Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IC/99/34
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organizationand
International Atomic Energy Agency
THE ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS
DETERMINISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD IN EGYPT
A. El-SayedDepartment of Earth Sciences, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy,Geological Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
andThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, SAND Group,
Trieste, Italy,
F. VaccariDepartment of Earth Sciences, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
andCNR-GNDT, Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, Rome, Italy
and
G.F. PanzaDepartment of Earth Sciences, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy,
CNR-GNDT, Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, Rome, Italyand
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, SAND Group,Trieste, Italy.
MIRAMARE - TRIESTE
April 1999
Abstract
The regional seismic hazard in Egypt is assessed using a deterministic approach, based
on the computation of synthetic seismograms at a set of grid points located at distances of 0.2°
from each other. The main input for this computation are earthquake sources and structural
models. The earthquake sources are parametrized using focal mechanism, seismogenic areas
and regional seismicity. A number of deep seismic profiles have been used to define the crustal
structures. Similar sets of gravity profiles have been used to define the density of the layers.
The peak displacement (DMAX), peak velocity (VMAX) and design ground acceleration
(DGA) are chosen and plotted to construct the seismic hazard maps. There are similarities
between computed and observed amplitudes of ground motion in terms of their values and
spatial distribution. The results obtained from the deterministic and probabilistic approaches are
comparable. The areas of high seismic hazard level are of great socio-economic importance.
1- Introduction
In Egypt, the population, archaeological sites and sensitive structures are concentrated
within a narrow zone around the Nile valley that occupies onlyl% of the total area of
the country. Nevertheless, both the population and the newly developed areas in this
zone are still growing rapidly.
In general, buildings in Egypt are not designed to resist earthquakes, therefore,
relatively small events can be the source of huge socio-economic disasters. The event
of October 12,1992 is an example of a small but damaging earthquake in Egypt. This
event has magnitude (mb) = 5.4, but still, 554 persons have been killed, about 20,000
people injured and over one billion US$ had been reported as property losses. This is
not the only destructive earthquake in Egypt, but similar events occurred in 778, 1303
and 1847. These earthquakes destroyed parts of big cities, like Cairo and Alexandria
(Ambraseys et al., 1994; El-Sayed, 1996).
The economic and social effects of earthquake disasters can be reduced through a
comprehensive assessment of seismic hazard and ri^k for areas like Egypt. Such a
study leads to increase public awareness, consequently upgrading the existing
buildings and engineering works as well as reliable earthquake resistant design for
new structures. Loss of life and property damage can be substantially reduced by
highly detailed, specific prediction of seismic ground motion and related damage
scenarios. With the knowledge of the geological structure and probable earthquake
source mechanisms, realistic ground motion at all sites of interest can be determined.
Instead of waiting for the earthquakes to occur and to record the ground motion in
Egypt using a dense network, we can map the ground motion by computing complete
synthetic strong motion records and testing their reliability against the available
information (e.g. Panzaet al., 1999a,b).
An attempt to estimate seismic hazard in Egypt using Poisson probabilistic seismicity
model has been done by El-Sayed (1996) after the destructive earthquake of October
12, 1992. The obtained results indicate that the level of seismic hazard is relatively
high in densely populated areas that can affect the socio-economic development of the
country.
The main aims of the present study are (1) to map the possible seismic ground motion
using a deterministic approach, (2) to create a synthetic seismogram database for the
studied area for further investigation, and (3) to compare the results obtained with the
deterministic and the probabilistic approaches.
2- Method
A deterministic approach to estimate the seismic hazard has been developed by Costa
et al. (1992 and 1993) and subsequently applied to several regions of the world (e.g.
Orozov-Stanishkova et al., 1996; Radulian et al., 1999; Alvarez et al., 1999; Aoudia et
al., 1999; Panza et al., 1999a). The procedure uses the available information on the
earth structure parameters, the seismic sources and the level of seismicity of the area
to compute synthetic seismograms. Once calibrated against the available information,
the synthetic seismograms allow us to estimate in a rather realistic way the
engineering parameters needed to assess the seismic hazard, even in those areas where
scarce (or none) historical or instrumental information is available. Moreover, the
method allows us to evaluate the influence of different input parameters on the final
result. The immediate outcome of the procedure are maps showing the distributions of
the peak displacement (DMAX), peak velocity (AMAX) and design ground
acceleration (DGA), over the investigated territory. The details of the technique are
given by Costa et al. (1993) and Panza et al. (1999a). As shown by Aoudia et al.
(1999), the method can directly include information on maximum possible magnitude
based on geological studies.
The deterministic approach followed in the present paper is completely different and
complementary to the probabilistic one as in general proposed. It highlights some
issues largely overlooked in the probabilistic approach: (a) the effect of crustal
properties on attenuation are not neglected, (b) the ground motion parameters are
derived from synthetic time histories and not from over simplified attenuation
"functions"; (c) the resulting maps are in terms of design parameters directly, and do
not require the adoption of probabilistic maps to design ground motion, (d) such maps
address the issue of the deterministic definition of ground motion in a way which
permits generalization to locations where there is little seismic history.
3- Input
The input data needed to compute synthetic seismograms consist of four main
sections: earthquakes catalogue, seismogenic zones, focal mechanisms, and structural
models.
