UNCONFIRMED MINUTES · Web viewA review of the shop floor paperwork identified four examples where shop floor paperwork was not properly filled out. In three of the cases, downstream

COMPOSITES TASK GROUPJANUARY 2007

UNCONFIRMED MINUTES22-26 JANUARY 2007

CROWN PLAZA HOTELREDONDO BEACH, CA

These minutes are not final until confirmed by the Task Group in writing or by vote at a subsequent meeting. Information herein does not constitute a communication or recommendation from the Task Group and shall not be considered as such by any agency.

MONDAY, 22 JANUARY 2007 (CLOSED SESSION)

2.0 CLOSED MEETING

A Closed meeting was held with only Primes attending. Items discussed were Auditor Metrics, results from Auditor Observations, Staff Engineer delegation and actions that need to be taken to become an auditor, Failure Criteria, and review of various audits in Task Group review.

TUESDAY, 23 JANUARY 2007 (OPEN SESSION)

1.0 OPENING COMMENTS

10.1 Call to Order/Quorum Check

The Composites Task Group Meeting was called to order by David Watson at 10:24 p.m. A quorum of qualifying members was established; 13 prime voting members present

10.2 Introductions

Attendee introduced themselves and the companies they represent

10.3 Routing of Attendance List

The attendance list was routed for signatures.

User Members PresentName CompanyOliver Abri Honeywell MexicoMike Bemis Goodrich AerostructuresSharon Bull Rolls Royce plcMark Couey Raytheon AircraftLucia Cutillo Alenia Aeronautica s.p.a.Uta Dietrich AirbusKevin Dowling Spirit AerosystemsChris Duncan Honeywell

Page 1 of 15


Udo Goessler EurocopterOscar Gomez Robio Honeywell MexicoOlivier Goupillon EurocopterSteve Grunshaw BAE Systems (Air Systems)Brett Hemingway BAE Systems (Air Systems)Mark Jackson Vought AircraftJamar Johnson Bell HelicopterBetty Kocsis Honeywell AerospaceEric Le Fort SONACA - BelgiumFrank Lennert The Boeing CompanyLance Loeks The Boeing CompanyClaudia M Gomez Bravo Honeywell MexicoWill Macias Goodrich AerostructuresAndreas Mastorakis GE AviationPatrick McCulloch Honeywell AerospaceAngelina Mendoza Goodrich AerostructuresRick Ouellette BoeingKeith Panuska Lockheed MartinGreg Sayler MD HelicopterArun Sibal Lockheed MartinQaedeer Syed Northrop GrummanDavid Watson Bombardier Inc.Troy Grim Spirit Aerosystem

Other Participants/Members PresentKevin Bidlack Applied Aerospace StructuresPaul Braun CTLCandy Brown CytecJohn Brunet OCM Test LabMeraleen Cain HexcelDoug Campion Applied Aerospace StructuresElmer Cardwell GDATPEric Dirats Dirats LabsJim Ferrel HexcelBrian Gallagher Henkel Corp, Aerospace GroupMiguel A. Gerdel Thermal StructuresNiko Gjaja The M&P LabBrian L. Johnson Royal Plastic Manufacturing Inc.James Kernan CCADDavid Kimber ATK Space SystemsAharon Klipper Israel Aerospace IndKatheen Knecht GKN AerospaceTommie Lakes GKN Aerospace STLVicki Leclerc CFANRichard Lewis CTL AerospaceJune Mason Texas Composites Inc.Brian McCrory Delsen Testing LabsBruce Nyman CFANKrish Patni D & J Engineering, Inc.

Page 2 of 15


Steve Peery CHIBernadette Recio Corpus Christi Army DepotRoy Redmond Hexcel CorpJim Rossi Westmoreland TestingDon Russel Toray CompositesJason Scharf C&D ZodiacDavid Scott Hitco Carbon CompositesAndrew Sinclair Bodycote Testing GroupDavid Thornhill GDATPDavid Tomasitis PTIGreg Wallis PTIMatt Williams Integrated Technologies Inc. (Intec)

PRI Staff PresentRebekah Foutz PRI Staff (Warrendale, PA)

10.4 Review of Agenda

10.4.1 The Staff Engineer (Rebekah Foutz) reviewed the agenda for this Composites Task Group January 2007 Nadcap meeting in Redondo Beach, CA with the task group members present.

