Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LIFE AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES OF UKRAINE AGROBIOLOGICAL FACULTY
Department of History and Political Science
Department of Culturology
“APPROVED”
Dean of the Agrobiological Faculty
_________ V.O. Zabaluyev
―____‖ ________________ 2015
TRAINING-METHODOLOGICAL COMPLEX on the course
“HISTORY OF UKRAINE, ETHNIC AND CULTURAL STUDIES”
Field of study 6.090101 ―Agronomy‖
KYIV-2015
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LIFE AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES OF UKRAINE
Department of History and Political Science
“APPROVED”
Dean of the Agrobiological Faculty
_______________ V.O. Zabaluyev.
―_____‖_____________________2015
.
CONSIDERED AND APPROVED
at the meeting f the Department
of History and Political Science
Minute №16 dated June 26, 2015
Head of Department
___________ A.M.Chernii
CURRICULUM on the course unit
“HISTORY OF UKRAINE”
Field of study 6.090101 ―Agronomy‖
Specialty___________________________________________________________
Agrobiological Faculty
Author: Candidate of historical sciences, associate professor Isakova N.P.
Kyiv– 2015
1. Description of Discipline “HISTORY OF UKRAINE”
Branch of Knowledge, Field of Study, Specialty, Education and Qualification Level (EQL)
Education and qualification level
(EQL)
Bachelor
Field of study 6.090101 “Agronomy”
Specialty
Specialization
Characteristics of the Discipline
Kind Elective academic discipline chosen by the
University
Total number of hours 60
ECTS hours 2
Modules 2
Course paper -
Methods of control Exam
Discipline criteria for full time аnd extra-mural studies
Full time study Extra-mural study
Year of training І
Semester: І
Lectures 15 год. год.
Practical classes, Seminars 30 год. год.
Lab work год. год.
Self-study 15 год. год.
individual lessons год. год.
Hours per week for full time students 3 год.
2. Purpose and targets of the course
The purpose of instruction on the course ―History of Ukraine‖ is the
students’ profound mastering and understanding of the history of emergence and
formation of the Ukrainian people and Ukrainian statehood, establishment of the
national identity, the treatment of political activities of classes and social groups in
Ukraine, on certain stages of historical progress. The general intention of the
syllabus is to train high-skilled professionals for agricultural industry, proceeding
from the processes of promoting humanistic values within high school, integration
of professional and socially relevant humanitarian training, improvement in the
content and structure of the course, making use of the global and domestic thought,
common human values.
Targets of the course:
Educational - to study objectively the phenomena and processes in the
history of social, political and cultural life of Ukraine in its connection with global
civilization, from the dialectical viewpoint and on the basis of: scientific principles,
the historical principle first of all, the viewpoints of learned historians, progressive
Ukrainian and foreign authors, works of leaders of political parties;
Formative - to form the historic thinking and awareness, pro-active attitude,
the feeling of pride for being a Ukrainian, the understanding of necessity of
maintaining a sovereign national state and constitutional responsibility for its
destiny.
Renaissance and establishment of students’ awareness of actual events of
history of the Ukrainian people - that were groundlessly falsified by the totalitarian
regime - this is the requirement that is demanded from the knowledge achieved as
a result of students’ learning the subject.
As the result of the course, the student should: know the basic theoretical issues, the key problems of all the course topics,
the general mechanism of the historical development; complex and contradictory
events, transformations of the history of the social, political and cultural life of
Ukraine in correlation with the world civilization; tendencies of the economic
development of Ukraine and, especially, its agro-industrial complex; be profoundly
oriented in the historical sources and new scientific literature;
be able to synthesize the acquirements into the appropriate world outlook
and the high political culture; creatively apply the acquired knowledge on the
History of Ukraine in the everyday activities, for the orientation in the social-
political life, evaluation of the social settings, events; form personal scientific
opinion on the actual political problems of the present; conceive the mechanism of
the historical development; promote the formation of the historical comprehension
and national self-consciousness, active positions of the future specialists, their
patriotic, moral and ethic convictions.
3. The Program & Structure of the Discipline for :
– full time аnd study
– extra-mural study
Modules
Topics
Amount of hours
Full time study Extra-mural study
weeks total including total including
l s lab ind s-s. l s lab ind s-s.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Module I. Ancient, Medieval and Modern History of Ukraine
Topic 1. Historical
background of the
emergence of the
Ukrainian people
1 3 1 2
Topic 2. Kyivan Rus 2 5 2 2 1
in the historical
destiny of the
Ukrainian people
Topic 3. The
Lithuanian - Polish
period of Ukrainian
history
3 4 2 2
Topic 4. Origin of
the Ukrainian
Cossacks.