The earthquakes catalogue used in this study has been assembled for the area located
between latitude 20°-35<>N and longitude 22°-38°E for the time period 184 bC-1998.
The temporal distribution of the reported events shows that our catalogue contains
three periods of observations that are represented by the historical (184 bC-1899),
early instrumental (1900-1960) and recent instrumental period (1961-1998).
Ambrasyes et al. (1994) revised the existing historical catalogues for Egypt and
produced a catalogue of historical earthquakes with location and Mf magnitude
(equivalent to Ms) given for most of the events. We use this catalogue for the period
(184 b C - 1899).
For both early and recent instrumental periods, the information has been assembled
from computer files stored at WDC.A, published catalogues, CD products of the ISC
and NEIC (Table 1). The duplicate events were removed after reviewing the various
sources, giving the preference to the sources that included more complete and recent
information.
Different agencies report different magnitudes, i.e., some agencies report ML, others
Ms, m,, Mw, ML or MD (see Table 2). The difference between these values can be as
large as one magnitude unit. Moreover, the same kind of magnitude reported by
different agencies for the same event may differ by 0.5. Consequently, the acritical
compilation of data from different catalogues could be a source of large errors. To
minimize these errors all the compiled data should be homogenized to the same
magnitude. In our case, we have used the duplicates, i.e., the magnitude reported for
the same event by different agencies, to construct linear relations between the
different magnitudes (Table 2). In our compilation, for each earthquake, we give three
magnitudes (mb, Ms and ML), either reported or obtained from other magnitudes. The
largest of them is considered for the calculation of the synthetic seismograms. The
distribution of the collected earthquake epicenters is shown in Figure 1.
Tectonic evidence suggests that the earthquakes in the area are shallow events
concentrated in the crust; and there is nothing in the macroseismic data to indicate the
contrary (Ambraseys et al., 1994). The recent part of the instrumental observation
supports the tectonic evidences and only in areas close to Crete and Cyprus few
earthquakes at intermediate depths are recorded.
The completeness of the catalogue for the two periods of instrumental observation has
been analyzed. The early part of the catalogue is complete up to the events of
magnitude 5.0 and larger, while after 1960's it seems to be complete for the events of
magnitude 3.5 and larger. However, this difference in completeness does not affect
our calculations since in the deterministic procedure we use events of magnitude 5.0
and larger.
The seismogenic zones represent areas that are characterized by a specific level of
seismicity, stress regime and tectonic behavior, which is assumed to be homogeneous
within the zone. A large amount of geologic, tectonic and seismological information
has been analyzed to define these zones.
The primary features of active plate tectonics in the vicinity of Egypt are discussed in
detail by many authors: McKenzie (1970), McKenzie et al. (1970), Neev (1975), Riad
(1977), Ben-Avraham (1978), Ben-Menahem et al. (1976), Garfunkel and Bartov
(1977), Sestini (1984) and Mesherf (1990). There are three major plate boundaries
located near Egypt: the African-Eurasian plate margin, the Levant transform fault, and
the Red Sea plate margin. They separate the African, Eurasian and Arabian plates. A
piece of the African plate, called the Sinai block or subplate, is partially separated
from the African plate by the spread-apart or rifting along the Gulf of Suez
(Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1985). In addition to these plate boundaries, there is a
megashear zone running from southern Turkey to Egypt (Neev, 1975; Kebeasy, 1990)
marked by relatively moderate and scattered seismicity (Fig. 2). The interaction
between the mentioned plate boundaries has created active areas in/and around Egypt.
In general, four major seismogenk zones can be identified in Egypt, namely: (1) Gulf
of Aqaba-Levant zone, (2) Northern Red Sea-Gulf of Suez, (3) Suez-Cairo-
Alexandria fault zone and (4) Eastern Mediterranean-Cairo-Fayoum zone (Kebeasy,
1990; Maamoun and Ibrahim, 1978; Reborto et al., 1992; Mohammed, 1993; El-
Sayed and Wahlstrom, 1996). In addition to these zones, Kebeasy (1990) defined
other local seismic zones, e.g., Gilf El-Keber, Aswan and Qena local source zones (8,
9 and 10 in Fig. 2). Since distant earthquakes have caused considerable damage in
Egypt, three remote seismogenic zones, i. e., Egypt-Mediterranean-Coast, Cyprus and
Crete (5, 6 and 7 in Fig. 2) have been included in this study. Figure 2 shows the major
seismogenic zones used in the present study.
The focal mechanisms database that may describe the geodynamic characteristics of
the seismogenic zones in Egypt is based on the Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT)
catalogue. In total, there are 41 CMT focal mechanism solutions available for the
studied area. CMT solutions are reported only for events with magnitude > 5.0. The
distribution of the earthquake epicenters shows that, in some active areas, the energy
is released through small earthquakes, i.e., M < 5.0, consequently, such areas do not
have any focal mechanism solution in the CMT database. There is a relevant number
of focal mechanism solutions available for earthquakes with magnitude 4.0 - 5.0
(Abo-Elenean, 1993), from which only the events that have a well-constrained focal
mechanism were selected. The focal mechanism database that we have assembled
contains 57 events (Fig. 3 and Table 3).
