Upload
jack-preston
View
225
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The (Re-)Ascent of Women
-Phillip Tussing, Economics(with thanks to Scotty Moore, Anthropology)
The Paleolithic: Hunter-Gatherer Economy
Two principles: One: that women were the
principle gatherers (80% of calories)
Two: that roles aren't fixed in stone
We are often taught that…
THE FALLACY OF FARMING
Farming is superior to hunting/gathering because the lives of hunters are “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”
The status of women relative to men has ALWAYS been low – until modern times
Spend 2 hours per day gathering food and resources
Average caloric intake is 2200 calories per day
Diverse diet and small populations lead to increased health
Lack of private property greatly reduces crime rates
IT’S GOOD TO BE A HUNTER/GATHERER
Main social role: collect resources for immediate consumption
Women are often responsible for gathering but roles are NOT fixed
Gathered resources contribute up to 80% of the diet
Number of children limited by mobility
So – women’s contributions are immediate and critical to group survival
WOMEN IN HUNTER/GATHERER SOCIETIES
EARLY farming societies had all of the negatives that come with farming (and very few positives) Sanitation problems Disease Poorer diet and overall health Reliance on single crops
All of this leads to HIGH INFANT MORTALITY RATES Ancient Egypt – 25-35% infant
mortality rate
Main social role: provide delayed labor
WOMEN IN FARMING SOCIETIES
Early Industrialization: Britain after 1790
-women as well as men in industry – mostly young & unmarried
-especially in textile industry – traditional for women
-women had lower wages than men – used to save more expensive male labor
Economic Position of “Sweatshops”
In a column in the NY Times on 14 Jan 2009, Nicholas Kristof wrote: “...while it shocks Americans to hear it, the central challenge in the poorest countries is not that sweatshops exploit too many people, but that they don’t exploit enough.... sweatshops are only a symptom of poverty, not a cause, and banning them closes off one route out of poverty. The best way to help people in the poorest countries isn’t to campaign against sweatshops but to promote manufacturing there.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/opinion/15kristof.html
Women & the Rise of the Middle Class
-Move from Agricultural labor to Manufacturing
-Now Children, which were a Benefit in Agriculture, have an Opportunity Cost (prevents women from working & earning money)
-Consumer culture of “labor-saving devices”, many of which give women more time to work outside the home
WWII:Women Replace Male Workers
-”Rosie the Riveter” icon
-women not only in traditional roles, but heavy manufactuing
-again substituting for male labor, but temporary
-changed attitudes about women's competence
Women in Services
Women dominate many service industries
-76.7% of US Economy in 2011 was services
-typical of “post-industrial” rich country economies
Women Dominate Growing IndustriesFastest-Growing
Industries, US: Top 11:1. Management & Scientific Consulting
2. Services for Elderly
3. Physical & Occupational Therapists
4. Data Processing
5. Home health Care
6. Specialized Design
7. Computer Systems Design
8. Mental Health Care
9. Merchandise Stores
10. Medical Labs
11. Other Healthcare
-Women dominate primarily in traditional female industries:
-Healthcare
-Education
-Retail Store clerks
-Administrative Support
The Richer you Are, The Fewer Children
Post-Industrial Society-current American society is “post-industrial”
(dominated by services)
-US fertility rate as of 2012 is 2.06 – just under “replacement rate” of approx 2.1 – population would be shrinking already without immigration
-in most other OECD (i.e., “rich”) countries, the rate is as low or lower – in France it is 2.08; in Russia it's 1.43; in Japan it's 1.39; in Singapore 0.78 (!); in China it is 1.55 and falling; in India 2.58 (just above the World average of 2.47), but also falling.
The future holds more measures to support women in childbirth, childrearing while working, as well as more equal social and economic status
Model for the Future?
Sweden
Fertility Rate of 1.67
The Government Encourages Sexual Equality
-85% of Men take Govt-subsidized Parental Leave
-the more leave men take, the higher their wives' earnings
-Childcare is universal
References
-http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0250E/x0250e03.htm
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/miscellaneous/women_workforce.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/philip-n-cohen/women-may-be-losing-jobs_b_114504.html
http://paa2008.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=81736
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/world/europe/10iht-sweden.html?pagewanted=3
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html