18
G. Penn, D. Arbelaez, J. Corlett, P.J. Emma, G. Marcus, S. Prestemon, M. Reinsch, R. Wilcox, A. Zholents SLAC 25 September 2013 Three FEL Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Three FEL Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

  • Upload
    mimir

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Three FEL Designs for the Next Generation Light Source. G. Penn , D. Arbelaez , J. Corlett , P.J. Emma, G. Marcus, S . Prestemon , M. Reinsch , R. Wilcox, A. Zholents SLAC 25 September 2013. Next Generation Light Source Soft x-ray FEL facility High repetition rate – 1 MHz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

G. Penn, D. Arbelaez, J. Corlett, P.J. Emma, G. Marcus, S. Prestemon, M. Reinsch, R. Wilcox, A. Zholents

SLAC

25 September 2013

Three FEL Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Page 2: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Next Generation Light Source

Soft x-ray FEL facilityHigh repetition rate – 1 MHzCW superconducting Linac to 2.4 GeVMultiple FEL beamlines using identical bunches

3 distinct initial FELs for different science needs

nominal bunch: 300 pC, 500 A, 0.6 m emittance,

150 keV energy spread, 10 muse idealized beam, include resistive wake fields

Page 3: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Beamlines for different purposes Self-seeded: high flux, harder x-rays

Long pulses, large pulse energy, better BW than SASE Highest repetition rate - MHz (no external laser) Pulse duration and timing set by electron beam

HGHG: stable, transform limited pulses, softer x-rays Close to transform limit Adjustable pulse timing, duration and bandwidth Lower photon energies

2-Color Chirp-Taper: pump-probe, short pulse Two short pulses ~2 fs, substantial frequency chirp independent timing, photon energy, angle

0.2 – 1.2 keV

0.1 – 0.72 keV

0.2 – 1 keV

Page 4: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Superconducting undulators for X-rays

Nb3Sn SC undulators, 6 mm magnetic gap

shortest undulator period: u=20 mm, max K = 5

allows 0.2 keV up to ~1.5 keV photons in fundamental HGHG beamline, u=23 mm, K=6.8

allows 0.1 keV up to ~1 keV

S. Prestemon et al., PAC 2003, MPPG010

could use shorter undulator periods for dedicated beamlines at ~2.5 keV

Page 5: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Self-seeded Beamline tuning range 0.2 – 1.2 keV self-seeded

1.2 keV to 1.5 keV, SASE only MHz repetition rate aim for 2% efficiency with resolving power 20,000

7 meters for monochromator

optics

92 m

SASE stage seeded stage 

35.2 m 48.4 m

8.8 m

mon

o.

4.4 m

P

u = 20 mm both stages

Page 6: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Monochromator selects bandwidth bandwidth unchanged through seeded stage unless

beam has energy chirps

typical pulse after monochromator constant bandwidth in seeded stage

independent peaks, ~ 25 fs width each

~ 1 eVSASE bw

80 meVseeded bw

Page 7: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Self-seededResults

Page 8: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Self-seeding & coherence for R=20,000:

~ 30 fs coherence time at 1 nm wavelength ~ 130 fs coherence time at Carbon edge (4.5 nm)

pulse duration is defined by electron bunch 300 fs if no beam manipulations

shorter bunch “core” will not hurt beam brightness reduces total # photons

Page 9: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

HGHG Beamline

tuning range 0.1 – 0.72 keV 2 stages of HGHG with fresh bunch delay

similar to FEL-2 of FERMI@Elettra input laser 215 – 260 nm

100 kHz repetition rate 200 MW peak power (more for short pulses)

fre

sh

bu

nc

h

u = 23 mmu = 75 mm u = 50 mm64 m

         P  

    

 

rad-1mo

d-1

rad-2mo

d-2

 

4.4 m

6.0 m41.6 m

Page 10: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Relies on fresh bunch delay

fresh bunch needed for high photon energies

input laser at 100 fs FWHM almost overlaps second round of HGHG ~ 50 fs output duration

150 fs delay

increased energy spreadhurts performance

Page 11: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Results at 720 eV ideal beam total harmonic, 126 100 fs input laser

50 fs output pulse 2.1 × transform limit

75 meV FWHM

103 eV

50 fs FWHM

Page 12: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

HGHG pulse properties Wigner plot frequency chirp partly explains 2 × transform limit

Page 13: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

HGHG for a Short Bunch for a 50 fs “core”, barely use 20 fs FWHM seed laser

spacing is too tight and output pulse is quite short

output pulse has 250 meV bandwidth, only 4 fs duration

current ramp current ramp

Page 14: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

2-Color Chirp-taper beamline 2 pulses with one electron bunch, from 0.2 keV to 1 keV 100 kHz repetition rate

    

 

123 m

pulse 1 P  

 

4.4 m

mod

1

48.4 m

pulse 2 P

48.4 m

mod

2

3 m

m

0.5 mr

u = 23 mm both radiators

2.5 fs FWHM

0.6 fs FWHM if use chirp to compress

5 m seed:study 2 m

Page 15: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Chirped pulse could be compressed

5 x more compressed after linear dispersion: close to transform limit

chirped output pulse

Page 16: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Statistical fluctuations good transverse mode quality, low background starts from noise so fluctuates shot to shot

varies mostly in pulse energy timing, photon energy and chirp very stable

shot to shot fluctuations, and averaged profile

Page 17: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Evolution of Pulse

Page 18: Three  FEL  Designs for the Next Generation Light Source

Each beamline serves a role

Self-seededcan use full 1 MHz repetition ratehighest brightness and photon energy

HGHGnear transform limitadjustable parameters, stability from seed laser

Two-color chirp-taperpump-probe at 100 kHzcan scan in time delay, photon energy, orientation