Thompson - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

8/3/2019 Thompson - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/thompson-campus-improvement-plan-2011-2012 1/12

C-FBISD VISION:

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.

Thompson ElementaryCAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2011-2012

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District

Angie Doak



BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Nancy Cline, President James Goode, Vice President Richard Fleming, Secretary

Lynn Chaffin, Assistant Secretary Frank Shor, Board Member

Nancy Watten, Board Member Karin Webb, Board Member

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH

SCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

Creekview

Early CollegeNewman Smith

R. L. TurnerRanchview

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Blalack BushFieldLongPerryPolk

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES

Supporting Objective 1:

Continuously increase student achievement


Continuously improve the learning environment forstudents and staff


Continuously increase operational effectiveness


Continuously increase stakeholder confidence andsupport of our school system

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

BlairBlanton

CarrolltonCentral

Country PlaceDavis

Farmers BranchFreemanFurneaux

GoodKent

LandryLas Colinas

La VillitaMcCoy

McKamyMcLaughlinMcWhorterRainwaterRiverchaseRosemeade

Sheffield IntermediateSheffield Primary

Stark StricklandThompson

CENTERS

Mary Grimes Education CenterSalazar Transition School

Kelly Pre-K CenterHuie Education CenterCLC Learning Complex

C-FBISD GOAL

The Goal of the Carrollton-Farmers

Branch ISD is high achievement for

all students.

2



3

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

BUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVESDelores Stanley

PARENT REPRESENTATIVES

Minerva Gomez

ADMINISTRATORS

Angie Doak-PrincipalRobyn Callahan- Assistant Principal

STAFF REPRESENTATIVESStephanie ParcelJackie ShafferCathy ZlyFarah RehmanChristine SchummEric Herrington

Brandy GoodlettCourtney Wilson

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW :

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date






4

C-FBISD VISION

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments ofAcademic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce readywithout remediation.

MISSION

Together with families and community we commit all districtresources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as:

A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner

A complex thinker

An effective communicator

STATEMENT OF BELIEFS

We believe that:

The economic, political and societal success of ourcountry depends upon a quality education for all.

Diversity strengthens the community and enriches thefabric of our society.

It is the responsibility of the entire community topartner in the educational process.

Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturingenvironment.

Belonging to a family, to a school and to a community

is vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning. People learn at different rates, have different

capacities and that each person’s educational pathdeserves to be valued equally.

Learning empowers people to reach their fullpotential: physically, mentally, socially, andemotionally

Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.

GRADUATE PROFILE

Graduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:

Responsible individuals who:

Model productive citizenship

Practice successful personal management

Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior

Appreciate the value of diversity

Function effectively as team members

Competent learners who:

Continually pursue and integrate knowledge

Achieve academic standards

Apply various forms of technology

Seek educational and career options

Produce quality products

Complex thinkers who:

Solve problems critically

Create original ideas and solutions

Understand and apply systems thinking

Effective communicators who:

Read with understanding Interpret information

Interact through listening and speaking

Write clearly



5

TARGET AREAS

Title I – Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase parental involvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I – School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachers

TS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments.TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.





THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENT

ACHIEVEMENT

CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNING

ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONAL

EFFECTIVENESS

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDER

CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL

SYSTEM

7

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR – Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP

ACTION STRATEGYPERSON

RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Implement Instructional Rounds Angie Doak August 2011 – May 2012STAAR, MAP,Unit/Common assessments

Campus BudgetTS1, TS2, TS8,TS9

Implement Progress Monitoring Angie Doak August 2011-June 2012STAAR, MAP,

Unit/Common assessments

Campus Budget TS4, TS8, TS9

Implement Focused Tutoring Robyn CallahanSeptember 2011-May2012

STAAR, MAP,Unit/Common assessments

Title 1-$25, 624.05

TS9

Implement Test Protocols/Procedures as perdistrict/state mandate

Physical EducationTeachers

Fall 2011 Fitness Gram testFitnessAssessment

TS2


Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Utilize Instructional Facilitators with Tier 3 students andteacher coaches

Angie Doak August 2011 – May 2012STAAR, MAP,Unit/Common assessments,IRI, SNAP data

Title 1-$81,204.58

TS1, TS2,TS3,TS9, TS10

Utilize RTI Interventionists with Tier 3 students Angie Doak August 2011 – May 2012 STAAR, MAP,Unit/Common assessments,IRI, SNAP data

District BudgetTS1, TS2,TS3,TS9,TS10

Provide acceleration for students identified as At Risk Angie Doak August 2011 – May 2012

STAAR, MAP,Unit/Common assessments,IRI, SNAP data, Reportcards

Comp Ed Funds- $155,193.32

TS1, TS2,TS10






ACHIEVEMENT




EFFECTIVENESS



SYSTEM

8

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction – I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Implement book study of the Energy Bus Angie Doak August 2011-June 2012 TASB Employee Survey Campus Budget TS1, TS2


Performance Target: Employee: Campus Environment – I would characterize my campus as having a positive attitude.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Lead book study sessions of the Energy Bus Teachers August 2011-June 2012 TASB Employee survey Campus Budget TS1, TS2


Performance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction – Teachers work amicably together on common problems.