Egypt is characterized by complicated tectonics. Hence, focal mechanism solutions of
events that occur within the same seismogenic zone are different (Fig 3). With our
approach, it is preferable to choose one representative focal mechanism for each
seismogenic zone (Fig 3, Table 3). The selection of the representative events is based
on the known tectonics of the area as well as on the size of the earthquake. For
example, there are 10 focal mechanisms available for the Gulf of Aqaba-Levant
seismogenic zone, and the focal mechanisms of these events are considerably
different; based on the known tectonics, the mechanism of the largest event of the
November 22, 1995 (Ms=7.3) is chosen as representative for the whole zone.
The regional polygons are the surface boundaries of different structural models that
characterize the lithospheric properties of the studied area. These structural models
are represented by a number of flat layers. The thickness, density, P- and S-wave
phase velocity and quality factor are given for each of these layers.
In the present study, the Egyptian territory is subdivided into five regional polygons
(Fig. 4), that take into account the available tectonic, geological and geophysical
characteristics described by Mesherf (1990) and Said (1990). The thickness of the
earth's crust, the density and the P-wave and S-wave velocity models are taken from
deep seismic sounding and Bouguer anomaly profiles published by the Egyptian
General Petroleum Company (GPC). These data are stored in the Atlas of Geology at
Cornell University, USA (Barazangi et al., 1996). The S-wave velocity is assigned to
be Vp/1.73. The quality factors are taken from Xie and Mitchell (1990). For the
uppermost part of the crust there is a large number of geological wells that are drilled
as deep as 3.5 km (Said, 1981), as well as shallow seismic profiles (El-Gamili, 1982;
Marzouk, 1995 and Mohammed, 1995) that give the details of the upper 300 meters.
These detailed profiles are concentrated in the Nile Delta and Nile valley area. Due to
the lack of specific models, for the upper mantle we have considered a standard
continental model (Harkrider, 1970; Du et al., 1998).
4- Calculations
The calculation of the set of seismograms is made as follows, starting from the basic
knowledge of the seismicity and of the structural models.
4.1- Definition of seismic sources and observation points
The seismic sources used in the computation of the synthetic seismograms are defined
in two steps: (1) discretization of the observed seismicity and (2) smoothing of the
discretized seismicity within the seismogenic zones.
For the discretization of the seismicity the studied area is subdivided into cells (0.2°
by 0.2°). The magnitude of the strongest earthquake occurred within a cell is assigned
to the cell.
The smoothing procedure is applied to account, though in a rough way, for the source
dimension of the largest earthquakes, and for the location errors that may be
particularly severe for historical events (Costa et al., 1993; Panza et al., 1999a). The
seismogenic zctnes are introduced into the procedure as natural boundaries in the
smoothing process. After the smoothing of seismicity, only the sources falling within
the seismogenic zones are taken into account for the computations of synthetic
seismograms.
Each seismic source is represented by one double couple located in the center of each
cell. This source replaces all the events falling within the cell and its strength is
determined according to the maximum magnitude in the cell after smoothing. The
orientation of the double-couple source is determined on the basis of the available
fault plane solutions.
The observation points are placed at a grid with dimension of 0.2° by 0.2° over the
whole studied area. They do not overlap with the sources, because the sources are
placed in the center of each cell falling within the seismogenic zones, whereas, the
observation points are placed at the corners of the grid.
4.2- Ground motion parameters
When the seismicity, the source mechanisms, the structural models and the
observation points are defined, synthetic signals are computed using the modal
summation technique (Panza, 1985; Panza and Suhadolc, 1987; Florsch et al., 1991).
To study the ground motion in Egypt, around 2500 seismic sources are used. The
horizontal P-SV (radial) and SH (transverse) components of motion are computed andi
rotated to the common reference system (NS and EW direction), then their vector sum
is calculated. The total number of seismograms expected for the above configuration
would exceed 32 million. To reduce the computations, the source-receiver distance is
kept below an upper threshold (90 km at most), which depends on magnitude (Costa
et al., 1992; 1993; Panza et al., 1999a). At each observation point all seismograms
generated by different sources are examined and the largest component of ground
motion is selected for further analysis.
The synthetic signals are computed to obtain the peak ground displacement (DMAX),
velocity (VMAX) and acceleration (AMAX) up to a maximum frequency of 1 Hz.
The design ground acceleration (DGA) is obtained through extrapolation using
standard code response spectra. Since there is no building code available for Egypt,
the EC8 for the soil A (European code) is used in this study. The choice of the soil A
is justified by the fact that in all structural models the topmost S-wave velocity is
greater than 0.8 km/sec.
Since we compute complete time series it is possible to consider other parameters,
like Arias (1970) intensity or other'integral quantities (e.g., Uang and Bertero, 1990;
Decanini and Mollaioli, 1998) which are of great interest in seismic engineering.
To estimate the effects of distant earthquakes in Egypt, calculations have been carried
out taking into account only the large events reported in the Gulf of Aqaba, Cyprus
and Crete, and allowing source-receiver distances in the range of 100-1000 km (e.g.
see Fig. 6).