Zaporizhian Sich
4 4 2 2
Topic 5 Ukrainian
national-liberation
revolution of the
17th century and
establishment of
Ukrainian statehood
5 4 2 2
Topic 6. Tsarist
onslaught on
Ukrainian statehood
(the late 17th – 18th
centuries). Loss of
Ukrainian
independence
6 4 2 2
Topic 7. Ukraine
within the
boundaries of the
Russian and
Austrian empires
(end of the 18th –
19th centuries)
7 4 2 2
Total number of hours
for Module I
28 7 14 7
Module II. Contemporary History of Ukraine
Topic 1. Ukraine on
the eve and during
World War
8 4 2 2
Topic 2. Struggle for
rebirth of Ukrainian
statehood in 1917-1920
9 4 2 2
Topic 3. Inter - war
period in the history of
the Ukrainian people
(1921-1939)
10 4 1 2 1
Topic 4. Ukraine in
World War II and in
the flame of the Great
11 4 2 2
Patriotic War
Topic 5. Ukraine in the
late 1940 -1980s
12 4 1 2 1
Topic 6. Ukraine’s
advance towards
independence
13 4 2 2
Topic 7. The agrarian
sector as important
factor in establishing a
civil society
14 4 2 2
Topic 8. Ukraine and
modern world 15 4 2 2
Total number of hours
for Module II
32 8 16 8
Total number of hours 60 15 30 15
4. Topics of Seminars
№ з/п
Topics Amount of
hours 1 Methods of studyi 2
2 Prehistory of Ukraine 2
3 Emergence of statehood on Ukrainian territories
ІХ–ХІV ст.
2
4 The Lithuanian - Polish period of Ukrainian history 2
5 Origin of the Ukrainian Cossacks. Zaporizhian Sich 2
6 Khmelnychyna 2
7 Tsarist onslaught on Ukrainian statehood (the late 17th – 18th
centuries). Loss of Ukrainian independence
2
8 Ukraine on the eve and during World War I 2 9 Ukrainian statehood in 1918-1920 2 10 East Ukraine in the 1920 - 1930s of the 20th century 2 11 Contribution of the Ukrainian people in the victory over fascism during
World War II
2
12 Ukraine in the late 1940 -1980s 2 13 Stages of establishing of sovereign and independent Ukraine 2 14 Contribution of the agrarian sector of economy in the developing of
civil society in modern Ukraine
2
15 State system reforming in modern Ukraine 2
5. Topics of Practical Classes №
з/п Topic Amount of
hours 1
2
...
6. Topics of of Lab Work №
з/п Topic Amount of
hours 1 2
...
7. Control Questions, Sets of the Tests for Assessment Purpose
НАЦІОНАЛЬНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ БІОРЕСУРСІВ І ПРИРОДОКОРИСТУВАННЯ УКРАЇНИ
ОКР Бакалавр
напрям підготовки/
спеціальність всі напрями
підготовки з викладанням
дисципліни англійською
мовою
Кафедра
Історії і політології
2014-2015 навч. рік
ЕКЗАМЕНАЦІЙНИЙ
БІЛЕТ№ 1
з дисципліни
History of Ukraine
Затверджую
Зав. кафедри
__________
(підпис)
проф.Черній А. М. (ПІБ)
12листопада 2014 р.
Екзаменаційні запитання
1. The subject matter, sources, methodological principles of the history of Ukraine. Periodization of the
history of Ukraine. 2.The Decembrist movement in Ukraine.
Тестові завдання різних типів
Test 1 . Complete the gaps with the correct date.
Zaporozhian Sich was liquidated in_____________.
Test 2. Complete the gaps with the correct date.
The West Ukrainian lands became a part of Soviet Ukraine in_____________.
Test 3. Indicate a theory of origin of Kyivan Rus:
1 A theory of the modern Ukrainian historians
2 Norman
3 Polish
4 Russian
5 Khozar
6 Anti-Norman
Test 4. Correlation to be found out:
а) Olvia 1) monarchy
b) Khersones 2) constitutional monarchy
c) Tira 3) republic
d) the Kingdom of Bosporus 4) parliamentary republic
Test 5. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
By its political structure Kyivan Rus was __________________.
Test 6. Among the hetmans of the“both banks” of Ukraine in the XVII century were (choose the false statements):
1 B. Khmelnytsky,Vyhovsky, Yu. Khmelnytsky; P. Doroshenko, I. Samoylovych., I. Mazepa
2 B. Khmelnytsky, I. Vyhovsky, P. Doroshenko, P. Teteria, I. Samoylovych, I. Mazepa 3 B. Khmelnytsky, I. Vyhovsky, P. Teteria, I. Briukhovetsky, Yu. Khmelnytsky; P. Doroshenko 4 I. Vyhovsky, P. Doroshenko, I. Samoylovych., I. Mazepa, D. Mnogogrishny, P. Teteria
Test 7. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
The policy of_________________________________ was primarily distinguished by prodrozkladka, maximum restriction on private
property, winding up trade and monetary relations, state monopoly on banking system and large-scale enterprises, home and foreign trade.
Test 8. Complete the gaps with the three correct words.
After the disintegration of Kyivan Rus into separate regional formations the state-creating tradition of Rus had been undertaken by
________________________________________________________________.
Test 9. Ukrainian dissidents were typically engaged in:
1 armed guerilla warfare
2 sending letters in defense of human rights to the Party and the Government officials 3 Coup d’etat, revolt 4 informing international community on human rights abuse in the USSR
Test 10. In foreign economic activity Ukraine observes the principles of:
1 reciprocal benefit
2 equality and impossibility of economic discrimination 3 inequality and economic discrimination 4 free forms of choice for building international economic relations
Control Questions
1. The subject matter, sources, methodological principles of the history of
Ukraine. Periodization of the history of Ukraine.
2. The ancient times. The dawn of human civilization on the territory of
Ukraine.
