Upload
joanne
View
44
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Haunts of Cloud Climatologies; Diurnal cycles, Sensor scan angles, FOV size and, Sensor Calibrations. Donald Wylie Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706. Local Noon. Average Diurnal Cycle of Low Clouds. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Haunts of Cloud Climatologies; Diurnal cycles, Sensor scan angles, FOV size and,Sensor Calibrations
Donald WylieSpace Science and Engineering Center
University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison, WI 53706
Average Diurnal Cycle of Low Clouds
Average Diurnal Cycle of High Clouds
From B. Cairns, 1995, Atm. Res. 37, 133-146, Fig. 2
Local Noon
Local Midnight
SunsetSunrise
Average Diurnal Cycle of Low Clouds
Average Diurnal Cycle of High Clouds
From J.W. Bergman and M. L. Salby, 1996, J. Climate, 9, 2802-2820
High clouds lag low clouds
Largest cycle magnitude (0.30 range)
Smallest cycle magnitude (0.08 range)
Diurnal Cycle in NOAA HIRS Data
Boreal summer 1986-97(June, July and August)
Boreal winter (Austral summer) 1986-97(December, January and February)
From the data use in Wylie, Jackson, Menzel, and Bates, 2005, J. Climate, 18, 3021-3031
Sunrise Sunset
Cloud Cover Over Southern Tropical Oceans (Equator - 30 South)in Austral Summer From 1986 - 96
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
Local Standard Time
Clo
ud
Co
ve
r (%
) All Clouds (10% Range)
High Clouds (3% Range)
NOAA 9,11 and 14
NOAA 10and 12
NOAA 9,11 and 14
NOAA 10 and 12
Sunrise Sunset
High Cloud Diurnal Cycle from GOES VAS Data
Local Noon
Local Midnight
From D. P. Wylie and H. M. Woolf, 2002, Monthly Wea. Rev., 130, 171-179
10% range
Similar shape
Diurnal Cycle SummaryCloud studies that use visible data will over report cloud
cover over land and under report cloud cover over oceans from their diurnal cycles. Magnitude of the error is around 2-10%.Averaging of the ascending and descending orbits with an analysis technique that does not depend on solar reflection measurements, will greatly reduce the diurnal cycle errors.
Diurnal cycles in high clouds mainly occur where there are strong diurnal cycles in cumulus clouds – sub-tropical mountain slopes and coastal land areas. The high cloud maxima lag the low cloud maxima by 4-6 hours.
Over oceans high cloud diurnal cycles are weak and absent in many areas.
In winter diurnal cycles in high clouds are usually absent.
Change of Cloud Frequencies with Scan Angle (Tropics)
45°
TropicsScan Angle
Category Nadir > 41DegAll Clouds over Land 0.70 0.10 14%All Clouds over Oceans 0.72 0.17 24%Light Ci over Land 0.23 0.03 13%Light Ci overOceans 0.27 0.06 22%Dense Ci over Land 0.29 0.02 7%Dense Ci over Oceans 0.19 0.02 11%High Clouds over Land 0.48 0.05 10%High Clouds over Oceans 0.40 0.07 18%
Cloud Cover
The Increase in Reported Cloud Cover from Nadir to the Highest Scan Angle
Reasons why the reported cloud cover increases with scan angle
1. Slanted path through atmosphere increases cloud optical depth by 141% or by a factor of 1.41. This could increase reported cloud cover by 0.01-0.02.
2. FOV size increases by a factor of 2. Using pairs of HIRS FOVs this will increase cloud cover reported by 0.06.
vs.
Count pixels individually
Counting a pair as cloudy if either is cloudy.
vs.
HIRS will recognize the cloud
HIRS will not find the cloud
2% of clouds
4% ofclouds
GLAS
There are many small clouds but it’s theIt’s the large ones that account for the coverage.
All Clouds
High Clouds
Sensor calibrationUse AIRS hyper-spectral measurements to estimate HIRS
Preliminary HIRS-AIRS Comparison
Ch 4 Ch 5 Ch 6 Ch 7 Ch 8
Mean Difference N16-AIRS (K)(From one day of HIRS-AIRS data 380 points.) 0.33 0.66 0.34 0.28 0.10
St-dev of Difference (K) 0.18 0.27 0.43 0.66 1.02
Correction for part of spectra not sampled by AIRS
0.04 0.24 -0.61 0.24 -0.33
Final difference (K) 0.29 0.43 0.95 0.04 0.43
N16 – Radiance calculated from Sounding. (K) -1.50 -1.80 -1.45 -0.50
Unexplained measured differences betweenHIRS-2 and HIRS-3 (K) -2.5 -2.2 0.7 -0.6 0.40
Summary
1. Diurnal cycles can cause errors of 2% to 10% in reported cloud cover. The largest error is when only the day time part of the 2 pm NOAA orbit is used.
2. Scan angle - changes reported cloud cover by 7-24%, but averaging all FOVs from all angles changes together biases cloud cover by
only 3%.
3. Holes and clouds below the 20 km FOV size of HIRS cause over reporting of cloud cover where the clouds are cold, but under reporting of clouds that are very small and optically thin at all altitudes. The second error cancels part of the first.
4. Sensor calibration problems – a preliminary comparison of HIRS-3 to AIRS shows +0.3 to +0.9 K possible biases. We need to compare
HIRS-2 on NOAA 14 to AIRS to see if there is a bigger bias or if there is a bias of the opposite sign.