9
273. THE 'SCANNING ELECTRON MICRO'SCOPE: A HIGH INFORMATION CONTENT IMAGE OF BIOLOGICAL 'SYSTEMS T. L. HAYES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY The principal value of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) lies in the instrument's ability t o produce high information content images. It is not, in general, an instrument of higher resolving power than the conven- tional transmission electron microscope but the SEM can add useful informa- tion that is not available in the transmission electron microscope image. The resolving power of current scanning electron microscopes is about 100 8. The information rich image of the SEM is made possible by an imaging technique that allows uncoupling of the two functions of a microscope: localization and information transfer. The light microscope and the conven- tional transmission electron microscope utilize a lens system for image formation. Such a system makes use of the same radiation to both localize the points of the specimen and t o carry information about each point. As a result, the parameters of resolution and image information are linked to- gether by the type of radiation used. For example, the light microscope produces an image which is rich in information (spatial, chemical, physio- logical) but low in resolution while the conventional transmission electron microscope produces an image which is high in resolution but low in information (chemical bonds do not influence the image, the image is two dimensional, the specimen is not living). The SEM on the other hand uses a non-focused system of image forma- tion which allows the uncoupling of resolving power and information content. One kind of radiation (electrons) can be used to localize the specimen points at high resolution while another kind of radiation (visible light, secondaxy electron, etc.) can be used to transfer the information about these points to the image (Fig. 1). By utilizing a time sequence of points (T.V.) as the imaging system, rather than a lens focusing system, the SEM permits a great increase in the information transfer from specimen t o image. This information rich image allows an investigation of the second transfer step: information transfer from image t o observer. The usual mode of transfer in scientific studies makes use of a reduction of the image to ideas which are expressed in words or numbers. is transferred by objective, abstract means. The SEM can provide images that are suitable for this type of transfer as illustrated by computer analysis of images, pattern recognition or chemical analysis by cathodoluminescence or characteristic X-rays. The SEM can also provide images that can help us to investigate another mode of information transfer from image t o observer: the subjective, experiential mode. In particularr, the secondary electron mode of SEM operation produces an image with the important experiential factor of 3 dinensional space (Fig. 2). world is not suited to ow experiential understanding but we sometimes forget that a 2 dimensional world is equally foreign. A three dimensional image provides one important parameter that permits the image t o approximate experienced vision (Fig. 3, 4). In this mode the information We are often aware that the four dimerisionjl The value of experiential information transfer depends somewhat on the definition of reality that we prefer. Many may not agree with Soren

The Scanning Electron Microscope: A High Information

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

273.

T H E ' S C A N N I N G E L E C T R O N M I C R O ' S C O P E : A H I G H I N F O R M A T I O N C O N T E N T I M A G E O F B I O L O G I C A L ' S Y S T E M S

T. L. H A Y E S U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , B E R K E L E Y

The p r inc ipa l value of t h e scanning e l ec t ron microscope (SEM) l i e s i n t h e instrument 's a b i l i t y t o produce high information content images. It i s not, i n general , an instrument of higher resolving power than t h e conven- t i o n a l transmission e l ec t ron microscope but t h e SEM can add usefu l informa- t i o n t h a t i s not ava i lab le i n t h e transmission e l ec t ron microscope image. The resolving power of current scanning e l ec t ron microscopes i s about 100 8.

The information r i c h i m a g e of t he SEM i s made possible by an imaging technique t h a t allows uncoupling of t h e two funct ions of a microscope: l o c a l i z a t i o n and information t r a n s f e r . The l i g h t microscope and the conven- t i o n a l transmission e l ec t ron microscope u t i l i z e a l e n s system f o r i m a g e formation. Such a system makes use of t h e same r a d i a t i o n t o both loca l i ze t h e poin ts of t h e specimen and t o ca r ry information about each point . A s a result, t h e parameters of r e so lu t ion and i m a g e information are l inked t o - gether by t h e type of r ad ia t ion used. For example, t he l i g h t microscope produces an image which i s r i c h i n information ( s p a t i a l , chemical, physio- l og ica l ) but low i n r e so lu t ion while t h e conventional transmission e l ec t ron microscope produces an image which i s high i n r e so lu t ion but low i n information (chemical bonds do not influence t h e image, t h e image i s t w o dimensional, t h e specimen i s not l i v i n g ) .

The S E M on t h e other hand uses a non-focused system of image forma- t i o n which allows t h e uncoupling of resolving power and information content. One kind of r ad ia t ion (e lec t rons) can be used t o l o c a l i z e t h e specimen poin ts at high r e so lu t ion while another kind of r ad ia t ion ( v i s i b l e l i g h t , secondaxy e lec t ron , e t c . ) can be used t o t r a n s f e r t h e information about these poin ts t o t h e image (Fig. 1). By u t i l i z i n g a t i m e sequence of po in ts (T.V.) as t h e imaging system, r a t h e r t han a l e n s focusing system, t h e SEM permits a g rea t increase i n t h e information transfer from specimen t o image.

