Upload
kellie-ball
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
What do banks securitise? MBS –Residential mortgages –Commercial mortgages ABS –Auto loans –Consumer loans –Credit cards –Leases –SME loans –Future Flows CDO –Backed by loans or bonds
Citation preview
The Prospects for Securitisation in Russia
Alex MedlockHead of OriginationMNB Capital Markets
Securitisation as an effective financial instrument – Moscow 2006
Agenda
• Key drivers towards securitisation• Structural considerations - Russian Auto
Loans Finance• Outlook 2006
What do banks securitise?
• MBS – Residential mortgages– Commercial mortgages
• ABS – Auto loans– Consumer loans– Credit cards– Leases– SME loans– Future Flows
• CDO– Backed by loans or bonds
2004 EMEA Securitisation – by asset class
CDO, 15.37%
CMBS, 7.84%
ABS, 23.49%
RMBS, 53.31%
Source: Moody’s
Total:€280 Billion
Market Developments - ABS Issuance Volume in CIS, CE and SEE
Russia42%
Kazakhstan34%
Czech Republic
12%
Poland7%
Latvia5%
Furure Flows, 59%
Consumer Loans, 13%
RMBS, 5%
Auto Loans, 4%
Credit Cards, 12%
CMBS, 7%
Total = $1,193.1 mm Total = $1,193.1 mm
Drivers – Why do Bank Securitise?
• Optimise Funding
• Risk Management
• Capital Management
Access to a new Investor base through higher rating and different asset class
Reliable and competitive funding Liquidity Management Term Funding
Transfer of risks associated with pool of loans
Manage interest rate and credit risk
Release of regulatory capital Improve ROE
DETERMINE YOUR GOALS
Drivers – the housing finance market In Russia
• In EMEA RMBS accounts for over 50% of all issuance
• Housing market in Russia growing rapidly but still small and more or less doubling each year
• Less than 1% of GDP compared to 2-20% in other emerging markets and 40-70% in OECD countries
• IFC estimated medium term potential of Russian mortgage market equivalent to $10bn- £30bn
• Market dominated by Moscow and St. Petersburg
Structuring the Deal
• Number of different ways to structure securitisation
• True Sale
• Synthetic
Standalone or Term Deal Conduit
Risk Transfer and Capital Relief Less local structuring No funding More complex to discuss with local
regulators
Comparing Term Deal and Conduit Structures
• Term Deal
• Conduit
Longer tenors Wide variety of assets Large volumes
Easy to implement (documentation and marketing)
No formal rating required Short term High quality assets
Structuring the Deal – key steps
Pre Mandate
Structuring
Mandate
Extension
ObjectivesPreliminary Portfolio AnalysisInitial Legal Due DiligenceFeasibility Study
Selecting PortfolioArrangers, Lawyers & Rating AgenciesSelect Structure
Obtain ProposalsSelect Arrangers and AdvisorsFinance Structure note
Allow sufficient timeTalk to InvestorsPost Closing
Structuring Considerations
• Investors
• Structure
• Rating• Legal Opinions• Size• Collateral• Type of Offering
Credit Enhancement FX Liquidity
Public V Private Listing RegS/144a
Deal Structure - Russian Auto Loans Finance
Issuer:Russian Auto Loans
Finance B.V.
TrusteeTMF Trustee
Stichting100% of Share Capital
Back-up Servicer:Russian Standard Bank
Originator:Bank Soyuz
InvestorsCash Manager:JP Morgan
Servicer:Bank Soyuz
Security Security
Notes
Sale of Auto LoansCollections Servicing
Fee
ServicerReports
Collateral Summary
Receivables:Number:Outstanding Balance:Asset Type:Geographic Diversity:Average LTV:WA Remaining Term:WA Seasoning:Arrears:Static/Revolving:
Auto Loan Contracts denominated in USD3,679USD 49.8 MillionNew Foreign CarsMainly Moscow region70%30 months5 monthsNo Loans> 1 monthStatic
Note Structure
• Senior/Subordinated Notes paying sequential• Credit enhancement mainly through subordination of the Class B
and Class C notes plus Reserve Fund• Expenses Contingency Fund
Class A Notes
Class B Notes$3.98 M B2
Class C Notes$1.99 M
Class A1$43.7 M Baa3
Class A2$0.1 M N/R
Deal Performance
05
101520
2530354045
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
US
$ M
illio
ns
•Deal closed on 24 July 2005•Class A1 Notes
•Subordination has increased from 12% to 19.3%Note Payment Dates (10th)
The notes were rated by Moody’s and sold to Asian, European and off-shore American investors
Distribution by Region Type of Investor
Investors – Bank Soyuz
Off-Shore US15%
South Eastern Europe
10%
Europe 30%
Asia 45%
Insurance10%
Hedge funds 25%
Commercial Banks65%
Russia - the story so far
Gas export receivables - USD 1.25bln issued Jul 2004 - Maturity: Feb 2020. Priced at 7.201%. RegS/144a. Rating: BBB-
Offshore credit card receivables - USD 225m issued Oct 2005 – Maturity: Nov 2009. Priced at 9.75%
Auto loans USD 40m issued July 05 – Maturity: July 2010. Coupon: 1m Libor plus1.75%pa. Rating Baa3
Residential Mortgages USD 50m Warehouse 1 year Loan Facility – Nov 2005
Consumer Loans - Phase I €126.5 m (Phase II €164.5m to be placed during the nine months from closing). Issued Dec 2005Maturity Dec 2012. Coupon: 1m Euribor plus 2.5%pa
Outlook for securitisation - 2006
• Russia– Residential mortgages– Auto loans– Consumer loans– Leases– Future flows
• Kazakhstan– Future flows– Residential mortgages– Consumer loans
• Ukraine– Residential mortgages