The Sirte Basin Province of Libya Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System

The Sirte Basin Province of Libya—Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System

By

Thomas S. Ahlbrandt

U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2202–F

U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological Survey

U.S. Department of the Interior

Gale A. Norton, Secretary

U.S. Geological Survey

Charles G. Groat, Director

Version 1.0, 2001

This publication is only available online at:http://geology.cr.usgs.gov/pub/bulletins/b2202-f/

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publicationis for descriptive purposes only and does notimply endorsement by the U.S. Government

Manuscript approved for publication May 8, 2001Published in the Central Region, Denver, ColoradoGraphics by Susan M. Walden, Margarita V. ZyrianovaPhotocomposition by William SowersEdited by L.M. Carter

III

Contents

Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... 1Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 1Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 2Province Geology................................................................................................................................. 2

Province Boundary ..................................................................................................................... 2Geographic Setting..................................................................................................................... 4Political and Exploration History ............................................................................................. 5Geologic Setting.......................................................................................................................... 7

Total Petroleum System ..................................................................................................................... 11Petroleum Occurrence .............................................................................................................. 11Source Rock ................................................................................................................................ 13Overburden Rock ........................................................................................................................ 17Reservoir Rock ............................................................................................................................ 17Seal Rock ..................................................................................................................................... 21Trap Style ..................................................................................................................................... 21

Petroleum Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 21References Cited ................................................................................................................................. 27

Figures

1–3. Maps showing:1. Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System, assessment units,

and oil and gas field centerpoints ......................................................................... 32. Structural elements of Sirte Basin ........................................................................ 43. Central Mediterranean Sea, USGS-defined Pelagian province,

and offshore

areas of Sirte Basin......................................................................... 54. Northeast-southwest offshore regional cross section

........................................

65. East-west onshore structural cross section.................................................................. 86. Pre-Hercynian subcrop map in Sirte Basin area .......................................................... 87. Stratigraphic section in central Sirte Basin................................................................... 98. Stratigraphic section in eastern Sirte Basin.................................................................. 109. Schematic cross section showing general structural position,

stratigraphic age, and lithology of most traps within

onshore

Sirte Basin............................................................................................................ 1110. Diagram showing burial history curve for deepest portion

of Sirte Trough..................................................................................................................... 1211. Map showing postulated petroleum migration pathways for oil

sourced from Upper Cretaceous shales......................................................................... 13

IV

12. Map showing postulated pre-Upper Cretaceous source areas and migrationpathways of nonmarine source rocks in eastern Sirte Basin..................................... 14

13. Oil geochemistry plots for 81 oil samples from 55 fields in Sirte Basin ..................... 15 14. Events chart for Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System ................................................. 1615. Map showing tectonic elements and oil fields in eastern Sirte Basin ...................... 1816. Stratigraphic cross section in Calanscio-Hameimat Trough ...................................... 1917. East-west structural cross section across western margin of Messla High ........... 2018. Schematic structural cross section from Sarir Trough across

Messla High and into Hameimat Trough........................................................................ 2019. Stratigraphic cross section through Zelten Formation bioherms............................... 2220. Cumulative plot of volume of known oil versus field discovery year

for Southeast Sirte Clastics Assessment Unit ............................................................... 2321–23. Histograms showing:

21. Volumetric assessment results for geologically risked assessment units in Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System in Sirte Basin ............................. 25

22. Volumetric assessment results for geologically risked and unriskedassessment units in Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System in Sirte Basin....... 25

23. Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team (2000) mean risked estimates for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids versus Masters and others’ (1994) mean estimates .......................................... 26

Tables

1. Sirte-Zelten, Total Petroleum System 204301—assessmentresults summary.................................................................................................................. 24

Abstract 1

Foreword

This report was prepared as part of the World Energy Project of the U.S. Geological Survey. For this project, the world was divided into eight regions and 937 geologic provinces. Of these, parts of 128 geologic provinces were assessed for undiscovered petroleum resources. The primary documentation for these assessments is in U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assess-ment Team (2000). The petroleum geology of these priority and boutique provinces is described in this series of reports. Seventy-six “priority” provinces (exclusive of the United States and cho-sen for their high ranking) and 52 “boutique” provinces (exclu-sive of the United States) were selected for appraisal of oil and gas resources. Boutique provinces were chosen for their antici-pated petroleum richness or special regional economic or strate-gic importance.

The purpose of the World Energy Project is to assess the quantities of oil, gas, and natural gas liquids that have the poten-tial to be added to reserves within the next 30 years. These vol-umes either reside in undiscovered fields whose sizes exceed the stated minimum-field-size cutoff value for the assessment unit (variable, but must be at least 1 million barrels of oil equivalent) or occur as reserve growth of fields already discovered.

The total petroleum system constitutes the basic geologic unit of the oil and gas assessment. The total petroleum system includes all genetically related petroleum that occurs in shows and accumulations (discovered and undiscovered) that (1) has been generated by a pod or by closely related pods of mature source rock, and (2) exists within a limited mappable geologic space, along with the other essential mappable geologic elements (reservoir, seal, and overburden rocks) that control the funda-mental processes of generation, expulsion, migration, entrap-ment, and preservation of petroleum. The minimum petroleum system is that part of a total petroleum system encompassing discovered shows and accumulations along with the geologic space in which the various essential elements have been proved by these discoveries.

An assessment unit is a mappable part of a total petroleum system in which discovered and undiscovered fields constitute a single, relatively homogeneous population such that the chosen methodology of resource assessment based on estimation of the number and sizes of undiscovered fields is applicable. A total petroleum system may equate to a single assessment unit, or it may be subdivided into two or more assessment units if each unit is sufficiently homogeneous in terms of geology, exploration con-siderations, and risk to assess individually.

A graphical depiction of the elements of a total petroleum system is provided in the form of an events chart that shows the times of (1) deposition of essential rock units; (2) trap formation;

(3) generation, migration, and accumulation of hydrocarbons; and (4) preservation of hydrocarbons.

A numeric code identifies each region, province, total petro-leum system, and assessment unit; these codes are uniform throughout the project and will identify the same type of entity in any of the publications. The code is as follows:

Example

Region, single digit

3

Province, three digits to the right of region code 3

162

Total petroleum system, two digits to the right of province code 3162

05

Assessment unit, two digits to the right of petroleum system code 316205

04

The codes for the regions and provinces are listed in U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team (2000).

Oil and gas reserves quoted in this report are derived from Petroconsultants’ Petroleum Exploration and Production data-base (Petroconsultants, 1996) and other area reports from Petro-consultants, Inc., unless otherwise noted.

Figure(s) in this report that show boundaries of the total petroleum system(s), assessment units, and pods of active source rocks were compiled using geographic information system (GIS) software. Political boundaries and cartographic representations were taken, with permission, from Environmental Systems Research Institute’s ArcWorld 1:3 million digital coverage (1992), have no political significance, and are displayed for gen-eral reference only. Oil and gas field centerpoints shown in these illustrations are reproduced, with permission, from Petroconsult-ants (1996).

Abstract

The Sirte (Sirt) Basin province ranks 13th among the world’s petroleum provinces, having known reserves of 43.1 bil-lion barrels of oil equivalent (36.7 billion barrels of oil, 37.7 tril-lion cubic feet of gas, 0.1 billion barrels of natural gas liquids). It includes an area about the size of the Williston Basin of the north-ern United States and southern Canada (

≈

490,000 square kilome-ters). The province contains one dominant total petroleum system, the Sirte-Zelten, based on geochemical data. The Upper Cretaceous Sirte Shale is the primary hydrocarbon source bed. Reservoirs range in rock type and age from fractured Precam-brian basement, clastic reservoirs in the Cambrian-Ordovician Gargaf sandstones, and Lower Cretaceous Nubian (Sarir) Sand-stone to Paleocene Zelten Formation and Eocene carbonates commonly in the form of bioherms. More than 23 large oil fields (>100 million barrels of oil equivalent) and 16 giant oil fields (>500 million barrels of oil equivalent) occur in the province.

The Sirte Basin Province of Libya—Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System

By Thomas S. Ahlbrandt

2 The Sirte Basin Province of Libya—Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System

Production from both clastic and carbonate onshore reservoirs is associated with well-defined horst blocks related to a triple junc-tion with three arms—an eastern Sarir arm, a northern Sirte arm, and a southwestern Tibesti arm. Stratigraphic traps in combina-tion with these horsts in the Sarir arm are shown as giant fields (for example, Messla and Sarir fields in the southeastern portion of the province). Significant potential is identified in areas mar-ginal to the horsts, in the deeper grabens and in the offshore area.

Four assessment units are defined in the Sirte Basin prov-ince, two reflecting established clastic and carbonate reservoir areas and two defined as hypothetical units. Of the latter, one is offshore in water depths greater than 200 meters, and the other is onshore where clastic units, mainly of Mesozoic age, may be res-ervoirs for laterally migrating hydrocarbons that were generated in the deep-graben areas.

The Sirte Basin reflects significant rifting in the Early Cre-taceous and syn-rift sedimentary filling during Cretaceous through Eocene time, and post-rift deposition in the Oligocene and Miocene. Multiple reservoirs are charged largely by verti-cally migrating hydrocarbons along horst block faults from Upper Cretaceous source rocks that occupy structurally low posi-tions in the grabens. Evaporites in the middle Eocene, mostly post-rift, provide an excellent seal for the Sirte-Zelten hydrocar-bon system. The offshore part of the Sirte Basin is complex, with subduction occurring to the northeast of the province boundary, which is drawn at the 2,000-meter isobath. Possible petroleum systems may be present in the deep offshore grabens on the Sirte Rise such as those involving Silurian and Eocene rocks; however, potential of these systems remains speculative and was not assessed.

Introduction

The Sirte Basin province ranks 13th among the world’s petroleum provinces, exclusive of the U.S. provinces, with 43.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BBOE) of known petroleum vol-ume, and it ranks 15th if U.S. petroleum provinces are included (Klett and others, 1997). The Sirte Basin province is considered a “priority” province by the World Energy Assessment Team as described in the Foreword. Sixteen giant (>500 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE)) fields occur in the province; reservoirs range in age from Precambrian to Miocene. Exploration has focused on structural highs, principally the horst blocks such as the Waddan, Az Zahrah, and Zaltan platforms (also variously known as Jebel Uddan, Beda, Dahra, Al Hufra, and Zeltan plat-forms) (figs. 1, 2). These platforms are dominated by carbonate and bioherm Tertiary reservoirs of Tertiary age. In the eastern Sirte Basin, significant stratigraphic clastic traps superimposed on structural highs principally occur in Mesozoic clastic reser-voirs such as at Sarir and Messla fields (fig. 1).

The Sirte Basin province is characterized by one dominant petroleum system, the Sirte-Zelten, which is subdivided into four assessment units (fig. 1). The Sirte Basin (also referred to as “Sirt Basin”) is a late Mesozoic and Tertiary continental rift, triple junction, in northern Africa that borders a relatively stable Paleo-zoic craton and cratonic sag basins along its southern margins (fig. 2). The province extends offshore into the Mediterranean Sea, with the northern boundary drawn at the 2,000 meter (m)

bathymetric contour. The thickness of sediments in the province increases from about 1 kilometer (km) near the Nubian (also known as Tibesti) Uplift on the south to as much as 7 km offshore in the northern Gulf of Sirte. The onshore area is relatively well explored for structures, which are dominated by regionally exten-sive horsts and grabens (fig. 2). Hydrocarbon resources are approximately equally divided between carbonate and clastic res-ervoirs (pre-Tertiary, dominantly clastic; Tertiary, dominantly carbonate reservoirs). The prospective area in the province cov-ers about 230,000 km

2

(Montgomery, 1994; Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996; MacGregor and Moody, 1998). The offshore portion (figs. 3, 4) is far less explored and its petroleum potential is largely unknown.

Offshore, geologic relations in the Sirte Basin province indi-cate a potential for major reserves to be added by the dominant Mesozoic system, but Paleozoic and Cenozoic petroleum systems may be proven to exist as well. Speculative hydrocarbon systems are also postulated for the eastern part of the province, including Lower Cretaceous and Triassic source rocks (Mansour and Magairhy, 1996; Burwood, 1997; Ambrose, 2000), as well as Eocene and Silurian source rocks in the deeper grabens and off-shore areas (Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996).

Recent petroleum geochemistry data confirm the domi-nance of the Upper Cretaceous Sirte Shale (equivalent to the upper part of the Rakb Group; see fig. 7) as the source of hydro-carbons in the Sirte Basin (Ghori and Mohammed, 1996; Baric and others, 1996). Recent exploration suggests additional poten-tial in the grabens, particularly in the southern part of the Zallah Graben (Abu Tumayam), the Marada Graben (Maradah), and the Sirte Graben (Ajdabiya, Kalash, or Sirt), as discussed by Hallett and El Ghoul (1996, fig. 5). Hydrocarbons generated by Eocene source rocks, particularly in the offshore, offer speculative potential as well.