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Implement Internal Instructional Rounds Angie Doak August 2011-April 2012 TASB Employee survey Campus Budget TS1, TS2


Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Communicate attendance law via letter to parents Angie Doak August 2011-June 2012 EOY Attendance report Campus Budget TS1, TS2, TS10






ACHIEVEMENT




EFFECTIVENESS



SYSTEM

9


Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Implement student behavior charts whennecessary

Robyn Callahan August 2011-June 2012EOY Student ServicesDiscipline Report

Campus Budget TS1, TS2,

Implement R-Time Character Education program

weeklyMichelle Garcia August 2011-June 2012

R-Time lessons,

walkthroughsCampus Budget TS2, TS9

Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Examine campus staffing efficiency and makerecommendation(s) to central office Angie Doak January 2012-March2012 Staffing costs District Budget TS1, TS2

Recruit highly qualified teachers via select pool ofapplicants

Angie Doak January 2012- June2012

Staffing costs District Budget TS3, TS5

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Implement “Coffee Talk” Angie Doak August 2011-June 2012District CommunitySurvey

District budget TS1, TS2

Provide Spanish translations at all school events Angie Doak August 2011-June 2012 AttendanceCampusBudget, (Title1-$100.00)

TS1, TS2, TS6

Provide “Meet the Teacher” Night prior to thebeginning of the new school year

Angie Doak August 2011 AttendanceCampusBudget, Title

($50.00)

TS1, TS2, TS7






ACHIEVEMENT




EFFECTIVENESS



SYSTEM

10


Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction


RESPONSIBLETIMELINE

EVALUATION/

MEASURERESOURCES

TITLE I

COMPONENT

Implement Content Family NightsAngie Doak/JudyLoosier

August 2011-June 2012 AttendanceCampusBudget/(Title1-$679.37)

TS1, TS2, TS6

Provide Parent Volunteer sessions, ParentConnect, Bi-monthly newsletters

Angie Doak August 2011-June 2012Attendance, Connect-Eddata

CampusBudget/Title($100.00)

TS2, TS6


Performance Target: Employee: Campus Communication – School has system of communication that’s open, regular and honest

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENT

Provide school-wide weekly campus memo Angie Doak August 2011-June 2012 TASB Employee survey Campus Budget TS1, TS2






ACHIEVEMENT




EFFECTIVENESS



SYSTEM

11

+

ERG Performance Index 2010 Rank2011

Target2011 Rank

2012

Target2012 Rank

Education Productivity Index(EPI)

119 114

Academic Performance Index(API)

114 109

Staff Productivity Index (SPI) 131 126

Employee Opinion Survey2011

Result

2012

Target

2012

Result

Employee Job Satisfaction – I would

recommend this campus to a friend as a

good place to work. 66% 71%

Employee Campus Environment – I would

characterize my campus as having a

positive atmosphere. 57% 63%

Employee Curriculum and InstructionSupport – Teachers work amicably together

on common problems. 90% 92%

Employee Campus Communication –School has system of communication that’s

open, regular and honest.

58% 63%

AEIS2011

Result

2012

Target

2012

Result

Campus Rating E EStudent Attendance Rate 97.12 97

Students with Disciplinary Placements 28 15

Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey)2011

Result

2012

Target

2012

Result

Very Satisfied or Satisfied with District 71% 76%

RESULTS - 2012

PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)

C-FBISD Met AYP

2008 Yes

2009 Yes

2010 Yes

2011 No

Target 2012 Yes

Results 2012






ACHIEVEMENT




EFFECTIVENESS



SYSTEM

12


READING/ELAREADING/ELA 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS% SATIS

% COM% ADV

Target Result Target Result

Afr. American 87.5 95 50 50

Hispanic 88.4 95 30.6 32

White 100 100 45.2 47

Econ. Dis. 87.7 95 32.1 34

LEP 83 90 23 25

G/T 100 100 100

Special Ed 57 65 20 30

All Students 90.3 95 36.9 40

WRITINGWRITING 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American 100 100 20 20

Hispanic 84.8 95 8.7 17

White 85.7 100 14.3 20

Econ. Dis. 87.2 95 8.5 15

LEP 78 85 7 15

G/T 100 100 100


All Students 87.1 95 11.3 25

SOCIAL STUDIESSOCIAL STUDIES 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. AmericanHispanic

White

Econ. Dis.LEP

G/TSpecial Ed

All Students

MATHEMATICSMATHEMATICS 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American 87.5 95 12.5 20

Hispanic 83.9 95 24.8 35

White 96.8 100 32.3 35

Econ. Dis. 84.8 95 22.6 35

LEP 78 85 23 35

G/T 100 100 100


All Students 87 95 26.9 36

SCIENCESCIENCE 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American 87.5 90 12.5 20

Hispanic 91.7 92 41.7 42

White 100 100 60 65

Econ. Dis. 90.7 92 35.2 41

LEP 73 80 14 20

G/T 100 100 100


All Students 91.3 92 40.6 45

RESULTS - 2012

PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

SATISFACTORY ADVANCED

# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

Documents

Thompson - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012