68
Unified Cognitive Science Neurobiology Psychology Computer Science Linguistics Philosophy Social Sciences Experience Take all the Findings and Constraints Seriously

Unified Cognitive Science

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Unified Cognitive Science. Neurobiology Psychology Computer Science Linguistics Philosophy Social Sciences Experience Take all the Findings and Constraints Seriously. What are schemas?. Regularities in our perceptual, motor and cognitive systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Unified Cognitive Science

Unified Cognitive Science

•Neurobiology•Psychology•Computer Science•Linguistics•Philosophy•Social Sciences•Experience

Take all the Findings and Constraints Seriously

Page 2: Unified Cognitive Science

What are schemas?

• Regularities in our perceptual, motor and cognitive systems

• Structure our experiences and interactions with the world.

• May be grounded in a specific cognitive system, but are not situation-specific in their application (can apply to many domains of experience)

Page 3: Unified Cognitive Science

Basis of Image schemas

•Perceptual systems

•Motor routines

•Social Cognition

•Image Schema properties depend on

•Neural circuits

•Interactions with the world

Page 4: Unified Cognitive Science

Spatial schemas•TR/LM relation

•Boundaries, bounded region

•Topological relations

•Orientational Axes

•Proximal/Distal

Page 5: Unified Cognitive Science

Trajector/Landmark Schema

•Roles:

Trajector (TR) – object being located

Landmark (LM) – reference object

TR and LM may share a location (at)

Page 6: Unified Cognitive Science

TR/LM -- asymmetry

•The cup is on the table

•?The table is under the cup.

•The skateboard is next to the post.

•?The post is next to the skateboard.

Page 7: Unified Cognitive Science

Topological Relations

•Separation

Page 8: Unified Cognitive Science

Topological Relations

•Separation

•Contact

Page 9: Unified Cognitive Science

Topological Relations

•Separation

•Contact

•Coincidence:

-Overlap

-Inclusion

Page 10: Unified Cognitive Science

Orientation•Vertical axis -- up/down

up

down

above

belowupright

Page 11: Unified Cognitive Science

OrientationHorizontal plane – Two axes:

Page 12: Unified Cognitive Science

Language and Frames of Reference

•There seem to be three prototypical frames of reference in language (Levinson)

•Intrinsic

•Relative

•Absolute

Page 13: Unified Cognitive Science

Intrinsic frame of reference

frontback

right

left

Page 14: Unified Cognitive Science

Relative frame of reference

frontback

left??

right??

Page 15: Unified Cognitive Science

Absolute frame of reference

north

west

south

east

Page 16: Unified Cognitive Science

semantic schema Containerroles:

interiorexteriorportalboundary

Representing image schemas

Interior

Exterior

Boundary

PortalSource

Path

GoalTrajector

These are abstractions over sensorimotor experiences.

semantic schema Source-Path-Goalroles:

sourcepathgoaltrajector

Page 17: Unified Cognitive Science

Language and Spatial Schemas• People say that they look up to some people, but

look down on others because those we deem worthy of respect are somehow “above” us, and those we deem unworthy are somehow “beneath” us.

• But why does respect run along a vertical axis (or any spatial axis, for that matter)? Much of our language is rich with such spatial talk.

• Concrete actions such as a push or a lift clearly imply a vertical or horizontal motion, but so too can more abstract concepts.

• Metaphors: Arguments can go “back and forth,” and hopes can get “too high.”

Page 18: Unified Cognitive Science

Regier Model Lecture

Jerome A. FeldmanMarch 4, 2008

With help from Matt Gedigian

Page 19: Unified Cognitive Science

Neural Theory of Language

Page 20: Unified Cognitive Science

Language Development in Children

•0-3 mo: prefers sounds in native language

•3-6 mo: imitation of vowel sounds only

•6-8 mo: babbling in consonant-vowel segments

•8-10 mo: word comprehension, starts to lose sensitivity to consonants outside native language

•12-13 mo: word production (naming)

•16-20 mo: word combinations, relational words (verbs, adj.)