Acknowledgments

The Sirte Basin was studied utilizing both published data and proprietary databases, including the 1996 Petroconsultants file, the 1998 Geomark oil geochemical file, and other industry sources. References listed in this publication reflect the most rel-evant or current information in the author’s opinion, and also include items resulting from searches of the GEOREF database as well as other pertinent geologic information. Basic geologic and petroleum information was utilized from USGS Open-File Reports 97-470A (Persits and others, 1997) and 97-463 (Klett and others, 1997), Digital Data Series 60 (U.S. Geological Sur-vey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000), and UNESCO 1:5,000,000 tectonic and geologic maps of Africa.

Province Geology

Province Boundary

The south and southeast boundaries of the Sirte Basin prov-ince (2043) are drawn at the Precambrian-Paleozoic contact along the Nubian Uplift and its northeast-trending extension, termed the Southern Shelf (figs. 1, 2) or also referred to as the Northeast

Province Geology 3

Mediterranean Basin

Pelagian Basin

Crete

Sirte Basin

Cyrenaica Uplift

Cyrenaica Basin

Fezzan Uplift

Murzuk Basin

Tibesti Arch/ Alma Arch

Nubian Uplift

Mabruk (017-A/B/C)

Bahi (032-A)

032-G-001 Dahra West (032-B/II) Sahl (006-O-004)Amal (012-U)

Amal(012-B/E/N/R)Dahra East-Hofra (032-F/Y/011-A/4O)

Augila-Nafoora (102-D/051-A/G)006-HHH-001

Lehib-Dor Marada (006-UU/013-T)

LP003C-A-002

Sorra (006-PP)

Raguba (020-E)

Zenad(011-VVV)

006-4D-001Intisar (103-A)Ghani (011-RRR) NC098-A-001Nasser (006-C/4I/4K)

Intisar (103-D) Bu Attifel (100-A)

082-UU

011-4I-001 Gialo (059-YY)Gialo (059-E)Jebel (006-P)Kotla (047-C/A)Zella (NC074B-A)

Eteila (013-G/HH)

Masrab (059-P)Waha North (059-A)Beda (047-B)Waha South (059-A)

Samah (059-L)

Defa (059-B/071-Q)

Messla (065-HH/080-DD)Sarir (065-L)

Sarir North (065-C)Sarir (065-C)

ASSESSMENT DATA

Assessment units boundary and name

Southeast Sirte Clastics

Southeast Sirte Hypothetical

Central Sirte Carbonates

Offshore Sirte Hypothetical

Total petroleum system boundary

?

?

??

?

Pod of active source rocks boundary—Ticks indicate side of their presence; queried where extent uncertain

EXPLANATIONHydrographyShorelineGeologic province name and boundaryCountry boundaryGas field centerpointOil field centerpointAnnotated Fields with magnitude > 100,000 mbo or mmscfg

100 KILOMETERS

20430103

20430101

20430104

20430102

20432043

Hamra Basin2047

2046

2041

2070

2045

2044

2048

20°E 25°E15°E

35°

30°

25°

0

Figure 1.

Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System showing boundaries of the total and minimum petroleum system, pods of ac-tive (thermally mature) source rock, four assessment units, and oil and gas field centerpoints (named fields exceed 100 mil-lion barrels of oil equivalent). Note the 200 m bathymetric isobath forms boundary between Offshore Sirte Hypothetical Assessment Unit (20430103) and Central Sirte Carbonates Assessment Unit (20430102). The 2,000 m bathymetric isobath forms northern boundary of province, total petroleum system, and Offshore Sirte Hypothetical Assessment Unit 20430103. Projection: Robinson. Central meridian: 0.


Tibesti Arch/Alma Arch uplift by some authors (for example, Futyan and Jawzi, 1996). The Cyrenaica Shelf (also referred to as a platform, including both basin and uplift) forms the eastern and northeastern border. The western border, generally called the Western Shelf (fig. 2), is a combination of the Nubian Uplift and a northwest-trending extension called the Fezzan Uplift (Tripoli-As Sawda Arch); the latter feature intersects the Nafusa (Talem-zane-Gefara) Arch, an east-west-trending arch along the north-west margin of the province (Persits and others, 1997; fig. 3). The northern margin is the 2,000 m bathymetric contour (isobath) in the Gulf of Sirte (figs. 1–3). Offshore the province is separated from the Pelagian Basin petroleum province (2048) by the Medina Bank (fig. 3). To the west is the Hamra Basin, to the south the Mur-zuk Basin, and to the east the Cyrenaica Basin (2041) (fig. 1).

Alternative basin outlines have been drawn (for example, Mont-gomery, 1994; Futyan and Jawzi, 1996, Selley, 1997); however, the Sirte Basin boundary outline as just described was drawn based upon surface geologic and subsurface tectonic maps pre-pared at a scale of 1:5,000,000 by UNESCO and shown on sup-porting maps such as the Africa geologic map prepared for the World Energy Project (Persits and others, 1997).

Geographic Setting

The Sirte Basin is a triple-junction continental rift along the northern margin of Africa (fig. 2). It is bordered on the north by the Gulf of Sirte (Sidra) in the Mediterranean Sea. Although the Nubian Uplift rises to 3,000 m south of the Sirte Basin, much of

mTi

best

iA

rm

Al Bayda

Platform

CyrenaicaTerrane

SarirArm

Cyrenaica Silver

Upper Cretaceous-middle Eocene right-lateral stress shear system

Sirte

Arm

15°E 20°E 25°E 30°E

20°

25°

Tibe

sti A

rm

Alexandria

CairoE G Y P TE G Y P TCYRENAICA SHELF

Sarir Study Area

N I

G E

RN

I G

E R

WESTERN SHELF Aswad

Platform

L I B Y AL I B Y A

DarnahAl JabalAl Akhdar

0 250 KILOMETERS

M e d i t e r r a n e a n S e a

G u l f o f S i r t e Benghazi

Suluq Low

Hun

Graben

Waddan

(Jebel Uddan) P

latform

Zallah

(Tagrifet)Trough

Az

Zahrah

(Al Hufrah, D

ahra) Platform

Maradah

Trough

C H A DC H A D

SOUTHERN SHELF

S U D A NS U D A N

Zaltan

(Al Janamah) P

latformS

irte

Zeltan

Platform

Calanscio Trough

South Depression

Sarir Trough

Hameim

at TroughMesslah High

(Ajdabiya, K

alash) Trough

Inferred edge

Structural lows

Tertiary volcanics

Cambrian-Ordovician rocks

Precambrian rocks

EXPLANATION

30°

Figure 2.

Structural elements of Sirte Basin. Troughs and grabens, platforms and horsts are synonymous terms. Individual horsts and gra-bens possess multiple names. For example, the Sirte (Sirt) Trough is also known as the Kalash or Ajdabiya Trough, as noted (modified from Ambrose, 2000). Barbs show direction of relative movement on faults.

Province Geology 5

the land area in the basin is characterized by desert steppes and includes eolian deposits of the Kalanshiyu and Rabyanah Sand Seas of the Sahara Desert. In a relatively narrow, northern coastal strip, some land areas are as much as 47 m below sea level. The Sirte Basin is roughly the size of the Williston Basin in North America (

≈

490,000 km

2

). Libya is the fourth largest country in Africa and the 15th largest country in the world.

Political and Exploration History

Libya became an independent nation in 1951; however, it has a complex early history dating back to 10,000 years before the present (B.P.) when Neolithic cultures domesticated cattle and cultivated crops in the coastal zone. Until about 4,000 B.P., nomadic cultures thrived in what is now the Libyan Desert (part

SIC

ILY

AD

VE

NT

UR

EP

LAT

EA

U

MALTA G

RABEN

MAL

TA-M

EDIN

A C

HAN

NEL

MED

INA

GR

ABEN

RAGUSA-

MALTA

PLATEAU

ION

IAN

AB

YS

SA

L B

AS

IN

ISIS

HO

RST

JARRAFA

GRABEN

ME

LITA

BA

NK

ME

DIN

A B

AN

K

FO

RE

-AR

C S

CR

AP

ING

ZO

NE

FO

RE

-AR

C S

CR

AP

ING

ZO

NE

MEDITERRANEAN RID

GEHELLENIC ARC

SIRTE R

ISE

UPP

ER S

IRTE

SLO

PE

MARADA TROUGH

MIS

URATA-S

IRTE R

IDGE

SIRTE T

ROUGH

CYR

ENAI

CA

RID

GE

LOW

ER S

IRTE

SLO

PE

CA

LTA

NIS

SE

TTA

BA

SIN

MA

LTA

CY

RE

NA

ICA

UP

LIF

T

TU

NIS

IA

AS

HTA

RT-

TRIP

OLI

TAN

IA B

AS

IN

LAM

PE

DU

SA

PLA

TE

AU

TALE

MZ

AN

E-

GE

FAR

A A

RC

H

PAN

TELL

ER

IAG

RA

BE

N

MIS

UR

ATA

VA

LLE

Y

MAGHREBIA

N TREND

LIB

YA

010

0 K

ILO

ME

TE

RS

GA

FSA

-GE

FAR

A E

XTE

NS

ION

AL

FAU

LT S

YS

TEM

NORTH-SOUTH AXIS

Cou

ntry

bou

ndar

yPr

ovin

ce b

ound

ary

Stru

ctur

al h

igh

boun

dary

Faul

t

Loc

atio

n of

cro

ss s

ectio

nA

xis

of s

truc

tura

l hig

h

Mai

n m

agm

atic

are

as

NE

FU

SA

AR

CH

Gul

fof

Gab

es

Gul

fof

Ham

mam

et

Pela

gian

Sea

Approximateeastern limit

of Triassic salt

A

A'

EX

PLA

NA

TIO

N

10°E

12°E

14°E

16°E

18°E

20°E

22°E

30°

32°

34°

36°

38°

Figu

re 3

.

Cen

tral M

edite

rran

ean

Sea,

sho

win

g US

GS-d

efin

ed P

elag

ian

prov

ince

and

offs

hore

are

as o

f Sirt

e Ba

sin,

the

Sirte

Ris

e. S

truct

ural

hig

h bo

unda

ries

are

base

d on

sei

smic

dat

a an

d dr

awn

on 1

.0 a

nd 1

.8 s

econ

d tw

o-w

ay tr

avel

tim

e in

terv

als

(mod

ified

from

Fin

etti,

198

2; B

isho

p, 1

988;

Jon

gsm

a an

d ot

hers

, 198

5; a

nd K

lett,

in

pre

ss).

Sect

ion

A–A

' is

show

n in

figu

re 4

.

6The Sirte B

asin Province of Libya—Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum

System

A A'

+

++

+

++

++

++

++

++

+

++

++

++

+

++

+

+

+

320

240

160

80

10

15

20

0

0

5

SW

DE

PT

H, I

N K

ILO

ME

TE

RS

320

240

160

80

10

15

20

0

0

5

NE

18° E 20° E 22° E 24° E

34°

36°

MS-33

GREECE

LOCATION MAP

MelangePliocene-QuaternaryMessinianMiddle lower Miocene to PaleoceneMesozoicCrystalline metamorphic basementBasaltic basement and volcanicsExtrusives

EXPLANATION

++ +

BASALTIC BASEMENTINTERMEDIATE CRUST TYPE

Middle-lower MioceneOligoceneEocene

Paleocene

MessinianP-Q

Cretaceous

Middle Upper Jurassic

HELLENIC ARCSIRTE LOWER SIRTE MARGIN IONIAN ABYSSAL BASIN FORE - ARC SCRAPING ZONE

Cretaceous

TriassicJurassic

MOHO

RECONSTRUCTED ON SEISMIC REFLECTION LINE MS-33

BOUGUER GRAVITY

HE

LLE

NIC

TR

OU

GH

TROUGH

SIRTE RISE

Figure 4.

Northeast-southwest offshore regional cross section showing structural, tectonic, and crustal relationships in offshore Sirte Rise to Hellenic Arc (modified from Finetti, 1982).