3. A primitive society on the territory of Ukraine.
4. The first state-like formations on the territory of Ukraine.
5. Peculiarities of Trypillyan Culture.
6. The origin of Eastern Slavs.
7. Concepts of Kyivan Rus origin.
8. Political order & social structure of Kyivan Rus.
9. Economic development of Kyivan Rus.
10. Halytsko-Volynsk Principality – the successor of Kyivan Rus traditions.
11. Social, economic and political development of Halytsko-Volynsk
Principality.
12. The Ukrainian lands as part of the Great Lithuanian Principality and other
states (14-16 cen.).
13. Invasion of the Ukrainian lands by Poland. National, social and religious
confrontation. The Union of Lublin (1569).
14. Economic Development of the Ukrainian Territories (in the Polish-
Lithuanian period (15-16 cen.).
15. Historical background, origin and evolution of Cossacks.
16. Zaporozhian Sich as a democratic Christian Cossack Republic.
17. Cossacks and Peasants uprisings of the Late 16th century and the 1620s-
1630s.
18. The Ukrainian national- democratic revolution of the mid 17th century.
19. The National Liberation War of the Ukrainian people (1648-1657): victories
and defeats of Khmelnytskyi.
20. The Ukrainian state system making during the National Liberation War of
the Ukrainian people. The main features of the Ukrainian Cossack State (17th
cen.).
21. The Pereiaslav Council. Major interpretations of the 1654 Agreement.
22. The onset of the Ruin. Ukraine in the second half of the 17th century.
23. Home and foreign policy of the Left-Bank Hetmans (second half of the 17th
century).
24. Home and foreign policy of the Right-Bank Hetmans (second half of the 17th
century).
25. Changes in the political and social system of the Ukrainian Cossack state
(17 cen.).
26. The policy of Peter I and Catherine the Great towards Ukraine (18th cen.).
27. The liquidation of the Ukrainian autonomy by the Russian tsarism (18th
cen.).
28. The phases of liquidation of the Ukrainian autonomy (18th
cen.).
29. Complete destruction of Zaporozhian Sich: internal and external reasons
(1775).
30. Ukrainian lands under Russian and Austrian imperial rule (19th
cen.).
31. The Decembrist movement in Ukraine.
32. The Ukrainian national renaissance (early19th
cen.).
33. The activity of the Brotherhood of St.Cyryl and Methodius.
34. Socio-economic consequences of the Peasant reform of 1861 in Ukraine.
Reforms of 1860s-1870s.
35. The peculiarity of the political situation in Ukraine after the February
revolution of 1917. The origin of the Central Rada.
36. The Central Rada and its politics.
37. The historical significance of the Universals of the Central Rada.
38. The Ukrainian state of Hetman P.Skoropadskyi.
39. The Directory: internal and external policy.
40. Ukraine in the period of the New economic policy (NEP).
41. Ukraine and creation of the USSR (1922).
42. The policy of Ukrainization and its consequences (1920s-1930s).
43. The industrialization of Ukraine in the 1930s.
44. Forced collectivization of agriculture in Ukraine.
45. West Ukrainian lands in the structure of nearby states: Poland, Romania,
Czechoslovakia.
46. Ukraine in the flame of World War II (1941-1945).
47. The underground movement and the guerrilla (partisan) war against fascist
invaders in Ukraine in 1941-1942.
48. Economic and political reconstruction in the post-war period (1940s —
beginning of the 1950s).
49. The era of Khrushchev( the Thaw) as a transitional phase in Soviet history.
50. Dissident movement in Ukraine. S.230, 233-234.
51. Crisis escalation in social, economic, political and cultural life of Ukraine
(second half of the 1960s — middle of the 1980s).
52. Ukraine on the way to freedom and independence. Adoption of the
Declaration of state sovereignty of Ukraine.
53. The Proclamation of Act of Ukraine’s Independence. Development of the
Ukrainian Independent State.
54. Adoption of the Constitution of Ukraine (1996).
55. Constitution of Ukraine on the rights and liberties of the Ukrainian citizens.
56. Constitution of Ukraine on the three branches of power.
57. The conception of foreign policy of the modern Ukraine.
58. Political system of modern Ukraine.
59. The national symbols of Ukraine.
60. The economic development of modern Ukraine.
Set of Tests for Assessment Purpose Test 1
A Primitive Society and Statelike Formations on Ukraine’s Territory
Eastern Slavs
Mark the right answer.
a. IV millennium B.C.
b. III millennium B.C.
c. II millennium B.C.
2. The lifetime of the Trypillian archeological culture on the territory of Ukraine:
a. V – IV millennium B.C.
b. IV - II millennium B.C.
c. II – I millennium B.C.
3. The most ancient people on the territory of Ukraine were:
a. Cimmerians
b. Scythians
c. Greeks
4. Cimmerians lived on the territory of Ukraine during:
a. End of II – beginning of I millennium B.C.
b. Middle and end of I millennium B.C.
c. End of I millennium B.C – beginning of I millennium A.D.
5. The Cimmerians occupied the steppe territory of Ukraine:
a. From the Dniester to the Dnieper
b. From the Dniester to the Don
c. From the Dnieper to the Don
6. The main occupations of the Iran-speaking tribes were:
a. Driven cattle-breeding
b. Hunting and fishing
c. Farming and cattle-breeding
7. The Scythian state occupied the territories:
a. Steppes of the Northern Black Sea Shore and the Danube basin
b. Forest-steppe and forest regions of the right-bank Ukraine
c. Steppes of the Northern Black Sea Shore and forest-steppe region of the
Dnieper basin
8. On the modern territory of Ukraine the Scythians dominated in:
a. XI – V centuries B.C.
b. VII – III centuries B.C.
c. V – IV centuries B.C.
