Introduction

"Geography is the study of the patterns and processes of human (built) and environmental

(natural) landscapes, where landscapes comprise real (objective) and perceived (subjective)

space." - Gregg Wassmansdorf

Without question, transportation research is on the rise in North American and the world.

Given the daunting implications of global climatic change, governments at all levels-

municipal, regional and national have developed a renewed interest in revitalizing their

transportation systems. These systems may include public transit, highways, roads,

airports, and other infrastructure. In geography, a lot of this research is occurring in a sub-

discipline called Transportation Geography or Transport Geography.

Transport Geography has been around for over a century and gained tremendous

momentum during Geography’s quantitative revolution of the 1950s (Goetz et al., 2007). It

is a field of study that endeavours to understand the movements of freight, people and

information and how they correlate with transport infrastructures, terminals, equipment

and networks that occupy an important place in space (Rodrigue, 2010). Furthermore,

most of the research conducted in transport geography asks questions around the

accessibility and mobility of transportation systems.

The challenge for transportation geographers is to define a set of theories and concepts

about the spatial relationships between people and places that situate accessibility and

mobility at the nucleus of human interaction (Keeling, 2007). Indeed, transport geography

is only becoming more relevant to the discipline today because of its great potential to

integrate both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, concepts and theories to help

explain the world around us.

Progress in transportation geography has been fuelled by the uncertainties and

complexities surrounding global climate change (Hall, 2010). Across the world, as cities

1

become even more urbanized, traffic congestion is forecasted to get worse. With growing

purchasing power parity, the Chinese and Indians are buying more automobiles to enjoy

the materialistic lifestyles that Western Civilization has been accustomed to for so long

(Hall, 2010). Fortunately, transportation research is evolving with this global phenomenon.

The focus of this progress paper is to capture the evolution of transport geography and

how it has risen as an interdisciplinary and inter-methodological field. Some scholars still

think that transport geography’s interdisciplinary linkages to civil engineering, statistics

and economics are merely a detriment to its development (Goetz et al., 2007). By contrast

however, some believe that the multidisciplinary approach to geography and

transportation has led transportation research to be spread among a larger number of

journals in geography, transportation and the larger academic world (Goetz et al., 2007).

This paper will stick with the latter argument and illustrate examples from the literature

where transport geography has become more relevant due to its strong quantitative

orientation and interest in post-positivism and humanistic approaches.

This Progress in Human Geography paper will highlight the importance of access and

mobility to transport geography, and how these concepts draw upon a multidisciplinary

framework. But before we embark on this journey; the paper will begin with a history and

overview of transport geography and its relationship to the broader field.

History of the sub-discipline

The Quantitative Revolution of the 1950s was a time of radical transformation of spirit and

purpose, which Anglo American geography experienced in the 1950s and 1960s (Barnes,

2001). This new way of thinking was premised on inferential statistics, abstract models and

theories. Transportation geography was among many sub-disciplines during this time that

engaged with such methods and theories. There were two prominent geographers who

influenced the sub-discipline during the 1950s; they were Edward L. Ullman and Harold M

Mayer (Barnes, 2000).

2

Both Ullman and Mayer were influential in stressing the spatial nature of transport and in

demonstrating its centrality to geographic study (Goetz et al., 2007). Ullman’s work at the

University of Washington influenced scholars like William Garrison and a group of

graduate students including Brian Berry, William Bunge and Michael Dacey to name a few

(Goetz et al., 2007). In particular, transport geography had a strong quantitative focus

because of its relationship with civil engineering and economics. Indeed, it had an emphasis

on spatial interaction and network analysis which included topics such as transportation,

spatial structure and processes, the gravity model, structural analysis of transportation

networks flows, optimalities and allocation models (Goetz et al., 2007).

The Gravity model, adapted from Isaac Newton’s law of gravity, used mathematics to

illustrates the relationships between places (such as Toronto and Montreal). The model

explains how the spatial interaction between two locations declines with increasing

distance, time, and cost between them (Hay, 2000). However, there is a positive association

with the amount of activity at each location. People like Elliot Hurst argued that transport

geography’s quantitative orientation was analytically thorough however; the entire socio-

economic and political realms within which transport systems operate had been neglected

in the “positivist-scientistic” studies of the time (Goetz et al., 2007).

With the academic excitement of the quantitative revolution, transport geography

completely deviated away from human geography and had virtually no studies that were

qualitative in orientation (Goetz et al., 2007). Studying transport networks and the

provision of scheduled services were mathematically-based drawing on positivism (Hay,

2000).

Network studies conducted by geographers explored the geographical pattern of transport

networks (roads, railways, canals, highways) and explained these patterns either at the

level of the whole network to individual links, including an account of how these patterns

have changed over time by the growth and decay of networks (Hay, 2000). This required

data collection and rigorous quantitative approaches to examine things like frequency and

3

demand of transport networks. After examination, optimization models would be

developed to illustrate how the system can be more efficient and cost-effective.