Province Geology 7

of the Sahara) in what was until then a savanna environment. About 4,000 B.P., either migration occurred or the population was absorbed into the Berber tribe. Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Muslims, the Turks of the Ottoman Empire, and finally the Italians subsequently occupied this area prior to its indepen-dence. Libya was liberated from the Italians and Germans in World War II, and Britain acted as the country’s administrative overseer from 1943 to 1949. Following a period of transition under the United Nations, a Libyan government was formed in 1951. Concerned about domination by foreign interests, Libya passed basic minerals laws in 1953 and 1955; multiple conces-sions were then granted to Esso, Mobil, Texas Gulf, and others, resulting in major oil discoveries by 1959. By 1969, production from the Sirte Basin exceeded production from Saudi Arabia (3 million barrels of oil per day (MMBOPD), which has now decreased to 1.5 MMBOPD (Yergin, 1991; Petroconsultants, 1996; EIA, 1997). Libya nationalized its oil industry in 1973, and some U.S. oil companies began withdrawing from Libya in 1982, following a 1981 U.S. trade embargo. By 1986, the remaining U.S. companies were ordered to cease activities in Libya. In 1992, the United Nations sanctioned Libya in response to the 1988 bombing of a Pan American flight over Scotland. Addi-tional sanctions applied by the U.S. Sanctions Act of 1996 were relaxed in 1999. Today, U.S. and other companies have com-menced reentry into Libya, and a number are currently active, led by AGIP (Italy), OeMV(Austria), Veba (Germany), TOTAL (France), Nimir (Saudi), WOC (NOC, Conoco, Marathon, Amerada Hess), ETAP (Tunisia), and others.

The first reported occurrence of petroleum in the Sirte Basin was observed in a coastal water well drilled by Italian colonists, Libya having become an Italian colony following a 1911–1912 Turkish-Italian war in which Italy controlled part of the country (and ultimately the entire country in 1923). The Italian govern-ment embarked on geologic investigations of the area and pro-duced a geologic map in 1934. Shows of natural gas were observed in the late 1930’s, but World War II interrupted explora-tion efforts. Competitive bidding for petroleum concessions was subsequently permitted by two mineral laws passed in 1953 and 1955, and exploration by Esso, Mobil, Texas Gulf, and others commenced with seismic, magnetic, and gravity data being col-lected. From 1956 to 1961 giant oil fields were discovered, including Amal, Sarir, and Raguba (Montgomery, 1994, fig. 1). Lewis (1990) documented the interesting discovery history of these fields including the notation that the Sarir field was nearly bypassed because oil was not anticipated in the Nubian Forma-tion. That formation was subsequently shown to be a prolific res-ervoir with initial production rates of 20,000 barrels of oil per day (BOPD). By 1961, Libya was exporting oil, and by 1966 it had become the seventh largest oil-producing nation. For a period in the 1960’s, Libya exceeded Saudi Arabia in petroleum exports (Yergin, 1991).

According to Hallett and El Ghoul (1996), 9,850 wells have been drilled in the Sirte Basin, and of those 1,578 were wildcats. They reported 100 billion barrels of oil (BBO), 50 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of associated gas, and 20 TCF of non-associated gas in place. Clifford (1984) reported 27.9 billion barrels of reserves (recoverable oil). Based on data from Petroconsultants (1996), the USGS reported that known petroleum reserves in the Sirte Basin province (2043) were 43.1 billion BBOE (36.7 BBO, 37.7

TCF natural gas, 0.1 billion barrels of natural gas liquids (BBNGL); Klett and others, 1997), an amount that constitutes 1.7 percent of the world’s known oil reserves. Exploration has focused on structural highs (horsts) with little exploration of intervening grabens such as those shown in figure 6. Recent drill-ing has demonstrated potential in the grabens; for example, such shows as observed in well A1-119 on the Al Brayqah Ridge within the Ajdabiya (Sirte) Trough (Graben) (Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996) provide a strong indication that future drilling in the deep trough areas may result in the discovery of several billion barrels of additional oil reserves. Even though the Sirte Basin is the most explored province in Libya, significant potential remains particularly in the grabens and offshore areas.

The prospective area of the Sirte Basin occupies about 230,000 km

2

, with a wildcat drilling density of one new field wildcat per 145 km

2

(Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996). The overall drilling density of the basin is 3.3 wells per 100 km

2

(MacGregor and Moody, 1998), with an average field depth of 2,100 m. By comparison, the northern North Sea is nearly three times more intensely explored (nine wells per 100 km

2

) to average depths of 3,000 m. MacGregor and Moody (1998) believed that the petro-leum discoveries in the future for the Sirte Basin lie in refocusing exploration to subtle forms of traps such as hanging wall closure, relay ramps, and stratigraphic traps; such subtle traps, they pointed out, are represented in the North Sea but have yet to be developed extensively in the Sirte Basin. Recent indications of hydrocarbons within grabens suggest that these areas have poten-tial as well as clastic reservoirs beneath the carbonate reservoirs in the Central Sirte Basin (Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996). The off-shore area beyond 200 m depths is largely unexplored, but it has both significant hydrocarbon potential and significant exploration risk.

Geologic Setting

The Sirte Basin province is considered to be a holotype of a continental rift (extensional) area and is referred to as part of the Tethyan rift system (Futyan and Jawzi, 1996; Guiraud and Bos-worth, 1997). The structural weakness of the area is exemplified by alternating periods of uplift and subsidence originating in late Precambrian time, commencing with the Pan African orogeny that consolidated a number of proto-continental fragments into an early Gondwanaland (Kroner, 1993).

Early Paleozoic history of the Sirte Basin reflects a relatively undisturbed Paleozoic cratonic sag basin with intermittent peri-ods of arching in the Paleozoic(?) (for example, formation of a regional uplift referred to as the Sirte Arch; Bellini and Massa, 1980; Van Houten, 1980; Anketell, 1996). The timing of this uplift is debatable; historically it is considered to be a mid-Pale-ozoic event, but it could have formed in the Mesozoic preceding an Early Cretaceous rifting event.

Rifting commenced in the Early Cretaceous, peaked in the Late Cretaceous, and terminated in early Tertiary time, resulting in the triple junction (Sirte, Tibesti, and Sarir arms; see inset, fig. 2) within the basin (Harding, 1984; Gras and Thusu, 1998; Ambrose, 2000). According to Anketell (1996), the Early Creta-ceous rifting reflected east-west sinistral shear zones (strike-slip) that strongly controlled clastic deposition in the Sarir arm, but


West East

Feet

Feet2000

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Sea Level

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

22000

Sea Level

M. Eocene

PaleoceneL. Eocene

Dahra

Manzila

Ridge

U. CretaceousPaleocene

L. EoceneM. Eocene

Pal. & basement rocks

A1-63(Projected) B1-3 A1-44 E1-17 E1-11X1 N1 L1-11 A1-11 G1 F1-92 A1 T1 L1-20 J1-31B3I1-123C1-63T-16MM1-6C6 C10 E1-31 D1-31

INDEX MAP

o

o oo

o

o

Southern Shelf

h

Gulf of Sirte

Cyrenaic

Platform

100 KM

19 2332

30

2828

100 KILOMETERS

AL HUFRAH ZALTAN AMAL

JabalAl Aswad

Hun G

raben

Waddan Uplift

L. EocenePaleocene

U. CretaceousPaleozoic & basement

rocks

Zallah Trough

Az Zahrah-Al Hufrah Platform

Maradah Trough

Zaltan Platform

Ajdabiya Trough

Ar R

akb High

Maragh Low

Cyrenaica Platform

Pal. &basement rocks

U. Cretaceous

Tertiary(Undifferent.)

FIELD FIELD FIELD

0

Figure 5.

East-west onshore structural cross section across Sirte Basin (modified from Roohi, 1996a). Note name changes for troughs and platforms relative to figure 1 and nearly vertical displacement on faults (heavy dashed lines).

Awjilah Jalu

Jalu

Maradah

MEDITERRANEAN SEA

CARBONIFEROUS

CYRENAICA UPLIFT

CARBONIFEROUS

CAMBRIAN - ORDOVICIAN

CA

MB

RIA

N -

OR

D.

CA

MB

RIA

N -

OR

D.

PERMIAN

PECA

RMBRIAN A

ND GRANITIC B

ASEMENT

DEVONIAN

DEVONIAN

SILU

RIA

N

SILURIAN

SILURIAN

ZALLAH

AZ ZAHRAHAL HUFRAH

HAMEIMAT TROUGHZALTAN

PLATFORM

PLATFORM

AL

KO

TLA

H G

RA

BE

N

MAR

ADAH

TRO

UG

H

TROUGH

SILUR

IAN

DEVONIAN

DEVONIAN

DEVONIAN

ABU TUMAYAM

BASIN

WADDANUPLIFT AJDABIYA TRO

UG

H

AL BAYDAPLATFORM

Misratah

Sirt

Al Brayqah

Darnah

Tubruq

Zallah

Waddan

Samnu

HU

N G

RABEN

33°

31°

29°

27°

25°E23°E21°E19°E17°E15°E

Al Burdi

Al Jaghbub

Al Bayda

Binghazi

Suluq

Hun

Ajdabiya

TazirbuWaw al Kabir

DUR AL Q

USSAH TROUGH

Al Fuqaha

PRE-HERCYNIANSUBCROP MAP

SIRTE BASIN

0 30 60 KM

Figure 6.

Pre-Hercynian subcrop map in Sirte Basin area (modified from Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996).

Province Geology 9

Ambrose (2000) alternatively proposed that dextral shear forces dominated this period of deformation in the Sarir arm. Dextral shear forces dominated Late Cretaceous tectonism, as discussed by Gras (1996), Guiraud and Bosworth (1997), and Ambrose (2000). The Late Cretaceous rifting event is characterized by the formation of a series of northwest-trending horsts and grabens that step progressively downward to the east; the Sirte Trough (variously known as the Ajdabiya Trough, the Abu Attifel Gra-ben, the Hameitat, Kalash, or Sirt trough or graben (Finetti, 1982; Montgomery, 1994; Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996; Roohi, 1996a, b; Mansour and Magairhy, 1996)) represents the deepest portion of the basin (figs. 2, 3, 4, 5). These horsts and grabens extend from onshore areas northward into a complex offshore terrane that includes the Ionian Abyssal Plain to the northeast (fig. 3). This plain is underlain by oceanic crust that is being subducted to the north and east beneath the Hellenic arc (Westaway, 1996, fig. 4). The Pelagian province to the west, particularly the pull-apart basins of the Sabratah Basin and extending along the South Cyrenaica Fault Zone (SCFZ) and the Cyrenaica Platform to the east, is strongly influenced by extensional dextral strike-slip faulting (Anketell, 1996; Guiraud and Bosworth, 1997; fig. 2). To the south, the Nubian Uplift is the stable continental basement for this rifted basin.

Although the timing of formation of the Sirte Arch is uncer-tain, sufficient uplift of the area now known as the Sirte Basin took place to cause erosion of pre-Cretaceous sediments over a wide area (fig. 6). An argument favoring the deformation to be of Mesozoic age rather than Paleozoic age may be that it was related to the west-to-east migration of a mantle plume across North Africa that was followed by Cretaceous rifting (Guiraud and Bos-worth, 1997). The youngest rifting in North Africa is now east of the Sirte Basin in the Red Sea where rifting is active today.

Syn-rift clastics of the Sarir Sandstone (Nubian Sandstone equivalent) in the eastern part of the Sirte Basin province accu-mulated in and across a series of east-west-trending horsts and grabens in the Sarir arm during Middle and Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous time (fig. 2). This depositional period was fol-lowed by rifting along the northeastern arm of a triple junction that resulted in the formation of a series of northwest-southeast-oriented horsts and grabens (Sirte arm) beginning in the Late Cre-taceous and extending into the early Tertiary. Transpressional forces elevated platforms (horsts) in the Tibesti and Sirte arms to higher structural elevations than in the nearby Trias/Ghadames province to the west in Algeria or the Cyrenaica Platform (Shelf) to the east (figs. 1, 2, 5).

The Sirte Basin is asymmetric, deepening to the east as shown in figure 5. The relative relief on the juxtaposed horst and graben blocks increases to the east coincident with significant thinning of sediments across the province. Erosion associated with the Sirte Arch resulted in truncation of the Paleozoic sequence in the Hamra Basin and western Cyrenaica Platform, but these deposits were preserved offshore (Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996; fig. 6, this report). Cambrian-Ordovician sediments were also preserved over much of northern Libya prior to the formation of the Sirte Arch (El-Hawat and others, 1996). Progressive erosion of younger sediments and subsequent episodes of block faulting resulted in placing these mostly clastic Paleozoic and Mesozoic reservoirs in a structural high position with respect to thermally mature Cretaceous source rocks that occupied the deeper portion

of the basin (fig. 5; Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996). The Sarir arm (eastern limb) of the triple junction in the Hameimat and Sarir Troughs is thought to have an Early Cretaceous origin in which clastic reservoirs are juxtaposed against basin structures (El-Alami, 1996a; Gras and Thusu, 1998; Ambrose, 2000). The syn-depositional clastics of the Sarir Formation occupy structural lows in the Sarir arm, and stratigraphic traps are important com-ponents of the petroleum system of this area. These Cretaceous clastic reservoirs are treated as a separate assessment unit within the total petroleum system. To the west, Late Cretaceous and lower Tertiary carbonate reservoirs, commonly reefs or bioherms

Hofra Fm.

