58
Introduction Constructing the SWIID Using the SWIID Conclusions The Problem Not-So-Attractive Solutions The Standardized World Income Inequality Database Frederick Solt University of Iowa 18 September 2013 Frederick Solt The SWIID

The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

  • Upload
    phambao

  • View
    229

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Standardized World IncomeInequality Database

Frederick SoltUniversity of Iowa

18 September 2013

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 2: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Problem: Quantity vs. Quality

I Goal: To make valid comparisons of levels and trends inincome inequality across countries and over time

I Need: Comparable data for many countries and yearsI Issue: Most of the available data is incomparable

1. Income definition (e.g., market income, consumption)2. Unit of analysis (e.g., household, adult equivalent, individual)3. Harmonization (e.g., treatment of non-monetary income)4. Coverage (entire population vs., e.g., major cities, rural, adults)

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 3: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Problem: Quantity vs. Quality

I Goal: To make valid comparisons of levels and trends inincome inequality across countries and over time

I Need: Comparable data for many countries and yearsI Issue: Most of the available data is incomparable

1. Income definition (e.g., market income, consumption)2. Unit of analysis (e.g., household, adult equivalent, individual)3. Harmonization (e.g., treatment of non-monetary income)4. Coverage (entire population vs., e.g., major cities, rural, adults)

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 4: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Problem: Quantity vs. Quality

I Goal: To make valid comparisons of levels and trends inincome inequality across countries and over time

I Need: Comparable data for many countries and yearsI Issue: Most of the available data is incomparable

1. Income definition (e.g., market income, consumption)2. Unit of analysis (e.g., household, adult equivalent, individual)3. Harmonization (e.g., treatment of non-monetary income)4. Coverage (entire population vs., e.g., major cities, rural, adults)

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 5: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Problem: Quantity vs. Quality

I Goal: To make valid comparisons of levels and trends inincome inequality across countries and over time

I Need: Comparable data for many countries and yearsI Issue: Most of the available data is incomparable

1. Income definition (e.g., market income, consumption)2. Unit of analysis (e.g., household, adult equivalent, individual)3. Harmonization (e.g., treatment of non-monetary income)4. Coverage (entire population vs., e.g., major cities, rural, adults)

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 6: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Problem: Quantity vs. Quality

I Goal: To make valid comparisons of levels and trends inincome inequality across countries and over time

I Need: Comparable data for many countries and yearsI Issue: Most of the available data is incomparable

1. Income definition (e.g., market income, consumption)2. Unit of analysis (e.g., household, adult equivalent, individual)3. Harmonization (e.g., treatment of non-monetary income)4. Coverage (entire population vs., e.g., major cities, rural, adults)

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 7: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Problem: Quantity vs. Quality

I Goal: To make valid comparisons of levels and trends inincome inequality across countries and over time

I Need: Comparable data for many countries and yearsI Issue: Most of the available data is incomparable

1. Income definition (e.g., market income, consumption)2. Unit of analysis (e.g., household, adult equivalent, individual)3. Harmonization (e.g., treatment of non-monetary income)4. Coverage (entire population vs., e.g., major cities, rural, adults)

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 8: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

The Problem: Quantity vs. Quality

I Goal: To make valid comparisons of levels and trends inincome inequality across countries and over time

I Need: Comparable data for many countries and yearsI Issue: Most of the available data is incomparable

1. Income definition (e.g., market income, consumption)2. Unit of analysis (e.g., household, adult equivalent, individual)3. Harmonization (e.g., treatment of non-monetary income)4. Coverage (entire population vs., e.g., major cities, rural, adults)

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 9: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

A Tradeoff

LIS

Top Incomes

All the Ginis

WIID2c

D&S Accept

OECDSEDLACEurostat

SWIID Source

0

1000

2000

3000

0 5 10 15 20 25

Additional Definition/Unit Combinations

Cou

ntry

−Ye

ars

Obs

erve

d

I More observations, more incomparability

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 10: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 11: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 12: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 13: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 14: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 15: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 16: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 17: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 18: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

Two (Not-So-Attractive) Options

I Comparable Data for a FewCountries and Years

I Luxembourg Income Study (208)I All the Ginis (590)I SWIID Source Data (962)

I But this entails giving up on manycomparisons and throwing away alot of data

I Incomparable Data for ManyCountries and Years

I Just ignore incomparability, orI Make a fixed adjustment for

different definitions and units

I But crudely reducing thesedifferences to constants meansany comparisons are extremelydubious

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 19: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

All the Ginis

AtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG IndiaAtG India

AtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG ChinaAtG China

15

25

35

45

55

1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

2013 All the Ginis

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 20: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

All the Ginis with Adjustments

I Use included dummy variables to calculate adjustmentsper Milanovic (2013, 8) . . .

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 21: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

All the Ginis with Adjustments

AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.

AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.

15

25

35

45

55

1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 22: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The ProblemNot-So-Attractive Solutions

All the Ginis and the LIS

AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.AtG India w/ adj.

AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.AtG China w/ adj.

●LIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS IndiaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS ChinaLIS China

15

25

35

45

55

1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

I Using the same income definition and unit of analysis (andharmonizing) can make a big difference

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 23: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

SWIID: The Logic

I How to maximize comparability for the widest possiblecoverage?

I This is a missing-data problem, fit for multiple imputation:I LIS gives high comparability, but with ˜98% missing country-yearsI Other data informs imputations of these missing observationsI ‘Adjustment’ modeled as varying across countries and over time,

relying as much as possible on proximate years in the same countryI Error terms in the models–the residual incomparability–is

incorporated as uncertainty

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 24: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

SWIID: The Logic

I How to maximize comparability for the widest possiblecoverage?

I This is a missing-data problem, fit for multiple imputation:I LIS gives high comparability, but with ˜98% missing country-yearsI Other data informs imputations of these missing observationsI ‘Adjustment’ modeled as varying across countries and over time,

relying as much as possible on proximate years in the same countryI Error terms in the models–the residual incomparability–is

incorporated as uncertainty

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 25: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

SWIID: The Logic

I How to maximize comparability for the widest possiblecoverage?

I This is a missing-data problem, fit for multiple imputation:I LIS gives high comparability, but with ˜98% missing country-yearsI Other data informs imputations of these missing observationsI ‘Adjustment’ modeled as varying across countries and over time,

relying as much as possible on proximate years in the same countryI Error terms in the models–the residual incomparability–is

incorporated as uncertainty

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 26: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

SWIID: The Logic

I How to maximize comparability for the widest possiblecoverage?

I This is a missing-data problem, fit for multiple imputation:I LIS gives high comparability, but with ˜98% missing country-yearsI Other data informs imputations of these missing observationsI ‘Adjustment’ modeled as varying across countries and over time,

relying as much as possible on proximate years in the same countryI Error terms in the models–the residual incomparability–is

incorporated as uncertainty

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 27: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

SWIID: The Logic

I How to maximize comparability for the widest possiblecoverage?

I This is a missing-data problem, fit for multiple imputation:I LIS gives high comparability, but with ˜98% missing country-yearsI Other data informs imputations of these missing observationsI ‘Adjustment’ modeled as varying across countries and over time,

relying as much as possible on proximate years in the same countryI Error terms in the models–the residual incomparability–is

incorporated as uncertainty

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 28: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

SWIID: The Logic

I How to maximize comparability for the widest possiblecoverage?

I This is a missing-data problem, fit for multiple imputation:I LIS gives high comparability, but with ˜98% missing country-yearsI Other data informs imputations of these missing observationsI ‘Adjustment’ modeled as varying across countries and over time,

relying as much as possible on proximate years in the same countryI Error terms in the models–the residual incomparability–is

incorporated as uncertainty

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 29: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

LISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLIS

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

Luxembourg Income Study

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 30: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

LISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLIS

Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Adult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult Equivalent

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

SWIID Source Data: A Complete Annual Series for the UK

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 31: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

LISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLIS

Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Adult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult Equivalent

● ●

Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,HH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per CapitaHH Per Capita

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

1. Counting across all countries, another series is actually more plentiful

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 32: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

LISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLIS

Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Adult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult Equivalent

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

2. Using only the complete series discards a lot of other data

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 33: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

LISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLIS

Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Adult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult Equivalent

OECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECDOECD

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

3. Harmonization is important . . .

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 34: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

LISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLISLIS

Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Net Income,Adult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult EquivalentAdult Equivalent

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

I To get comparable data, we need to shift this series “up”:We need to multiply it by some factor greater than 1

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 35: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.Constant Adj.

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

SWIID Source Data, Global Fixed Adjustment: G × .98

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 36: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

UK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK AdjustmentUK Adjustment

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

SWIID Source Data, UK Fixed Adjustment: G × 1.04

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 37: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.Lowess Adj.

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

SWIID Source Data, Loess Estimate Adjustment: G × 1.00 to 1.08

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 38: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

● ● ●

●●

●●

● ●

SWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIIDSWIID

20

25

30

35

40

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Gin

i Ind

ex

SWIID Estimate and 95% Confidence Interval

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 39: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

An Illustration: Inequality in the United Kingdom

Net IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet IncomeNet Income

Market IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket IncomeMarket Income

25

30

35

40

45

50

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

SW

IID G

ini I

ndex

SWIID Estimates and 95% Confidence Intervals

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 40: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

Constructing the SWIID

1. Collect all available Gini data

2. Categorize observations by combination of income definitionand unit of analysis

3. Calculate all observed adjustment ratios ρabit = GbitGait

4. Predict unobserved ρ̂abit using:

a. Loess by country over timeb. Regression by country-decadec. Regression by countryd. Regression by ‘region’e. Regression by advanced or developing world

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 41: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The LogicAn IllustrationConstructing the SWIID

Constructing the SWIID

5. Make two-step predictions: ρ̂1bit = ρ̂abit × ρ̂1ait

6. Use ρ̂ and all observed Ginis to estimate standardized Ginis

7. If multiple estimates exist for a country-year, combine them:

a. Start with best-fitting estimate for each country-yearb. Incorporate additional estimates if they reduce error