Even the provision of scheduled transport services was primarily an exercise involving

collaboration between civil engineers and geographers. Indeed, scheduling transport

services involved optimization of cost and efficiency based on travel demand and travel

forecasting (Goetz et al., 2007).

For example, to determine the suitability of a transport service in a city, studies would

show cost-benefit analysis to determine how the city could economize based on the current

demand of the service and its scheduling i.e. whether it should be increased or decreased.

Above all, statistical techniques were applied to networks and to frequency of scheduled

services in time and their spatial pattern.

Amid these quantitative transport studies, some argued that it was critical to pay attention

to the “mobility problems of those (in both rural and urban areas) who are dependent upon

scheduled services and the inequities between them and those who have access to private

transport” (Hay 2000, p. 855). Thus, these studies were informative and comprehensive

from a quantitative perspective, but did not necessarily capture the experiences and

mobility issues around scheduled transport services. This kind of research would require

more of a qualitative approach and thus geographers criticized such studies because they

missed out on what could have been significant findings capable of influencing public

policy. Nonetheless, we cannot understate the significant contributions that transport

geography made to the field of geography during the 1950s-1970s. It strengthened its

analytical framework by combining with fields such as planning, civil engineering and

economics (Keeling, 2007).

As the years progressed, there was a growing inertia in transportation geography.

Geographers cited the dominance of quantitative thinking as a major cause, and called for

a qualitative approach to intra-urban travel to help us learn more about people’s everyday

travel choices and experiences (Hall, 2010). During this time, perhaps the greatest

4

challenge was with defining a set of theories and concepts about the spatial relationships

between people and places that situate accessibility and mobility at the nucleus of human

interaction (Keeling, 2007). Transport geography had been criticized by some for being a

quiet corner of the discipline that has lost its centrality largely because it remained within

the analytical framework of the 1960s (Goetz et al., 2009).

As a result of its primarily quantitative focus, it was not properly aligned with how

geography was changing. Positivism was no longer the dominant philosophy in the

discipline, post-positivism was becoming more important. Sub-disciplines such as urban

geography, feminist geography, cultural geography, critical geography and Marxist

geography started to receive more scholarly attention and influence in the wider discipline.

What is more, these sub-disciplines provided insightful critique and analysis of positivist

geography and discussed the value in embracing qualitative research (Barnes, 2000).

Transport geography had its own conundrum in that it was a sub-discipline with great

potential to employ qualitative research but this was not widely supported. Transport

geography had no relationship with these topics and thus some called it “a quiet and

moribund corner of the discipline” (Goetz et al., 2007, p. 327). Thus, the sub-discipline was

looking for ways to re-integrate and demonstrate its relevance to geographical research.

Examples of transport geography’s re-emergence will be illustrated in the next section.

An Evolving sub-discipline

In geography, the post-1970s was an era of pluralism where sub-disciplines like transport

geography moved beyond just model building, analytical-empirical methods and

quantification (Goetz et al., 2007). This era was one of post-positivism with the rise of

studies focusing on behaviour, humanistic-cultural and even Marxist social theory.

Throughout the latter half of the 20th century, there was a rise in transport-oriented

journals (Goetz et al., 2007). These journals would include Progress in Human Geography,

The Professional Geographer, Environment & Planning A and Economic Geography.

5

These journals started to address questions around accessibility and mobility which are

arguably the two fundamental dimensions of transport geography research.

Bigger questions started to come to the fore regarding sustainable transport, people’s

access to public transportation, the effects of commuting on quality of life, and the growing

importance of understanding transportation’s link to global climate change. Goetz et al.

(2007) provide evidence showing how transport geography reinvigorated its importance in

the wider discipline.

Figure 1. Transport-oriented research in top geography journals (1996-2006).

Journal No. of transport geography articles

1. Progress in Human Geography 72. Transaction, IBG 53. Environment and Planning D 64. Political Geography 55. Annals of the Association of 13

American Geographers6. Antipode 47. Economic Geography 148. Environment and Planning A 919. Area 1310. The Professional Geographer 3011. Geoforum 1812. Urban Geography 9

Total 225 (4.5% of journal capacity)

As shown in the figure, in the ten-year study period, a total of 5,040 articles were published

by the twelve journals. Of these 5,040 articles, 225 were on transport-related topics. 102 of

the studies were qualitative in their orientation, 123 used a more quantitative methodology

(Goetz et al., 2007). Thus, the evidence suggests that transport geography has begun to

incorporate a more critical qualitative approach in geographical endeavour. This inclusion

of the critical qualitative approach was timely as other geographies such as feminist, urban,

economic, political and cultural started to attract the academic spotlight for the discipline

(Painter, 2000). Indeed, critical transport geography started to investigate topics such as

6

commuting behaviour and mobility looking at the roles of gender, race and ethnicity

(Goetz et al., 2007).

