Upload
gaerwn
View
30
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
UM lab activity. Status report Dec . 7. Hardware progress. We have managed to connect both DRS4 boards to the panel. 4 RO channels and 4 HV channels at the same time. A 4X4 array of pixels is available for measurements – a 2D detector. Same connectors as last week.. Set-Up. C HV =2pf. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Yiftah Silver, Dan Levin 1
UM lab activity
Status report Dec. 7
December 7, 2010
Hardware progress
• We have managed to connect both DRS4 boards to the panel.
• 4 RO channels and 4 HV channels at the same time.
• A 4X4 array of pixels is available for measurements – a 2D detector.
• Same connectors as last week.
Yiftah Silver, Dan Levin 3
Rout=100[Ohm]
11/30/2010
HV
Rq=22MOhm
SnO2
Attenuators: For HV line:20dB &inverter
For RO line 20dB+20dB
Ni
Set-UpCHV=2pf
2 DRS4 boardsDiscrimination threshold:
For RO lines: -0.5VDRS4 trigger
Common trigger – OR on all RO channels
Bkg measurements
• A measurement of hit rate over time was made on one pixel (12X30) with the LabView program and the scope.
• The measurement is of RO line 12 after a (10X attenuator).
• 24 consecutive hit rate measurements were made, each 15 min long – total of 6 hours.
Hit rate over time (12X30)
From the same measurement:Rise time distribution is obtained by subtracting the time of the point 10% of the peak from 90% of the peak, without any fits.
Few hits were at -20V
Measurements on 4X4 array
• A set of measurements were made with the DRS4 boards.
• 3 min measurement of bkg • Followed by a measurement when the
collimated Sr90 is above the 4 center pixels.• Pulse height distributions were made for each
pixel separately at each of the conditions.• “Lego” plots were made for visualization.
Measurements on 4X4 arrayPV1 99%Ar- 1%CF4 700 Torr , 850V
Subtraction of the bkg from the source
The source is clearly seen in the center of the array of pixels
Pulse height distribution 4x4 bkg
X axis – mV (this is after 2 attenuators X10 each)
Shown here are pixels (10,11)X(29,30)
Pulse height distribution 4x4 bkg
X axis – mV (this is after 2 attenuators X10 each)
Shown here are pixels (12,13)X(29,30)
Pulse height distribution 4x4 bkg
X axis – mV (this is after 2 attenuators X10 each)
Shown here are pixels (10,11)X(31,32)
Pulse height distribution 4x4 bkg
X axis – mV (this is after 2 attenuators X10 each)
Shown here are pixels (12,13)X(31,32)
Pulse height distribution 4 center pixel under source
X axis – mV (this is after 2 attenuators X10 each)
Shown here are pixels (12,13)X(31,32)
Bkg hit measurement on 4X4 array
• We used the common trigger for counting the rate on the 16 pixels.
• 60 consecutive measurements were made, each of 15 min (as before) total of 15hours.
• Measurement started at Sat. Dec.3 at 6PM• Connected pixels: RO lines: 10-13
HV lines: 29-32• As before: 850V
Rate over time (16 pixels)
A few hours later, no pulses were seen at 850V at all.When voltage was raized to ~870 a fast rate was observed but coming only from one pixel (10X32)The signal itself was different – lower &slower.
The beginning of the measurement shows the same behavior as the measurement of one pixel, But, Clearly something happened after ~7 hours
A few hours later and @870 V
Summery
• Background needs to be further investigated, after a suck n’ bake we shall replace the current Gas with a new one (still Ar-CF4 at the same pressure and percents) and will try to repeat the hit rate over time experiment.
• it seems that both the pulse height and rise time distributions are very narrow but a better examination is needed because of unexpected peaks.