Upload
frederick-barber
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Future of Electric Power In Utah
January 12, 2010
Utah Constitution confers upon municipalities the “exclusive” responsibility to furnish public services to their residents
Municipalities have the authority to:– provide their own power service, or– provide a franchise agreement for someone else
to provide the service
Municipal Power
UAMPS Overview
UAMPS is an energy services interlocal entity that provides electric energy services on a nonprofit basis to its members
UAMPS’ flexible organizational structure allows development, financing and operation of projects for generation, transmission and power supply management
Project-based organization with 15 separate projects Members elect to participate in Projects based on
their individual needs
52 Members Eight States
– Arizona– California– Idaho– Oregon– Nevada– New Mexico– Utah– Wyoming
UAMPS Membership
UAMPS Projects
Resource Projects– Coal
Hunter Project San Juan Project IPP Project
– Hydro CRSP Project
– Wind Firm Power Supply Project Horse Butte Wind
– Natural Gas Payson Project Natural Gas Project (procurement of long-term gas)
– Other Pool Project Resource Project (investigation of supply-side and demand-side alternatives)
UAMPS Projects (cont.)
Transmission Projects– Craig-Mona Project (345 kV)– Central-St. George Project (345/138/69 kV)
Service Projects– Government and Public Affairs Project– Member Services Project
UAMPS Resource Typewith Horse Butte Wind
Coal42%
Natural Gas11%
Wind5%
Hydro13%
Purchases29%
UAMPS has the ability to:
Provide an analysis of power supply options Plan, construct and manage generation Construct, acquire and manage transmission Negotiate Power Purchase Agreements
– Draft Request for Proposals (“RFP”) – Evaluate RFP response
Shape power supply (buy/sell and schedule) to meet load requirements
Provide marketing services (buy/sell hourly) Provide transmission services
Resource Development Philosophy
Provide a reliable, cost-effective electric power supply portfolio– Minimize impacts on rates to members– Minimize portfolio integration costs– Maintain system reliability– Ensure flexibility– Ensure short and long-term needs are met– Maintain diversity in resource mix
Resource Development Philosophy (cont)
UAMPS categorizes load requirement into three characteristics:
– Base – Intermediate– Peaking
Current Resource Investigation
Supply-side – Wind – Geothermal– Solar – Nuclear– Natural Gas– Coal – Power purchase contracts
Demand-side – Carbon footprint template– Energy Efficiency Programs– Net metering
Resource Evaluation
Financial Operational Reliability Environmental Flexibility Short-Term and Long-Term Diversity
Development Factors
Site suitability (soil, seismic, etc.) Water availability (quantity and quality) Fuel availability and transportation Transmission Air quality Public opinion and controversies
Regulation
A lot of “unknowns”– Congressional action re: GHG
Cap & Trade ($) Carbon Tax(es) $
– Implementation schedule and transition period of legislation
– Regulations (Environmental Protection Agency)– National Renewable Portfolio Standards requirements
Resource Lead Times
Typical Planning Horizon ~ 20+ Years Acquisition and procurement of resource
– Coal 10 years– Nuclear 15 years– Natural Gas 5 years– Wind 3 years– Solar 5 years– Efficiency 1 year
Resource Costs
Coal 5 cents per kWh Uncertainty
Nuclear 9 cents per kWh Technical Natural Gas 6.5 cents per kWh Volatility Hydro 6 cents per kWh Small Wind 7 cents per kWh Location Solar 15 cents per kWh Expensive Efficiency 1 cent per kWh Must Do
Challenges
Renewable Resources– Only part of the answer– Additional fossil fuel energy is needed
Global Climate Change– Impositions of regulation enhance the complexity
to build new generation