During this time period, topics like environmental justice, accessibility to public transit and

equity around transportation came to the fore. More critical was the increased research

interest in the concept of mobilities. This concept encompasses both the large-scale

movements of people, objects, capital and information across the world, as well as the more

local processes of daily transportation, movement through public space and the travel of

material things within everyday life (Goetz et al., 2007). These topics were very new to the

sub-discipline and would be influential in shaping public policy.

The sophisticated analytical and computing capabilities such as GIS have facilitated

broader, deeper and more interrelated approaches to transportation research (Keeling,

2007). GIS has been used for topics such as travel and commuting behaviour,

environmental justice, alternative fuels, access and equity to transportation networks. Thus

the confluence of both quantitative and qualitative methods has allowed transportation to

make massive strides in geographical research.

The next section of the paper will provide examples from the literature of topics that are

currently being studied in transport geography. I make reference to these studies because

many are qualitative in orientation exploring people’s experiences, behaviours and feelings.

These geographical studies contrast sharply from the ones of the quantitative revolution.

The methods used in these studies are increasingly being used to develop sustainable

transport systems in an era where climate change is becoming a more heated topic.

The Rise of Critical Transport Geography

Understanding travel behaviour has been a focal point of critical transport geography

research. A study by Line et al (2010) looked at the factors influencing the future travel

behaviour intentions of young people between 11 and 18 and how climate change

considerations affect these. Their sample was a group of youth in the United Kingdom.

7

Questionnaires, interviews and photography were the main methods used in this

qualitative study. Photography was used to compare photos between things like traffic

congestion, a motorist who looked happy while driving and pictures of the natural

environment. These photos were used as a trigger for discussion about the environmental

impacts of transport (Line et al., 2010). Researchers explained how the camera can provide

young research participants with a sense of empowerment and forging a good relationship

(trust) between the participant and the researcher.

Results show how these young participants are enthusiastic to drive if provided the

opportunity because of the speed, cost-savings, convenience, flexibility and freedom (Line

et al., 2010). Another finding was that youth mentioned how walking and cycling is good

for health, but it is an inconvenience. Using a car saves their energy; they think that

exercising should be separate from travelling. Another significant finding was that the

sample group identified the importance of the environment and climate change, but said

that it would still not deter them from their willingness to drive. Indeed, this was identified

as the social dilemma where their own efforts to tackle climate change may be rendered

worthless by the inaction of others (Line et al., 2010).

The transport policy implications of this study are intriguing. Policymakers need to

promote cycling as a signal of success and promoting it as cool instead of just the obvious

environmental and health benefits. Researchers suggest that society must empower young

people in relation to their knowledge of climate change and how to tackle this issue as well

as their ability to communicate effectively this knowledge to others (Line et al., 2010). Also,

there would be merit in gathering more youth together and providing them with different

transport choices, seeing what their choices are and their reasoning. Or, introducing

“covered” cycle paths and walkways to protect people from the weather.

Researchers suggest that these recommendations might help with changing youth’s

perceptions regarding driving and climate change. Also, if there were regulations to

8

enforce travel behaviour change towards more environmentally friendly options, then it

could help remove the social dilemma identified by the youth.

The study by Line et al. (2010) is a good example of a qualitative study trying to uncover

facts about travel behaviour. As mentioned, climate change has become an overarching

issue in the transportation research agenda (Hall, 2010). A study like this one explored the

personal feelings and experiences of youth 11-18 and their thoughts towards driving,

climate change and the use of alternative modes of travel. By developing a better

understanding of travel behaviour, particularly for youth, policymakers will be able to

implement measurements that promote a more environmentally friendly transportation

system while concomitantly addressing the critical issue of climate change.

Transport Geography and Sustainable Transport Systems

“Sustainable transportation systems” is an emerging area of transport geography research.

Environmental justice and equity are at the core of such research. The relatively new

interest in sustainable transport systems is mainly driven by the issue of climate change. As

argued in this paper, the link between transportation and climate change is becoming a

more important research area in transport geography and in the wider discipline because

of environmental and social justice issues (Hall, 2010). Ultimately, the goal of sustainable

transportation is to ensure that environmental, social and economic considerations are

factored into decisions affecting transportation activity (Loo, 2006).

A number of places throughout the world including Hong Kong, Tokyo and Singapore are

striving to bring about sustainable transport systems (Han, 2010). However, the success of

a sustainable transport system is contingent on access and mobility of the system i.e. the

two key concepts of transport geography. Both mobility and access will be discussed in this

section to illustrate why they are integral to the sub-discipline and how they relate to the

broader discipline of geography.

9

In a Transport Geography paper by Sun Sheng Han (2010), the author explains how

Singapore has been successful in promoting motorization with sustainable transport

planning. This paper discusses the close link between mobility and wealth. As Asian nations

like Singapore see greater wealth accumulation and higher purchasing power parity per

capita, there will be even more automobile consumption and production (Han, 2010).

