effect of “the Great War”
THE IMPACT OF WORLD WAR ONE
World War I in retrospective – the start of a century of global conflictRead Eric Hobsbawm’s article “The Future of War and Peace”Eric Hobsbawm: The Future of War and PeaceA good reference library on World War I:Trenches on the Web - Reference LibrarySee also this BBC site:BBC - History - The Western Front, 1914 - 1918 AnimationAnd this website devoted to events on the Eastern Front:The Eastern Front — 1914 - 1917
The Russian “battle order”
The effects of wars on the Russian system:
successful wars (1721, 1815, 1878, 1945) – reaffirmed the status-quo, strengthened the state, discouraged reforms
unsuccessful wars (1856, 1905, 1917, 1989) – fostered reforms and revolutions
Causes of Russia’s involvement in World War I:
- own imperial goals (the Balkans and Transcaucasus): natural behaviour of an empire
- influence of Britain and France
- a war to avoid a revolution
The clash of empires:
The interstate conflict
The internal factors:
- interplay of nationalisms
- class conflicts
- struggles over democratic reforms
THE WAR AS A REVOLUTIONARY FORCE: it tested the West and undermined capitalism
Results of the war:
-Collapse of 4 empires: Russian, Austro-Hungarian, German, Turkish
-World capitalism severely undermined – North and South (economically, politically, socially, ideologically)
-The rise of social protest and revolutionary movements everywhere
Russia as “the weakest link”: the sudden fall of the state (the February Revolution)
A key conflict within the February 1917 revolution in Russia:
Reform-minded elites saw removal of autocracy as a way to make Russia more successful in the war
The masses revolted, above all, against the war (as well as against imperialism, autocracy, and capitalism)
“Dual Power”: the Provisional Government and the Soviets
The 9 months between February and October pushed the masses away from more moderate political forces and gave the initiative to Lenin and the Bolsheviks
Russian Social-Democratic Workers Party (the Bolsheviks) – renamed in 1918 as:
All-Russian Communist Party (the Bolsheviks)
Lenin’s plan: Stage a socialist revolution in Russia to ignite revolutions
abroad and overthrow capitalism Advance the most radical demands to gain popular
support:-a democratic peace-radical land reform-worker control of factories-self-determination of nationalities
Push the Soviets to take power Overthrow the Provisional Government by force, if
necessary
Germany’s support of the Bolsheviks: were they really German agents?
November 7 (October 25), 1917: Bolsheviks and their allies establish a Soviet Government, which proceeds to implement the radical program
The first act:
The Decree on Peace: Russia exits the war, offers immediate peace
talks to all warring parties to conclude a democratic peace
Secret documents of the Imperial Government pertaining to the war are made public
3 CONCEPTS OF WORLD ORDER
CONSERVATIVE: a balance of power between strong states pursuing their national interests
LIBERAL: democratic values, self-determination of nations, free trade, disarmament, a world organization to keep the peace
RADICAL: socialism to replace capitalism; promotion of social and national revolutions
Read Paul Kennedy’s article on geopolitics vs. democracy: Blending Democratic Ideals With Geopolitical Wisdom In the wake of WWI, conservative notions were
discredited. The US advocated a liberal alternative Soviet Russia adopted a radical program – or was it that
radical?