PrecambrianPre

-Upp

er C

reta

ceou

sU

pper

Cre

tace

ous

Nubian Ss.

Bahi Fm.Lidam Fm.

Rakb Group

Satal Fm.

Beda Fm.

Dahra Fm.Khalifa Fm.

Zelten Fm.

Harash Fm.

Kheir Fm.

Ja

bal

Zel

ten

Gr.

Marada Fm.

Diba Fm.Arida Fm.

Augila Fm.

Gialo Fm.

Gir Fm.

Mio

.O

lig.

Eoc

ene

Low

erU

pper

Mid

.U

p.

Tran

s.Tr

ans.

Tran

s.Tr

ansg

ress

ive

Tran

sgre

ssiv

eR

egre

ssiv

eR

egr.

Reg

r.R

egre

ss.

Reg

ress

ive

Reg

ress

ive

Argub Carbonates

Rechmaf Fm.Sen.

Tur.

Cen.

Maa.

Sirte Sh.

lower unit

upper unit

Kalash Ls.

Low

er

Hagfa Sh.

Rabia Sh.

Thalith Mbr.

Pal

eoce

ne

Facha Dol.

Hon Evap.

Mesdar Ls.

Sh. Mbr.Ls. Mbr

ME

GA

CY

CL

ES

III

III

IV POST

-RIF

TSY

N-R

IFT

PRE-

RIFT

Seal

Source

Figure 7.

Stratigraphic section in central Sirte Basin (Sirte and Tibesti arms) (modified from Barr and Weeger, 1972; Montgomery, 1994). Primary hydrocarbon source and seal rock intervals are shown. Reservoirs are indicated by dots.


KHALIFA

SEAL

SOURCE

RESERVOIR

MAJORRESERVOIR

SARIR TROUGH-CALANSCIO TROUGH HAMEIMAT TROUGH

EO

CE

NE

PALE

OC

EN

E

BE

DA

FM

.

BE

DA

FM

.

BA

RIT

ON

IAN

LUT

ET

IAN

YP

RE

SIA

NLA

ND

EN

IAN

MO

NT

IAN

DA

NIA

NM

AA

ST

RIC

HT

IAN

CA

MPA

NIA

NT

UR

ON

IAN

CE

NO

MA

NIA

NS

AN

TON

IAN

/ C

ON

IAC

IAN

UP

PE

R C

RE

TAC

EO

US

MID

DLE

JU

RA

SS

ICLO

WE

R C

RE

TAC

EO

US

PRE SARIRBASEMENT

U. EOCENE

M. EOCENE

L. EOCENE

HAGFA SHALE

KALASH LS.

SIRTE SHALE

RACHMAT FORMATION

ETEL FORMATION

U. EOCENE

M. EOCENE

L. EOCENE

HAGFA SHALE

KALASH LS.

SIRTE SHALE

RACHMAT FORMATION

ETEL FORMATION

TAGRIFET LS. TAGRIFET LS.

THALITH MEMBER

KHEIR FORMATION KHEIR FORMATION

ZELTEN ZELTENKHALIFA SHALE KHALIFA SHALE

THALITH MEMBER

RABIA SH. MEMEBER

LOW

ER

LOW

ER

MID

DLE

MID

DLE

UP

PE

RU

PP

ER

Upper Sarir Sandstone Upper Sarir Sandstone

Variegated Shale

Middle Sarir Sandstone

SA

RIR

SA

ND

ST

ON

E

SA

RIR

SA

ND

ST

ON

E

SA

RIR

SA

ND

ST

ON

E

Middle Sarir Sandstone

Red ShaleLower Sarir Sandstone Lower Sarir Sandstone

Red Shale

SALT SALT

Secondary oil reservoir Main oil reservoir

Figure 8.

Stratigraphic section in eastern Sirte Basin (Sarir arm). The Sarir Sandstone is equivalent of the Nubian Sandstone of figure 7. Modified from Ambrose (2000).

on the northwest-southeast-trending horsts, are the dominant reservoirs in the remaining two arms (the Tibesti and Sirte arms) of the triple junction.

The complex tectonic history of the Sirte Basin resulted in multiple reservoirs and conditions that favored hydrocarbon gen-eration, migration, and accumulation, principally on or adjacent to the horst blocks. Carbonate reservoirs including bioherms mostly Paleocene and Eocene age (some Oligocene), were also concentrated on the structural highs in the central Sirte Basin, principally along the southern portion of the province in the Az Zahrah, Al Bayda, and Al Janamah Platforms (also known as the

Zeltan, Beda, Dahra, and Zalten Platforms, figs. 2, 5). These res-ervoirs were in turn charged by vertical migration along faults during the peak petroleum generation period of the early Tertiary; the conditions favoring concentration of petroleum in reservoirs of various ages along horst boundaries are demonstrated in figure 5. The so-called transfer zones of Harding (1984), Knytl and oth-ers (1996), and Van Dijk and Eabadi (1996) provide opportunities for the development of stratigraphic or a combination of strati-graphic and structural traps orthogonal to the trends of the horsts and grabens. Stratigraphic nomenclature used in this report is shown in figures 7 (Sarir arm) and 8 (Tibesti and Sirte arms).

Total Petroleum System 11

Total Petroleum System

Petroleum Occurrence

There is one dominant total petroleum system in the Sirte Basin, here named the Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System. The naming of the total petroleum system follows the convention of Magoon and Dow (1994) whereby the principal source rock is the Upper Cretaceous (Senonian/Campanian) Sirte Shale (also referred to as “Sirt Shale”) of the Rakb Group (figs. 7, 8, 9; El-Alami, 1996a, b). Some authors have distinguished an Upper Sirte Shale (Campanian) and a Lower Sirte Shale (Turonian), sep-arated by a Tagrifet Limestone (Coniacian/Santonian); all are considered source rocks (Mansour and Magairhy, 1996).

The reservoirs in the total petroleum system are nearly equally divided between clastic and carbonate rocks: clastic

fields have 14.5 BBOE known reserves versus 10.6 BBOE known reserves for carbonates as of 1994 (Montgomery, 1994). However, as shown by Harding (1984), the carbonates of the Paleocene Zelten Formation, containing an estimated 8.5 BBO of ultimate recoverable reserves (33 percent of total EUR), are the single largest reservoirs. The Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System is divided into four assessment units (fig. 1), as will be discussed later.

The Sirte Basin is an example of a dominantly vertically migrated petroleum system as shown by Harding (1984), wherein Upper Cretaceous oil charges multiple reservoirs along fault zones adjacent to horsts and grabens (Price, 1980, fig. 9). Guiraud and Bosworth (1997) demonstrated the importance of right-lateral wrench fault systems of Senonian age, and pointed out that the periodic rejuvenation of these systems in the Sirte Basin was particularly important to vertical migration of petro-leum. Refinements of a dominantly vertical horst and graben

PR

EG

RA

BE

NG

RA

BE

N F

ILL

INT

ER

IOR

S

AG

EXPLANATION

Shale

ChalkSandstoneQuartziteLimestone

Micrite

DolomiteCrystalline basementHydrocarbon accumulationMain hydrocarbon source*

*

* *

* UPPERCRETACEOUS

UPPERCRETACEOUS

CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN

CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN

PRECAMBRIAN

?

CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN ?

?

MIOCENE

OLIGOCENE

PALEOCENE PALEOCENE

EOCENE

Unconformity

Figure 9.

Schematic cross section showing general structural position, stratigraphic age, and lithology of most traps within the onshore Sirte Basin (modified from Harding, 1984). Note Upper Cretaceous source rocks charging multiple reservoirs on platforms (horsts). Barbs show direction of relative movement on faults.

12The Sirte B


System

Lith

olog

y

Form

atio

n

Oligocene-Miocene

TopGialo

Kheir

Zelten

Kalash

Sirt Shale

Tagrifet

RachmatEtelUSSVSMSS

Basement

144 123 103 82 62 41 21 00

1

2

3

4

5

AGE, IN MaD

EP

TH

, IN

KIL

OM

ET

ER

S

Oil window

Gas window

Oil generation peak

Figure 10.

Burial history curve for deepest portion of Sirte Trough (the Hameimat Trough), southeastern Sirte Basin (modified from Bender and others, 1996). USS, upper Sarir Sandstone; VS, variegated shale; MSS, middle Sarir Sandstone.


model were provided by Baird and others (1996), who argued for normal listric extensional and growth faults in the Sirte Basin as opposed to the more nearly vertical faulting described by Harding (1984). The structural history is also complicated by the develop-ment of transfer or relay fault zones (transtensional and transpres-sional areas) that produced additional migration routes to reservoirs occupying horst blocks (Knytl and others, 1996; Van Dijk and Eabadi, 1996).

A contrasting view is offered by Pratsch (1991), who believed that the Sirte Basin was an example of lateral migration and vertically stacked hydrocarbon systems isolated from each other. However, the oils in the various age reservoirs have been shown to be genetically linked (for example, El-Alami, 1996b; Gumati and Schamel, 1988; Gumati and others, 1996). Internal seals occur between the major reservoirs, so if one were consid-ering the oils at a reservoir or play level (regardless of the source of the oil) then Pratsch’s concept is understandable. At the larger petroleum system level, on the other hand, the Sirte Basin is con-sidered to be an example of a composite petroleum system in which petroleum sourced from Upper Cretaceous shales has migrated into multiple age reservoirs, dominantly vertically along normal, transfer, relay, or wrench faults adjacent to horsts. (See Harding, 1984; Baird and others, 1996; Van Dijk and Eabadi, 1996; and Guiraud and Bosworth, 1997.)

Source Rock

Published studies support the interpretation that the Sirte Shale (Upper Cretaceous, Campanian/Turonian) is the dominant source rock in the Sirte Basin petroleum province (Parsons and others, 1980; Gumati and Schamel, 1988; Montgomery, 1994; El-Alami, 1996b; Ghori and Mohammed, 1996; Mansour and Magairhy, 1996; Macgregor and Moody, 1998; Ambrose, 2000). The thickness of the Sirte Shale ranges from a few hundred meters to as much as 900 m in the troughs. These rocks are within the oil-generating window between depths of 2,700 and 3,400 m in the central and eastern Sirte Basin (Futyan and Jawzi, 1996; fig. 1). In figure 1, the outlines of the active pods of thermally mature Upper Cretaceous source rock are drawn reflecting depth of burial of at least 2,865 m (9,400 feet) (Mikbel, 1979; Goudarzi, 1980; Gumati and Kanes, 1985; Ibrahim, 1996), where condi-tions are considered favorable for oil generation (time tempera-ture index (TTI)=15, vitrinite reflectance (Ro)=0.7; Gumati and Schamel, 1988; Montgomery, 1994; fig. 10). Parsons and others (1980) reported total organic content (TOC) values ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 percent with an average of 1.9 percent TOC for 129 samples from the Upper Cretaceous source rocks. Baric and oth-ers (1996) presented organic geochemical data for a 500 m sec-tion of Sirte Shale in wells on the Zelten Platform (southern Sirte

22°E

5A1-5901-80

TI-80III1-59

'EEI'-8O'A' pool

'Z' pool KKI-80

HHI-80

UUI-80

RACHMATTROUGH

CALANSCIO HIGH

Gialo

Mesrab

Messla

Sarir-C-Main

Sarir-L-Field

Sarir-C-North

Abu-Attifel

HAMEIMAT TROUGH

CALANSCIOTROUGH

KALASHTROUGH

MESSLA HIGH

SARIRTROUGH

UUI-65JJI-65 VVI-65

?

?

29°

28°

40 KILOMETERS100 20 30

Basement high

Oil field

Upper Cretaceoussource area

Migration pathway

EXPLANATION

Fault—Block on downthrown side

?

Figure 11.

Postulated petroleum migration pathways for oil sourced from Upper Cretaceous shales, which also provide a regional seal in Sarir arm area of eastern Sirte Basin. Modified from Ambrose (2000).


Basin), in which total organic carbon (TOC) exceeds 0.5 percent and ranges as high as 3.5 percent; and hydrogen indices (HI) gen-erally exceed 300 milligrams of hydrocarbon per gram of organic carbon (mg HC/g org.C) and reach as much as 600 mg HC/ g org. C). Organic matter is dominantly Type II, and the shales are oil prone. El-Alami (1996b) documented Upper Cretaceous source rocks ranging from 0.10 to 7.86 percent TOC in the Etel and Rachmat Formations (Cenomanian-Turonian) and recorded an average of 1.28 percent TOC for the Sirte Shale in the Abu Attifel (Sirte Graben) in the eastern Sirte Basin.