9. The tribes, which inhabited the major part of the territory of modern Ukraine in
VII – III centuries B.C. were classified by the ancient Greek authors as:
a. Cimmerians
b. Scythians
c. Sarmatians
10. The Scythian state-organization existed on the territory of modern Ukraine
during:
a. VII – III centuries B.C.
b. V – II centuries B.C.
c. VIII – I centuries B.C.
11. Sarmatian tribes were roaming on the territory of Ukraine in:
a. III century B.C. – III century A.D.
b. III century B.C. – I century A.D.
c. VI century B.C. – II century A.D.
12. Greek city-states existed in the Northern Black Sea Shore in:
a. X century B.C. – I century A.D.
b. VII century B.C. – IV century A.D.
c. IV century B.C. – II century A.D.
13. The Veneds were mentioned as Slavs for the first time in:
a. I century A.D.
b. II century A.D.
c. III century A.D.
14. The motherland of Slavs according to the majority of scientists is considered:
d. The Danube basin
e. The Vistula and Pripyat basins
f. Baltic region
15.The ancestors of Ukrainians are considered to be:
a. Veneds and Ants
b. Ants and Sklavins
c. Sklavins and Veneds
16. The main occupations of the Slavs were:
d. Driven cattle-breeding
e. Plough farming and cattle-breeding
f. Hunting and fishing
17.The Slav tribes include:
g. Cimmerians, Scythians, Sarmatians
h. Kriviches, Dulibs, Dregoviches
i. Polyans, Severyans, Sarmatians
18. The tribal union of Ants existed in:
III – IV centuries
IV – VII centuries
V – VIII centuries
19.A signs of a crisis of the primitive patrimonial state and beginning of a state
consolidation of the Eastern Slavs were:
a. Existence of a neighbors’ community
b. Arousal of a private property on the property and cattle
c. Arousal of the property inequity
d. Arousal of nobility – a group of people, pretending for the rule over
the community because of their origin
20. In VII – VIII centuries the Eastern Slavs, who lived on the territory of modern
Ukraine, cultivated land with:
a. Mattock
b. Plough
c. Ralo
21. The way of a land cultivation when the land is intensely used and then left
for the fertility restoring is called:
a. Perelog system
b. Double-course rotation
c. Triple-course rotation
22. In a forest region of Ukraine the dominating system in XII century was:
a. Perelog cultivation system
b. Double-course rotation
c. Cuting-burning cultivation system
23. The peak of the development among the Eastern Slavs in I century reached
the following crafts:
a. Blacksmithing and goldsmithing
b. Blacksmithing craft and iron-mining
c. Iron-mining and goldsmithing
24. The sacred tree for the Slavs was:
a. Beech
b. Oak
c. Maple
d. Willow
25.Complete the gaps with the correct term.
In VI – VII century A.D. ____________________ spread out in all directions.
26.Complete the gaps with the correct term.
______________ social __________of labor took place on the territory of Ukraine.
27. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
Arousal of a private property on the property and cattle, arousal of the property
inequity
were tte signs of a crisis of
the______________________________________________
29. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
Driven cattle-breeding was the main occupations of the _____________________
tribes
28. Correlation to be found out:
a) 1 million years B. C. 1. Primitive men appeared on the present
territory of Ukraine
b) 40 000 – 10 000 years B.C. 2. Aeneolithic Age
c) 6 000 – 4 000 years B.C. 3. Trypillyan Culture
d) 4 000 – 3 000 years B.C. 4. Later Paleolithic Age
e) 10 000 – 6 000 years B.C. 5. Mesolithic Age
f) 4 000 – 2 000 years B.C. 6. Neolithic Age
30 Correlation to be found out:
a) VI – VII century A.D. 1. Cimmerians on the Northern
Black Sea shore
b) VII – III centuries B.C. 2. Scythians on the
Northern Black Sea Shore
c) VII century B.C.– IV century A.D. 3. Sarmatian tribes’
domination
d). III century B.C. – III century A. D. 4. Greek city-states on the
Northern Black Sea shore
e) II millennium - early I millennium B.C. Slavs
spread out in all directions
Test 2
Origin of Ukrainian Statehood.
Kyivan Rus and Halytsko-Volynsk Principality Mark the right answer.
1. Indicate a theory of origin of Kyivan Rus:
a. American
b. Norman
c. Polish
d. Anti-Norman
2. When the Norman theory of origin of Kyivan Rus appeared?
a. In IX century
b. In XIV century
c. In XVIII century
3. The strengthening of Rus in the middle of IX century is connected with the
names of the princes:
a. Kiy, Shchek, Khoriv
b. Ascold, Dir
c. Rurih, Cyneus, Truvor
4. Princess Olga founded ―uroku‖, which meant:
a. Determination of the rate of obligations for the benefit of Kyivan princes
b. The obligatory visits to Kyiv of the princes from the neighboring lands
were established
c. The pre-church schools, which provided the elementary education, were
founded.