5- Results and Discussion
5.1- Effect of local earthquakes
The spatial distribution of DMAX, VMAX and DGA (Fig. 5), due to sources located
at most at an epicentral distance of 90 km, shows that the highest accelerations are
concentrated in the Nile Delta, Northern Red Sea and its two extensions (Gulf of
Suez-Gulf of Aqaba), and Aswan. For these areas the peak ground acceleration varies
from 0.005g to 0.34g. The results obtained from the probabilistic approach (El-Sayed,
1996) varying from 0.005g to 0.4g are in agreement with the result of the
deterministic approach. Based on the conversion table given by Panza e al. (1999a),
these values correspond to intensities in the range V-XL
In the Nile Delta DGA can be as high as 0.15g, corresponding to intensity in the range
VIH-IX (Panza et al., 1999a), and agrees with the value, 0.2g, obtained by El-Sayed
(1996) using the probabilistic approach. Intensity IX (MSK) has been reported for the
area in 1847 (Sieberg, 1932; Maamoun et al., 1984; Ambraseys et al., 1994). In 1992
an earthquake occurred to the south of the Nile Delta, with epicenter and magnitude
(Table 2) similar to those assigned to the 1847 event (Sieberg, 1932; Maamoun et al.,
1984), nevertheless, the observed intensities for the two events are K (1847) and VI
(1992) (Sieberg, 1932; Maamoun et al., 1984; Helwan Institute of Astronomy and
Geophysics, 1993; Ambraseys et al., 1994). The latter observed intensity value is in
very good agreement with the intensity (VI), calculated using the conversion table
given by Panza et al. (1999a). The large difference between the 1847 and 1992
intensities may be due to: (1) the large uncertainties associated with historical
parameters, i.e., the event of 1847 may have a larger magnitude or can be located
closer to the Nile Delta, (2) the focal depths may be different. For example, if we
assume that the event of 1847 has a magnitude 6.4 (instead of 5.9) and a focal depth
of 8 km (instead of 22 km), the calculated intensity, using the conversion table given
by Panza et al. (1999a), is VIII, a value quite close the reported one. In 1992 the event
has been moderate (mb = 5.4), but caused considerable damage, therefore larger
events in this area could be the source of a huge social disaster.
In the areas of high economic importance (the largest Egyptian oil fields) of the Gulf
of Suez, DGA can be as high as 0.25g (intensity around X). The results obtained by
using the probabilistic method (El-Sayed, 1996) indicate that the maximum expected
intensity and acceleration are X and 0.35g, in satisfactory agreement with the results
of this study. In 1969, an earthquake with magnitude 6.9 occurred in this area,
generating a great quantity of surface lineaments and dislocations implying a MSK
10
intensity of IX-X (Maamoun et al., 1984). At the time of the earthquake, the area was
not populated and there were only few oil wells, located far from the epicenter.
Presently, the area is relatively highly populated and there is a large number of drilled
wells along the Gulf of Suez. Therefore, such intensity could be a source of major
danger today.
In the region of the Aswan High Dam, DGA can be as high as 0.14g (intensity around
VEH). This result agrees well with the value of the probabilistic approach (0.15 g)
given by El-Sayed (1996). For this area the largest reported earthquake has m < 6.
The most recent earthquake is that of November 14, 1981 (mb=5.1). This earthquake
caused considerable damage in Aswan, but obviously did not affect the stability of
the High Dam. '
5.2- Effect of distant earthquakes
Distant earthquakes of magnitude 7.3 and larger can generate in the northern part of
Egypt intensity up to VIE. Such intensity is a source of danger for the poorly
constructed buildings, which are common in the high-populated area of the Nile Delta
(Fig. 6). This is confirmed by both recent and historical observations.
In fact more than half of the earthquakes that affect the Nile Valley and the Delta
originate from epicenters outside Egypt. These are generally large-magnitude
earthquakes in the Hellenic arc or in the Dead Sea system. Recent examples are the
events of March 31, 1969 (Northern Red Sea), November 22, 1995 (Gulf of Aqaba
Ms = 7.3) and October 9, 1996 (southern Cyprus Ms = 7.0). These earthquakes are
felt throughout the Nile Valley with isolated damage at epicentral distances greater
than 300 km (Ambraseys et al., 1994; El-Sayed 1996).
This phenomenon is due to the presence of thick unconsolidated, water saturated
sediments in the Nile graben (El-Sayed, 1996) that, in the case of distant earthquakes,
may allow the generation and propagation of local surface waves (Faeh et al., 1994)
that will affect mainly the taller buildings. Detailed site effect studies are needed to
quantify ground motion amplification in the Nile graben. The existing seismic
11
profiles, geological wells, gravity and magnetic data as well as the seismograms that
will be recorded with the seismic stations recently installed by the Helwan Institute of
Astronomy and Geophysics will help to further carry on this work.
5.3- Comparison between observed and model data
The event of November 22, 1995, which is located in the Gulf of Aqaba, can be used
to compare the observed and the calculated DGA values. This earthquake (Ms =7.3)
has triggered strong motion accelerographs belonging to the Jordanian and Israeli
network at Aqaba and Eliat cities, respectively. A preliminary analysis of the strong
motion records indicates that at the port city of Eliat (a distance of about 90 km from
the epicenter), the peak ground accelerations for the EW, NS and vertical components
are 0.09g, 0.08g and O.llg, respectively. From the Jordanian network, two recorded
values for the horizontal peak ground acceleration at two stations at epicentral
distance of about 96 km1 (one on sandy soil, the other on the rocky soil in Aqaba) is
O.lOg and 0.05g, respectively. There are no recording stations near to the epicenter. In
the city of Nuweiba, located 40 km North of the epicenter, the surveyed damage
suggests that the horizontal peak ground acceleration's in the range 0.16g-0.25g and
the vertical peak ground acceleration is in the range 0.16g-0.20g (Osman, 1996).