This information r i c h image allows an inves t iga t ion of t h e second t r a n s f e r s tep: information t r a n s f e r from i m a g e t o observer. The usual mode of transfer i n s c i e n t i f i c s tud ie s m a k e s use of a reduct ion of t h e image t o ideas which are expressed i n words or numbers. i s t r ans fe r r ed by object ive, abs t r ac t means. The SEM can provide i m a g e s t h a t are su i tab le f o r t h i s type of t r a n s f e r as i l l u s t r a t e d by computer ana lys i s of images, p a t t e r n recogni t ion or chemical ana lys i s by cathodoluminescence or c h a r a c t e r i s t i c X-rays. The SEM can also provide images t h a t can help us t o inves t iga te another mode of information transfer from image t o observer: the subject ive, expe r i en t i a l mode. I n particularr, t h e secondary e l ec t ron mode of SEM operat ion produces an image with t h e important expe r i en t i a l f a c t o r of 3 dinensional space (Fig. 2) . world i s not su i ted t o o w expe r i en t i a l understanding but we sometimes fo rge t t h a t a 2 dimensional world i s equal ly fore ign . A t h ree dimensional image provides one important parameter t h a t permits t he image t o approximate experienced v i s ion (Fig. 3, 4) .

I n t h i s mode t h e information

W e are of ten aware tha t t h e four dimerisionjl

The value of expe r i en t i a l information t r a n s f e r depends somewhat on t h e d e f i n i t i o n of r e a l i t y t h a t we p re fe r . Many may not agree with Soren

274..

Kierkegaaxd when he suggests t h a t exis tence precedes essence but t he influence of 'his thoughts i s an e x i s t e n t i a l f a c t . It would seem t h a t at l e a s t we should inves t iga te t h e possible value of adding subject ive information t r a n s f e r t o the analyt ic , object ive modes which are d r e a d y familiar t o us. It i s possible t h a t i n addi t ion t o w r i t i n g t h e ana ly t ic program notes, we should t r y t o l i s t e n t o t h e symphony. i n biology (Fig. 5) subjective, expe r i en t i a l information t r a n s f e r w i l l add s ign i f i can t ly t o our understanding of t h e system.

P a r t i c u l a r l y i n deal ing with t h e very complex systems found

C onc l u s ion

We would suggest t h a t high information as wel l as high reso lu t ion should be considered i n t h e evaluat ion of a microscope's i m a g e and t h a t t he SEM i s a valuable instrument f o r t h e production of such high information con- t e n t images of b io log ica l systems. W e would a l so l i k e t o suggest t h a t sub- j e c t i v e as wel l as object ive cr i ter ia be considered when we evaluate the t r a n s f e r of t h i s information from image t o observer.

References

1) Hayes, T. L. and Pease, R. F. W. "The Scanning Electron Microscope: Pr inc ip les and Applications i n Biology and Medicine", i n Advances i n Biological and Medical Physics, (J. Lawrence and J. Gofman, eds.) Vol. 12, pp. 85-137, Academic Press, New York, 1968.

2) Microscopy", i n Advances i n Elec t ronics and Electron Physics (L. Marton, ed.) Vol. 21, pp. 181-247, Academic Press, New York, 1965.

Oatley, C. W., Nixon, W. C . and Pease, R. F. W. "Scanning Electron

3 ) Everhart , T . E., Wells, 0. C . and Oatley, C . W. "Factors Affecting Contrast and Resolution i n the Scanning Electron Microscope" , J. Elec t ronics and Control - 7,97-1ll, 1959.

4) Pease, R. F. W. "The Scanning Electron Microscope", lEEE Spectrum - 4, NO. 10, 96-102, O c t . 1967.

Ac knowle dgxe n t s

The Scanning Electron Microscope Program at Berkeley has been supported by t h e United S t a t e s Atomic Energy Commission, t h e J o i n t Services Elec t ronics Program, t h e United S ta t e s A i r Force Avionics Laboratory and the National I n s t i t u t e s of Health (Grant # GM5536-01).

271,.

ELECTRON GUN

ELECTRON LENS

DEFLECTION

ELECTRON LENS

Secondary electrons

Characteristic x rays

Transmmed electrons or specimen current

SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM

DEL 676-1648

Figure 1. Scanning e lec t ron microscope. Schematic diagram.

276.

Figure 2. Human red blood cells in blood clot. McDonald, L. W. and Hayes, T. L., Exp. and Mol. Path. - 10, 186-198, 1969. X 10,000.

277.

Figure 3. Living flour beet le . Pease, R . F. W., Hayes, T. L., Camp, A. S. and Amer, N. M., Science - 154, 1185, 1966. X 700.

278.

Figure 4. Eosinophil from peripheral blood of leukemic pa t i en t . McDonald, L. W. and Hayes, T. L., Exp. and Mol. Path. - 10, 186-198, 1969. x 2,000.