5. Volodymyr the Great ruled Kyivan Rus during:
a. 956-972
b. 980-1015
c. 1019-1054
6. The Christianity was brought to Kyivan Rus in:
a. 882
b. 918
c. 988
7. What is the most important move of Yaroslav the Wise to strengthen unity of
Kyivan Rus?
a. Spreading of education
b. Issuing of the ―Rus Pravda‖
c. The division of the lands between the sons during the lifetime.
8. The main pillar of the economy of Kyivan Rus in IX – XIII centuries was:
a. Cattle-breeding
b. Farming
c. Crafts and trade
9. The great prince was:
a. Great and powerful ruler
b. The oldest prince, head of the family, ruling Rus
c. The title of the princes who ruled in Kyiv for some period of time
10. The occupation of Smerds in XI – XII was:
a. Farming and cattle-breeding on the state lands, paying certain taxes to
princes with the products and later money and working the obligations
b. Farming, working for the family only and for the needs of the
community, paying the part of the products and the time
c. Farming on their own or community lands and crafts, paying tribute to
the prince
11. The people, who had taken loans and become dependent on the loan owner,
were called in Kyivan Rus:
a. Zakupy
b. Ryadovychi
c. Kholopy
12. The Mongol-Tatars invaded Kyiv in:
a. 1234
b. 1240
c. 1242
13. Halycia and Volyn were inhabited by the descendants of the tribes:
a. Dulibs, Uliches, Tivertsians
b. Dulibs, Uliches, Drevlyans
c. Dulibs, Tivertsians, White Croats.
14. The united Halytsko-Volynsk principality was formed in:
a. 1199
b. 1202
c. 1205
15. Halytsk and Volynsk principalities were united by:
a. Yaroslav Osmomysl
b. Roman Mstyslavych
c. Mstyslav the Brave
16. Among the provided statements choose the statements which say about the
results of the activity of prince Roman:
a. He liberated dependent peasants from obligations and debts.
b. He united Kyiv and Pereyaslav lands.
c. He provided the principality with the international authority.
d. He invaded the Lithuanian principality.
17. Prince Roman was fighting successfully with:
a. Sarmatians and Lithuanian feudal lords
b. Cumans and Lithuanian feudal lords
c. Sarmatians and Cumans
18. Danylo Halytsky was crowned in Dorohochyn as Prince in:
a. 1245
b. 1253
c. 1258
19. The capital of his state Danylo Halytsky chose to be:
a. Halych
b. Kholm
c. Lviv
20. Among the provided statements choose the statements which say about the
results of the domestic activities of Danylo Halytsky:
a. He reached the agreement with boyars and together with them through
the boyars rada solved the issues on the domestic policy.
b. He conquered the boyar opposition and strengthened the power of
princes.
c. He defended the Halych peasants and citizens from the self-will and over
exploitation.
d. He rebuilt old towns and founded new cities.
21. Among the provided statements choose the statements which say about the
results of the foreign political activities of Danylo Halytsky:
a. He established his rights on the ―homeland‖ (―otchyna‖) – Halicia and
Volyn with the Poles and Hungarians.
b. He reached the agreement with Mongol-Tatars and avoided ruining of the
home lands, though he needed to ruin the fortresses of the cities.
c. He united his state with Austria and Hungary, which were weakened after
the Mongol-Tatar invasion.
d. He convinced Lithuania for the union.
22. The dependency of Halytsko-Volynsk principality from Tatars in the second
half of XIII – first half of XIV centuries was displayed by:
a. Getting by the Halytsko-Volyn princes from the Tatar khans ―sign for
rule‖ and payment of the yearly tribute
b. Providing their help to the Tatars and paying them substantial tribute
(The tribute was collected every two years by the baskak sent by khan.)
c. Mainly in providing Tatar khans with the military support.
23. The last prince of Halytsko-Volyn state, prince of Mazovet Boleslav sat on
throne under the name:
a. Yuri I
b. Yuri II
c. Andrii II
24. According to historians Halytsko-Volyn state has ended its existence in:
a. 1349
b. 1389
c. 1439
25. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
The economic, social and political system, in which land was held by vassals
in exchange for military and other services given to overlords, is
called….________
26. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
At the very bottom of the social pyramid of Kyivan Rus were…_________
27. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
People, who owned no property and who hired themselves out as manual
labourers,were called in Kyivan Rus…_________
28. Complete the gaps with the correct term.
In performing his military functions Kyivan prince depended first and
foremost on…____________
29. Name the periods in the political history of Kyivan Rus,
please________________________________________________________
____
30. Correlation to be found out:
a) 1019-1054 1. Volodymyr Monomakh
b) 1113-1125 2. Jaroslav the Wise
c) 980-1015 3. Volodymyr the Great
d) 964-972 4. Danylo Halytskyi
8. Training Methods A training method comprises the principles and methods used
for instruction. Commonly used teaching methods may include class participation,
demonstration, recitation, memorization, or combinations of these. The choice of
teaching method or methods to be used depends largely on the information or skill
that is being taught, and it may also be influenced by the aptitude and enthusiasm
of the students.
Explaining, or lecturing, is the process of teaching by giving spoken
explanations of the subject that is to be learned. Lecturing is often accompanied by
visual aids to help students visualize an object or problem.
Demonstrating is the process of teaching through examples or experiments.
For example, a science teacher may teach an idea by performing an experiment for
students. A demonstration may be used to prove a fact through a combination of
visual evidence and associated reasoning.
Demonstrations are similar to written storytelling and examples in that they
allow students to personally relate to the presented information. Memorization of a
list of facts is a detached and impersonal experience, whereas the same
information, conveyed through demonstration, becomes personally relatable.
