5
TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK

TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK - Varkey Foundation · EdTech players regularly create a start-up inspired by their own unsatisfactory education experience and appetite for a technology

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK - Varkey Foundation · EdTech players regularly create a start-up inspired by their own unsatisfactory education experience and appetite for a technology

TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK

Page 2: TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK - Varkey Foundation · EdTech players regularly create a start-up inspired by their own unsatisfactory education experience and appetite for a technology

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Although ‘EdTech’ or Education Technology is witnessing considerable growth, it is subject to significant questioning. Educators remain unconvinced of its benefit. Start-ups, investors and enthusiasts engaged in the domain are inspired by its huge potential, at times claiming EdTech to be the solution to the Education Problem. However, whilst EdTech can indeed bring significant benefit to education, such outlandish claims require a healthy dose of tempering.

EdTech’s promise of a catalyst for education often disappoints. Teachers can feel disenfranchised by EdTech, at times even anxious about job security. After all EdTech, Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) and Virtual Reality (VR) announce a rather unpredictable future of smart technologies that will impact on teaching and learning in and beyond the classroom.

For EdTech to become an enabler and augment teaching and learning, it needs to be scaffolded to and driven by appropriate learner-centric design, pedagogies and recognize the importance of context. Teacher education can no longer ignore EdTech’s importance for teachers to flourish in the classroom and support their learners. Without these considerations EdTech will continue to disappoint.

In a world in which learning and unlearning are fundamental to solve the challenges our planet and humanity face, knowledge-based education alone no longer suffices and EdTech has a fundamental role to play. Ignoring its appropriate introduction to the classroom and beyond, will prevent today’s learners from thriving in tomorrow’s world.

Addressing some of the woes and myths of EdTech, as well as engaging with its promise and potential, this paper highlights that the time has come for an EdTech Rethink.

TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK

Carla Aerts Director of FuturesInstitute of Education – UCLMarch 2018

GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION ALLIANCE

The Dubai Declaration on Education and Climate Change 3

INTRODUCTION

The EdTech market is buoyant. Analysts and investors estimate an annual growth of 17%, to $252bn by 2020.1 To date growth has mainly been driven by the US, but South East Asia, the Far East and Middle East are seeing considerable EdTech engagement. Europe, mainly the UK and the Nordic countries, have vibrant EdTech start-up scenes, yet European investment in the sector has been rather lacklustre. Policy, institutional reluctance and market complexities present obstacles for EdTech seeking sustainable growth. Africa, on the other hand, presents considerable opportunity supported by growth in mobile technologies, despite current infrastructure challenges.

Regardless of the promise of growth, EdTech entrepreneurs and start-ups regularly see their products fail. Institutions grapple with EdTech introduction. Budget considerations, lack of infrastructure or appropriate understanding lead to its absence in strategic decision-making as too often EdTech is technology-driven and not sufficiently education-informed. Considered an IT problem, rather than an enabler of teaching and learning, its introduction can result in significant upheaval and frustration. Unable to convince and transform, lacking evidence of benefit, impact and outcome, EdTech has disappointed.

Whilst embarking on an EdTech start-up is not for the faint-hearted, EdTech’s potential cannot be ignored, despite its challenges. New approaches – also targeting learners and practitioners beyond the institution – are leading to exciting developments. The need for Lifelong Learning, Skills for the 21st Century and the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution as well as developments in AI, robotics, cognitive and educational neuroscience all present new opportunities.

Supported by appropriate learner-centred design, driven by education insight and validated by evidence, the EdTech promise may yet be realized.

SUFFERING FROM RETROFIT

Technology has transformed every aspect of our lives and continues to do so at an exponential pace. Yet, why does EdTech not make an impact on education? Some enthusiastic teachers and forward-looking institutions may have ‘flipped the classroom’2 and introduced technology to their lessons; however the trend is by no means ubiquitous.

Education tends to be a rather static domain Nineteenth-Century education models, originating in the Industrial Revolution, are still in vogue. Classrooms have

“ TEACHER EDUCATION CAN NO LONGER IGNORE EDTECH’S IMPORTANCE FOR TEACHERS TO FLOURISH IN THE CLASSROOM AND SUPPORT THEIR LEARNERS. WITHOUT THESE CONSIDERATIONS EDTECH WILL CONTINUE TO DISAPPOINT.