Several other potential source rocks of ages other than Late Cretaceous have been considered; Burwood (1997), for example, identified source potential in four mudstones within deeper parts of the Sirte Basin including the Sirte Trough. These potential source rocks occur in the Sirte Shale (Upper Cretaceous), a lower part of the Nubian Formation (Triassic–Lower Cretaceous), the Harash Formation (Paleocene), and the Antelat Formation (Eocene, Gir Formation equivalent) (figs. 7, 8). Silurian age source rocks, the Tanezzuft Formation, may be potential in Alge-ria where present in deeper areas off the flank of the ancestral Sirte Arch, and in the offshore area where the Silurian may be present (Futyan and Jawzi, 1996; Klitzsch, 1996, Gumati and others, 1996; fig. 6).

El-Alami (1996b) concluded that the mudstones within the Nubian (Sarir) Formation (particularly in the Lower Cretaceous part) are mature enough to generate oil in the deep parts of the Sirte Basin, but “their richness does not appear to be sufficient to cause generation of large amounts of hydrocarbons” (p. 347). Ambrose (2000) considered the Upper Cretaceous “Tethyan” shale system to be the dominant source rock, with particular emphasis on the Sirte Shale as being the primary source rock in the eastern Sirte Basin. He further concluded that potential Trias-sic source rocks are of limited distribution but as yet are not well known (compare figs. 11 and 12).

Geochemical data based on analyses of 81 oils from Libya (GeoMark, 1998) indicate that the Sirte Shale is the dominant source rock in the Sirte Basin province. Sirte oils are low sulfur and of relatively high gravity; for example, median oil gravity is 36

°

, ranging from 30

°

to 43

°

API, and median sulfur content is 0.3 percent (Petroconsultants, 1996; GeoMark, 1998; fig. 13). The oil generally has low gas/oil ratios (median 300 ft

3

/ barrel, U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000).

Although as many as four oil families can be identified, all but three of the 81 samples analyzed by GeoMark (1998) can be linked to a single oil family (Jerry Clayton, written commun., 1998) based on (1) pristane/phytane ratios (>1.0) to

δ

C13 aro-matic content, (2) sulfur content, (3) API gravity, and (4)

δ

C13

40 KILOMETERS100 20 30

Basement highOil field

Triassic source area

Variegated shalesource area

Migration pathway

EXPLANATION

Fault—Block on downthrown side

KALASH TROUGH

CALANSCIO TROUGH

Calanscio

Gialo

Mesrab

RACHMAT TROUGH

GGG1-59

Messla High

SARIR TROUGH

Sarir-C-Main

Sarir-C-North

Sarir-L Field

Messla

UU1-65 JJ1-65 VV1-65

KKI-80

HHI-80

UUI-80

'EE'-80

'A'-80

'Z'-80

'O'-80

TI-80

Abu-Attifel

Hameimat Trough

?

? ?

?

??

??

Figure 12.

Postulated pre-Upper Cretaceous source areas and migration pathways of minor nonmarine source rocks in eastern Sirte Basin. Modified from Ambrose (2000).


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

1 4 7

10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79

SIRTE BASIN OILS

SIRTE BASIN OILS

PE

RC

EN

T S

ULF

UR

Sirte Basin Oils

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79

SAMPLES

PR

IST

AN

E /

PH

YT

AN

E R

AT

IO

Series1

Series1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79

AP

I GR

AV

ITY

, IN

DE

GR

EE

SA

B

C

Series1

Figure 13.

Oil geochemistry plots utilizing data from GeoMark (1998) for 81 oil samples from 55 fields in Sirte Basin.

A

, Pristane/phytane ratios;

B

, Sulfur percentages;

C

, API gravity.


Her

cyni

an E

rosi

on

Z

N

Post Rift

S

RSyn-Rift

Pre-Rift

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

50

150

250

350

450

550

Paleogene

Cretaceous

Jurassic

Triassic

Permian

65

144

206

248

363

570

510

439

408

Precambrian

Cambrian

Ordovician

Silurian

Devonian

290

323

E

ML

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

M

M

M

M

M

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

Mississipian

Pennsylvanian

Neogene24

PalEoc

OligMioPlio

Fractures

PR

ES

ER

VA

TIO

N

CR

ITIC

AL

MO

ME

NT

GEN

ERAT

ION

-

TRA

P F

OR

MA

TIO

N

OV

ER

BU

RD

EN

RO

CK

RE

SE

RV

OIR

RO

CK

SE

AL

RO

CK

SO

UR

CE

RO

CK

RO

CK

UN

ITPETR

OLE

UM

SYST

EM E

VEN

TS

GEO

LOG

IC

TIM

ESC

ALE

ACC

UM

ULA

TIO

NM

IGR

ATIO

N-

?

?

G

TZ

MA

GH

Figu

re 1

4.

Sirte

-Zel

ten

Tota

l Pet

role

um S

yste

m e

vent

s ch

art.

Sig

nific

ant r

ock

units

not

ed o

n ch

art i

nclu

de G

H, G

arga

f/Hof

ra F

orm

atio

n—Ca

mbr

ian-

Ordo

vici

an s

ands

tone

s;

TZ, T

anez

zuft

Shal

e—Si

luria

n; N

, Nub

ian

or S

arir

Sand

ston

e—Ju

rass

ic–E

arly

Cre

tace

ous;

R, R

akb

Grou

p—Cr

etac

eous

, Tur

onia

n-Ca

mpa

nian

; S, S

irte

Shal

e M

embe

r of R

akb

Grou

p, p

rimar

y so

urce

rock

—Ca

mpa

nian

; Z, Z

elte

n Gr

oup

carb

onat

es—

Pale

ocen

e; H

, Hon

Eva

porit

e M

embe

r of G

ir Fo

rmat

ion—

Eoce

ne-Y

pres

ian;

G, G

ialo

For

mat

ion

car-

bona

tes—

mid

dle

Eoce

ne–L

utet

ian;

A, A

rida

Form

atio

n—Ol

igoc

ene;

M, M

arad

a Fo

rmat

ion—

Mio

cene

.


saturates vs.

δ

C13 aromatic characteristics (fig. 13). El-Alami

(1996b), Jerry Clayton (written commun., 1998), and Ambrose (2000), concluding that the Upper Cretaceous Sirte Shale is by far the dominant source of oil for the Sirte Basin province, also rec-ognized that there may be contributions from other Upper Creta-ceous source rocks in a composite total petroleum system, the Sirte-Zelten. (See Glossary in U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000.)

The remaining three oils analyzed by GeoMark (1998) appear to be younger (Tertiary, most probably reflecting a Pale-ocene/Eocene source); however, they may also reflect biodegra-dation of the Upper Cretaceous source (Jerry Clayton, written commun., 1998).

Tertiary petroleum systems may possibly exist in the deeper part of the Sirte Basin (for example, the Sirte or Ajdabiya graben of Baird and others, 1996, figs. 1, 6) and in offshore areas. A dis-tinctly different oil—lower gravity (<25

°

API), high sulfur (as much as 4.5 percent), and pristane/phytane ratios <1.0—is found in lower Tertiary reservoirs, particularly Eocene sequences (for example, Kalash Limestone, Gir or Kheir Formations, figs. 7, 8). Tertiary carbonates may contain indigenous hydrocarbon sources particularly in Eocene rocks (Gir Formation) that could poten-tially have contributed about 1 billion barrels of recoverable oil reserves in the Pelagian Basin (Bouris, Ashtart, Sidi el Itayem fields, fig. 3) to the northwest of the Sirte Basin (Bishop, 1985,1988; Rodgers and others, 1990). However, few data are available on these potential source rocks in the Sirte Basin. Abugares (1996) concluded that hydrocarbons in the Gir Forma-tion are actually sourced by Sirte Shales. El-Alami (1996b) and MacGregor and Moody (1998) suggested a secondary contribu-tion, where mature, from the Paleocene Heria Shales, which are depositionally similar to the Sirte Shale; they also recognized the possibility of other Tertiary-age source rocks, including the Kheir and Harash Formations (Paleocene/Eocene, figs. 7, 8).

As shown on the events chart (fig. 14), hydrocarbon genera-tion commenced about 50 million years ago (Ma) in the deeper basins, about 40 Ma in many other areas, and may continue to the present day. Geothermal gradients generally range from 1

°

F / 100 ft to 1.8

°

F / 100 ft; in general the horsts and grabens have roughly equivalent thermal regimes relative to the primary source rock (Gumati and Schamel, 1988). Along the southwest and west margins of the province are extrusive igneous deposits (fig. 2) whose presence tends to diminish the hydrocarbon potential of these areas (Busrewil and others, 1996; Hallett and El Ghoul, 1996).

Overburden Rock

As shown on the events chart (fig. 14), the Upper Cretaceous Sirte Shale is the source rock deposited generally in grabens that had formed during a period of active rifting in the Sirte and Tibesti arms of the rift system (fig. 2). During the Cretaceous, there were apparently two distinct rifting stages related to differ-ent limbs of a triple junction that were active at different times. In the eastern part of the Sirte Basin, the development of a series of east-west-trending horsts and grabens in the Sarir arm (fig. 2) was accompanied by syn-rift deposition of Early Cretaceous clastics called the Nubia or Sarir Sandstone. These clastic materials were

deposited within the rift basins, and some formed significant stratigraphic traps adjacent to horst blocks such as Messla and Sarir fields (Ambrose, 2000; figs. 15–18).

Northwest-southeast-trending horst and graben structures formed in the Sirte arm of the triple junction from the Late Cre-taceous to the end of the Paleocene in the central and western Sirte Basin, with the younger trends extending offshore (fig. 2; Van der Meer and Cloetingh, 1996; Guiraud and Bosworth, 1997). Overburden was largely deposited during the post-rift sed-imentation stage (Oligocene and younger). Pre-rift and early syn-rift deposition was largely clastic whereas later syn-rift deposi-tion was dominated by carbonate deposition. According to Hal-lett and El Ghoul (1996) (1) the deepest troughs, such as the Sirte (also called Ajdabiya Graben, fig. 2), have more than 7,000 m of sediment, of which 5,500 m is of Tertiary age (fig. 5); and (2) 80 percent of the drilling in the province has been on platform (horst) areas at depths less than 3,000 m.

Reservoir Rock

The distribution and quality of reservoirs in the Sirte Basin are most directly related to major tectonic events in the region, specifically reservoirs related to pre-rift, syn-rift, and post-rift sequences (figs. 7, 8). The current configuration of the Sirte Basin, deepening from west to east and also offshore, signifi-cantly influenced reservoir development. The basin is unusual in that oil is produced from Precambrian (fractured basement), Cambrian-Ordovician, Triassic through Lower Cretaceous, Pale-ocene, and Eocene rocks. Charging of multiple reservoirs from Upper Cretaceous source rocks along faults, principally along horst blocks, is illustrated in figure 9. Carbonate reservoirs, mostly of Tertiary age, contain 42 percent of the petroleum; and clastics, mostly of pre-Tertiary age, contain 58 percent (Harding, 1984; Petroconsultants, 1996). Carbonates of the Paleocene Zelten Group contain 33 percent of the known petroleum; this is the single largest reservoir interval. However, the clastics of Early Cretaceous age (Nubian or Sarir Sandstone) contain 28 percent, and clastics of Cambrian-Ordovician age (Gargaf, Hofra or Amal Group) contain 29 percent of known petroleum volume (fig. 9).

Montgomery (1994) divided the stratigraphy of the Sirte Basin into four megacycles (fig. 7). The oldest, of Paleozoic age, consists mostly of nonmarine clastics and some volcanic rocks, bounded by a Precambrian unconformity below and the Hercyn-ian unconformity of Late Permian and Early Triassic age above; local thicknesses are as much as 1,500 m. Cambrian-Ordovician sandstones, variously called Gargaf (western Sirte Basin), and Hofra Formation or Amal Group (central Sirte Basin; fig. 7) are important reservoirs. These reservoirs produce oil in 23 fields, at least 5 of which are giant accumulations—Amal, Raguba, Nafoora, Samah/Bel Hadan, Waha fields (fig. 1). Following dep-osition of the Cambrian-Ordovician, uplift occurred and much of the Paleozoic section was eroded from the central Sirte area (Massa and Delort, 1984; Anketell, 1996, fig. 6). However, Cam-brian-Ordovician reservoirs are preserved particularly in fault blocks related to subsequent rifting, and possibly in some of the offshore areas as well. The Cambrian-Ordovician reservoirs are commonly tightly cemented orthoquartzites (Roberts, 1970;


Barr and Weegar, 1972; Brennan, 1992). Production is enhanced by fracturing as noted by Roberts (1970) at Amal field and Bren-nan (1992) at Raguba field. In a few areas, Silurian, Devonian, and Carboniferous clastics are preserved and are potential reser-voirs (fig. 6).