A general trend in Asian countries like India and China is that increased wealth means

more production and subsequent purchasing of automobiles. This is an inherently unequal

process as more vehicles are being purchased and used by the wealthy which exposes the

poor to even more emissions and pollutants, “mobility for some will be at the expense of

immobility and disease of others” (Han, 2010, p. 314). It is difficult for the government to

discourage automobility when mobility is perceived to be better and public transit might be

unpopular because it is uncomfortable, dirty, inconvenient and less enjoyable.

The critical challenge is to balance motorization with public transit. Singapore has been

successful with such an endeavour. Their system fosters mobility because it allows users to

choose their mode of transportation subject to a range of well-coordinated policies to

control car population and usage, and at the same time to provide high quality public

transport facilities (Han, 2010). Roads have received substantial public investment; from

1986 to 1996 the road surface area increased 27%. Between 1996-2000 $3 billion was

invested to construct another 300 lane-km road and from 2001-2005, another $570 million

was used to further road expansions (Han, 2010). Public investment in the public transit

network has occurred simultaneously through the mass rapid transit (MRT) and the Light

Rapid Transit (LRT) networks.

Promoting motorization and public transit has involved a set of innovative management

policies to achieve a sustainable transport system. There are a number of tools used but I

will only discuss two for the purposes of this paper. The first is a vehicle quota system

(VQS) which combines state planning and market mechanisms to allocate vehicles to users

and so manage the vehicle population (Han, 2010). This management tool is effective in

10

controlling the vehicle population in Singapore as it limits car ownership. Ownership

requires a certificate of entitlement and the quota system is based on categories of vehicles

differentiated by engine size (Han, 2010). The VQS has reduced the annual growth rate of

vehicles to three percent.

The other innovative policy is road pricing. The country uses electronic road pricing (ERP)

which is a sophisticated combination of radio-frequency, optical-detection, imaging and

smart-card technologies (Han, 2010). ERP is a method of intelligent transportation systems

(ITS) which has gained popularity in places such as North American, Europe and South-

East nations like Singapore. These technologies have been championed by civil engineers

but have required input from transport geographers and planners in terms of situating

them in transportation networks. With ERP, the share of private cars over total

commuters declined from 48% to 29% (Jerram, 2007). Public transportation has received

many benefits from the ERP scheme. Indeed, buses have become faster, more efficient and

have seen ridership rates go up (Jerram, 2007).

Mobility has been advanced in Singapore because policies have promoted public transit.

Policies have made the quality, frequency and diversity of the public transit system and its

services a viable alternative to the car for a wide array of the population (Han, 2010). One

progressive and emerging idea is to install intelligent traffic lights to detect approaching

buses so the lights turn green automatically, this will also come with more bus lanes. This is

meant to increase efficiency and mobility as a bus carries more passengers than an

automobile.

These policies and ideas are not only indicative of a sustainable transport system, but

demonstrate ideas of environmental and social justice which relate to the wider discipline

of geography. Indeed, critical human geography as a sub-discipline has fostered an intense

academic environment where issues such as unequal relations of class, race, ethnicity and

gender became more commonplace (Painter, 2000). Social geography and urban geography

have also focussed on issues concerning justice and the environment.

11

Low fares in Singapore’s rapid transit system ensure that ordinary people can access

public transport (Han, 2010). Low-income commuters are assisted by the “many helping

hands” approach, with the government, local communities and the public transport

operators all extending their help in various ways such as government income

redistribution schemes and transport vouchers (Han, 2010). The rapid bus transit system

provides low fares in general and continuously seeks input from the public about quality of

service, price level, waiting and walking time in a trip. Last, road pricing has been effective

because it controls usage of cars i.e. making automobility less attractive because it is more

expensive and rapid bus transit more popular because it is cheaper and highly efficient

(Han, 2010).

To conclude discussion on this study, it is critical to understand Singapore’s success with

developing a sustainable transportation system. They have balanced motorization with

public transit usage which is a rational way of changing the system. Expecting everyone in

society to precipitously switch from driving to public transit and alternative transit

(walking, cycling) is not realistic. This process takes time. Access and mobility have been

crucial to the Singaporean experience. People get around their cities comfortably and

efficiently and public transit is priced at an affordable rate.

This study is an example of how transport geography research is moving beyond just

optimization models based on transport network efficiency. As mentioned, transport

geography is beginning to recognize the importance of sustainable transportation as it

relates to environmental protection and social justice. ERP, VQS and public transport

expansion have mitigated greenhouse gas emissions while allowing the country’s poorest to

enjoy the transport options available to them.

Building on Access in Transport Geography

This core idea of access in transport geography needs some elaboration. Elaboration is

needed to distinguish “access” from “accessibility”, two fundamentally different concepts.

12

Rodrigue et al (2009) provide a comprehensive explanation of this: many transport systems

have universal access since no specific user can have a competitive advantage over others;

access is the same for everyone. For example, a public highway system can be accessed by

anyone insofar as they have a vehicle and the will to use this method of transport. Thus, it

can be accessed by trucking fleets and its competitors and individuals or families with

smaller or larger cars. The authors explain how access is thus uniform wherever one is

located in regard to the transport system as long as there is a possibility to enter or exit it.

