Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
U.S Department of Justice
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
United States
Attorneys Bulletin
Published by
Executive Office for United States Attorneys Washington D.C
For the use of all U.S Department of Justice Attorneys
____William Tyson Director
EXECUTIVE EditorinChief Susan Nellor FTS 6334024UNITED Editor Judith Campbell FTS 6736348STATESATTORNEYS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
COENDATIONS 279
CLEARINGHOUSESpeedy Trial Act 281
POINTS TO REMEMBERInternal Revenue Service Project 719...................... 282
JURIS Data Base List...................................... 282
Personnel 282
Teletypes to All United States Attorneys.................. 282
CAS ENOTESOFFICEOFTHESOLICITORGENERAL........................... 283
CIVIL DIVISION............................................ 284
CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION..... 289
APPENDIX..... 291
VOL 33 NO 10 THIRTYSECOND YEAR May 24 1985
Please send cnange ot address to Editor United States AttorneysBulletin Room 1629 Main Justice Building 10th Pensylvania AvenueN.W Washington D.C 20530
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 279
COMMENDATIONS
Assistant United States Attorneys TATE CHAMBERS and
GREGORY HARRIS Central District of Illinois were commended byMr L.W Wiggs InspectorinCharge United States Postal Servicefor their enthusiasm and professionalism in the successful prosecution of United States Bileck
Assistant United States Attorney ANTHONY COCHRAN Northern
District of Georgia was commended by Mr Craig DonsantoDirector Election Crimes Branch Public Integrity SectionCriminal Division Department of Justice for his exemplary workin United States Brown
Assistant United States Attorney CHARLES CRANDALLSouthern District of California was commended by Mr Gerald
Hillier District Manager Bureau of Land Management CaliforniaDesert District Department of Interior for his successful prosecution of very important precedent setting case involving the
first cOnviction under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976
Assistant United States Attorney ROBERT CYNKAR EasternDistrict of Virginia was commended by Mr John Lawn ActingAdministrator Drug Enforcement Administration for his outstanding performance in bringing notorious Class herointrafficker and his chief lieutenant to justice
Assistant United States Attorney MYLES EASTWOOD NorthernDistrict of Georgia was commended by Mr Robert Serino DeputyChief Counsel Comptroller of the Currency for his generous and
valuable assistance in connection with several subpoena enforcement cases
Assistant United States Attorneys JOHN FISHER andRICHARD LETTS Southern District of Ohio were commended byMr David Ripa Special Agent in Charge United States CustomsService Department of Treasury for their excellent efforts in
prosecuting Columbus Auto Parts Company
Assistant United States Attorney CHARLES GORDER JRSouthern District of California was commended by Mr GaryPenrith Special Agent in Charge Federal Bureau of Investigationfor his exceptional presentation in the Matranga/Polizzi case
Assistant United States Attorney SHERRY HERRGOTT Districtof Arizona was commended by Mr William Webster DirectorFederal Bureau of Investigation for her outstanding efforts in
the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force investigation of
the Dirty Dozen Motorcycle Gang
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 280
Assistant United States Attorney JOHN HOUSTON SouthernDistrict of California was commended by Mr Gerald HillierDistrict Manager Bureau of Land Management California DesertDistrict Department of Interior for his work in the successfulprosecution and conviction of Evert Scott
Assistant United States Attorney PAUL KANTER CentralDistrict of Illinois was commended by Mr Paul Dollins Chiefof Police University Police Department University of Illinois at
UrbanaChampaign for his successful prosecution of RobertKindred
Assistant United States Attorney RICHARD LETTS SouthernDistrict of Ohio was commended by Mr Lary Clendinen ResidentAgent in Charge Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Departrnent of Treasury for his guidance and dedicated assistance in the
trial of John Rice
Assistant United States Attorney SHARON LOVELACE NorthernDistrict of Alabama was commended by Mr Harold Hughes DeputyGeneral Counsel United States Postal Service for her success in
obtaining dismissal in Downing United States Postal Service
Assistant United States Attorney HARRY MCCARTHY WesternDistrict of Washington was commended by Mr Paul AdamsInspector GeneralDesignate Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment for his work in the successful prosecution of
principals of NAN Partners
Assistant United States Attorney DONALD MOROZ NorthernDistrict of Indiana was commended by Mr Paul Adams InspectorGeneralDesignate Department of Housing and Urban Developmentfor his dedication and assistance in the prosecution of sevenindividual beneficiaries of the Housing Allowance Program
Assistant United States Attorney STUART NEWBERGERDistrict of Columbia was commended by Ms Joan ClarkAssistant Secretary for Consular Affairs Department of State for
exceptional professional support and dedication in Kline El
Salvador
Assistant United States Attorney STEPHEN SHEFLERNorthern District of California was commended by Mr T.DKeating Commanding Officer Naval Legal Service Office San
Francisco California Department of the Navy for his work in
concluding Medical Care Recovery Act case
Assistant United States Attorney EVAN SLAVITT District of
Massachusetts was presented an Outstanding Contribution Award bythe Boston Field Division Drug Enforcement Administration for
his success in obtaining the arrest and conviction of two Classviolators and $75000 fine from the Daly Drug Company
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 281
Assistant United States Attorney ERIC SWENSON NorthernDistrict of California was commended by Mr John WynesRegional Inspector General for Investigations General ServicesAdministration for his support and assistance in the prosecutionof Federal Protective Officer for abusing his position by makingimproper use of government funds