10.5 Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes

The minutes from the 16-20 OCTOBER 2006 Composites Task Group Meeting were reviewed. A motion was made for approval of the minutes, seconded, and all were in favor with no disapprovals. Therefore, the minutes were approved as written. All meeting minutes will be available on the Nadcap web site at www.pri-network.org/Nadcap.

3.0 STAFF/AUDITOR REPORT

10.6 Specific items of interest to Composites Task Group included:

10.6.1 A list of Mandating Primes was presented.

10.6.2 Conducted NCSI session hosted by the Boeing Company on 15 January 2007 focusing on suppliers located in the Asian Sector with 77 in attendance

10.6.3 2007 Audit Projections

150 Projected -US = 67 / Europe = 60 / Asia = 23

99 scheduled/conducted – US = 52 / Europe = 25 / Asia = 22

Page 3 of 15

http://www.pri-network.org/Nadcap



66% of plan as of January 2007

10.6.4 Presented the top ten NCR’s (103 audit conducted)

An updated NCR Pareto chart was presented which detailed the most recurring findings to date for Composites audits conducted. The checklist section in which finding was the most prevalent was 11a-g.2.1.

The Parato chart represented 60 initial and 42 reaccreditation audits (1 Failed audit) and found that there was a significant drop between companies going for re-accreditation vs initial accreditation for the most prevalent findings This suggests that most companies are improving from the Nadcap process and are sustaining their corrective actions

An NCR pareto chart, including the specific paragraph verbiage, can be viewed on www.eauditnet.com under Public Documents – Composites.

10.7 Auditor Base Status

10.7.1 The current auditor base status were presented to the Task Group, currently have 5 auditors

10.7.2 ITAR/EAR

10.7.2.1 Of the 99 audits scheduled

- 39 have ITAR/EAR restrictions

- 43 have no ITAR/EAR restrictions

- 17 have not indicated (Assume restriction required)

- 56% of scheduled audits have ITAR restrictions

ACTION ITEM – Rolls Royce to Host Composite NCSI Meeting for Europe Suppliers – Sharon Bull (Due Date: 22 April 2007)

ACTION ITEM – Boeing to host Composite NCSI Meeting for the US suppliers – Lance Loeks (Due Date: 22 April 2007)

11.0 METRICS

PRI presented the following charts regarding Composites Task Group metrics

Number of cycles to close chart - initial audits

- Maximum – 6

- Minimum – 3

- Average – 3.5

- Presented the approach that the task group will take regarding Mode D failures (At 3 cycles, relevant supplier primes will be notified; If 4 cycle response is unacceptable, audit will be submitted to taskgroup

Page 4 of 15

http://www.eauditnet.com/


for Mode D failure vote. This criteria will be added to the NTGOP-001 Appendix 14 and sent for ballot.

- Root cause and corrective action training may also be required for suppliers who exceed cycle time limits. More information will be gathered by PRI in regards to how other Task Groups are managing this requirement.

Number of cycles to close - reaccred audits

- Maximum – 4

- Minimum – 2

- Average – 2.9

Total supplier cycle time - initial audits

- Maximum – 49

- Minimum – 19

- Average – 33.4

Total supplier cycle time - reaccred audits

- Maximum – 39

- Minimum – 9

- Average – 26.8

Staff engineer cycle time - initial audits

- Maximum – 50

- Minimum – 20

- Average – 33.6

Staff engineer cycle time - reaccred audits

- Maximum – 29

- Minimum – 1

- Average – 17.8

Task group cycle time - initial audits

- Maximum – 21

- Minimum – 14

- Average – 17

Task group cycle time - reaccred audits

- Maximum – 17

- Minimum – 0

- Average – 5.1

- This will start to go down now that SE is delegated

Page 5 of 15


Suppliers on merit

- 82% of suppliers that are eligible have attained merit

Prime audit balloting participation

5.0 SUPPLIER SUPPORT COMMITTEE (SSC) REPORT

The Nadcap SSC update was presented by the Composites SSC representative, Miguel Gerdel. This update included the following topics…

- Leadership Teams- Description of how the SSC helps fellow suppliers- Sub Teams and Leaders

o Communication and Mentoring Teamo Metrics Team ( Metrics presented at SSC meetings)o 2007 Supplier Survey Teamo 25 Mile Rule Team (for satellite facilities)

- SSC Issue Topicso Prime Flow down issueso Prime Observer Concernso Need for a Universal Certificate of Conformance

- 5 Meeting Group Approacho SSC members are breaking out into 5 group meetings to

permit more effective covering of different topics

The minutes from the SSC meeting conducted on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 will be available on www.pri-network.org/Nadcap.