This contrasts with accessibility because accessibility can vary according to one’s location

within the transport system. Accessibility is not uniform but is a relative concept based on

space, place and income status to name a few (Rodrigue et al., 2009). For example, to

conceptualize this distinction, let’s think about the public highway system which everyone

can access in theory. A public highway system is usually extensive with numerous entry

and exit points throughout a city, province or even nation. You can access the system if you

have a car and get from point A to point B. However, the minute the government

implements a highway tax or a toll, the question of accessibility arises. A highway toll could

raise revenue to finance the expansion and maintenance of the public highway system. This

might be justified because it is not receiving enough tax revenue for transportation renewal

and thus has to resort to such economic measures.

The flipside to this argument is that revenue made from the highway toll or tax could be

used for public transit expansion. With more funding, transit can be expanded to all areas

of a city and could be priced at an affordable rate thereby making it accessible to all

members of society. This distinction between access and accessibility is indeed an

important one because it relates to social equality and justice which are crucial in critical

human geography and social geography research.

Access can be correlated with sustainable transportation systems. Also, access can explain

how transport geography has influenced professional fields like planning. Curitiba, Brazil

provides compelling evidence of access through its Bus Rapid Transit system. The citizens

of Curitiba feel more compelled to spend disposable income on transit services because the

13

bus rapid transit is safe, reliable, efficient and speedy thereby minimizing the need to use

an automobile (Levinson et al., 2002). For Curitiba, poor air quality and traffic congestion

have been the main impetuses to bring about a more sustainable transit system (Levinson

et al. 2002). Some urban scholars attribute poor air quality, traffic congestion and low

levels of urban liveability to a lack of transit-oriented development (Hodge & Gordon,

2008). Moreover, smart growth and transit-oriented development usually begin when a city

recognizes that automobile dependency is rampant along with a decreased sense of

community

Public transportation systems will never gain popular support if citizens do not have a

sense of culture, place and community where they are engaged. The citizens of Curitiba

have recognized that by neglecting the city’s natural environment, the impact of pollution

and other harmful pollutants would exacerbate the liveability of the city. To foster a

conservation ethic, instil environmental values and bring about social equity for citizens of

Curitiba, the city has implemented progressive waste management programs. In short, 70

percent of the city’s waste is recycled by citizens (Cunningham et al. 2005).

Food and bus coupons are handed out to low-income citizens in exchange for recyclables,

providing an alternative to welfare while also protecting the environment (Cunningham et

al 2005). In addition, money raised from selling materials goes into social programs and the

city employs the homeless and recovering alcoholics in its garbage separation plant

(Cunningham et al. 2005). Incentives from the municipality have also brought about social

equity; people can carry their trash to biweekly collection sites and trade four pounds of

garbage for one pound of vegetables (Lubow, 2007). In sum, these planning initiatives have

collectively created a better sense of community and citizenry and demonstrate how its

sustainable transit system is accessible to all citizens irrespective of class.

In Curitiba, the urban environment and public transportation are valued in the education

system of the city. Children are taught at a very young age to appreciate conservation of

waste and why reducing automobile dependency is important (Cunningham et al 2005).

14

For instance, there is a municipal program for children where they can exchange

recyclable garbage for school supplies, chocolate, toys and tickets for shows (Cunningham

et al. 2005). At a young age, they are introduced to how cars and vehicles pollute and how

using buses are more environmentally friendly. These use and success of these initiatives

are contrasted by the findings from the Line et al (2010) study.

Last, the BRT has been highly successful in Curitiba because of its physical and financial

accessibility. The feeder buses pass through neighbourhoods on the urban fringe and make

the system easily accessible to lower density areas (Levinson et al. 2002). The city’s express

system then utilizes these dedicated bus lanes and transports large numbers of passengers

to various locations along these structural corridors.

Transport Geography can be effective at highlighting spatial disparities and inaccessibility

issues. When professional planners study the work of transport geographers, they become

intrigued by the spatial inequalities of transportation systems and conduct work to

minimize such inequalities. This has been evidenced in Curitiba and Singapore making

transportation not only more sustainable, but accessible for all citizens. Also, both places

have been interested in peoples’ experiences and attitudes while using transportation. It is

the experiences and attitudes that have helped create a more effective and efficient system.

Transport Geography in Modern Geographical Thought

The growth of urban centres has spurred transportation geographers to develop new

theories and methods to help explain the changing dynamics of accessibility and mobility

(Keeling, 2009). Much of the literature on access and mobility focuses mainly on urban

areas. Urban areas have significant population sizes, a high concentration of human capital

and technology, transportation networks and various economic markets. Thus, urban

transport issues have dominated the discourse, in part because of the sheer size and

complexity or urban growth and change. However, this does not justify any reason to

neglect rural areas. Rural communities have become completely dependent on the

15

automobile, as the frequency and coverage of public transit services continues to decline

(Keeling, 2009).