1Refer to EdTechX global report 20172In a flipped classroom, a type of blended learning (a mode of learning where traditional classroom learning is complemented by the use of digital online media) is used to ‘flip’ the traditional learning mode or environment. Instructional content is delivered – often online – outside of the classroom, where students engage with this activity in preparation of the classroom activity that focuses on concepts and activities under the mentorship of a teacher.

Time For An EdTech Rethink2 Time For An EdTech Rethink 3

Page 3: TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK - Varkey Foundation · EdTech players regularly create a start-up inspired by their own unsatisfactory education experience and appetite for a technology

4 Time For An EdTech Rethink4

not changed much. While computers, technology and coding may have become part of the curriculum in some countries, EdTech hasn’t had a transformative impact on the classroom. Even where schools have adopted interactive whiteboards, Learning Management Systems, Virtual Learning Environments or allow for BYOD,3 the enabling effect of EdTech has not been realised.

The introduction of EdTech to the classroom often has led to an awkward reinforcement of a status quo, resulting from solutions based on existing process- and systems-engineered interpretations of teaching workflows, focussing on managing rather than enabling learning. The resulting ill-fitting retrofit has led to increased teacher workload and convoluted classroom administration. In short technology and engineering ignored learning and teaching.

LEARNER-CENTRED ED

Whilst we may have had the fortune to go to school and /or enjoy higher or further education, this doesn’t make us experts in pedagogy, teaching and learning or skills development, nor does an engineering, design or programming and problem solving skillset or expertise.

EdTech players regularly create a start-up inspired by their own unsatisfactory education experience and appetite for a technology challenge, embedded in genuine passion for better education. Yet, lacking understanding of pedagogy, learning and context, EdTech frequently has tended to put Tech first, at the peril of Ed.

Teachers and educators creating digital resources or tools encounter a different problem. Whist ingesting pedagogical and subject expertise in their digital resource or tool, an insufficient understanding of learner-centricity, usability and interactivity translated into digital interfaces, can have an equal detrimental effect as learners don’t engage.

For EdTech to flourish, pedagogy or androgogy,4 learner-centric design and technology need to work together, underpinned by digital channel and usability expertise. Without it, EdTech will continue to retrofit and remain an end in itself.

DOES EDTECH WORK?

EdTech is not shy of claims, mostly derived from market research rather than education understanding

or supporting evidence. This can be exceedingly hard to obtain. After all, innovation may not be able to tap into evidence. Whilst evidence should never stifle innovation, without gaining relevant validation, EdTech won’t be able to substantiate benefit or learning outcomes. Education insight and validation mindfulness are prerequisite.

The tension this creates for the EdTech start-up cannot be underestimated. To get the investor’s or other stakeholders’ attention, EdTech needs a compelling argument. This is regularly lacking, as proving impact of EdTech intervention scenarios may not be possible. This highlights the importance of teaching and learning understanding and its demonstration in the product. Without it, convincing will remain difficult.

EdTech’s Dependency on Teacher EducationWhen it comes to the classroom and Learning, the use of technology takes on a whole new dimension. EdTech needs to enable and enhance pedagogy and learning interventions in a discreet context, based on the teacher’s EdTech insight. Yet, teacher education still tends to ignore EdTech. It does not address the careful orchestration or design of EdTech-enhanced teaching and learning and considers EdTech an IT or ICT issue, rather than an education enabler.

Ignoring EdTech in teacher education can only result in an ongoing disconnect and a status quo. It won’t develop teachers’ digital acumen for pedagogically and ethically informed integration of EdTech. Finding oneself in a classroom as an inexperienced teacher, facing a seemingly complex technology, is not likely to empower nor instil EdTech engagement.

Unless teacher education recognizes the need for the development of EdTech skillset to scaffold classroom interventions, the teaching profession will be left in the cold. The gap between EdTech and Education will only continue to widen.

ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL…

In traditional education models, a front-of-class teacher delivered knowledge-based instruction to all students. In short, education adopted a one-size-fits-all industrial model that focused on servicing a need for knowledge rather than aptitude. These models still prevail.Adopting 19th-century education models is no longer adequate for learners to thrive in the 21st century. An education that allows us to ‘think big’ is indispensable, for ‘Inclusive education means recognizing and accepting differences across the full spectrum of learners’.5

Inclusive education refers to the need for the recognition of the individual learner, her aptitude and interests, context and culture, complemented by an

instilling of competencies and engagement with Meta-Learning6 and Meta-Concepts.7 EdTech can no longer be ignored in this consideration.

Interdisciplinary and international understanding, nurturing empathy and plasticity of mindset are prerequisites to thrive in the 21st Century, supporting learning in school and beyond, throughout life. It is in this sphere that EdTech has to play a transformative role for learners to blossom and gain indispensable digital skillset. Engaging with these facets of education is likely to bring the most exciting and apt EdTech innovation to date, whether to support learning and teaching in a remote context or the most technology-enabled setting.

EDUCATION IS CONTEXT

Context fundamental to education; there is no such thing as a “one education”. For the purpose of this paper, context is defined as: factors that are relevant for learning, including the interactions that learners experience with multiple people, artefacts, and environments.8 In addition, ‘culture’ and cultural setting cannot be ignored.

The belief that an EdTech solution can work anywhere or everywhere is widely upheld. Yet, local policy, curricula, infrastructure, pedagogies, culture and environment vary hugely, sometimes even within one country. The impact of context on EdTech scalability creates an uncomfortable tension for EdTech. A product may only suit a particular context and lack substantial growth or scaling opportunity sought by investors. Not all products can work in multiple contexts. Yet, for EdTech to bring appropriate benefit, it must not ignore context.

EDUCATION IS POLITICS

One can’t deny the importance of politics in education. Politicians and policy makers strive for stability and not for systemic change. Parents, school leaders and teachers – playing a significant role in the electorate – want a safe and stable environment. This can considerably impact the adoption of EdTech, especially in K-12 institutions.

WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS SCHOOL IS THAT THEY TEACH US MUSIC AND ART FROM MANY COUNTRIESIram 5th grade student

“3BYOD – Bring Your Own Device. Schools or institutions allowing students or learners to bring their own laptop, tablet or mobile phone to the classroom.4The science of understanding (theory) and supporting (practice) lifelong education. This concept is typically used for adults. In this context, androgogy is considered as a more holistic approach for new pedagogies as we increasingly move into a Learning Continuum requirement for society, throughout the lifespan of its citizens.

5Irina Bokova – Director General of UNESCO – 18th Commonwealth Lecture “Educating for Inclusion, Dialogue and Peace”, London February 20166Internal process that allow us to internalise or reflect on our learning. 7Meta concepts are concepts that are inherently overarching across the discipline and sometimes beyond, to other disciplines, rather than limited to a given subject itself. 8Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Baines, E. 2017. The significance of context for the emergence and implementation of research evidence: the case of collaborative problem-solving. Oxford Review of Education. Routledge.9Thinking about thinking or knowing about knowing. A self-awareness that includes the ability to formulate adequate strategies for problem-solving and understanding your own learning and knowledge.10UNESCO Institute of Statistics, October 2016

Time For An EdTech Rethink 5

Page 4: TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK - Varkey Foundation · EdTech players regularly create a start-up inspired by their own unsatisfactory education experience and appetite for a technology

Time For An EdTech Rethink6 The Dubai Declaration on Education and Climate Change 7

However, policy makers can no longer ignore the need for pedagogies that focus beyond knowledge-based learning and consider competencies such as empathy, ability to collaborate in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural contexts, Meta-Cognition9 and digital acumen. EdTech can be a distinct role in the development of these skills.