8. Inform with estimates from surrounding country-years:

a. Apply weighted moving-average smoother (with exceptions)b. Interpolate completely unobserved country-years

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 42: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Inequality in Net Income in Four Rich Countries

United KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom

GermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermanyGermany

SwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSwedenSweden

United StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited States

20

25

30

35

40

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

SW

IID G

ini I

ndex

, Net

Inco

me

SWIID Estimates and 95% Confidence Intervals

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 43: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Inequality in Net Income in Latin America

United StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited States

BrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazil

ChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChile

MexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexico

UruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguay

25

35

45

55

65

1980 1990 2000 2010Year

SW

IID G

ini I

ndex

, Net

Inco

me

SWIID Estimates and 95% Confidence Intervals

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 44: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Inequality in Net Income in Africa

BrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazil

South AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSouth Africa

NigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeriaNigeria

EgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgyptEgypt

25

35

45

55

65

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

SW

IID G

ini I

ndex

, Net

Inco

me

SWIID Estimates and 95% Confidence Intervals

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 45: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Inequality in Net Income in the BRICs

BrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazil

IndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndia

RussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussia

ChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChina

20

30

40

50

60

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

SW

IID G

ini I

ndex

, Net

Inco

me

SWIID Estimates and 95% Confidence Intervals

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 46: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Statistical Analysis with the SWIID

I Remember, the SWIID estimates are estimates

I Taking the standard errors into account is crucial to makingwell-grounded, defensible comparisons

I Fortunately, this is easier to do than it used to be . . .

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 47: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Statistical Analysis with the SWIID

I Remember, the SWIID estimates are estimates

I Taking the standard errors into account is crucial to makingwell-grounded, defensible comparisons

I Fortunately, this is easier to do than it used to be . . .

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 48: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Statistical Analysis with the SWIID

I Remember, the SWIID estimates are estimates

I Taking the standard errors into account is crucial to makingwell-grounded, defensible comparisons

I Fortunately, this is easier to do than it used to be . . .

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 49: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

CCTs in Brazil

I Has inequality declined in Brazil since the introduction ofnational conditional cash transfers in 2001?

United StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited StatesUnited States

BrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazil

ChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChileChile

MexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexicoMexico

UruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguayUruguay

25

35

45

55

65

1980 1990 2000 2010Year

SW

IID G

ini I

ndex

, Net

Inco

me

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 50: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

CCTs in Brazil

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 51: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

CCTs in Brazil

I Has the trend in inequality changed in Brazil since 2001?

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 52: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Post-Communism

I Since 1989, has inequality been increasing more rapidly inChina than in Russia?

BrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazilBrazil

IndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndiaIndia

RussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussiaRussia

ChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChinaChina

20

30

40

50

60

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year

SW

IID G

ini I

ndex

, Net

Inco

me

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 53: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

Graphical ComparisonsStatistical Comparisons

Post-Communism

I Since 1989, has inequality been increasing more rapidly inChina than in Russia?

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 54: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The Standardized World Income Inequality Database

I The SWIID maximizes comparability for the widest possible sample

I It multiply-imputes missing data in the LIS, using as muchinformation as possible from the same country in proximate years

I Residual incomparability is represented as uncertainty

I Incorporating the standard errors is therefore crucial . . .

I . . . and is now relatively easy

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 55: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The Standardized World Income Inequality Database

I The SWIID maximizes comparability for the widest possible sample

I It multiply-imputes missing data in the LIS, using as muchinformation as possible from the same country in proximate years

I Residual incomparability is represented as uncertainty

I Incorporating the standard errors is therefore crucial . . .

I . . . and is now relatively easy

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 56: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The Standardized World Income Inequality Database

I The SWIID maximizes comparability for the widest possible sample

I It multiply-imputes missing data in the LIS, using as muchinformation as possible from the same country in proximate years

I Residual incomparability is represented as uncertainty

I Incorporating the standard errors is therefore crucial . . .

I . . . and is now relatively easy

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 57: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The Standardized World Income Inequality Database

I The SWIID maximizes comparability for the widest possible sample

I It multiply-imputes missing data in the LIS, using as muchinformation as possible from the same country in proximate years

I Residual incomparability is represented as uncertainty

I Incorporating the standard errors is therefore crucial . . .

I . . . and is now relatively easy

Frederick Solt The SWIID

Page 58: The Standardized World Income Inequality · PDF fileThe Standardized World Income Inequality Database ... AtG India AtG China 15 25 35 45 55 ... The Standardized World Income Inequality

IntroductionConstructing the SWIID

Using the SWIIDConclusions

The Standardized World Income Inequality Database

I The SWIID maximizes comparability for the widest possible sample

I It multiply-imputes missing data in the LIS, using as muchinformation as possible from the same country in proximate years

I Residual incomparability is represented as uncertainty

I Incorporating the standard errors is therefore crucial . . .

I . . . and is now relatively easy

Frederick Solt The SWIID