Access to basic public transport infrastructure typically is the major challenge for rural

communities in non-Western societies, where private automobile ownership is rare but

population densities are higher (Keeling, 2009). These issues of spatial inequality, poverty,

gender and race have become only more important to modern geographical thought. These

topics are studied in sub-disciplines including social geography, urban geography, cultural

geography and critical human geography. Thus, there appears to be a trend in modern

geographical thought where issues of justice and equality are studied. This is a major shift

from the 1950s where the quantitative revolution did not account for things like social

justice or poverty, but instead focused on research that would drive the Military-

Industrial-Academic complex.

Many of the human geography sub-disciplines are focused on addressing inequality and

social justice. For example, the analysis of contemporary public transport systems from the

perspective of spatial inequalities and social exclusion is an intriguing topic not exclusive to

transport geography, but might attract social and feminist geographers. These issues are

indeed complex and inherently multidisciplinary in nature.

A seminal study by Law (1999) called for new geographies of gender and daily mobility,

arguing that transport geography was neither engaging with mobilities research nor

embedding gender-aware frameworks of analysis other than of the ‘women-do-this, men

do- that’ variety. A more systematic treatment of gender as a theoretical concept was

required (Hall, 2010). Gender shapes access to resources, time, money skills and

technology. “Access to each of these resources will influence travel behaviour (how often

trips are made, where and when they are made, and the mode of transport used) as well as

the experience and social meaning of mobility” (Law, 1999, p. 578).

16

Gender norms of domestic responsibility relate to transport research. Childcare and

domestic work, and on spatial patterns of segregated land-uses, and combined with

inflexible service hours and minimal public transport, generate time-space constraints that

“restrict the mobility of those responsible for this work, usually mothers or wives (Law,

1999, p. 578). What about single mothers who have less disposable income? Less income

usually means no access to an automobile which ultimately restricts mobility. The poor

family might be spatially segregated from public transit or unable to pay the fare because

of their financial situation. Or, if both parents are working full-time and commute over 60

minutes everyday, these commuting impacts can be detrimental to their health and to their

family and social welfare.

The difficulty that commuters have in seeing their kids before they go to bed, or the

difficulties in having family sit down meals in the evenings, all because people cannot get

about easily. As families spread out, it is harder and harder for them to keep in touch and

see each other. This affects rich families more than poor, as they spread out more (Cass et

al., 2005). People spend about 90 minutes each day travelling on average (84 minutes is the

average for Toronto) – more time than they spend on childcare, sports, outdoor activities,

shopping, social life and eating. (Jerram, 2007). If this time could be cut, we could hugely

improve our social lives, families and leisure opportunities.

A study by the University of Paris and Nottingham Trent University explains how public

transport relates to spatial inequality. Their study finds that when communities or areas

become isolated due to low quality/expensive public transport, it heightens poverty,

conflict, racism, alienation and crime. This leads to unhappiness and huge ‘knock on’ costs

in terms of prisons, mental health, unemployment benefit, lost income, etc (Jerram, 2007).

This illustrates the centrality of good public transport because everyone in society is

connected to it. Congestion from transportation is another growing phenomenon in terms

of the policy tools utilized to control and alleviate traffic and congestion. Jerram (2007)

highlights a number of advantages associated with London, England’s Congestion Charge

Zone (CCZ):

17

Raising the financial price of car travel induces some shifting to public transport Reduced congestion makes on-street public transport faster and cheaper to operate,

irrespective of whether more people use it or not Increased public transport route coverage and/or frequency to handle demand

further Enhances the service quality as perceived by the user Savings on parking charges Decrease amount of accidents every year

The key results from London’s CCZ are summarized below:

Traffic in the Congestion Zone dropped by about 16%. This had huge benefits for people

using buses and taxis and for people who needed to drive. Reliability benefits to car, taxi and commercial vehicle occupants (such as not being late due to unexpected congestion) were £10m; and to bus passengers, £10m.

Vehicle fuel savings: £10m (based on 2004 prices). Accident savings: £15m

Source: Jerram, 2007

While the data collected and analyzed provides compelling evidence that the CCZ has been

successful, there lacks discussion around peoples’ personal experiences with it how they are

coping with the transition to public transit; or, if they feel safer due to less congestion. With

congestion charging, there is still a large percentage of people who use their automobiles

for a number of reasons that we still do not completely understand.

Congestion charging, in multiple jurisdictions (Singapore, London, Stockholm, Olso) is

receiving more attention from human geographers in terms of the behavioural aspects

associated with it. For example, why people still choose more expensive travel options

(driving) when more efficient and cheaper travel modes are available to them. An

interdisciplinary research team from Sussex University interviewed 18 middle-class car

commuters to understand people’s transport attitudes and choices. The results were

broken down into four themes which dominated people’s thinking. These themes are

represented in figure 2 on page 18.