The Nubian (Sarir) deposits, ranging from Triassic/Late Jurassic? to Early Cretaceous in age, constitute the second major megacycle in the Sirte Basin province (Montgomery, 1994; El-Hawat and others, 1996; this report, figs. 7, 8) and are the produc-ing interval in at least 72 fields in the eastern Sirte Basin (Petro-consultants, 1996). These clastic strata are the primary reservoirs in several giant fields including Messla, Sarir, Amal, and Abu Attifel fields (fig. 1). The reservoirs are continental sandstones,

both alluvial and eolian deposits, although Ambrose (2000) iden-tified significant reservoirs in the Upper Sarir Sandstone that are fan delta deposits. El-Hawat and others (1996) divided the Nubian Sandstone into three members that reflect the interfinger-ing of alluvial deposits with Tethyan marine sediments as the Sirte rift system began to develop in Neocomian-Barremian time (El-Hawat, 1996; Ambrose, 2000). East-west-trending sinistral shear zones (strike-slip) strongly controlled deposition of the Nubian sequence according to Anketell (1996) and Abdulghader (1996), and Ambrose (2000) documented the sedimentological pattern and heterogeneities within the Nubian sequence that may have enhanced hydrocarbon potential of the Sarir Sandstone in the eastern Sirte Basin.

MESRAB FIELD

300

JJ1 Pool

KALASHTROUGH

CALANSCIO HIGH

300 300

300

600900

?900?600

GGG1-595A1-59

1500

1200

900

600

R3-82A'

A

1800

2100 2400

ABU ATTIFEL FIELD

300

HAMEIMAT TROUGH

QUADEEM FIELD

600

GIALO FIELD

'EE' Pool'A' Pool

'Z' Pool

CALANSCIO?1200TROUGH

RACHMAT TROUGH

III 1-59

300300

600

900

'O' Pool

'T' Pool

MESSLA HIGH

SOUTHERN MARGIN

EA

STE

RN

MARG

IN

'UU' Pool

'KK' Pool

'HH' PoolNORTHERN MARGIN

MESSLA FIELD

SARIR-L FIELD

SARIR-C-NORTH

300

300

SARIR-C-MAIN

600300 C280-65

SARIR TROUGH 9001200

1500UU1 Pool VV1 Pool

Y1-65

WE

STE

RN

MA

RG

IN

Oil field

Pre-Sarir basement

Sarir zero edge

300 m interval isopachSarir Sandstone

300

0 50 KILOMETERS

EXPLANATION

Fault—Block on down-thrown side

28°

29°

27°

21°E 22°E

Figure 15.

Tectonic elements and oil fields in eastern Sirte Basin. Sarir Sandstone isopachs are shown in main depocenters (modified from Ambrose, 2000). Cross section

A–A

' shown in figure 16.


The Nubian (Sarir) Formation is highly variable in thickness (maximum as much as 2,500 m); that variation reflects the infill-ing of low areas (grabens) that partially extend across some Cre-taceous horsts and formed prolific stratigraphic/structural traps such as Sarir field (Sanford, 1970; Lewis, 1990) and Messla field (Clifford and others, 1980; Koscec and Gherryo, 1996; Ambrose, 2000; this report, figs. 15–18). Lewis (1990) suggested that Sarir field is a complex of individual fields, Sarir C alone containing 6.5 BBO EUR. A cross section from Messla field by Ambrose (2000), shown in figures 15–18, portrays the major stratigraphic truncation that occurs in the Sarir Sandstone across the structural high and the opportunity for additional exploration targets near

these terminations, such as in the Upper Sarir fan delta deposits. Abdulghader (1996) documented average porosity of 27.5 per-cent for the main Sarir reservoir. Lewis (1990) documented aver-age porosity of 18–19 percent, and average permeability of 200–300 millidarcies at Sarir field.

The third megacycle, largely composed of marine deposits, of Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary ages, encompasses the entire Sirte Basin, and depositionally followed the early nonma-rine graben fill of the Sarir (Nubian) sediments in the eastern Sirte Basin. As summarized in Montgomery (1994), two major Upper Cretaceous transgressive and regressive cycles and two Pale-ocene cycles of sedimentation characterize this later syn-rift fill

A A'

CALANSCIO AREA SARIR-C Field HAMEIMAT TROUGHWEST EAST

Upper Sarir Sandstone (USS)

Middle Sarir Sandstone (MSS)

Lower Sarir Sandstone (LSS)

Variegated shale

Basement

Scale

150 m

Red shale (RS)

5A1-59 JJ1-65 C280-65 R3-82GR SLS GR GRGRSLS LLD

EXPLANATION

Unconformity

(bend in section)

Figure 16.

Stratigraphic cross section

A

–

A

' in Calanscio-Hameimat Trough (line of section shown in fig. 15). Note subdivisions (members) within the Sarir Sandstone and the combined structural-stratigraphic trap at Sarir-C field (modified from Ambrose, 2000).


USS = Upper Sarir SandstoneMSS = Middle Sarir SandstoneLSS = Lower Sarir Sandstone

TERTIARY

UPPER CRETACEOUS

Top Sarir Sandstone

USS

MSS

MSS

Red shale

Red shale

Thin silty variegated shale

Unnamed Pre-Sarir(? Triassic)

LSS

3000 m

USS

Basement

Variegated shale

Red shale

LSS

MSS

USSUU1 FieldMessla Field

UPPER CRETACEOUS

Top Sarir Sandstone

USS Truncation Play

SARIR TROUGH

SW NE

Approx2000 m

2500 m

MESSLA HIGH HAMEIMAT TROUGH

0 20 KILOMETERS

Figure 18.

Schematic structural cross section from Sarir Trough across Messla High and into Hameimat Trough showing hydrocarbon habitat of the Sarir Sandstone (modified from Ambrose, 2000). Note truncation and stratigraphic trap potential in various members of the Sarir Sandstone. Scale is approximate.

Sari

r Sa

ndst

one

Logs used: GR(LHS), LLD(RHS)

Unconformity

Tethyan shales

USS

Variegated shale

TarmatTarmat

LSSMSS MSS

Redshale

Red shale

002-65 001-65 UU1-65 JJ1-65 VV1-65 HH11-65

WEST EAST(Messla Field)

Top TagrifetRachmat Fm.Etel Fm.Top Sarir SS.

MSSRSLSS

Basement

0 m

150 m

300 m

WEST

EAST

0 10 20 KILOMETERS

002-65

001-65

UU1-65JJ1-65

VV1-65

HH11-65Middle Sarir Sandstone (MSS)

Red shale (RS)

Lower Sarir Sandstone (LSS)

Basement

Tethyan Shale sequence

Upper Sarir Sandstone (USS)

Variegated shale

Producing well

Dry hole

Figure 17. East-west structural cross section across western margin of the Messla High (modified from Ambrose, 2000). Note that faulting caused erosion of different members of the Sarir Sandstone along the highs.

Petroleum Assessment 21

sequence (fig. 7). Sedimentation was largely controlled by north-west-southeast-oriented horst and graben structures. Erosion along the Sirte Arch in the central Sirte Basin has removed evi-dence of the older sediments, including the Lower Cretaceous clastics, although the hydrocarbon potential is largely undevel-oped in structurally low areas within the central Sirte Basin.

The first Upper Cretaceous depositional cycle consists, in ascending order, of (1) a transgressive sequence comprising the Bahi Formation; (2) carbonates, commonly represented by dolo-mites of the Lidam Formation; and (3) a regressive sequence of carbonates, evaporites, and shales that now characterize the Etel Formation (a potential source rock interval, figs. 7, 8). A second transgression resulted in the deposition of shallow marine sedi-ments (Rachmat Formation) followed by deposition of deep marine sediments (Sirte Shale). Shallower water sequences in the younger Cretaceous Kalash Limestone are in turn overlain by shales (Hagfa Shale, similar lithologically to the Sirte Shale) and carbonates (Beda Formation) of Paleocene age. The Beda Forma-tion is a significant reservoir, commonly consisting of calcilutite, calcarenites, oolites, and skeletal debris along the south margin of the Sirte Basin; and significant production has taken place in fields such as Dahra and Hofra and in many fields on the Az Zahrah (Dahra and Beda) and Zelten (Al Janamah) platforms (Bebout and Poindexter, 1975; Brady and others, 1980; this report, figs. 2, 5).

Continued sedimentation during Paleocene time resulted in deposition of the Zelten Formation, which is notable for its car-bonate build-ups and reefs that grew on the structurally elevated horsts such as the Az Zahrah (Beda and Dahra) Platform and the Zelten (Al Janamah) Platform. As previously discussed, the Zelten Formation is the single largest reservoir interval in the Sirte Basin province. Carbonates, mostly Upper Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene, are the dominant reservoirs in 150 fields encompassed in the area shown as assessment unit 20430102 in figure 1. Carbonate deposition in the late syn-rift sequences took place particularly during Paleocene time on the platforms along the south margin of the Sirte Basin. Carbonates are important res-ervoirs in many giant oil fields such as Intistar, Beda, Defa, Waha, Haram, Zelten (Nasser), Hofra, and Nafoora (Belazi, 1989; Roohi, 1996b; figs. 1, 19).

The upper Paleocene regression of this megacycle is repre-sented by the deposition of shallow marine carbonates (Harash and Kheir Formations) followed by transgressive deposits of the Facha Dolomite (fig. 7). These were ultimately overlain and sub-sequently sealed in a final regression of this megacycle by the evaporites of the Gir Formation (Hon Evaporites Member). The carbonates in the upper part of the Gir Formation are the strati-graphically youngest potential reservoirs, containing about 1 per-cent of the proven hydrocarbon reserves in the Sirte Basin. Stratigraphic traps within the Eocene strata, including nummu-litic banks and dolomite zones in the Facha Dolomite (fig. 7) as well as possible indigenous, high sulfur (3 percent), heavy oil shows in tests near Beda-Haram, between Intisar and Amal fields, and in the eastern Sirte Basin (Ghori and Mohammed, 1996, fig. 1) indicate that the Eocene sequence may be an exploration target in the deeper portions of onshore grabens and offshore (Abugares, 1996).

The final megacycle represents the post-rift fill of Oligocene and younger age and is of minor potential for hydrocarbons

because no commercial shows of hydrocarbons have been found in rocks younger than Eocene.

In general, clastic reservoirs are dominantly of Early Creta-ceous and older (pre-rift, early syn-rift) ages in the eastern Sirte Basin, whereas carbonate reservoirs are dominantly uppermost Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (syn-rift or late syn-rift) else-where in the Sirte Basin province. The assessment units, dis-cussed later, were delineated using these criteria.

Seal Rock

Although carbonates and shales dominate much of the Ter-tiary sequence, the evaporite and salt deposits of the Eocene Gir Formation (Hon Evaporites Member; Abugares, 1996; fig. 7) are of the utmost importance to petroleum accumulation in the Sirte Basin province because they form essential seals for the hydro-carbons migrating out of the Upper Cretaceous into reservoirs of many ages along the faulted horsts and grabens (Harding, 1984; Montgomery, 1994; Abugares, 1996; figs. 7, 9). The formation shows rapid changes in thickness, reaching a maximum of 1,305 m in the Marada Trough. It contains dolomite, anhydrite, and halite, but also shows abrupt lithologic changes. In some areas, halite forms 35 percent of the total section, as in the Zallah Trough (Abugares, 1996), but the salt component decreases dra-matically around the onshore margins of the Sirte Basin, which might help to explain the absence of significant oil fields near the outcrop belt and the high risk of drilling in the offshore area.

Trap Style

Shown on the oil and gas field map for the Sirte Basin (fig. 1) are the 237 fields that were considered in this study. Of these fields, 221 are oil fields and 16 are gas fields (Petroconsultants, 1996). Known petroleum volumes of 43.1 BBOE rank the Sirte Basin province as the 13th in the world, exclusive of the U.S. (15th if U.S. provinces are included). It is dominantly an oil province with 36.7 BBO, 37.7 TCFG (6.3 BBOE), and 0.1 BB NGL (Klett and others, 1997). Twenty-three fields are major oil fields (>100 MMBOE), and 16 fields rank as giant oil fields (>500 MMBOE).

The dominant trap style is structural (84 percent), with the remainder considered stratigraphic or a combination of the two (Clifford and others, 1980). As examples of combined traps, bioherm developments in the Paleocene Zelten Group are found on horst blocks, and clastic stratigraphic traps such as at Sarir or Messla field are superimposed on structures (figs. 15–18). Simi-larly, bioherm development in Paleocene sediments of the Zelten Group in the Zelten field (Bebout and Poindexter, 1975), which occurs on a major horst, is shown to represent the carbonate assessment unit (20430102). An example of such a carbonate field is shown for Idris field in the northeastern Sirte Basin (Terry and Williams, 1969; this report, fig. 19).