12.0 NOP REVIEW

12.1 Procedures such as Nadcap Operating Procedures (NOP) and Nadcap Internal Procedures (NIP) that have been revised or are in the process of being revised since the October 2006 Nadcap meeting were presented. Documents that were reviewed were the NOP-001, NOP-003, NOP-006, NIP 7-03, NOP-007 and NTGOP-001.

In addition to the actions required to be taken per NOP-006, the Composites Task Group also decided that it was a “Best Practice” for the Task Group Primes to post their concerns in eAuditNet under Task Group Discussion next to the relevant NCR.

Page 6 of 15



13.0 AC7118 REV A – AUDIT FEEDBACK

No major comments so far as there has been a limited number of Composite Audits conducted to the AC7118 Rev A since its effective date of 8 January 2007. Further discussion will take place during the April 2007 Nadcap meeting.

14.0 OPEN DISCUSSION - WAYS TO CUT COSTS AND/OR ADD VALUE

The following suggestions were discussed as possible ways to cut costs and/or add value to the Nadcap process.

1. Discussion of eliminating quality system checklist questions- Perception is that auditors need the linkage to the job audits.- Perception is that this only adds one or two hours.- Gather statistics of findings to see if the quality system section 4 in the

AC7118 Rev A has significant number of findings

2. Further reducing the number of job audits.

3. Equipping the auditors with equipment (ie PDA’s) to allow the auditor to process the audit real time.

4. Developing a solid auditor training program/process/procedure – audio/video training.

5. Establishing training colleges where primes and suppliers can attend to learn how to prepare and audit to Nadcap Audit Criteria

6. Provide training to Supplier’s internal auditors.

7. 5 Year Plan

General Ideaso Work on action plans for improving metricso Having fewer meetingso Shorter meetingso Create strategic and tactical plans on where the industry should be

in 5 years Time to raise the bar without adversely affect the ability of

accreditation suppliers to continue to keep accreditation - Meet the Nadcap Minimums =12 month

accreditation

Page 7 of 15


- Consistently Meets the Nadcap Minimums =18 month accreditation

- Exceeds the Nadcap Minimums = 24 month accreditation

8. Improve the quality of the detail that the auditor includes in the NCR write ups to help the Staff Engineer better understand the intent or scope of the finding

ACTION ITEM – Review the quality section of the checklist to identify high level questions that do not add value beyond the scope of AS9100 accreditation – Rick Ouellette. (Due Date: 22 April 2007)

ACTION ITEM – Investigate Para. 3.3.1, compare the NCRs it is referenced in – PRI (Due Date: 22 April 2007)

ACTION ITEM – Circulate suggestions, generated at the 2007 Redondo Beach meeting, to reduce cost and/or add value to task group and have task group members prioritize them for discussion at the April 2007 meeting – PRI (Due Date: 12 FEB 07)

15.0 TRANSLATION OF AC7118 REV A AND AUDITOR HANDBOOK

Request was made for volunteers to help with translation of the AC7118 Rev A and Audit Handbook, HB7118 Rev A-3.

Eric LeFort has volunteered to work with others in the task group to translate AC and HB to French.

Miguel Gerdel has volunteered to work with others in the task group to translate AC and HB to Spanish.

Possible volunteers for Italian (Lucia Cutillo) and German (Udo Goessler).

ACTION ITEM - Request for volunteers to help Eric LeFort with translation of checklist and Audit Handbook into French – PRI (Due Date: 12 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Request for volunteers to help Miguel Gerdel with translation of checklist and Audit Handbook into Spanish – PRI (Due Date: 12 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Investigate other means to do initial translations of the AC7118 and Audit Handbook into other languages for Task Group translation teams to work with - PRI (Due Date: 22 April 07 )

FLOW DOWN TO SUB TIER SUPPLIERS (This item was added to the agenda during the meeting.)

Page 8 of 15


The Composite Task Group Suppliers felt that the presentation from Nadcap Management Council (NMC) on flowdown and the purchasing template proposed by the Chemical Processing Task Group does not address their concerns.