18

Figure 2. Summary of Transport Attitude and Choices (Jerram, 2007) Theme Explanation of theme

Journey-Based Affect (JBA)

JBA is all about how people feel during the journey If public transport is crowded, noisy, smelly, hot, has uncomfortable seating, or perceived as unsafe, people will not take it. Cars, on the other hand, can be perceived as entertaining places, even though you can’t read, gaze out of the window, etc.

Personal Space This was a dominating aspect of JBA. People liked being alone to some extent, but a greater priority was not being pushed up against others. It would make sense to highlight the improvements of public transport if it is to be appealing.

Autonomy Public transport was seen as unreliable and inflexible. Bus timetables were unpredictable and have complex timetables. The investigators concluded that ‘removing the unknown may help to address these issues’. Lack of autonomy could also produce negative affect around car use – having to arrive at a certain time to get a parking space or having to leave at a certain time to avoid rush hour. Thus, very often car use can constrain our freedom, but good public transport can enhance it. Policymakers have not addressed these issues. Public transport can be liberating, but is not presented as such in Britain.

Identity Many car owners considered their car ownership to be an essential element of themselves. Most car owners remember car acquisition as a moment of liberation, coming of age, or achieving social status. Policymakers and people promoting public transport alternatives have not addressed these issues, yet they are the central ones for car commuters

These themes need to be further explored in other geographical studies, particularly to

determine the variation in attitudes and choices between income groups. These kinds of

studies would influence modern geographical thought especially considering the

importance of qualitative research in human geography. All four themes could be placed in

a behavioural geography study cross cutting transport geography. The themes might be

able to reveal even more groundbreaking research when applied to various groups in

society. Using quantitative methods to illustrate the cost-benefit savings and efficiency

gains from a CCZ can reveal important findings. However, it is equally as important to

explore peoples’ experiences and attitudes regarding commuting and public transit.

Indeed, this is the research that can influence policymakers to make decisions that allow

for environmental and social justice.

19

Conclusion

In summary, these studies illustrate the interdisciplinarity of emerging transport research.

Such interdisciplinarity has been crucial to human geography since the 1970s. However,

there is the need for a confluence of quantitative and qualitative methodology to influence

public policy and to strengthen the vitality of the discipline. GIS techniques have hitherto

revolutionized transportation analysis (Keeling, 2007). It has been a very useful technique,

however, some human geography scholars have cautioned about overusing such methods

as was done in the 1960s. In the 1960s, there was a “narrow emphasis on network analysis

and mechanistic models which led to research becoming disembodied from its social and

political implications (Keeling, 2007, p. 223). This made transport geography less relevant

to how the discipline was changing. As Keeling (2007) writes:

“those embracing GIS technologies need to focus on the policy-making, problem-solving, and

forecasting capabilities of GIS from social and political viewpoints rather than allowing the flashy

technical capabilities of the software dominate the discourse” (Keeling, 2007, p. 223).

Despite some of the fair critiques from human geographers, this is an exciting time to be a

transport geographer. New ideas are being drawn from human geography, planning, GIS

and sustainable development to make this sub-discipline more appealing to the wider

discipline. With access and mobility becoming so central to transport geographers, their

studies are beginning to contextualize the human condition in terms of movement and

interaction (Keeling, 2009).

As shown in this paper, transport geography is still quantitative in orientation but has used

a number of qualitative methods since the 1970s. More qualitative studies are needed,

however, we should note the significant progress made thus far. From 1996-2006 a total of

5,040 articles were published by the twelve geography journals. Of these 5,040 articles, 225

were on transport-related topics. 102 of the studies were qualitative in their orientation,

123 used a more quantitative methodology These advances have helped other geographers,

as well as those affiliated disciplines (civil engineering, economics, planning) to “better 20

explain the inner workings and inter-connections of people and places from the global to

the local (Keeling, 2007, p. 522).

If transport geography continues to publish articles that are both quantitative and

qualitative in orientation, not only will the sub-discipline become even more relevant, but it

will be instrumental in influencing public policy. With 50% of the world’s population now

living in urban centres, the need for establishing sustainable transportation systems has

become more salient than ever before. As shown in this Progress in Human Geography

paper, global climatic change in combination with population growth and urban migration

are driving the transportation research agenda. The alleviation of greenhouse gas emissions

will only occur if cities aggressively invest in public transit systems. Singapore and London

have been successful with achieving sustainable transport systems because of broad social

and political support along with smart technologies such as ERP. The future of

transportation research and transport geography is going to require the integration of

technology and understanding the human condition.