Petroleum Assessment

The discovery history of the Sirte Basin started relatively late (as discussed earlier) because Libya did not really become an

22The Sirte B


System

Ο

A9-103 A12-103 A20-103 A18-103

A22-103 A7-103

A15-103

2700

2800

2900

3000

3100

3200

3300

9000

10000

11000

VERTICAL SCALEft m

VERTICAL EXAGGERATION =1X2.5

HORIZONTAL SCALE

0 1000 METERS

Non-reef well Non-reef well

GIR FORMATION 6560 ft (2000 m)out of section

5740 ft (1750 m)out of section

20-25%

20-25%

20-25%CorallineBiomicrite

Reef Limestone

ALGAL FORAMINIFERAL MEMBER

CORAL REEF MEMBER

< 20%

< 20%

Ο

Ο

> 25%

> 25%

Porosity Transition Zone

UpperKheirMarl

Lower KheirMarl

LowerZeltenCarbonates

Heira Shale

Heira Carbonate

Lo

wer

Land

enia

nM

iddl

e L

and.

U

pper

Land

enia

n

P A

L E

O C

E N

EE

O C

E N

ES

ER

IES

STA

GE

Ypr

esia

n

9000 ft (2743 m)

20-25%Ο

Ο < 20%

> 25%

Ο

Ο

< 20%

Ο > 25%

Ο

Ο

< 20%

Ο

Ο

Ο

Ο L. Zelten

9000 ft (2743 m)

Ο

Sealing evaporites

Shale and marl

Argillaceous limestone

Limestone

Bio-facies zones

Porosity zones

Porosity

EXPLANATION

Figure 19. Stratigraphic cross section through Zelten Formation (Paleocene) bioherms, Idris “A” field, northeastern Sirte Basin, representing reservoirs in carbonate assessment unit (modified from Terry and Williams, 1969).


independent country until 1951. Giant fields were found between 1956 and 1961, including Amal, Sarir, Raguba, and Zelten plat-form fields (Carmalt and St. John, 1986; Brennan, 1992; fig. 1). Three distinct discovery segments are seen on cumulative oil plots—a steep segment from 1956 to 1961, an intermediate seg-ment from 1962 to 1970, and a nearly flat segment since 1970 (fig. 20). The discovery process has been interrupted by political events, including sanctions against Libya that prohibited U.S. company involvement in exploration in Libya since 1981. Mont-gomery (1994) and MacGregor and Moody (1998) have con-tended that the Sirte Basin has a significant future potential, citing the fact that the North Sea is three times more heavily explored than the Sirte Basin as a comparison.

Four assessment units within the Sirte-Zelten total petro-leum system (two established, two hypothetical) were defined for the present study; they are as follows:

Southeast Sirte Clastics (20430101) is an established unit and includes Cretaceous and older (Cambrian-Ordovician, Precambrian) fields in the onshore area of the eastern Sirte Basin (fig. 1).

Central Sirte Carbonates (20430102) is an established unit and contains fields producing from carbonates of the Upper Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene platforms, mostly onshore, with potential for production to water depths of about 200 m (fig.1). Offshore production has been established in the water depth range of 200 m or less in the Gulf of Sirte (figs. 1, 2).

Some minor calcarenite Middle Cretaceous production is also included in these fields.

Offshore Sirte Hypothetical (20430103) extends from water depths of 200 m to 2,000 m and does not contain any established fields, although hydrocarbon shows have been encountered. Both positive and negative petroleum factors are recognized for this area. On the positive side is the likely presence of thermally mature Upper Cretaceous and possibly Silurian and Eocene source rocks, and the likelihood of both carbonate and clastic res-ervoirs being present. On the negative side, tectonic complexity is considerable, including a subduction zone and numerous extru-sive magmatic features that may have compromised preservation of the total petroleum system (figs. 4, 5). To address such circum-stances (and uncertainties), the world petroleum assessment (U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000) takes into account three geologic risk elements pertaining to rock characteristics (source, reservoir, and seal), migration and trap-ping conditions, and timing of geologic events as well as an addi-tional risk involving accessibility for exploration. Two of the three geologic risk factors are applied (1.0 indicating no risk) in this assessment unit: (1) rocks (0.8 or an 80 percent chance of success), and (2) timing of geologic events (0.6 or a 60 percent chance of success).

Southeast Sirte Hypothetical (20430104): Although there have been more than 65 wildcat tests in the southeastern Sirte Basin, none had hydrocarbon shows, according to Petroconsult-ants (1996). This area is therefore also considered to be a

Figure 20. Cumulative plot of volume of known oil (produced and remaining) versus field discovery year for Southeast Sirte Clastics Assessment Unit (from U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000).

Southeast Sirte Clastics, Assessment Unit 20430101

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

FIELD DISCOVERY YEAR

CU

MU

LA

TIV

E K

NO

WN

OIL

VO

LU

ME

, IN

MM

BO

24The Sirte B


System

Code Undiscovered resourcesand field MFS Prob. Oil (MMBO)

type (0-1) F95 F50 F5 Mean F95 F50 F5 Mean F95 F50 F5 Mean

20430101 Southeast Sirte Clastics Assessment UnitOil fields 10 890 2,293 4,130 2,380 195 672 1,879 808 12 40 113 48

Gas fields 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1.00 890 2,293 4,130 2,380 195 672 1,879 808 12 40 113 48

20430102 Central Sirte Carbonates Assessment UnitOil fields 5 1,711 3,785 6,144 3,840 1,488 3,633 6,946 3,841 88 217 419 231

Gas fields 30 2,467 5,618 11,252 6,076 71 166 347 182

Total 1.00 1,711 3,785 6,144 3,840 3,956 9,252 18,198 9,918 159 383 766 413

20430103 Offshore Sirte Hypothetical Assessment UnitOil fields 10 0 0 1,254 382 0 0 6,633 1,909 0 0 400 115

Gas fields 60 0 0 7,488 2,290 0 0 229 69

Total 0.48 0 0 1,254 382 0 0 14,121 4,199 0 0 629 183

20430104 Southeast Sirte Hypothetical Assessment UnitOil fields 5 0 70 824 253 0 13 222 60 0 1 13 4

Gas fields 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0.50 0 70 824 253 0 13 222 60 0 1 13 4

[MMBO, million barrels of oil. BCFG, billion cubic feet of gas. MMBNGL, million barrels of natural gas liquids. MFS, minimum field size assessed (MMBO or BCFG). Prob., probability (including both geologic and accessibility probabilities) of at least one field equal to or greater than the MFS. Results shown are fully risked estimates. For gas fields, all liquids are included under the NGL (natural gas liquids) category. F95 represents a 95 percent chance of at least the amount tabulated. Other fractiles are defined similarly. Fractiles are additive under the assumption of perfect positive correlation. Shading indicates not applicable]

Gas (BCFG) NGL (MMBNGL)

1.00

1.00

0.48

0.50

204301 Total: Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum SystemOil fields 2,600 6,148 12,352 6,854 1,683 4,318 15,679 6,618 100 258 946 397

Gas fields 2,467 5,618 18,740 8,366 71 166 576 251

Total 1.00 2,600 6,148 12,352 6,854 4,151 9,936 34,419 14,984 171 424 1,521 648

1.00

Table 1. Sirte-Zelten, Total Petrolem System 204301—assessment results summary.


0.0

500.0

1,000.0

1,500.0

2,000.0

2,500.0

3,000.0

3,500.0

4,000.0M

ILL

ION

BA

RR

EL

S O

F O

IL E

QU

IVA

LE

NT

20430101 20430102 20430103 20430104

ASSESSMENT UNITS GEOLOGICALLY RISKED

Mean oil

Mean gas

Mean NGL

Geologic Risk 1.00 Geologic Risk 1.00 Geologic Risk 0.48 Geologic Risk 0.50

Figure 21. Volumetric assessment results for geologically risked assessment units in Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System in Sirte Basin province 2043.

0.0

500.0

1,000.0

1,500.0

2,000.0

2,500.0

3,000.0

3,500.0

4,000.0

MIL

LIO

N B

AR

RE

LS

OF

OIL

EQ

UIV

AL

EN

T

20430101 20430102 20430103 20430103 20430104 20430104

ASSESSMENT UNITS GEOLOGICALLY RISKED AND UNRISKED

Mean oil

Mean gas

Mean NGL

Unrisked Unrisked Unrisked Risk Factor 0.48 Unrisked Risk Factor 0.50

Figure 22. Volumetric assessment results for geologically risked and unrisked assessment units in Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System in Sirte Basin.


hypothetical assessment unit. The Southeast Sirte Hypothetical (20430104) represents the possibility of hydrocarbon charging dominantly shallow clastic reservoirs along major fault systems. Potential reservoirs include Campanian marine bar sandstones (Hammuda, 1980; Montgomery, 1994).The entire risk (0.5 or a 50 percent chance of success) for this assessment unit is taken in the risk element involving the sourcing of petroleum for reservoir rocks, because reservoirs and geologic structures appear to be abundant. Lateral migration would be required to charge reser-voirs in this assessment unit.

Field growth has occurred in the Sirte Basin, as documented by Montgomery (1994); for example, Mabruk field has recently added more than 1 billion barrels of new reserves (fig. 1). For esti-mation of undiscovered field sizes, a Lower U.S. 48-field-growth model was used, as described by Schmoker and Crovelli (1998). Proprietary reserve data from North Africa presented to us from World Energy consortium members are consistent with the Lower U.S. 48-field-growth algorithm as defined by Schmoker and Crovelli (1998).

The last assessment reported by the U.S. Geological Survey for undiscovered oil and natural gas was given by Masters and others (1994), who reported mean undiscovered petroleum resources for Libya as 7.1 BBO, with a 95 percent to 5 percent fractile range of 3.5 to 13.3 BBO; mean undiscovered gas volume of 23.9 TCF, with a 95 percent to 5 percent fractile range of 8.9 to 48.9 TCF of gas; and mean undiscovered 0.4 BBNGL. Ahlbrandt and others (1998) tested several methods for calculating undis-covered resources in the Sirte Basin. The discovery process

method calculated a median estimate of 12.2 BBOE, and the frac-tal method calculated an estimate of 47.5 BBOE. The median value of Masters and others’ (1994) assessment, which was a geologically based Delphi estimate, was 10.7 BBOE and a mean of 11.5 BBOE.

The results of the current resource estimates are shown in table 1 and in figures 21 and 22. These estimates are derived from geologic inputs to the Monte Carlo probabilistic model developed for the World Energy Project (Charpentier and Klett, 2000). Risking structure and other methodological considerations are provided in chapters within the recent world assessment (U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000).

Following is a summary of the unrisked assessments for the two established assessment units and the risked assessments for the two hypothetical assessment units in the Sirte Basin province (figs. 21, 22). The mean geologically risked (GR) estimates com-pare favorably with the estimated mean of Masters and others (1994). The current mean resource estimates are 11.63 BBOE (unrisked) and 8.98 BBOE (risked; fig. 23).

Compared to Masters and others (1994), less natural gas is estimated for the Sirte Basin as a result of the present study. This reduction is in large part due to reduced amounts of gas associ-ated with Sirte Basin oils calculated on the basis of very low gas/oil ratios (GOR median used in this assessment is 300; U.S. Geo-logical Survey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000), reflecting data available to us from Petroconsultants (1996) and GeoMark (1998). The geologically risked numbers reflect levels of uncer-tainty for the two hypothetical assessment units.

9,600

3,983

13,583

6,854

2,497

9,999

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000M

ILLI

ON

BA

RR

ELS

OF

OIL

EQ

UIV

ALE

NT

1994 ASSESSMENT 2000 ASSESSMENT

Mean oil

Mean gas

Mean NGL

Total

648

Figure 23. Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team (2000) mean risked estimates for oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids versus Masters and others’ (1994) mean estimates, Sirte Basin province 2043.

References Cited 27

References Cited

Abugares, Y.I., 1996, Sedimentology and hydrocarbon potential of the Gir Formation, Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbe-ta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 45–64.

Abdulghader, G.S., 1996, Sedimentology and reservoir heterogeneities of the Nubian Formation, southeastern Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 223–250.

Ahlbrandt, T.S., Klett, T.R., and Pollastro, R.M., 1998, Estimates of undis-covered oil and gas in petroleum systems of the world; North Africa and Middle East examples: Proceedings of the 15th World Petro-leum Congress, Beijing, China, John Wiley, London, v. 2, p. 180–183.

Ambrose, Greg, 2000, The geology and hydrocarbon habitat of the Sarir Sandstone, SE Sirt Basin, Libya: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 23, p.165–192.

Anketell, J.M., 1996, Structural history of the Sirt Basin and its relation-ships to the Sabratah Basin and Cyrenaican Platform, Northern Lib-ya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p. 57–88.