ACTION ITEM: Put together a proposed flow down requirements template for suppliers - See Chemical Processing example Purchase Order – David Tomasitis (lead), Dave Kimber, Brian Johnson, Aharon Klipper (Due: 28 FEB 07)

16.0 ACTION ITEM LIST REPORT OUT

Discussion took place regarding the results of Action Items assigned during the October Nadcap meeting. The status of these Action Items is as follows:

October Action Items #1 – 13 – ClosedOctober Action Items #14 – Open

WEDNESDAY, 24 JANUARY 2007 (OPEN SESSION)

10:45 AM Quorum Recheck - 11 Voting Primes present

PLANNING AND OPS MEETING & NMC MEETING REPORT OUT (This item was added to the agenda during the meeting.)

AC7118 has been translated into Japanese and is on the JAQG website Nadcap meeting schedule was discussed for 2008 and 2009.

The minutes from the Planning and Ops and Nadcap Management Council meetings are available on www.pri-network.org/Nadcap.

ACTION ITEM: Determine what procedure and checklist Nadcap Management Council (NMC) Oversight sub-group is using when they are conducting Auditor oversight audits to determine if the Composites Task Group can use it during Composite specific Auditor oversight audits – PRI (Due Date:28 FEB 07)

10.0 ACTION ITEM LIST REPORT OUT - CONTINUED

Further discussion took place regarding the results of Action Items assigned during the October Nadcap meeting. Action items are posted on www.eauditnet.com under Public Documents – Composites and can also be found attached to the end of this document.

ACTION ITEM – Define what an iron is and describe a process that can be used to satisfy Question 16a-b.2.16 in AC7118 Rev A –Sharon Bull [Lead], June Mason, Dave Kimber, John Riddle ,Kevin Bidlack (Due: 16 March 07)

ACTION ITEM – Send the NTGOP Appendix14 (that includes the January 2007 revisions) to task group for Ballot – PRI (Due: 5 FEB 07)

Page 9 of 15

http://www.eauditnet.com/



ACTION ITEM – Incorporate all resolved handbook clarification agreed to at the January2007 meeting – PRI (Due: 28 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Define acceptable vs unacceptable humidifiers – Francis Averous [Lead], Betty Kocsis, Greg Wallis, June Mason (Due Date: 23 March 07)

ACTION ITEM - Revise Auditor Handbook to put generic text in the general section for material identification and to add specific text where it applies to an individual material type including core protection requirements - Circulate the proposed clarification to Task Group and comments are to be forwarded to Dave Kimber. Discuss final proposal during April meeting. – PRI (Due Date: 2 FEB 07)

11.0 RESOLUTION OF HANDBOOK COMMENTS

Audit Handbook comments were reviewed and resolved. Time did not allow for the completion of comment review. A conference call will be scheduled to finalize the review and resolution of Audit Handbook Comments prior to the April Nadcap meeting.

ACTION ITEM - Schedule a conference call for Primes and Suppliers to finish Audit Handbook discussion. – PRI (Due Date: 12 FEB 07)

12.0 OPEN DISCUSSION

12.1 Redundant audits

Task Group Primes were asked to be a focal point for Supplier’s to contact when they believe they are having customer audits that are redundant with the Nadcap composite audit. This is voluntary and does not imply that every Prime represented on the Task Group will participate.

12.2 Material specification and configuration control

This issue is beyond the scope of this task group and is a Prime/Supplier issue.

12.3 t-frm-11 – Notification of Change/Request for Revised Certification

Proposal for a minor move to maintain current accreditation pending closing of a follow up audit. A motion is made to accept the proposal. Seconded Voted 11 to accept, 2 to reject, 3 abstained.

Minor Move – within 25 miles, management doesn’t change, processes do not change, same equipment is used, a majority of employees are retained, uses the same quality system and the same procedures

12.4 Core Processing

Page 10 of 15


Discussion of defining what is the intended scope of an AC7118 Rev A audit for core processing.

ACTION ITEM - Contact primes not in attendance at the January 2007 meeting to see if they are will to have their suppliers contact them when they believe they are having a customer specific audit that is redundant with Nadcap Composite audit – PRI (Due Date: 12 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Define Scope of core processing audit - Lance Andreas, Mike Bemis Roy Redman [Lead], Miguel Gerdel (Due Date: 16 March 07)

13.0 OPEN DISCUSSION – NEW BUSINESS

This time is set aside to address any new business or discuss further any topics raised by meeting attendees. No new business presented.

