30
The Scientific Approach (or why Chymistry outlasted Magick) Lab 2

The Scientific Approach ( or why Chymistry outlasted Magick )

  • Upload
    trapper

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Scientific Approach ( or why Chymistry outlasted Magick ). Lab 2. Futures. Seen CSI? House? Numbers? Myth busters? Wonder about global warming? Best ways to create jobs? Have views about anything at all? Want to be the one that solves problems?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

The Scientific Approach(or why Chymistry outlasted Magick)

Lab 2

Page 2: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

2

Futures• Seen CSI? House? Numbers? Myth busters?• Wonder about global warming? Best ways

to create jobs?– Have views about anything at all?

• Want to be the one that solves problems?

Science isn’t facts. Facts fuel science. What can you do with information?

Page 3: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

3

Experimentation: asking questions

• It’s how we verify important things about the world

• Good experimentation: baby monkey• Poor experimentation: kitten

Page 4: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

4

Definitions

• “Science is the human endeavor to achieve a better understanding of the world by observation, comparison, experiment, analysis, synthesis, and conceptualization”

• “Science is a body of facts (‘knowledge’) and the concepts that permit explaining these facts.”– Both from Ernst Mayr, What makes biology unique p. 140 (Kindle version)

Page 5: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

Albert Einstein Sez...“The whole of science is nothing more

than a refinement of everyday thinking.”

Page 6: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

6

You already do this• You stumble out of your room at 4 a.m. and

turn on a lamp• Nothing happens• Now what? Curse the darkness?• Notes to self: What elements are you

employing? What’s your process?**Your notes today will be your material for a graded exercise at day’s endTake a blank sheet of paper out to start

Page 7: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

7

Gonna Science you up• “The light’s not turning on!” = observation• ‘Possible explanations’ = models• “If I ______, it should _____” = prediction• Execution of prediction = test• “Gotta catch ‘em all”: goal is to whittle away

possibilities until only one is left standing– If only looking at one, challenge it to fail

Page 8: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

8

Ways of knowing• Empirical--you saw it, touched it, etc.• Reasoned argument from documented/identified

assumptions & previous knowledge• Repeatedly established by others that you ‘trust’• ‘Intuition’ arises from experience & mental

participation• Never: assertions by authority regardless of the

nature (or volume) of that authority. No, really--never!

Page 9: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

Hypothesis testing (a more detailed explanation of science)

Read, Observe, Consider, Intuit

Create/Embrace an explanation (model)

Derive predictions

Create tests to which you ‘know’ the answer**Because of insights from your model

Execute tests

Reject/modify modelGain confidence

Repeat

Do results make sense?

Page 10: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

The answer, my friend, ain’t blowin’ in the wind

Page 11: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

Questions

• What do you think that was a graph of?• You’re probably wrong… I’ll just tell you

It was a Cholera outbreak in the UK• Is this an effective means of displaying the

data?

Page 12: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

12

Thinking with your nose

Page 13: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

• Two paper towels will be passed around

• Give your nose a pass at each– What do you notice?– What does the fact of smelling tell

you about involvement of molecules?– What does smelling different things

tell you?

The Question(s)

Page 14: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

C10H14O

The formula for both smells. What can you conclude about how its bonded?

Page 15: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

This is the structural drawing for both smells. What can you conclude?

Page 16: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

The Answer(s)

• One form of carvone (L-carvone) = spearmint; the other (D-carvone) is caraway oil

• The only difference is the teal-circled carbon. In one, the Hydrogen goes down into the board (and the -CHCH2CH3 group out), in the other, vice versa. See StructViewer

• Even with just your nose, you can figure out a lot…

Page 17: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

17

PatternMaster

A quest for the rules that order a system

Page 18: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

18

Rule Quest

*NEIGHBOR definitions are clockwise, counterclockwise

Given 1-step clockwise*, it could be...

•Perimeter to top inner color

•Top inner color to lower left color

•Lower right color to lower left color

Page 19: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

19

Take a look

Bio181M_Go => PatternMaster for FunEnter a random # Select ‘Demo’

Page 20: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

20

Solver

After exposure, ask: which is easier to figure out--WHAT is making a given block happy, or WHO

Page 21: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

P’Master, written part• Description clearly explains underlying rule– supplemented with examples– sufficient to guide someone who doesn’t know the

game• If proposed solution is wrong or

incomprehensible, points taken OFF & max possible score 40 no matter what

• Easy => 90; Medium => 95; Hard => 100 (if perfect write-up)

Page 22: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

22

Quantum Mine

Scientifically exploring a black box

Page 23: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

23

Rules of the Mine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Box_(game)

or...

Page 24: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

24

Ordering the unknown• In PatternMaster, you conjecture

from a ‘standing start’, then test resulting hypotheses

• Next exercise, you’ll investigate building of knowledge, = creation of simplifying view from initially disparate information

• Or: Indicator 1-6; Substance A & B

Page 25: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

Molecular Detecting

• You have 2 samples and 6 chemicals to test them with

• Use the same number of drops for each one (consistency is kind of a big deal in science…)

• Record your data in a chart (template is in your lab manual (appendix I)

• Tell me what you learned (i.e. what behaves similarly, can the reaction be reversed with the other sample, etc.)

Page 26: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

Homework

•Quantum Mine: Solution & (written) approach

•Pattern Master: Solution & (written) description•Next week: write-up of today’s work (see rubric)

Assessor: Logic of disproof

Page 27: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

27

Some definitions• “Science is the human endeavor to achieve a better

understanding of the world by observation, comparison, experiment, analysis, synthesis, and conceptualization”

• “Science is a body of facts (‘knowledge’) and the concepts that permit explaining these facts.”

• Both from Ernst Mayr, What makes biology unique p. 140 (Kindle version)

Page 28: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

28

Consider...How do you know:

• The world isn’t flat?• What trees are made of?• Earth circles the sun?• Where you were born?

Page 29: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

How NOT to Represent your Data

Do you know what the hell this is telling us? Because I don’t.

Page 30: The Scientific Approach ( or why  Chymistry  outlasted  Magick )

How to Represent your Data (in a good way)