DECREE ON PEACE, 7.11.17
1. Called for immediate democratic peace without any territorial claims or indemnities
2. Right of nations to self-determination
3. Willing to consider other terms proposed by other states
4. Immediate armistice for 3 months
5. Call to working people of the world to rise against “slavery and exploitation of any kind”
WILSON’S 14 POINTS, 8.01.18 Expressed “universal human sympathy” with the Russian
desire for peace and the Russian proposals. Offered a program for establishing “an ordered peace”:
- Open diplomacy, no secret treaties- Absolute freedom of the seas- Free trade- Maximum arms reduction- Evacuation of the Russian territory- Right of nations to self-determination- Creation of an international organization to keep peace THE KEY THEME:
“The principle of justice to all peoples and nationalities and the right to live on equal terms of liberty and safety with one another, whether they be strong or weak”
Russia and America offered alternatives to the collapsed world order
Russia’s radical alternative (revolution)America’s liberal-democratic alternative (reform)Despite similarities, the two alternatives were
fundamentally incompatible: US strove to preserve global capitalism through reformRussia sought to destroy capitalism and replace it with communism
For the first time in their shared history, Russia and America became enemies
US, as well as Britain, France, and Japan, intervened in the Civil War on the side of the Whites
It sent troops to occupy a few areas of Russia in the North and the Far East
It refused to recognize the Soviet Government until 1933
In the ideological sense, the Cold War started in 1917
The Soviets launch their foreign policy in a combination of diverse approaches:
1. Repudiate international obligations of the Empire
2. Foster revolution abroad – use propaganda, subversion, armed force if necessary. Creation of the Communist International (Comintern).
3. Build a strong state and deal with other states on the basis of Realpolitik – and use all the traditional tools of the state
4. Support some liberal-internationalist ideas
CONTRADICTIONS IN FOREIGN POLICY: WILL THEY HURT OR HELP THE SOVIETS?
FIRST TASKS OF SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY
1.Extricate Russia from WWI Talks with Germany and its alliesThe Treaty of Brest-Litovsk: almost fatal to Soviets The eruption of the Civil War – peace with Germany one of the causes
2.Win the Civil WarDefeat the Whites militarily and politicallyRepel foreign intervention
3.Help establish Soviet-type regimes around RussiaUnsuccessful: Germany, Finland, Baltic states, Hungary, Northern IranSuccessful: Ukraine, Belarus, Transcaucasia, Central Asia, Mongolia
Timeline
1917-1921: the Revolution and the Civil War 1921-1929: consolidation 1929-1941: mobilization 1941-1945: the Great Patriotic War 1946-1991: the Cold War
Hallmarks of the period
1921 as the pivotal year End of the Civil War: a devastated country Shift from War Communism to NEP
World revolution is postponed Formation of the Soviet Union Normalization of relations with other countries Machiavellianism Use of the Comintern The rise of Stalin
“World revolution” is postponed
Stabilization of capitalism worldwide NEP means a shift from revolution to reform, a revival of
capitalism in Russia, a compromise between communism and capitalism
“Socialism in one country” becomes the goal; success of the Soviet model would be the best help to the world revolution
Primacy of internal tasks over foreign policy Deep splits within the leadership, the Communist Party, and
the Comintern: has the revolution been betrayed?
Formation of the Soviet Union – 1922
The Russian Empire is largely restored under a different management
Revolutionary annexation of non-Russian lands: Ukraine, Belarus, the Caucasus, Central Asia.
Suppression of nationalists; use of the Red Army; reliance on pro-Soviet groups
The ambivalence of Soviet federalism: was it a mere façade for a unitary state?
Normalization of relations with other countries
Recognition of the Soviet Government: Afghanistan – 1919, USA – 1933 Britain – the trade agreement of 1921
The Soviet needs: Legitimation: from a rogue state to a legal successor
to the Russian Empire A peaceful international environment Trade and investment Participation in international diplomacy
Machiavellianism Using conflicts between potential adversaries;
building balances of power; pragmatic maneuvering in world affairs, readiness to use any means available to achieve foreign policy goals
Rapallo (1922) and the Soviet-German axis A separate deal between 2 “rogue states” Mutual interests Mutual rearmament What about German Communists?
The China policy Support of Chinese nationalism against Japan and
the West What about Chinese Communists?
Use of the Comintern (and other Internationals) The Comintern: 1919-1943 Idealism vs. pragmatism Extremism vs. moderation The domestic/international linkage of Comintern The Comintern as a tool of Soviet foreign policy
The state relied on subversive forces abroad The key role of secret services Undermined official interstate relations Had some disastrous consequences on politics abroad Discredited the idea of communism
Not a single successful revolution Partial responsibility for the rise of Nazism in Germany The tragedy of true believers