Demonstrations help to raise student interest and reinforce memory retention
because they provide connections between facts and real-world applications of
those facts. Lectures, on the other hand, are often geared more towards factual
presentation than connective learning.
Collaboration allows students to actively participate in the learning process
by talking with each other and listening to other points of view. Collaboration
establishes a personal connection between students and the topic of study and it
helps students think in a less personally biased way. Group projects and
discussions are examples of this teaching method. Teachers may employ
collaboration to assess student's abilities to work as a team, leadership skills, or
presentation abilities. Collaborative discussions can take a variety of forms. After
some preparation and with clearly defined roles, a discussion may constitute most
of a lesson, with the teacher only giving short feedback at the end or in the
following lesson.
The educational process NULESU is implemented in various forms, among
them being the class work, practical training and control. The auditorium classes
are conducted in the form of lectures, practical classes, seminar, laboratory and
individual lessons, including classes with the use of distance learning methods.
Self-study is the main way to master knowledge and skills in the time free from
normative classes. At NULESU it is provided by the system of teaching-and-
methodic means, among them manuals, teaching and methodical textbooks,
abstracts of lectures, practical classes etc, including their electronic versions which
can be used on distance. This work is conducted according to schedules. It
guarantees possibility of the students’ individual access to the necessary didactic
materials. At the beginning of the current term the students are informed about the
schedule. The teaching staff is always available for consultation when students use
complex equipment and information access systems while studying independently.
9. Methods of Control Methods of control are: previous monitoring, a modular control and final
control.
Previous monitoring is used as a prerequisite for the successful planning and
management of educational process. It helps identify existing knowledge of the
day to use them as a lecturer orientation in the complexity of the material. Ante
control in the form of test and evaluation of residual knowledge also spend some
time after the final exam in certain subjects as to assess the strength of knowledge
and to determine the level of knowledge on subjects providing opportunities to
determine the perception of new disciplines.
Current control knowledge is an integral part of the whole educational process
and serves as a means of identifying the degree of learning training material. The
task of this control are reduced to that: identify the scope, depth and quality
perception (mastering) of the material being studied; identify shortcomings in
knowledge and identify ways to address them; identify the degree of responsibility
of students and their attitudes to work, finding the causes that hinder their work;
identify the level of mastering the skills of independent work and identify ways
and means of development; stimulate student interest in the subject and in the
knowledge of their activity.
The main tasks of this control - to help students organize their work, learn
independently, responsibly and systematically study all subjects. Current control -
a continuation of the training of the teacher and the teaching staff, it is associated
with all kinds of academic work and must teach students to prepare for the
inspection of the first day of classes and every day, not the end of the semester or
school year. However, the current control is a measure of the work and the
teaching staff. Of course, semester students study simultaneously up to ten items,
and not all teachers put them to the same requirements. Module control of
knowledge is an indicator of quality study of selected chapters and topics related
cognitive, methodological, psychological and organizational qualities of students.
The final control is the exam students to assess their knowledge and skills in
accordance with the model professional. The main purpose of examination -
establishing actual content in terms of student learning, the quality and depth of
skills and apply them in practice. The final grade is given according to the current
normative acts, national system and European system of ECTS credit transfer for
all.
10. Distribution of Points that receive students.
Evaluation of the student is in accordance with the provisions of the document ―On the
examinations and tests NUBiP in Ukraine‖( minute 6, 02/20/2015), the table 1.
Ratio of the National Grades to ECTS and Subject Rating National
Grade
ECTS Definition of ECTS Subject rating,
points
Excellent A Excellent – the
excellent performance
with the minor ratio of
mistakes
90 – 100
Good B Very Good – above the
average level with
several mistakes
(82 – 89
C Good – a good work in
general with a certain
number of gross errors
74 – 81
Satisfactory D Satisfactory – not bad
but with the
considerable amount of
drawbacks
64 – 73
E Sufficiently – the
performance satisfies
the minimal criteria
60 – 63
Unsatisfactory FX Non-satisfactory – the 35 – 59
work is required to pass
the test (a positive
mark)
F Non-satisfactory – the
serious further work is
required
1 – 34
The subject rating consists of:
Rsubj = Rtr+Rat
Rtr – rating on the training activities
Rat – attestation rating
Rsubj = 100; Red=70; Rat =30
Maximum rating on the subject - Rsubj is 100 points. Maximum rating on the training activities - Rtr is 70 points.
Maximum attestation rating – Rat is 30 points. Minimum rating on the subject - Rsubj is 60 points. Minimum rating on the training activities - Rtr is 42 points.
Minimum attestation rating – Rat is 18 points. The rating on the training activities consists of the sum of the ratings for the
notional modules on the subject:
Rtr = R(1)
nm+R(2)
nm=…=R(N)
nm,
n - the number of the notional modules.
Maximum rating of the each notional module - R(1)
nm is 100 points.
Minimum rating of the each notional module - R(1)
nm is 60 points.
For the extra-curriculum work a student got 20% of Rsubj and his maximum
rating on the extra-curriculum is less than 20 points - Rextra-curr.= 20 points. Penalty
rating is 5 points - Rpen= 5 points.
11. Courseware Isakova N.P. Ancient & Medieval History of Ukraine. Reference Textbook
for Students with Training in English.-. K., 2014 . – 61 p.