These observed values are comparable with the values we calculated for this
earthquake (considering distance and azimuth); in fact we got maximum values of
0.16g and 0.07g and 0.06g at distances of 43 km, 93 km and 96 km, respectively. The
points of the real and calculated
The earthquakes of 1955 (Alexandria offshore), 1969 (Gulf of Suez), 1982 (Aswan)
and 1992 (Cairo) are associated with maximum MSK intensities VIII, IX, VII and VI,
respectively (Maamoun et al, 1984). For these events the ground accelerations
calculated and converted into the corresponding intensity ranges, using the relation
given by Panza et al. (1999a), give VII-VIE, IX-X, V-VI and V-VI, respectively.
In general, the local match between synthetic computations and the few observations
available for the Gulf of Aqaba earthquake encourages the extension of the reliability
of our calculations to the rest of the area, where no surveys or observations are
12
available. Recently, a digital seismic network has been installed in Egypt by the
Helwan Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics and it is presently under testing. As
new data will be available they will be easily incorporated in our hazard maps.
6- Conclusion
The results obtained with the probabilistic and the deterministic approach are in
general very similar. The considerable differences in some areas may be related to the
following factors: the probabilistic methods (1) are very sensitive to the completeness
of the catalogue and (2) are using simple attenuation laws that oversimplify the wave
propagation phenomena.1
Earthquakes that are located within the Egyptian territory can generate ground
acceleration up to 0.15g, 0.25g and 0.35g (VIH-IX, IX-X and X-XI, MSK) in the
highly populated area of the Nile Delta, in the Gulf of Suez and in the Gulf of Aqaba,
respectively. These values are extremely high for the existing built environment and
could cause severe damage and huge socio-economic losses due to the high economic
importance of the areas.
Distant earthquakes, located as far as the Gulf of Aqaba, Cyprus and Crete (300-
800km) can generate ground acceleration up to 0.08g (VIII) in northern Egypt. The
energy in this case is carried by long period surface waves that could be mainly a
source of danger for tall buildings, long bridges and lifelines.
7- Acknowledgements
This work was carried on at the Department of Earth Sciences, Trieste University
(DST-UTS), Italy. Financial support was provided by ICTP, Italy. The first author is
highly indebted to Professors G. Furlan, Head of TRIL program ICTP and Refat EI-
Sherif, Head Geology Department, Mansoura University, for providing an excellent
opportunity to to visit DST-UTS and to produce commendable results for Egypt.
Thanks also to Drs. Marrara, Costa, Aoudia, Vecchies, Peresan, Sarao and all
members of the seismology group of DST-UTS who provided moral support and
rendered their services as and when required. Our thanks also to Professor Ota
Kulhanek, Uppsala University, Sweden, for his encouragement to start this work,
13
ReferencesAbo-Elenean, K.: 1993, Seismotectonics of the Mediterranean region north of Egyptand Libya. M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University.
Arias, A.: 1970, A measure of earthquake intensity. In: R. Haunsen (Editor), SeismicDesign for Nuclear Power Plants. Cambridge, MA, 438-483.
Alvarez, L., Vaccari, F. & Panza, G.F.: 1999, Deterministic seismic zoning of easternCuba. Pure and Applied Geophysics. In press.
Ambraseys, N.N., Melville, C.P. & Adam, R. D.: 1994, The seismicity of Egypt,Arabia and the Red Sea a historical review. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Aoudia, A., Vaccari, F., Suhadolc, P. & Meghraoui, M.: 1999, Seismogenic potentialand earthquake hazard assessment in the Tell Atlas of Algeria. Submitted to Journalof Seismology.
Barazangi, M., Fielding, E.J., Isacks, B. & Seber, D.: 1996, Geophysical andgeological databases and CTBT monitoring; A case study of the Middle East, In E.S.Husebye and A.M. Dainty (Editor), Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 197-224.
Ben-Avraham, Z.: 1978, The structure and tectonic setting of the Levant continentalmargin, eastern Mediterranean. Tectonophysics, 46: 313-331.
Ben-Menahem, A., Nur, A. & Vered, M.: 1976, Tectonics, seismcity, and structure ofthe afro-Eurasian junction - the breaking of an incoherent plate: Physics of the Earthand Planetary Interiors, 12: 1-50.
Costa, G., Panza, G.F., Suhadolc, P. & Vaccari, F.: 1992, Zoning of the Italian regionwith synthetic seismograms computed with known structural and source information,Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid,435-438.
Costa, G., Panza, G.F., Suhadolc, P. & Vaccari, F.: 1993, Zoning of the Italianterritory in terms of expected peak ground acceleration derived from completesynthetic seismograms. J. Applied Geophys., 30: 149-160.
Decanini, L.D. & Mollaioli, F.: 1998, Formulation of elastic earthquake input energyspectra. Earthquake Engineering and structural Dynamics, 27: 1503-1522.
Du, Z.J., Michelini, A., & Panza, G.F.: 1998, EurlD: a regionalized 3-D seismologicalmodel of Europe. Phys. of Earth and Planet. Int., 105: 31-62.