14.0 MEETING CLOSE OUT

14.1 Next meeting date and location

The next Nadcap meetings are scheduled for the week of 23-27 April 2007 in Paris, France.

The Composites Task Group will tentatively meet on Monday, 23 April through Wednesday, 25 April 2007. The Non Metallic Materials Testing Sub-Group will tentatively meet on Thursday, 26 April through Friday, 27 April 2007.

The formal agenda will be developed, distributed and will be available on www.pri-network.org. Topics will include addition of clarification to the Audit Handbook, Redundant Audits and Material Specification and Revision and Configuration Control.

ADJOURNMENT – The meeting was adjourned at 5p.m.

THURSDAY, 25 JANUARY 2007 (OPEN SESSION)

Non-Metallic Materials Testing (NMMT) Sub Group

2.0 STAFF/AUDITOR REPORT

2.1 Specific items of interest to NMMT sub-group included:

2.1.1 Pilot Audits

Page 11 of 15

http://www.pri-network.org/


2.1.1.1 The first pilot audit was performed on 3-6 October 2006. Next pilot audit is scheduled for 7-9 March 2007.

2.1.1.2 Looking for a European Supplier to participate in a third pilot audit that will take place no later than May 2007.

2.1.1.3 Anticipate the release of AC7122 in July 2007

2.1.2 Auditor Base Status

2.1.2.1 The current auditor base status was presented. Currently have 2 auditors and 1 auditor trainee.

2.1.3 Prime Mandates

2.1.3.1 Ten Primes have indicated that they will mandate either in 2007 or 2008. A total of 31 Suppliers have been identified to date that will be impacted by the mandates.

ACTION ITEM - Provide feedback regarding participation in Pilot Audit. – Andy Sinclair and Candy Brown (Due Date: 9 FEB 07)

3.0 INTER-LABORATORY PROFICIENCY TESTING

3.1 The first IPT will include tension, compression and Tg by TMA. A statement of work, specimen details and a report spreadsheet were created. Suppliers were contacted via email requesting notification of participation in the IPT.

ACTION ITEM - Generate a proposed IPT compression test spreadsheet and provide to Andreas and PRI. – Uta Dietrich (Due Date: 2 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Generate a proposed IPT TMA (Tg) test spreadsheet and provide to Andreas and PRI. – Brain McCrory (Due 2/2/07)

ACTION ITEM - Provide completed /updated SOW letter including IPT info regarding type of material, specimen configuration, cure cycle and expected failure load to PRI. – Andreas Mastorakis (Due Date: 9 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Send out e-mail asking for IPT participants. Include SOW and test spreadsheets – PRI (Due Date: 9 FEB 07)

4.0 ACTION ITEM REPORT OUT/AUDIT HANDBOOK DEVELOPMENTDiscussion took place regarding the results of Action Items assigned during the October Nadcap meeting. The status of these Action Items is as follows:

October Action Items #1 – 12 – Closed

Page 12 of 15


ACTION ITEM - Report back DMA round robin results to PRI – Candy Brown (Due Date: 20 JAN 07)

ACTION ITEM - Incorporate into the Audit Handbook Niko’s proposal for definitions and requirements for Test Reports and Certifications – PRI (Due Date: 16 FEB 07)

FRIDAY, 26 January 2007 (OPEN SESSION)

5.0 RESOLVE AC7122 BALLOT COMMENTS

Comments received from the ballot of the AC7122, AC7122/1 and AC7122/2 were reviewed and resolved. AC7122 will be split into sections and assigned to teams which will incorporate those sections into the Audit Handbook in addition to identifying what areas of the AC7122 are not reflected in the AC7122/1 and AC7122/2.

