Upload
benny-tarrant
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THEIS RESEARCH SEMINAR
Genetic adaptation of aspen populations to spring risk
environments: a novel remote sensing approach
Haitao Li
Department of Renewable ResourcesUniversity of Alberta
Feb 16th , 2010
OUTLINE • Background
o Phenology & budbreak o Adaptation & genotypeo Land surface phenology
• Methodologyo Provenance trialo Remote sensing
• Resultso Maps & graphs
• Discussion
Objective
• INVESTIGATIONGeographic patterns of genetic variation
in the spring phenology of aspen
• INTERPRETATIONAdaptation of populations to climatic
risk environments
• IMPLEMENTATIONSeed transfer
• EXPLORATION New method—remote sensing
• PHENOLOGYrecurring biological phases of
species, biotic and abiotic causes, and the
interrelation of phases within or among species
• ADAPTATIONsurvival adaptation
capacity adaptation
• APPLICATION
Forest management, seed transfer, climate modelling, …
Introduction
Tem
pera
ture
Threshold
Time
• BUDBREAK Spring phenology
Adaptive trait
Environmental contral
• HEATSUMthe thermal time, it is the
accumulation of degree-days leading to a phenological event
Degree-day :The average daily temperature above a certain threshold (0°C)
Introduction
1
1
1
0)(
)(1
0
Tbxif
Tbxif
TbxxGDD
xGDDHeatsum
t
t
tt
t
tt
Heatsum
• LAND SURFACE PHENOLOGY Forest canopy
spectral reflectivity
• MODIS
(Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer)
a key instrument aboard on both Terra and Aqua satellites lunched by NASA
Introduction Resolution
Spatial 250-1000 m
Spectral 0.62-14.38 µm
temporal 1-2 days
• NDVINormalized Difference Vegetation Index
• EVIEnhanced Vegetation Index
Introduction
Source Data from NASA: http://honeybeenet.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sites/ScaleHiveSite.php?SiteID=MD001
LCCGEVI
NDVI
bluerednir
rednir
rednir
rednir
)( 21
Workflow of thesis
Field observation
Remotely sensed data
Spatial pattern of genotypes
Climate data Spatial pattern
Adaptation
Spatial pattern of genotypes
Correlation test
No
Yes
Field observation
• PROVENANCE TRIAL1998
43 open pollinated bulked seed lots
Randomized complete block design
Location of provenance trial
Research area and location of provenances
o 43 provenances cover western Canada and Minnesota in USo 1126 trees in command garden o observation from May 4th to June 2nd 2009
Field observation
• 7-level bud development scale
0, dormant
1, buds swelling
2, buds breaking
3, extend to 1cm
4, extend to 2cm
5, extend to 3cm
6, fully extended 120 130 1400
1
2
3
4
5
6
Inde
x of
Bud
-bre
ak
Days
1
2
3
45
6
Results of Field Observation
Symbols represent different ecological regions: BC taiga plains, AB northern boreal plains, AB lower rocky mountain foothills, AB central boreal plains, SK central boreal plains, MN boreal shield.
Remote sensing methods
Climate data
Average required heatsumPlus standard error Heatsum maps from 2001 to 2005
EVI imageries Map of green up date From 2001 to 2005– MODIS EVI data from 2001 to 2005
– spatial resolution 500 meter – 16 days interval
Greenup date
Mean temperature in the 130th day
2001 2002 2003
Average for five years20052004
The distribution of Greenup date
2001 2002 2003
Five-year average20052004
The distribution of Greenup date
2001 2002 2003
Five-year average20052004
Heatsum requirements from provenance trial and remote sensing data
Aspen Parklands
NorthHigh Elev
Validation • Provenance trials
Similar spatial pattern for required heatsum• Climate data
Storm-track from Rocky mountain to central Alberta
Correlation of heatsum with long-term climate conditions
PCA: PC1 & PC2
-4 -2 0 2 4 6
-4-2
02
4
Prin1
Pri
n2
BC
CT FH
MN
NW
SK
MAT
MWMT
AHMSHM
MCMT
EXT_Cold
PAS
MCMT
SHM
PCA (Red is high value and green is low)
MCMT: mean coldest month temperatureSHM: summer heat/moisture index
PCA: PC3
-4 -2 0 2 4
-4-3
-2-1
01
Prin2
Prin
3
BC
CT
FH
MN
NW SK
PAS
MWMT
AHM
EXT_Cold MCMT
SHM
MWMT
PCA (Red is high value and green is low)
AHM: annual heat/moisture indexMCMT: mean coldest month temperatureMWMT: mean warmest month temperaturePAS: precipitation as snow
Correlation of heatsum with long-term climate conditions
Precipitation and dryness in winter and early spring affect the timing of budbreak
Interpretation • Survival adaptation
vs. • capacity adaptation
o North & high elevation
short growing season
break earlyo Dry areas
aspen parklands and other place
breaking bud in late spring
too dry to grow
Graphed by Tim Gylander
Growth traits: Height and DBH
Mapped by Pei-yu Chen
Growth traits: Productivity
Application
Later budbreak
Later budbreak
Relatively early budbreak
Relatively early budbreak
X
What’s new
Environmentalcontrol
• Budbreak delayed by doughtiness and frost damage
Technology• Detecting genotype by
remote sensing
Acknowledgement
• Andreas Hamann, Xianli Wang, Elisabeth Beubia, Pei-yu Chen, Nicholas Coops, Arthuro Sanche
• NSERC, Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries, Ainsworth Engineered Canada LP, Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd., Western Boreal Aspen Corporation, Weyerhaeuser Company Ltd.
THANKS