El-Gamili, M.: 1982, A geophysical interpretation of a part of the Nile Valley, Egyptbased on gravity data. J. Geol. Special Vol. part 2: 101-120.
1.4
El-Sayed, A.: 1996, Seismic Hazard of Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, SeismologicalDepartment Uppsala University, Sweden.
El-Sayed, A. & Wahlstrb'm, R.: 1996, Distribution of the energy release, b-value andseismic risk in Egypt. Natural Hazards, 13: 133-150.
Faeh, D., Suhadolc, P., Mueller, St. & Panza, G.F.: 1994, A hybrid method for theestimation of ground motion in sedimentary basins: quantitative modeling for MexicoCity. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84: 383-399.
Florsch, N,, Faeh, D., Suhadolc, P. & Panza, G. F.: 1991, Complete syntheticseismograms for high-frequency multimodal SH waves. Pure and AppliedGeophysics, 136: 529-560.
Garfunkel, Z. & Bartov, Y.: 1977, The tectonics of the Suez rift. Bull. Geol. Surv.Israel, 71: 1-44.
Harkrider, D.: 1970, Surface waves in multilayered elastic media. Part II. Highermode spectra and spectral ratios from point source in plane layered earth models,Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 60: 1937-1987.
Helwan Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics: 1993, The final report on the detailedstudies around Dahsour earthquake 12 October 1992. Seismological Department,internal report.
Huang, P.Y. & Solomon, S.C.: 1987, Centroid depth and mechanisms of Mid OceanRidge earthquakes in the Indian Ocean. Gulf of Aden and Red Sea. J. Geophys. Res.,92: 1361-1382.
Kebeasy, R.M.: 1990, Seismicity. In R. Said (Editor), The Geology of Egypt. A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 51-59.
Maamoun, M. & Ibrahim, E.M.: 1978, Tectonic activity in Egypt as indicated byearthquakes. Bull, of HIAG. No. 170.
Maamoun, M., Megahed, A. & Allam, A.: 1984, Seismicity of Egypt. Bull of HIAG,4B: 109-160.
Marzouk, I.: 1995, Engineering seismological studies for foundation rock for El-GizaProvince. NRIAG Bull., 11: 265-296.
Mesherf, W. M.: 1990, Tectonic. In R. Said (Editor), The Geology of Egypt. A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 113-155.
McKenzie, D.: 1970, Plate tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Nature, 326: 239-243.
15
McKenzie, D., Davies, D. & Molnar, P.: 1970, Plate tectonics of the Red Sea and eastAfrica. Nature, 226: 243-248.
Mohammed, A. :1993, Seismic Microzoning study and its applications in Egypt.Ph.D. Theses, Ain Shams Univ., Egypt.
Mohammed, A.: 1995, Seismic response analysis of the foundation area of the 12October 1992 earthquake determined from seismic refraction technique. NRIAGBull., 11:297-328.
Neev, D.: 1975, Tectonic evolution of the Middle East and Levantine basin (easternmost Mediterranean). Geology, 3: 683-686.
Orozova-Stanishkova,I.M., Costa, G., Vaccari, F., & Suhadolc, P.:1996, Estimates of1 Hz maximum acceleration in Bulgaria for seismic risk reduction purposes,Tectonophysics, 258: 263-274.
Osman, A. & Ghobarah, A.: 1996, The Aqaba earthquake of November 22, 1995.EERI special earthquake report.
Panza, G.F.: 1985, Synthetic seismograms: The Rayleigh waves model summation.J.Geophys., 58: 125-145.
Panza, G.F. & Suhadolc, P.: 1987, Complete strong motion synthetics. In : B.A. Bolt(editor), Seismic Strong Motion Synthetics. Computational Tecniques 4 . AcademicPress, Orlando, 153-204.
Panza, G.F. Vaccari, F., & Cazzaro, R.: 1999a, Deterministic seismic hazardassessment. F. Wenzel et al. (eds.), Vrancea Earthquakes: Tectonic and RiskMitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 269-286.
Panza, G.F., Vaccari, R, & Romanelli, F.: 1999b, IGCP project 414: realisticmodeling of seismic input for megacities and large urban areas. Episodes, Vol.22, no.1.
Poirier, J.P. and Taher, M.: 1980, Historical Seismicity in the near and Middle EastNorth Africa and Spain from Arabic documents (Vllth-XVIIth Century). Bull. Seism.Soc. Am., 70: 185-201.
Radulian, M., Vaccari, F., Mandrescu, N., Panza, G.F. & Moldoveanu, C.L.: 1999,Seismic hazard of Romania deterministic approach. Submitted to Pure and AppliedGeophysics.
Reborto, P., Paolo, L, & Dimitris, D.: 1992, Seismotectonic regionalization of the RedSea area and its application to seismic risk analysis. Natural Hazard, 5: 233-247.
16
Riad, S.: 1977, Shear zones in north Egypt interpreted from gravity data. Geophys.,42: 12074214.
Said, R.: 1981, The River Nile. Springer Verlag, New York, USA.
Said, R.: 1990, The Geology of Egypt. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, TheNetherlands.
Sestini, G.: 1984, Tectonic and sedimentary history of NE African margin(Egypt/Libya). In J. E. Dixon and A. F. Robertson eds. The geological evaluation ofthe eastern Mediterranean. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK, 161-175.