A fundamental problem for politicians and policy makers is the acute shortage of qualified teachers and teachers leaving the profession. UNESCO predicts the worst ever global teacher shortage as set to reach a shortfall of nearly 69 million by 2030.10

The highest concerted efforts and deployment of budgets will not solve this problem. Considering technology as the solution for the teacher shortage problem equally cannot be the answer. EdTech or Artificial Intelligence can’t replace teachers, but looking into solutions or approaches that consider EdTech to augment and enable teaching, allowing for new models and enhanced collaboration, removing administrative, marking and non-teaching-related burdens can no longer be ignored.

These pressing needs present huge opportunities for EdTech. However, it is unlikely that political appetite and context will allow for the required fast-paced adoption and transformation. Yet without a concerted and expert-informed and EdTech enhancement strategy, the endemic teacher shortage problem will present humanity with worrying economic, health, technology and climate challenges and increasing volatility.

SMART EDTECH

Tackling the 21st-Century education challenges will no doubt rely on an increased and transparent introduction of AIEd, VR and Intelligent or Smart Vitual Reality (IVR), or AI-enabled AR. These technologies don’t represent an outlandish and distant future, they are available today and evolving at tremendous speed.

Adaptive learning technologies are already in use. These still tend to focus on remedial learning activity resulting from measuring of student’s progress and performance based on continuous assessment. Today’s systems often lack insight in cognitive understanding and focus too often on the myth of Personal Learning Styles11 and technology-led interventions. Such adaptive learning approaches can lead to a new standardization of education, claiming a fully personalized learning experience based on wrong premises and even Neuromyth.

Without recognizing context and an insight into pedagogy and domain or subject knowledge and the learner’s cognitive ability or learning science, such learning solutions are likely to remain a smart

technology, rather than be learner-enhancing. To have impact and come to fruition, it will become increasingly vital for EdTech to have an in-depth holistic understanding of teaching and learning for learner-centred design, in multi-disciplinary collaboration with engineering and usability expertise.

Advances in AIED will lead to new modes of collaborative problem-solving and tutoring solutions enhancing individual as well as collaborative learning, supporting effective mapping of tutors or resources to learners, or orchestrating problem-solving scenarios for groups of learners that will benefit from carefully designed collaboration.

EdTech should enable teachers to focus on their teaching and designing more personalized learning interventions for learners to discover the joy and intrigue of learning. Rather than living in anxiety about tests and exams, embedded assessment and a focus on Meta-Cognitive Skills should enable today’s learners to address the challenges of tomorrow world and flourish living in it.

For teachers to benefit from the augmentation such EdTech developments bring, they will need to have developed a digital understanding and acumen, allowing them to deploy appropriate teacher-designed and EdTech-enhanced learning interventions. Without introducing EdTech to teacher education, this will not and cannot happen.

SUMMARY

As Technology progresses, the education necessary to utilise it effectively also grows, and education must adapt to keep up. In this way, technology and education are in a race. C.D. Goldin and L.F. Katz.12

The introduction of EdTech is not without problems and raises fundamental educational, ethical, privacy and ownership questions, which cannot be explored with appropriate merit in this paper.

However, dealing with these questions will prove critical to address the divide between the fast-paced technology revolution and education. Not dealing with this gap with intent and speed will only result in its widening, negatively impacting on teaching and learning and the ability to deal with a challenging world.

Brave steps by EdTech players and other education stakeholders are required to engage in an increased collaboration to narrow this divide and empower education, for learning in the 21st Century to continue to take place in both analogue and digital modes that transparently intersect.

As educators, EdTech specialists or stakeholders we have a responsibility to education and its constituents. We have to ensure that learners are listened to and teachers have the tools to support their practice; allowing them to engage in meaningful dialogue and collaboration in an increasingly digital world, enabling them to thrive and carve their own futures supported by EdTech, a transparent enabler and facilitator.

SOURCES

Bokova, I. 2016. Address by Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO on the occasion of the 18th Commonwealth Lecture: “Educating for Inclusion, Dialogue and Peace”. London, 25th February 2016

Carr, N. 2011. The Shallows: How the Internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic Books.

Christensen, C. M. and Eyring, H. J. 2011. The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education From Inside Out. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Coleman, S., Pothong, K., Perez Vallejos, E. and Koene, A. 2017. The Internet on Our Own Terms: How Children and Young People Deliberated About Their Digital Rights. Leeds – Nottingham Universities and 5 Rights.