279.

Figure 5. Trabeculas meshwork of human eye, Spencer, W. H., Alvarrado, J. and Hayes, T. L., Invest igat ive Ophthallmology 7, 651-662, 1968. X 3,200.

-

280.

T. L. HAYES: Paper I n .

GUENTHER: Thank you very much D r . Hayes f o r showing once again t h a t progress i n t h e b io log ica l a rea i s so dependent upon advances i n physical sciences. To lead the discussion, Dr. Don DeFremery of t he Western U t i l i z a - t i o n Lab a t fibany. Don.

DON DeFREMERY: Thank you, M r . Chairman. I c e r t a i n l y want t o thank the three speakers f o r t h e s t imulat ing t a l k s t h a t they gave t o us. D r . Sayre f o r t he discussion of t he mechanical fragmentation of chicken myofibr i ls as influenced by th ree general types of treatments--heating or beating t o acce lera te glycolysis ; nembutal anesthesia or e l e c t r i c stunning t o retaxd post-mortum glycolysis ; and ioda-acetate or epanephrin treatment t o e l iminate glycolysis , and an attempt t o co r re l a t e t h e degree of fragmentation with the meat tenderness. Next we heard from D r . Thomas who gave us f i r s t a h i s to ry of microincineration of muscle as pr imit ive as it w a s i n the beginning and then a descr ip t ion of h i s own work on several facets--development of t he technique of low temperature ashing or low temperature inc inera t ion and i t s appl ica t ion t o b a c t e r i a l spores, p lan t viruses , mitochondrial p a r t i c l e s , var ious p l an t t i s s u e s even t o human h a i r . times, and f i n a l l y I should say we then heard f rom Dr. Hayes and from t h e t i t l e of h i s t a l k you might be l e d as t ray . a t ion t r a n s f e r and the perception of r e a l i t y by way of t h e scanning e l ec t ron microscope. The t i m e i s running a l i t t l e late, so I don ' t th ink I ' m going t o say very much more. I don ' t want t o pass up t h e opportunity, however, t o ask Dick Thomas one question -- a quest ion t h a t I thought needed answering. Dick, could you give us t h e manufacturers' names and the approximate p r i ces of several of t h e low temperature ashers t h a t you spoke of i n your t a l k ? F i r s t , s ince we both work f o r t h e U.S.D.A., perhaps I ought t o read our l e g a l disclaimer at t h i s po in t . o r recommendation of t h e product by t h e U. S. Department of Agriculture t o the exclusion of others t h a t may be su i tab le ."

I'd l i k e t o t a l k t o you Dick a l i t t l e b i t about human h a i r one of these

I would c a l l it a descr ip t ion of inform-

"Reference t o a company or product name does not imply approval

DICK THOMAS: Well ac tua l ly there are four companies t h a t I know of now. The f i r s t company t o ge t i n t o t h i s w a s Tracer Lab, t he d iv i s ion i n Richmond, Cal i forn ia , and they put out an instrument ca l led the low temperature asher, t h a t ' s been out f o r about six years now. The idea caught on and Coleman Instruments i s now of fer ing a device t h a t ' s ca l l ed a Model 40 R F Reactor, I bel ieve. A company, j u s t recent ly s taxted i n Hayward, ca l l ed In t e rna t iona l Plasma Corporation now o f f e r s an instrwnent. And then las t year I learned of a company i n Europe--Baltzer's Lippenstein t h a t also makes an instrument which w a s designed by a group i n Austr ia and in t e re s t ing ly enough, f o r me at least , i s intended pr imari ly f o r e l ec t ron microscope specimens. The p r i ces of these instruments, as competition has moved in, t h e p r i ces come down. They a l l run around $2,000 - $3000 or something l i k e t h a t .

DON DeFEIEMERY: Are the re any questions from the f l o o r ? I think, perhaps, t he speakers have overwhelmed you. I had a f e e l i n g a f t e r D r . Hayes's t a l k t h a t I w a s coming back t o t h e world or r e a l i t y as I knew it before, and I ' m not qu i te sure now, j u s t what r e a l i t y i s . I want t o thank p a r t i c u l a r l y t h e l as t two speakers f o r t h e qua l i t y of t h e e l ec t ron micrographs or t he scanning e l ec t ron micrographs, i f you w i l l . qua l i ty . D r . Guenther. John.

They were c e r t a i n l y of very exce l len t If t h e r e ' s no f u r t h e r discussion I'll t u r n the meeting back t o

281.

J. GUENTHER: Thanks Don. I guess we're about ready t o t u r n it back t o Max f o r t h e business session. L e t ' s stand up and take a break. Incidental ly , we did get a few l e t t e r s someone brought up here. There's one for Zerle Carpenter, f o r King or Landmann, Alsmeyer, Tuna, Kinsman and t h e r e ' s a postage due here for James Price. take a break.

Bet te r come back and ge t them. L e t ' s

# # # # # # # # # # #