Sieberg, A.: 1932, Erdbebengeographie. Handbuch der Geophysik, Band IV,Abschnitt VI, Berlin, Germany.
Uang, CM. & Bertero, V.V.: 1990, Evaluation of seismic energy in structures.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19: 77-90.
Woodward-Clyde Consultants: 1985, Earthquake activity and Dam stabilityevaluations for the Aswan High Dam, Egypt. Aswan High Dam authority, Ministry ofIrrigation, Egypt.
Xie, J. & Mitchell, B.J.: 1990, A back-projection method for imaging large-scalelateral variations of Lg coda Q with application to continental Africa. Geophys. J. Int.,100: 161-181.
17
Table 1. Catalogues used as sources in this study.
Source Catalogue
Ambraseys et al. (1994)
Poirier and Taher (1980)
European-Mediterranean Seismological Center
Gutenberg and Richter (Seismicity of the Earth)
International Seismological Bulletin data base
The Seismological bulletin of Israel
Preliminary Determination of Epicenters
International Seismological Summaries
Seismicity of Egypt (Maamoun et al., 1984)
Earthquake data file of the Mediterranean and
surrounding area
Covered
period
742-1981
528-1160
1902-1985
1904-1952
1964-1996
1907-1993
1869-1995
1913-1963
1900-1984
1901-1975
Number of
events
250
21
228
24
9893
4031
1611
110
216
236
18
Table 2. Relationships between magnitude determined by different agencies. IPRG =
seismological bulletin of Israel, ISC = International Seismological Center, PDE =
Preliminary Determination Epicenters, ATH = Athens, HLW = Helwan, EMSC =
European Mediterranean Seismological Center, MED = Mediterranean, mb = body
wave magnitude, ML = local magnitude, MD = duration magnitude and Ms =surface
wave magnitude.
Equation
ML(n>RG) = (1-02 0.29) + (0.74 0.07) ir^ ( i S Q
mb(PDE) = (0.43 0.08) + (0.91 0.02) ir^ (ISC)
ML(ATH) = (1-12 0.35) + (0.72 O.O^m^isC)
MD(HLW) = (1-97 0.27) + (0.55 0.07) mb (ISC) :
nyEMSC) = (0-73 0.20) + (0.73 0.05) mb (ISC)
Ms(EMSC) = (l-83 0.28)+ (0.60 0.06)mb(iSC)
ML(EMSC) = (0.96 0.20) + (0.98 0.04) mb (ISC)
MS(MED) = (0.89 0.20) + (0.79 0.04) mb (ISC)
ML(HLW) = (0.08 0.10)+ (1.01 0.02)mb(iSQ
Number of event used
127
460
34
23
125
51
29
139
Maamounet al., 1984
L9
Table 3. Events shown in Fig 6 and their focal mechanism parameters. Columns (1)Event number, (2) date, (3) origin time, (4) latitude (°N), (5) longitude (°E), (6) depth(km), (7) body wave magnitude, (8) strike, (9) dip, (10) slip in degrees and (11)bibliographical source of the solution: CMT, ABU and HU denote the HarvardCentroid Moment Tensor catalogue, Abo- Elenean (1993) and Huang and Solomon(1987), respectively.
11234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
1955 09 121969 03 311972 06 281974 04 291977 09 111978 03 071978 12 091979 04 231979 05 151979 06 151981 09 131981 11041982 09 171983 01 031983 03 191984 03 201984 07 021984 08 241984 08 241985 07 221985 09 271986 05 221986 10 021987 01 021987 04 091987 06 281988 06 051988 09 051989 03 171989 03 281989 06 141989 08 271990 07 091991 03 191991 10 051992 10 121992 10 201992 10 27
306 09 2407 15 5409 49 3520 04 3923 19 2722 33 4907 12 5613 015506 59 221134 1423 25 2509 05 3422 22 2900 12 2421 41 4921 36 060147 0906 02 2506 29 042132 3516 39 4819 52 2110 12 4610 144603 00 0400 50 2018 26 5820 03 3605 42 5313 29 1418 06 400121 171122 1412 09 2718 48 2613 09 5901 57 5809 44 46
432.2027.6127.7030.5234.5134.1924.000.5434.3834.8234.5623.8833.7033.9734.7530.1825.8632.8832.3834.1634.0534.1234.6530.4632.3932.5527.9834.5134.5134.0634.3034.2534.4534.6029.5229.7428.5128.84
529.6033.9133.8031.7222.9925.4526.4035.5924.8024.4225.1332.3822.9023.8924.8932.1033.8534.9134.8128.4026.9426.7229.1632.2228.9724.4933.7326.6525.5324.6826.1026.2826.2426.1332.5830.6333.1633.11
633.06.06.033.036.842.06.515.015.033.015.015.023.4102.065.010.010.039.028.015.043.833.215.020.010.015.017.015.017.055.915.015.033.015.031.022.010.010.0
76.16.15.94.85.85.45.35.15.65.64.85.16.05.45.64.75.15.15.05.45.55.15.35.04.65.24.54.94.85.45.15.05.15.44.35.93.83.4