Baird, D.W., Aburawi, R.M., and Bailey, N.J.L., 1996, Geohistory and petroleum in the central Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds.,The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevi-er, v. III, p. 3–56.

Baric, G., Spanic, D., and Maricic, M., 1996, Geochemical characteriza-tion of source rocks in NC-157 Block (Zaltan Platform), Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 541–553.

Barr, F.T., and Weegar, A.A., 1972, Stratigraphic nomenclature of the Sirte basin, Libya: Tripoli, Libya, Petroleum Exploration Society of Libya, 179 p.

Bebout, D.G., and Poindexter, C., 1975, Secondary carbonate porosity as related to Early Tertiary depositional facies, Zelten field, Libya: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 59, p. 665–693.

Belazi, H.S., 1989, The geology of the Nafoora oil field, Sirte basin, Libya: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 12, p. 353–366.

Bellini, E., and Massa, D., 1980, A stratigraphic contribution to the Palae-ozoic of the southern basins of Libya, in Salem, M.J., and Busrewil, M.T., eds., The geology of Libya: London, Academic Press, v. 3, p. 3–57.

Bender, A.D., Fausto, M.C., and Ricardo, P.B., 1996, A basin modeling study in the southeastern part of the Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. I, p.139–157.

Bishop, W.F., 1985, Eocene and Upper Cretaceous carbonate reservoirs in east central Tunisia: Oil and Gas Journal, v. 83, no. 48, p. 137–142.

———1988, Petroleum geology of east-central Tunisia: American Asso-ciation of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 72, p. 1033–1058.

Brady, T.J., Campbell, N.D.J., and Maher, C.E., 1980, Intistar “D” oil field, Libya, in Halbouty, M.T., ed., Giant oil and gas fields of the decade 1968–1978: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 30, p. 543–564.

Brennan, P., 1992, Raguba field—Libya, Sirte Basin, in American Associ-ation of Petroleum Geologists Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Atlas of Oil and Gas Fields, Structural Traps VII: p. 267–289.

Burwood, R., 1997, Petroleum systems of the east Sirte Basin: Ameri- can Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 81, p. 1365.

Busrewil, M.T., Mriheel, I.Y., and Al Fasatwi, Y.A., 1996, Volcanism, tec-tonism, and hydrocarbon potential of parts of Al Haruj area, south-west Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p. 317–330.

Carmalt, S.W., and St. John, B., 1986, Giant oil and gas fields, in Halbouty, M.T., ed., Giant oil and gas fields, Future petroleum provinces of the world: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 40, p. 11–54.

Charpentier, R.R., and Klett, T.R., 2000, The Monte Carlo Simulation meth-od, Chapter MC in U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team, U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment 2000—Description and results: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-60, 4 CD-ROMs.

Clifford, A.C., 1984, African oil—past, present and future, in Halbouty, M.T., ed., Future petroleum provinces of the world: American Asso-ciation of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 40, p. 339–372.

Clifford, A.C., Grund, R., and Musrati, H., 1980, Geology of a stratigraphic giant, Messla oil field, Libya, in Halbouty, M.T., ed., Giant oil and gas fields of the decade 1968–1978: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 30, p. 507–524.

EIA, 1997, Annual Energy Review: Department of Energy/Energy Informa-tion Agency: DOE/EIA–0384 (97), 358 p.

El-Alami, M., 1996a, Petrography and reservoir quality of the Lower Cre-taceous Sandstone in the deep Mar Trough, Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 309–322.

———1996b, Habitat of oil in Abu Attiffel area, Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 337–348.

El-Hawat, A.S., Missallati, A.A., Bezan, A.M., and Taleb, T.M., 1996, The Nubian Sandstone in Sirt Basin and its correlatives, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 3–30.

Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 1992, ArcWorld 1:3M digital database: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI), available from ESRI, Redlands, CA, scale: 1:3,000,000.

Finetti, I., 1982, Structure, stratigraphy and evolution of central Mediter-ranean: Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, v. 24, no. 96, p. 247–312.

Futyan, A., and Jawzi, A.H., 1996, The hydrocarbon habitat of the oil and gas fields of North Africa with emphasis on the Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 287–308.

GeoMark, 1998, Oil information library system/petroleum information library system: CD-ROM database available from GeoMark Research Inc., 9748 Whithorn Drive, Houston, TX 77095.

Ghori, K.A.R., and Mohammed, R.A., 1996, The application of petroleum generation modeling to the eastern Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 529–540.

Goudarzi, G.H., 1980, Structure—Libya, in Salem, M.S., and Busrewil, M.T., eds., The Geology of Libya: London, Academic Press, v. 3, p. 879–892.

Gras, R., 1996, Structural style of the southern margin of the Messlah High, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geol-ogy of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p. 201–210.

Gras, R., and Thusu, B., 1998, Trap architecture of the Early Cretaceous Sarir Sandstone in the eastern Sirt Basin, Libya, in MacGregor, D.S., Moody, R.T.J., and Clark-Lowes, D.D., eds., Petroleum geology


of North Africa: Geological Society, Special Publication 132, p. 317–334.

Guiraud, Rene, and Bosworth, William, 1997, Senonian basin inversion and rejuvenation of rifting in Africa and Arabia—Synthesis and implication to plate-scale tectonics: Tectonophysics, v. 282, p. 39–82.

Gumati, Y.D., and Kanes, W.H., 1985, Early Tertiary subsidence and sedi-mentary facies—Northern Sirte basin, Libya: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 69, p. 39–52.

Gumati, Y.D., Kanes, W.H., and Schamel, S., 1996, An evaluation of the hydrocarbon potential of the sedimentary basins of Libya: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 19, p. 95–112.

Gumati, Y.D., and Schamel, S., 1988, Thermal maturation history of the Sirte basin, Libya: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 11, p. 205–218.

Hallett, D., and El Ghoul, A., 1996, Oil and gas potential of the deep trough areas in the Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 455–484.

Hammuda, O.S., 1980, Sediments and palaeogeography of the Lower Campanian sand bodies along the southern tip of Ad Daffah–Al Wahah Ridge, Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., and Busrewil, M.T., eds., The geology of Libya: London, Academic Press, v. 2, p. 509–520.

Harding, T.P., 1984, Graben hydrocarbon occurrences and structural styles: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 68, p. 333–362.

Ibrahim, M.W.I., 1996, Geothermal gradient anomalies of hydrocarbon entrapment; Al Hagfah trough, Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 419–434.

Jongsma, D., van Hinte, J.E., and Woodside, J.M., 1985, Geologic struc-ture and neotectonics of the North African continental margin south of Sicily: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 2, p. 156–179.

Klett, T.R., in press, Total petroleum systems of the Pelagian Province, Tunisia, Libya, Italy, and Malta—The Bou Dabbous–Tertiary and Jurassic-Cretaceous composite: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2202-D.

Klett, T.R., Ahlbrandt, T.S., Schmoker, J.W. and Dolton, G.L., 1997, Rank-ing of the world’s oil and gas provinces by known petroleum vol-umes: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-463 CD-ROM.

Klitzsch, E., 1996, Geological observations from Nubia and their structural interpretation, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p. 101–106.

Knytl, J., Brydle, G., and Greenwood, D., 1996, Tectonic history and struc-tural development of the Kaf-Themar trend of the western Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p.167–200.

Koscec, B.G., and Gherryo, Y.S., 1996, Geology and reservoir perfor-mance of Messlah oil field, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 365–390.

Kroner, A., 1993, The Pan-African belt of northeastern and eastern Afri-ca, Madagascar, southern India, Sri Lanka and east Antarctica; Terrane amalgamation during formation of the Gondwana Super-continent, in Thorwiehe, U., and Schandelmeier, H., eds., Geoscien-tific research in Northeast Africa: Rotterdam, Netherlands, A.A. Balkema, p. 3–9.

Lewis, C.J., 1990, Sarir field, in American Association of Petroleum Geol-ogists Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Structural Traps II: p. 253–263.

Magoon, L.B., and Dow, W.G., 1994, The petroleum system—From source to trap: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 60, p. 3–23.

MacGregor, D.S., and Moody, R.T.J., 1998, Mesozoic and Cenozoic petro-leum systems of North Africa, in MacGregor, D.S., Moody, R.T.J., and Clark-Lowes, D.D., eds., Petroleum geology of North Africa: Geological Society, Special Publication 132, p. 201–216.

Mansour, A.T., and Magairhy, I.A., 1996, Petroleum geology and stratig-raphy of the southeastern part of the Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 485–528.

Massa, D., and Delort, T., 1984, Evolution du Bassin de Syrte (Libya) du Cambrien au Cretace Basal: Bulletin Société Géologique de France, Series 7, v. 26, no. 6, p. 1087–1096.

Masters, C.D., Attanasi, E.D., and Root, D.H., 1994, World petroleum assessment and analysis, in Proceedings of the 14th World Petro-leum Congress: London, John Wiley, p. 529–541.

Mikbel, S.R., 1979, Structural and configuration map of the basement of east and central Libya: Neues Jahrbuch fur Geol. Palaont. Abhhan-dlungen, v. 158, no. 2, p. 209–220.

Montgomery, S., 1994, Sirte Basin, North-Central Libya, prospects for the future: Petroleum Frontiers, Petroleum Information Corporation, v. 11, no. 1, 94 p.

Parsons, M.B., Azgaar, A.M., and Curry, J.J., 1980, Hydrocarbon occur-rences in the Sirte Basin, Libya, in Miall, A.D., ed.: Canadian Society Petroleum Geologists Memoir 6, p. 723–732.

Persits, F., Ahlbrandt, T.S., Tuttle, M., Charpentier, R., Brownfield, M., and Takahashi, K., 1997, Map showing geology, oil and gas fields and geological provinces of Africa: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-470A (CD-ROM).

Petroconsultants, 1996, Petroleum exploration and production database as of January, 1996: Petroconsultants, Inc., P.O. Box 740619, 6600 Sands Point Drive, Houston TX 77274-0619, U.S.A., or Petroconsult-ants, Inc., P.O. Box 152, 24 Chemin de la Mairie, 1258 Perly, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pratsch, J.C., 1991, Vertical hydrocarbon migration; a major exploration parameter: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 14’ p. 429–444.

Price, L.C., 1980, Utilization and documentation of vertical oil migration in deep basins: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 2, p. 353–387.

Roberts, J.M., 1970, Amal field, Libya, in Halbouty, M.T., ed., Geology of giant petroleum fields: American Association of Petroleum Geolo-gists Memoir 14, p. 438–448.

Rodgers, M.R., Beahm, D.C., and Touati, M.A., 1990, Discovery of the Ezzaouia and Robbana accumulations, Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 74, p. 750.

Roohi, M., 1996a, A geological view of source-reservoir relationships in the western Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 323–336.

———1996b, Geological history and hydrocarbon migration pattern of the central Az Zahrah–Al Hufrah Platform, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. II, p. 435–454.

Sandford, R.M., 1970, Sarir oil field, Libya—Desert surprise, in Halbouty, M.T., ed., Geology of giant petroleum fields: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 14, p. 449–476.

Schmoker, J.W., and Crovelli, R.A., 1998, A simplified spreadsheet pro-gram for estimating future growth of oil and gas reserves: Nonre-newable Resources, v. 7, p. 149–155.

References Cited 29

Selley, R.C., 1997, The Sirte Basin of Libya in African Basins, in Selley, R.C., ed., Sedimentary basins of the world: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. 3, p. 27–37.

Terry, C.E., and Williams, J.J., 1969, The Idris “A” bioherm and oilfield, Sirte basin, Libya—Its commercial development, regional Pale-ocene geologic setting and stratigraphy, in Exploration for petro-leum in Europe and North Africa: London, Institute of Petroleum, p. 31–68.

U.S. Geological Survey World Energy Assessment Team, 2000, U.S. Geo-logical Survey world petroleum assessment 2000—Description and results: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-60, 4 CD-ROMs.

Van Dijk, P.M. and Eabadi, A.M., 1996, Relay growth faulting and con-temporaneous drape folding of the Ma’zul Ninah Formation in the

southern extension of the Hun Graben, western Sirt Basin, Libya, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p. 155–166.

Van Houten, F.B., 1980, Latest Jurassic–Early Cretaceous regressive facies, northeast Africa Craton: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 64, p. 857–867.

Van der Meer, F., and Cloetingh, S., 1996, Intraplate stresses and the sub-sidence history of the Sirt Basin, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p. 211–230.

Westaway, R., 1996, Active tectonic deformation in the Sirt Basin and its surroundings, in Salem, M.J., El-Hawat, A.S., and Sbeta, A.M., eds., The geology of Sirt Basin: Amsterdam, Elsevier, v. III, p. 89–100.

Yergin, D., 1991, The prize: New York, Simon and Schuster, 877 p.

Documents

The Sirte Basin Province of Libya Sirte-Zelten Total Petroleum System