“Although fluctuating oil prices, economic downturns, and other interruptions to the pace of global

development may cause transport demand and supply contractions over short time-frames, the

human need for increased accessibility and mobility at all scales suggest that transportation

geographers have much to analyze over the coming years and decades” (Keeling, 2009, p. 522)

An opportunity is presented in transport geography. Research in this sub-discipline can

significantly influence the way we design our transportation networks and public transit

systems. Transport geographers are beginning to study the human condition as it relates to

transportation, however, this will be an ongoing test as human geography evolves over the

next century. With a history of a strong quantitative orientation, due largely to its

academic connections with civil engineering and economics, it has become more pluralistic

overtime. The quantitative tradition is very strong and the sub-discipline is presented with

an opportunity to integrate with qualitative research. Together, such integration can play a

role shaping the future and relevancy of transport geography.

21

References

Barnes, T.J. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography (4th ed.). In R.J. Johnston et al. Quantitative Revolution. (pp. 664-667). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Barnes, T.J. (2001). Retheorizing Economic Geography: From the Quantitative Revolution to the “Cultural Turn”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3), 546-565.

Black, W.R. (1996). Sustainable Transportation: a US perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(3), 151-159.

Brugmann, J., 2009. Welcome to the Urban Revolution: How Cities are Changing the World. Toronto: The Penguin Group.

Cass, N., Shove, E., Urry, J. (2005). Social Exclusion, Mobility and Access. Sociological Review 2005.

Cunningham, W.P., Cunningham, M.A., Saigo, B.W., Bailey, R., Shrubsole, D. (2005). Environmental Science: A Global Concern (Canadian Edition). Toronto: McGraw-HillRyerson.

Garcia-Palomares, J.C. (2010). Urban sprawl and travel to work: the case of the metropolitan area of Madrid. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 197-213.

Goetz, A.R., Vowles, T.M., Tierney, S. (2009). Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide in TransportGeography. The Professional Geography, 61(3), 323-335.

Hall, D. (2010). Transport geography and new European realities: a critique. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 1-13.

Han, S.S. (2010). Managing motorization in sustainable transport planning: the Singapore experience. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 314-321.

Hay, A.M. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography (4th ed.). In R.J. Johnston et al. Transport Geography. (pp. 855-856). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hawken, P., Lovins, A., Hunter, L. (1999). Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Boston: Little, Brown.

Hodge, G., Gordon, D. (2008). Planning Canadian Communities: An Introduction to the Principles, Practice and Participants (5th Ed), Toronto: Thomson Nelson.

22

Jerram, L. (2007). Congestion Charging, Transport Improvement and Manchester. University of Manchester. Retrieved March 30, 2010 from the World Wide Web:www.unitedcity.co.uk/.../media/08.07.31_Dr_Leif_Jerram_paper.pdf

Johnston R, Gregory D, Pratt G, Watts MJ and Whatmore, S. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th Edition, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kahn, M.E. (2006). Green Cities: Urban Growth and the Environment. Washington D.C:Brookings Institution Press.

Keeling, D.J. (2009). Transportation geography: local challenges, global contexts. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 516-526.

Keeling, D.J. (2007). Transportation geography: new directions on well-worn trails. Progress in Human Geography, 31(2), 217-225.

Lane, B.W. (2010). The relationship between recent gasoline price fluctuations and transit ridership in major US cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 214-221.

Law, R. (1999). Beyond ‘women and transport’: towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 567-588.

Levinson, H.S., Zimmerman, S., Clinger, J., Rutherford, S.C. (2002). Bus Rapid Transit: An Overview. Journal of Public Transportation, 5, 1-29.

Line, T., Chatterjee, K., Lyons, G. (2010). The travel behaviour intentions of young people in the context of climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 238-246.

Loo, B.P.Y., Chow, S.Y. (2006). Sustainable Urban Transportation: Concepts, Policies and Methodologies. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 132(2), 76-79.

Lubow, A. (2007, May 20). Recycle City: The Road to Curitiba. The New York Times. Retrieved March 1, 2009 from the World Wide Web:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/magazine/20Curitiba-t.html?ref=magazine

National Post. (2007, March 17). Happy being in transit. The National Post. Retrieved March 12, 2010 from the World Wide Web:

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/toronto/story.html?id=d15701dc-e605-412c- bccd-fc110fdc1327&k=12122

Painter, J. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography (4th ed.). In R.J. Johnston et al. Critical Human Geography. (pp. 126-128). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

23

Rodrigue, J.P. (2009). What is Transport Geography? Department of Global Studies and Geography, Hofstra University. Retrieved February 19, 2010 from the World Wide Web:http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch1en/conc1en/ch1c1en.html

Spears, J., Kalinowski, T. (2010, March 30). Toronto commuting times worst of 19 major cities. The Toronto Star. Retrieved March 25, 2010 from the World Wide Web:http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/transportation/article/787400--toronto-commuting- times-worst-of-19-major-cities-study-says

Yasmine, F., Larsen, J., El-Geneidy, A. (2010). Examining Travel Distances by Walking and Cycling in Montreal, Canada. School of Urban Planning, McGill University. Retrieved March 1, 2010 from the World Wide Web:http://tram.mcgill.ca/Multimedia/posters/walk_cycle_distance.pdf

24