•24-36 mo: grammaticization, inflectional morphology

•3 years – adulthood: vocab. growth, sentence-level grammar for discourse purposes

Page 21: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 22: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 23: Unified Cognitive Science

Trajector/Landmark Schema

•Roles:

Trajector (TR) – object being located

Landmark (LM) – reference object

TR and LM may share a location (at)

Page 24: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 25: Unified Cognitive Science

Language and Frames of Reference

•There seem to be three prototypical frames of reference in language (Levinson)

•Intrinsic

•Relative

•Absolute

Page 26: Unified Cognitive Science

English ‘on’1.The computer is on the desk

2.The picture is on the wall

3.The projector is on the ceiling

LM

TR

DN

UP

TR/LM, verticality, contact, support

LM

TR

TR/LM, contact, attaching force

LM

TR

TR/LM, contact, attaching force

Page 27: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 28: Unified Cognitive Science

Image schemas

•Trajector / Landmark (asymmetric)

•The bike is near the house •? The house is near the bike

•Boundary / Bounded Region

• bounded region has a closed boundary•Topological Relations

•Separation, Contact, Overlap, Inclusion, Surround•Orientation

•Vertical (up/down), Horizontal •Absolute (E, S, W, N)

LMTR

bounded region

boundary

Page 29: Unified Cognitive Science

Spatial schemas•TR/LM relation

•Boundaries, bounded region

•Topological relations

•Orientational Axes

•Proximal/Distal

Page 30: Unified Cognitive Science

Regier’s Model

•Training input: configuration of TR/LM and the correct spatial relation term

•Learned behavior: input TR/LM, output spatial relation

Learning System

above below left right in out on off

Input:TR

LMabove

Page 31: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 32: Unified Cognitive Science

Issue #1: Implicit Negatives

• Children usually do not get explicit negatives

• But we won’t know when to stop generalizing if we don’t have negative evidence

• Yet spatial relation terms aren’t entirely mutually exclusive

• The same scene can often be described with two or more spatial relation terms (e.g. above and outside)

• How can we make the learning problem realistic yet learnable?

Page 33: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 34: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 35: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 36: Unified Cognitive Science

Dealing with Implicit Negatives

• Explicit positive for above

• Implicit negatives for below, left, right, etc

• in Regier:

E = ½ ∑i,p (( ti,p – oi,p) * βi,p )2,

where i is the node, p is the pattern,

βi,p = 1 if explicit positive,

βi,p < 1 if implicit negative

Page 37: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 38: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 39: Unified Cognitive Science

above – positive examples

Page 40: Unified Cognitive Science

above – negative examples

Page 41: Unified Cognitive Science

above – after training

Page 42: Unified Cognitive Science

above – test examples

Page 43: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 44: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 45: Unified Cognitive Science

Learning

Systemdynamic relations(e.g. into)

structured connectionistnetwork (based on visual system)

Page 46: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 47: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 48: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 49: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 50: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 51: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 52: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 53: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 54: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 55: Unified Cognitive Science

Issue #2: Shift Invariance

• Backprop cannot handle shift invariance (it cannot generalize from 0011, 0110 to 1100)

• But the cup is on the table whether you see it right in the center or from the corner of your eyes (i.e. in different areas of the retina map)

• What structure can we utilize to make the input shift-invariant?

Page 56: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 57: Unified Cognitive Science

Topological Relations

•Separation

•Contact

•Coincidence:

-Overlap

-Inclusion

-Encircle/surround

Page 58: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 59: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 60: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 61: Unified Cognitive Science
Page 62: Unified Cognitive Science

Limitations

•Scale

•Uniqueness/Plausibility

•Grammar

•Abstract Concepts

•Inference

•Representation

Page 63: Unified Cognitive Science

Demo of the Regier System

•on the English above

Page 64: Unified Cognitive Science

Language and Thought

• We know thought (our cognitive processes) constrains the way we learn and use language

• Does language also influence thought?

• Benjamin Whorf argues yes

• Psycholinguistics experiments have shown that linguistics categories influence thinking even in non-linguistics task

Language

Thought

cognitive processes

Page 65: Unified Cognitive Science

Image schemas

•Trajector / Landmark (asymmetric)•The bike is near the house •? The house is near the bike

•Boundary / Bounded Region •a bounded region has a closed boundary

•Topological Relations•Separation, Contact, Overlap, Inclusion, Surround

•Orientation•Vertical (up/down), Horizontal (left/right, front/back)

•Absolute (E, S, W, N)

LMTR

bounded region

boundary

Page 66: Unified Cognitive Science

More image schemas

•Proximal / Distal•distance from center (near/far)

•Part / Whole•top of the hill, cover of the magazine

•Container•interior, exterior, boundary, portal

•Source-Path-Goal•source, path, goal, trajector

•Force-Dynamics•support, force

S GPTR

Page 67: Unified Cognitive Science

Regier’s Model

•Training input: configuration of TR/LM and the correct spatial relation term

•Learned behavior: input TR/LM, output spatial relation

Learning System

above below left right in out on off

Input:TR

LMabove

Page 68: Unified Cognitive Science

Learning

System

We’ll look at the details next lecture

dynamic relations(e.g. into)

structured connectionistnetwork (based on visual system)