Assistant United States Attorney ROBERT WEIDNER Districtof Arizona was commended by Mr Larry Hultquist VicePresident Legal Division Farm Credit Banks of Sacramento for
his success in obtaining grand jury indictment of Martha BondDuncan
CLEARINGHOUSE
peedy Trial Act Administrative Office of the United StatesCourts Amended Guidelines and Southern District of Florida
Monograph Available
Two recent publications regarding judicial construction and
implementation of the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974as amended are available upon request from the Office of LegalServices
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts hasissued amended Guidelines to the Administration of the SpeedyTrial Act of 1974 which replace the December 1979 revision withamendments through October 1984
The Appellate Division of the United States AttorneysOffi-cefor the Southern District of Florida has prepared monograph onthe Speedy Trial Act 18 U.S.C 3161 et seq which surveys casesfrom all circuits and is designed to- help line assistants deal
with the practical problems of administering the Act The UnitedStates Attorneys office for the Southern District of Floridaintends to revise and update the monograph as necessary
Please contact Ms Susan Nellor Director Office of LegalServices at FTS 6334024 to request copies of either publication Please request item.number CH14 for the Guidelines and
item number CH15 for the monograph
Executive Office
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 282
POINTS TO REMEMBER
Internal Revenue Service Project 719
In an attempt to assist United States Attorneys in collectingvarious debts and judgments the Civil Division participates in
Internal Revenue Service Project 719 proqram which usesInternal Revenue Service computerized records to provide currentaddress information upon specific request
To participate in the program the requesting office mustsend to the Civil Division two items the debtors name and
the debtors Social Security number If the Social Securitynumber is not provided it is impossible for the request to beforwarded to the Internal Revenue Service
If the debtor has filed federal income tax return withinthree years the Internal Revenue computer will automaticallyprint an IBM card with the Street and city address reported by thedebtor on the tax return and send it to the Civil Division Ifthe debtor failed to file tax return within three years the IBM
card will read no record All of the IBM cards are forwardedto the United States Attorney making the request
IRS Project 719 is also used by the Criminal Division and is
specifically discussed at USAM 9120.210
Civil Division
JURIS Data Base List
Appended to this issue of the Bulletin is the most recentrevised JLJRIS Data Base Listing dated May 1985
Justice Management Division
Personnel
Effective April 29 1985 Anton Roland Valukus was court
appointed United States Attorney for the Northern District ofIllinois
Executive Office
Teletypes to All United States Attorneys
listing of recent teletypes sent by the Executive Officeis appended to this Bulletin If United States Attorneysoffice has not received one or more of these teletypes copies maybe obtained by contacting Ms Theresa Bertucci Chief of the
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 283
Communications Center Executive Office for United States Attorneys at FTS 6331020
Executive Office
CAS ENOTES
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL
The Solicitor General has authorized the filing of
brief as amicus curiae in support of the petitioner in
Maine Moulton Ct No 84786 The issue is whether the
Sixth Amendment prohibits the use at trial of postindictmentstatements made by defendant to codefendant who was actingas an informant when the contact was initiated by the defendantand the investigation pertained not to the underlying crime but
to threats made by the defendant against the informant and other
prospective government witnesses
petition for writ of certiorari in Turnbo BurrusNo 831951 9th Cir Sept 25 1984 rehearing denied Jan1985 The issues are Whether the courts of sending state
in this case the federal government have jurisdiction under the
Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act to enjoin the transfer of
prisoner to receiving state for trial there and Whetherthe antishuttling provisions of the Act are violated whenprisoner is returned to the sending state after dismissal of the
indictment in the receiving state
jurisdictional statement in Department of the TreasuryGalioto No 842045 D.N.J Feb 1985 The issue is whether
former mental patients constitutional rights are violated byfederal statutory provisions which prohibit persons with historyof mental illness from owning guns and which provide no opportunity for removing such disability in individual cases
petition for .a writ of certiorari in ICC State of Texas749 F.2d 1144 5th Cir 1985 The issue as in ICC TnStateMotor Transit Co petition filed Mar 25 1985Ts whether the
Hobbs Act bars party from relitigating the validity of an agencyrule after the rule has been upheld by another court of appealsand the statutory 60day period for seeking judicial review has
expired
brief as amicus curiae in support of respondents in
Midlaritic National Bank New Jersey Dept of EnvironmentalProtection Ct No 84801 and ONeill City of New York
Ct No 84805 The issue is whether trustee in bankruptcymust comply with state laws regulating the disposal of
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 284
hazardous wastes when exercising his power under Section 554 of
the Bankruptcy Code to abandon property that is financial burdento the bankrupt estate
CIVIL DIVISION
D.C CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD.IS NOTREQUIRED TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL PRIVATE OFFICES FOR LABORAND MANAGEMENT MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
