17
Training and Development

Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Training and Development

Page 2: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Training vs. Development

• Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies.– Focus on current job

– Mainly required on company time

• Development is the formal education, job experiences, and background that prepares employees for future jobs.– Focus on future jobs and preparation for change

– More generally applicable skills

– Mainly voluntary on employee’s own time.

Page 3: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Training Process

Needs Analysis

Evaluation

Training Delivery

Training Design

Page 4: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Setting Training Objectives

• Align/match identified training needs with training objectives.

• Define objectives in specific, measurable terms:– In terms of desired employee behaviors.– In terms of the results that are expected to follow

from such behaviors.

• Information for setting objectives should come from the organization’s performance management system.

Page 5: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Training Delivery

• Classroom instruction– By far the most common means of instruction

• Videotapes• On-the-job training

– Formal – job shadowing / apprenticeships

– Informal – job rotation

• CBT – Computer-Based Training– Technical skills

– Business simulation

• EPSS – Electronic Performance Support• Simulations

Page 6: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Evaluation

• Level 1 – did they enjoy the training– “Smile sheets”

• Level 2 – did they learn anything– Pre and post tests– Follow-up evaluations

• Level 3 – did they transfer new skills to the job– Depends on the work environment– Needs support of boss and co-workers

• Level 4 – did the training impact the business– Detailed ROI study– Seldom straightforward

Page 7: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

General vs. Specific Skills

• General skills are useful at all or most firms.– T&D which develops skills useful at other firms. – Increases the likelihood that employees will be bid

away or “poached” for higher salaries.

• Specific skills are useful for only certain jobs at certain firms.– Increases job performance but does not prepare

employees for future jobs.

Page 8: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

You Paid for Grads' Skills. Now Use Them.

October 15, 2001

BusinessWeek's 2001 survey say their employers should have more clearly defined how an EMBA degree would affect their career paths. No surprise, then, that recent EMBA grads report that anywhere from 40% to 70% of their classmates changed jobs during or after the program.

Page 9: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Tuition-Reimbursement

• Most “general” development provided by firms.– Broadly useful skills– Degree as a signaling mechanism

• 75-80% of firms provide some type of T.R.• 33% Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work

For offer 100% T.R.• Typically used by 7-10% of employees

Page 10: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

“Gold-Plated” Tuition Reimbursement

• Any program reimbursed.• $10,000 stock bonus for completing a degree. • 3 hours per week time off.• Stock awards totaled $88 million since 1996.• In 2001:

– $45 million in tuition for 14,000 employees– $16 million in stock awards for 1,900 employees

Chairman and CEO: “Our goal is to have the best-educated

workforce on the planet”

Page 11: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Reasons to Provide T.R.

• Attract Quality Employees– “Employer of Choice”– Who values tuition-reimbursement?

• Improve Employee Skills– Engineers getting MBA’s– Stay on the “cutting-edge”

• Retain Skilled Employees– “Employability” or learning contract

Page 12: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Study Info

• ~10,000 full-time salaried employees.

• ~12,000 current and former employees 1996-2000 were analyzed using HRIS records.

• ~1,000 survey responses.

• U.S. employees only.

• Tuition-reimbursement 1996-2000– 38% salaried employees participated– 9% salaried employees earned a degree

Page 13: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Participation in Tuition Reimbursement and Voluntary Turnover 1996-2000

6.1%

10.6%

8.3%

14.1%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

13%

14%

15%

Not Participated(N=7410)

Took Classes(N=5303)

Earned Degree,NoPromotion (N=835)

Degree thenPromotion (N=392)

N = 12,360

Those who earned a degree split by receiving reward afterward

Page 14: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Promotion, Tuition-Reimbursement and Voluntary Turnover 1996-2000

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

Promoted Not Promoted

Vo

lun

tary

Tu

rno

ve

r 1

99

6-2

00

0

Not Participated(Promoted 96-00)

Took Classes(Promoted 96-00)

Earned a Degree(Promoted After)

N = 12,360

χ2 (p < .001)

Page 15: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Findings

• Tuition-reimbursement contributes to retention while taking classes and voluntary turnover after graduation.

• Earning a degree interacts with promotions.– Makes promotion a more powerful retention tool.– Integration with performance management and career

systems is crucial.

• If well managed, tuition-reimbursement can:– Attract high-quality employees– Strengthen employee capabilities– Reduce turnover

Page 16: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

Managing General Skills Development

• Before development– Feature development in recruiting

– Clear career pathways with defined competencies

– Integrated with performance management

• During development– Apply course material and projects to work problems

– Managers should follow-up regularly with employees

• After development– Put the employees’ new skills to use

– Reward employees for new skills

– Challenge employee to apply new skills

– Lateral moves and stretch assignments

Page 17: Training and Development. Training vs. Development Training is a planned effort by companies to facilitate the learning of job-related competencies. –Focus

When to Develop General Skills?

• Desired length of relationship with employee– Permanent employees and mostly full-time– Career progression

• Type of relationship with employees– High-involvement workplaces– “People are our most important asset”

• Type of skills required– High-skilled workforce– Unique skills that are not readily available

• Degree of technological change and innovation– “Half-life” of knowledge– Need to support change initiatives