ACTION ITEM - Provide EN equivalents (Replacing red XXXXs in AC7122/2 paragraphs 8.3.7, 8.3.9, 8.4.4, 8.4.7, 8.5.5, 8.6.4, 8.6.7, 8.8.5, 8.8.7) to PRI. – Uta Dietrich (Due Date: 16 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - E-mail description of ASTM D 2393 to PRI. Mike Bemis (Due Date: 29 JAN 07)

ACTION ITEM - Send PRI definition of ‘Nadcap recognized’ that details how to determine if a registrar is 'Nadcap recognized' for HB7122/1 para 1.1. – Jim Ferrel (Due Date: 9 April 07)

ACTION ITEM - Contact Rick Ouellette in AQS Task Group to define acceptable methods of signing or signature according to AQS requirements and add to HB7122/2. – PRI (Due Date: 16 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Determine if AC7122/1 paragraphs 2.3 and 7.5 are covered by AC7004. – Frank Lennert (Due Date: 5 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Update tables in AC7122/2 to reflect the changes that were made to the tables in AC7122. – Mike Bemis (Due Date: 2 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM – Clarify selection of ambient and non-ambient job audits to beginning of HB7122/2. – Andreas Mastorakis (Due Date: 9 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Send pictures of fire test cabinets to PRI to incorporate into the AC7122/2. – Lance Loeks (Due Date: 9 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Create necessary Audit Handbook clarification for all paragraphs in AC7122/1. Take information from AC7122 and place it under each question it applies to in the /1. – Andreas Mastorakis (Lead), Candy Brown (Due Date: 9 April 07)

ACTION ITEM - Create necessary Audit Handbook clarification for AC7122/1 sections 1-4. Take information from AC7122 and place it under each question it applies to in the /1. – PRI (Due Date: 9 April 07)

Page 13 of 15


ACTION ITEM - Schedule Conference call for week of 12 February 2007 – PRI (Due Date: 2 FEB 07)

ACTION ITEM - Create necessary Audit Handbook clarification for all job audits related to Mechanical tests, section 5 AC7122/2. Take information from AC7122 and place it under each question it applies to in the /1 and/or /2. – Brett Hemingway (Lead), Paul Braun (Due Date: 9 April 07)

ACTION ITEM - Create necessary Audit Handbook clarification for all job audits related to Physical Tests, section 6 and Chemical Tests, section 7 AC7122/2. Take information from AC7122 and place it under each question it applies to in the /1 and/or /2. – Jim Ferrel (Lead), Don Russell (Due Date: 9 April 07)

ACTION ITEM - Create necessary Audit Handbook clarification for all job audits related to Thermal Tests, section 8 AC7122/2. Take information from AC7122 and place it under each question it applies to in the /1 and/or /2. – Joe Dwyer (Lead), Andrew Sinclair, Olivier Goupillon (Due Date: 9 April 07)

ACTION ITEM - Create necessary Audit Handbook clarification for all job audits related to Fire Tests, section 9 AC7122/2. Take information from AC7122 and place it under each question it applies to in the /1 and/or /2. – Lance Loeks (Lead), Uta Dietrich (Due Date: 9 April 07)

ACTION ITEM - Send results from all action items that require review and discussion to all Task Group members so that comments can be organized prior to the Nadcap meeting. – PRI (Due Date: 13 April 07)

6.0 OPEN DISCUSSION/NEW BUSINESSThis time is set aside to address any new business or discuss further any topics raised by meeting attendees. No new business items were presented.

7.0 MEETING CLOSE-OUT

7.1 Next meeting date and location

The next Nadcap meetings are scheduled for the week of 23-27 April 2007 in Paris, France.

The Composites Task Group will tentatively meet on Monday, 23 April through Wednesday, 25 April 2007. The Non Metallic Materials Testing Sub-Group will tentatively meet on Thursday, 26 April through Friday, 27 April 2007.

The formal agenda will be developed, distributed and will be available on www.pri-network.org. Topics will include addition of clarification to the Auditor Handbook, Redundant Audits and Material Specification and Revision and Configuration Control.

Page 14 of 15

http://www.pri-network.org/


ADJOURNMENT – The meeting was adjourned at 12:00p.m.

8.0 CLOSED MEETINGA Closed meeting was held with only Primes attending. This time was taken to review and resolve the NCRs identified during the first Pilot Audit. Representatives from the audited Supplier were invited and attended this Closed meeting.

ADJOURNMENT – This meeting was adjourned at 5:00p.m.

Minutes Prepared By:Rebekah Foutz [email protected] Bemis [email protected] Kocsis [email protected]

ACTION ITEM LIST

***** For PRI Staff use only: ******

Are procedural/form changes required based on changes/actions approved during this meeting? (select one)

YES* NO

*If yes, the following information is required:

Documents requiring revision:

Who is responsible: Due date:

Page 15 of 15

mailto:[email protected]