Isakova N.P. Guidelines for Self-Study on History of Ukraine. Part I.- K.:
UkrINTEI, 2014. ─ 94 p.- 5,9 ум.др.арк.
Isakova N.P. Guidelines for Self-Study on History of Ukraine. Part IІ.- K.:
UkrINTEI, 2014. ─ 88 p.
Isakova N.P. The Lithuanian─Polish Period of Ukrainian History. Self-
study. Methodological Printed Matter for Students of the Faculties with the
Teaching in English. - K.: NAU, 2010. – 94 p.
Земерова Т.Ю. Історія України. Основні події історії України.
Політичний, економічний і культурний розвиток. Хронологічна таблиця :
[посібник] / Т. Ю. Земерова, І. М. Скирда. – Х. : Співак В. Л. : Весна, 2014. –
511 с.
Ісакова Н.П., Кропивко О.М., Паламарчук Н.І. Історія України (в
схемах і таблицях). Навчальний посібник для студентів аграрних закладів ІІІ–
ІV рівня акредитації. – Київ: Аграр. освіта, 2005. – 204 с.
12. Recommended Literature
Required Reading list
Aleksieiev Yu. History of Ukraine. – Kyiv: Caravela, 2007. – 208p.
Abridged History of Ukraine at Portals of the World: Ukraine project by
the Library of Congress. – N.-Y., 1996.
Chirovsky, Nicholas L. Fr. An Introduction to Ukrainian History. Vol.1
/Ancient and Kyivan-Halician Ukraine-Rus. – N.Y.: Philosophical library, 1981.-
347 p.
Hrushevsky M. History of Ukraine-Rus’ in 9 vol. Selected vol. translated
into English.-L., 1999.
Isakova N., Dankevych L. History of Ukraine: Coursebook for Students of
Higher Educational Institutions. Part 1. Prehistory – the Late 19th Century.– K.:
AgrarMediaGroup, 2014. - ─ 484 p.
Isakova N.P., Dankevych L.R. History of Ukraine from Ancient Times to
the Late 19th century: Textbook for Students of Higher Educational
Establishments.- K.: AgrarMediaGroup, 2013. ─ 332 p.
Isakova N., Dankevych L. History & Economics. Reference Book for
Students with Training in English. – K.: AgrarMediaGrup, 2013. -346 p.
Kenez, Peter. A History of the Soviet Union from the Beginning to the
End, - Cambridge etc.: Cambridge univ. press, 1999.- 317 p.
Knysh, George. Rus and Ukraine in Medieval Times. – Winnipeg, 1991.-
39 p.
Kohut, Zenon E. Russian Centralism and Ukrainian Autonomy: Imperial
Absorption of the Hetmanate, 1760-1830 s. – Cambridge (Mass.): Distributed by
Harvard univ. press for the Harvard Ukr. Research inst., 1988.- 363 p.
Markus, Vasyl. Religion and the Nationalism in Soviet Ukraine after 1945.
- Cambrige (Mass.): Ukr. Studies. Fund, Harvard univ., 1985.- 56 p.
Manning, Clarence. 20-th Century Ukraine: New-York; Bookman assoc. ,
1951.- 243p.
Nahayewsky, Isidore. History of the Modern Ukrainian State, 1917-1923. –
Munich: Ukr. Free univ. a. Acad. Of Arts a. sciences, 1966.- 315 p.
History of Ukraine.- Boulder (Col.): Westview press, 1999.- 258 p.
Subtelny Orest. Ukraine: a History.- third ed.- Toronto etc.: Univ. of
Toronto Press, 2000.- 736 p.
The Ukraine, 1917-1921: A Study in Revolution (Ed. By T. Hunczak.-
Camb. (Mass Distributed by Harvard univ. press, 1977.- 424 p.
Ukraine: Briefly about Her Past and Present". //Welcome to Ukraine, 2003,
№1, p.25.
Алексєєв С.В. Історія України: Короткий курс лекцій : [для студ. вузів
усіх спец. та усіх форм навчання] / С. В. Алексєєв [и др.] ; Донбаська держ.
машинобудівна академія. – Краматорськ : ДДМА, 2007. – 228 c.
Багацький В.В. Історія України : підручник / В. В. Багацький, Л. І.
Кормич. – Вид. третє, доп. іпереробл. – К. : Алерта, 2010. – 388 с.
Бадах Ю.Г. Історія України. Практикум : навч. посіб. / Ю. Г. Бадах ;
Київ. нац. торгов.-екон. ун-т. – К. : Київ. нац. торг.-екон. ун-т, 2011. – 408 с.
Бойко О.Д. Історія України : підручник / О. Д. Бойко. – 5-те вид.,
допов. – Київ : Академвидав, 2014. – 717 с.
Гудзь В. Історія України : підручник для студ. вищ. навч. закладів / В.
Гудзь. – 2-е вид., доп. і перероб. – К. : Слово, 2008. – 672 с.
Історія України : курс лекцій / [В. М. Щербатюк та ін.] ; за ред. д-ра
іст. наук В. М. Щербатюка ; Нац. акад. внутр. справ. – Київ : Фенікс, 2014. –
375 с.
Історія України : навч. посібник / М. В. Борисенко [та ін.]. – К. : Ніка-
Центр, 2007. – 184 c.
Історія України : підручник / Г.Д. Казьмирчук [та ін.] ; наук. ред.