8 9 10 1134 36 10 ABU294 37 -18 HU288 40 -103 HU78 8574225241
-176 ABU28 10014 40
197 40 -4172 4 -20216 11 10256 65 -11146 72 -15
34 9336 7039
134 56 048 -34
1324
67135 76227 37
37 -53-13
99136 80186 36 -30326 40 -7256 49 -80
5510
223 19 33
CMTCMT
58 150 ABUCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTABU
21930358 39 13127 75 154281 45 -110 CMT54 51 151 ABU
CMTCMTCMTCMTCMTABUABUCMTABUCMT15 55 -11
77 10 -118 CMT67 53 29 CMT102 8 -68 CMT
CMT129 27 -106 CMT245 36 -33 CMT283 50 -132 ABU136 42 -75 CMT275261
6348
122 ABU-170 ABU
20
39404142434445464748495051525354555657
1992199319931993199419951995199519951995199519951996199619961996199619961997
10030808090509111111121202101010111201
27220303282908222223071021091010272013
1102110312 4316 3309 3804 5812 1304 1522 1618 07180103 2704 5913 1001 1004 5400 4407 2110 19
44501423373722265726015256592451252028
28.8534.7428.6228.3630.6534.8929.4929.0728.3229.3134.7934.3729.0334.5034.5834.7534.4727.7534.09
33.1234.4134.4034.0832.8032.6332.2634.7334.2134.4824.1523.3734.3732.0931.3432.0332.0333.0431.74
19.015.015.015.023.015.013.018.415.015.015.021.015.023.019.033.032.624.033.0
3.95.36.05.73.85.34.26.25.05.35.25.05.16.45.44.95.04.45.3
312343139142270224117196202199319289132481391476212397
4627361349208559677762230775362486576
-117133-122-123-140132-6-15-3712375-104170124-168-6311
ABUCMTCMTCMTABUCMTABUCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTCMTABUCMT
21
Figure Captions
Figure 1. Distribution of earthquake epicenters in the studied area for the time period1900 - 1998.
Figure 2. Distribution of earthquakes and seismogenic zones in Egypt and its vicinity(modified from Kebeasy, 1990). Numbers identify seismogenic zones mentioned inthe text.
Figure 3. (a) Focal mechanism solutions available for the studied area. The numbersin the figure are the same as in Table (3). The size of each beach ball is proportionalto the size of the earthquake, (b) Representative focal mechanism for each seismiczone.
Figure 4. (a) Regional polygons used in this study, (b) Crustal models considered foreach polygon.
Figure 5. Distribution of the computed (a) ground displacement, DMAX, (b) groundvelocity, VMAX, and (c) design ground acceleration, DGA. Both DMAX and VMAXare calculated for frequencies up to lHz.
Figure 6. Map of design ground acceleration distribution computed for the event of1996, in the Gulf of Aqaba and examples of the ground motion traces. Seismogramsare computed up to frequencies of lHz. The peak value of ground motion parametersis given above §ach trace, d = distance in km and Az = azimuth in degrees.
22
* + +• + #
Magnitude<5.0
O 5.0-5.4A 5.5-5.9# 6.0-6.4
6.5-6.97.0-7.4
Figure (1)
23
Magnitude+ <5.0
O 5.0-5.4A 5.5-5.9# 6.0-6.4
6.5-6.97.0-7.4
25° 35°
Figure (2)
24
35°
Figure (3a)
25
Figure (3b)
26
Crete Cyprus
Mediterranean Sea
Figure (4a)
27
0 2
0 10
10
•3 20
30
40
0 500 1000 1500
40
3 4
1 .
0
10
20
30
40
0 2 4 6 8
1 •
. 1 . . .
0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8V
10
20
30
40
1 •-
n .. :
IV0 1 2 3 4 0 2 4 6 8
0
0 I 2 3 4, 0 2 4 60
1•£
Q
30
20
30
40
•
•
0
10
20
30
40
0
10
20
30
40
0
10
20
30
40
n) )
•
0 500 1000 1500
L
0 500 1000 1500
L L_j
•
0 500 1000 15000
10
20
30
40
• 1 1
0 500 1000 15000
10
20
30
40
L
Qp
Qs
•
Density (g/cm3) Velocity (km/s) Q
Figure (4b)
28
Mediterranean Sea
0.5-1.01.0-2.02.0-3.53.5-7.07.0-13.4
25 30°
Figure (5a)
VMAX(cm)• 0.0-0.5
0.5-1.01.0-2.02.0-4.04.0-8.08.0-15.015.0-30.030.0-36.0
Figure (5b)
30
DGA(cm/s2). 0.000-0.005+ 0.005-0.0ld
0.010-0.02(jv 0.020-0.04Cf
0.040-0.0800.080-0.1500.150-0.300)
«. 0.300-0.338
0 +OOQO +
QOOOO+OOOOOO++OOOOO+
•j-foooo+t
Figure (5c)
31
= 657km = 469km = 290° d = 30Okm
liill/iAvV^v™^—^^-
1.56 (cm/s)
2.11 (cm/s1)
0 100 200 \ 300Time (s)
0/ 100 200 300Time (s)
0 100 200 / 300Time fs)
0.82 (cm/s)W*H
1.59 (cm/s1) 2.13 (cm/s:)
0 100 200 300Time (s)
z = 22T d = 395km
0 100 200 300Time (s)
z = 204° d = 388km
2.11 (cm/s)
0.92 (cm/s)
1.38 (cm/s1)
0 100 200 3001 line (s)
Az=188" d = 414km
Figure (6)
32