Cukurova, M., Luckin, R. and Baines, E. 2017. The Significance of Context for the Emergence and Implementation of Research Evidence: The Case of Collaborative Problem-solving. Oxford Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389713

Delors, J. and Commission. 2013. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century.

Dodgson, M. and Gann, D. 2010. Innovation: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dweck, C. 2012. Mindset: How You Can Fulfil your Potential. New York: Ballantine Books.

Fadel, C., Bialik, M. and Trilling, B. 2015. Four-

Dimensional Education: The Competencies Learners Need to Succeed. Boston, MA: Centre for Curriculum Redesign.

Gates, B. 2017. Our Education Efforts Are Evolving. www.gatesnotes.com.

Gerstein, J. 2012. The Flipped Classroom: The Full Picture Based on an Experiential Model of Learning. US.

Hannon, V. with Peterson, A. 2017. Thrive: Schools Reinvented for the Real Challenges We Face. London: Innovation Press.

Howard-Jones, P.A. 2014. Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience | AOP, published online.

Kaplan, J. 2016. Artificial Intelligence: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: OUP.

Keen, A. 2015. The Internet is not the Answer. London: Atlantic Press.

Khan, S. 2012. The One World School House; Education Reimagined. US: Hodder.

Krug, S. 2014. Don’t Make Me Rethink: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. US: New Riders.

Leonhard, G. 2016. Technology vs Humanity: The common clash between man and machine. UK-US: Fast Future Publishing.

Luckin, R. and Holmes, W. with Griffiths, M. and Forcier, L.B., 2016. Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson.

Luckin, R., Baines, E., Cukurova, M. And Holmes, W. With Mann, M.2017. Solved! Making the case for collaborative problem-solving. London: Nesta.

Price, D. 2013. Open: How we’ll work, live and learn in the future. Great Britain: Crux Publishing.

Richardson, W. and Dixon, B. 2017. 10 Principles for Schools of Moderns Learners. Modern Learners, Change School. Australia: modernlearners.com

Robinson, K. with Aronica, L. 2010. The Element. How Finding your Passion Changes Everything. London: Penguin Books.

Tainton, P. 2017. How to transform the way government works to deliver against bold targets for strategic priority projects. South Africa: Western Cape Game Changer Series Part 1.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. UIS Fact Sheet. October 2016, No. 39. The World Needs Almost 69 Million New Teachers to Reach the 2010 Education Goals.

Wojcicki, E. and Izumi, L. 2014. Moonshots in Education: Launching Blended Learning in the Classroom. US: Pacific Research Institute.

Online Links

Global Report Predicts EdTech Spend to Reach $252bn by 2020, EdTechXGlobal: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-report-predicts-edtech-spend-to-reach-252bn-by-2020-580765301.html

African Ed-Tech Incubator Aims to Set Companies, and Students, on Winning Path, EdWeek Market Brief, 28 July 2017: https://marketbrief.edweek.org/marketplace-k-12/african-ed-tech-incubator-aims-set-companies-students-winning-path/

EdTech - A Growth Area for Africa, allAfrica, 8 March 2017: http://allafrica.com/stories/201703090131.html

EdTech’s greatest opportunity lies in Africa, Medium, 30 September 2017: https://medium.com/@jamieamartin1/edtechs-greatest-opportunity-lies-in-africa-5b79b723d09e

Flipped Classroom, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flipped_classroom

Blended Learning, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blended_learning

Learning Analytics, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_analytics

The Artistry of Teaching, Modern Learners: https://modernlearners.com/the-artistry-of-teaching/

Time For An EdTech Rethink 711IThere is no evidence of personal learning styles and widespread research proves to the contrary, yet there is still a strong belief amongst educators that learning styles exist, despite evidence to the contrary.12C.D. Goldin and L.F. Katz. The Race between Education and Technology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)

Page 5: TIME FOR AN EDTECH RETHINK - Varkey Foundation · EdTech players regularly create a start-up inspired by their own unsatisfactory education experience and appetite for a technology

The pictures throughout this report were chosen to represent children and teachers all around the world.