Г.Д. Казьмирчук ; Київський національний ун-т ім. Тараса Шевченка. – 2-ге
вид., випр. і допов. – К. : Логос, 2010. – 648 с.
Історія України та її державності / Л. Є. Дещинський [та ін.]. – Вид. 4-
те, переробл. і доп. – Л. : Бескид Біт, 2008. – 444 с.
Kаденюк О.С. Історія України : навч. посіб. для студ. вищ. навч. закл.
/ Каденюк О. С. – К. : Кондор, 2008. – 407 с.
Лазарович М.В. Історія України : навч. посіб. / М. В. Лазарович. – 2-ге
вид., виправл. і доповн. – К. : Знання, 2011. – 686 с.
Литвин В.М. Історія України : підручник / Володимир Литвин ; [відп.
ред. В. А. Смолій] ; Нац. акад. наук України, Ін-т історії України. – К. :
Наукова думка, 2013. – 989 с.
Мицик Ю.А. Історія України : навч. посіб. / Юрій Мицик, Олег Бажан.
– Київ : Кліо, 2015. – 677 с.
1. Світлична В. Історія України. Навч. посібник. – К.: Каравела, 2004. –
408 с.
2. Сулько В. С. Історія України : навч. посіб. / В. С. Сулько ; Рівнен. держ.
гуманіт. ун-т, Каф. історії України. – РІвне : О. Зень [вид.], 2011. – 543 с.
Supplementary literature
Beauplan, Guillaume. A Description of Ukraine / Introd. transl. From the
Fr. a. not by Andrew B. Pernal – London: Harvard univ. press, 1993.- 242p.
Folk Heroes of Ukraine / Trans. and adapted from Ukr. by Mary Skrypnyk.
– Toronto: The Ukr. Canadian, 1966. – 52 p.
Hetmans of Ukraine // http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hetman
Hrushevsky M. The Historical Evolution of the Ukrainian Problem /
Transl. – London, 1915. – 58 p.
Internet Encyclopedia of Ukraine (IEU) //http://www.
encyclopediaofukraine.com/
Krushelnycky Askold. An Orange Revolution: A Personal Journey
Through Ukrainian History. N.-Y., 2006.- 320 p.
Lewytzkyi, Borys. Politics and Society in Soviet Ukraine, 1953-1980. -
Edmonton: Canad. Inst. of Ukr. Studies.Univ. of Alberta, 1987.-219 p.
Liber, George. Soviet Nationality Policy, Urban Growth and Identity
Change in the Ukrainian SSR 1923-1934. – New-York: Cambridge univ. press,
1992. - 289 p.
Marples, David R. Stalinism in Ukraine in the 1940 s. – New-York: St.
Martin’s press, 1992.- 228 p.
Rady, Reid Martyn. Russia, Poland and the Ukraine, 1662-1725. – London,
etc.: Hodder and Soughton, 1990.- 130 p.
Sichynski, Volodymyr. Ukraine in Foreign Comments and Descriptions
from the V-th to XX-th century.-N.Y.: Ukr. Congr. Comm. of US, 1953.- 235 p.
Ukraine after Shelest / Ed. by B. Krawchenko.- Edmonton: Canad. inst. of
Ukr. Studies. Univ. of Alberta, 1983.-119 p.
Ukrainian Past, Ukrainian Present: Sel. Papers from the 4-th World Congr.
for Soviet a. East Europe Studies, Harrogate, 1990- N-Y.: St. Martin’s press,
1993.- 137 p.
Верстюк В., Дзюба О., Репринцев В. Україна від найдавніших часів до
сьогодення: Хронологічний довідник. – К.: Наук. думка, 1995. – 688 с.
Войцехівська І., Абліцов В., Божко О. та ін. Історія України в особах
ХІХ – ХХ ст. – К.: Україна, 1995. – 479 с.
Гетьмани України: історичні портрети. – К.: Україна, 1991. – 216 с.
Гісем О.В., Мартинюк О.О., Трухан О.Ф. Історія України в таблицях.
– Х.: КСД, 2006. – 480 с.
Довідник з історії України. – К.: Генеза, 2001. – 1135 c.
Енциклопедія українознавства / Інститут української археології НАН
України. – К.: Віпол, 1994. – Т. 1. – 400 с.
Енциклопедія українознавства / Інститут української археології НАН
України. – К.: Віпол, 1995. – Т. 2. – 400 с.
Енциклопедія українознавства / Інститут української археології НАН
України. – К.: Віпол, 1995. – Т. 3. – 430 с.
Історична наука: термінологічний і понятійний довідник: Навч. посіб.
/ В.М. Литвин, В.І. Гусєв, А.Г. Слюсаренко та ін. – К.: Вища шк., 2002. – 430
с.
Історія України. Комплексний довідник + профільний рівень / [уклад.:
Воропаєва В. В. та ін.]. – Видю 5-те, допов. та перероб. – Харків : Весна :
Співак В. Л., 2014. – 703 с.
13. Online Content 1. histua.com/
2. www.istpravda.com.ua/tags/tag_історія+України/
3. likbez.org.ua/
4. www.ukrainehistory.narod.ru/
5. www.history.org.ua/
6. www.iananu.kiev.ua
7. www.litopys.org.ua
8. www.mon.gov.ua
9. www.nbuv.gov.ua
10. www.nplu.org.ua