The National Railroad Adjustment Board NRAB consists of 17
labor and 17 manaqement members who are paid by their sponsorsTogether with neutral referees paid by the government they sit
in panels of three to decide contractual disputes in the industryEver since the Board was created about 50 years ago it has
provided headquarters in Chicago at qovernment expense includingindividual private offices for the labor and management membersIn 1983 however in order to provide more money for hirinqneutral referees needed to resolve pending cases the NationalMediation Board which supervises the NRABs budget decided to
eliminate the private offices for Board members This decisionwas challenged by the organization representing the labor unionsthe unions were supported by the management organization as amicuscuriae The district court held that the controlling statutes did
not mandate individual private offices and the D.C Circuit has
now affirmed that holding
Railway Labor Executives Association National MediationBoard ____F.2d ____
No 845160 D.C Cir Apr .1985145101921
Attorneys Robert Greenspan Civil Division FTS6335428 Marc Richman Civil Division FTS 6335735
D.C CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT NATIONAL BANKS CAN ACQUIREBROKERAGE FIRMS BUT THAT THE BROKERAGE OFFICES BECOMEBRANCH BANKS SUBJECT TO STATE LAW RESTRICTIONS
In Securities Industry Assn Board of Governors 104 S.Ct3003 1984 the Supreme Court held that bank holding companiescould acquire discount brokerage firms In the present case the
Comptroller of the Currency authorized two national banks to
acquire brokerage firm or to provide brokerage services throughanoperating subsidiary of the bank without resorting to the bank
holding company structure. The Securities Industry Assn representing most national stock brokerage firms challenged the
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 285
Comptrollers decision The district court accepted our argumentthat operation of brokerage business by national bank did not
violate the GlassSteagall Act The court however then held
that all offices of the bank that deal in securities become branch
banks subject to the restrictions of the McFadden Act The
principal restrictions are that bank may not have branches in
more than one state and that national banks are subject to the
same restraints on branching that the state imposes on its own
state banks Both the federal qovernment and SIA appealed
The D.C Circuit has now affirmed both holdings of the court
below in one paragraph per curiam opinion Judge Scaliadissented from the holding erse to the government In his
view SIA lacked standing to assert the branching argument becausesecurities firms are not within the zone of interests of the
McFadden Act which was intended to protect state.banks not the
securities industry The district court and presumably the
majority Judges Wright and Ginsburg held that SIA was within the
zone of interests of the GlassSteagall Act and for that reasoncould assert claim under the McFadden Act Because there is an
intracircuit conflict on the issue of whether litigant who is
within the zone of interests protected by one statute has standingto assert -claim under different statute we are now givingcareful consideration to seeking rehearing en banc
Securities Industry Assn Comptroller of the CurrencyF.2d ____ Nos 845026 and 845085 D.C Cir Apr 121985 J. 145115905
Attorneys Anthony Steinmeyer Civil Division- FTS
6333388 Mark Gallant Civil Division FTS 6333425
D.C CIRCUIT VACATES DISTRICT COURT DECISION ORDERINGTHE DISCLOSURE OF -CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AND ORDERS REMANDTO CONSIDER ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
In August 1982 Peterzell made Freedom of Information Act
FOIA request directed to the Central Intelligence Agency CIAseeking inter alia all documents describing or authorizing CIAcovert operations in Central America which were approved byPresident -Reagan in the last year The CIA identified 15- such
documents and withheld them all as properly classified pursuant to
an ExeÆutive Order in the interest of national security exemptionand as specifically exempt from disclosure by statute exemp
tion 3.- After the CIA indicated-that 15 documents -were responsive to Pete.rzells request concerning Central America Peterzell
argued that the United States covert presence in Nicaragua was
public knowledge and that accordingly documents pertaining to
such activities did not qualify for-FOIA immunity The districtcourt initially granted summary judgment to the governmentLater however after Peterzell moved for reconsideration based on
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 286
further statements by Executive and congressional officialsregarding United States activities in Nicaragua the districtcourt reversed its prior ruling and ordered the release of all 15documents The court found the additional statements to besufficient evidence of official acknowledgment of covert actionin Nicaragua to warrant release of the documents Seeking relieffrom this second ruling the government offered for in camerainspection classified affidavit and classified memorandum oflaw to show that the documents should not be released Thedistrict court denied the governments motion without viewingeither of the proffered submissions and without viewing thedocuments
On appeal we argued that only the Executive BranchnotCongress or the presscould officially acknowledge involvementin covert actions in Nicaragua and that in this case no suchExecutive Branch statement was made We also argued that ifthere were an official acknowledgment it was at best generaland therefore did not require the release of specific details ofsuch operations It also did not require the release of documentspertaining to other Central American countries Finally weargued that the district court erred in refusing to view the documents and the two additional in camera submissions before orderingthe release of the documents
The court of appeals did not reach the official acknowledgment question because it determined that the case had to beremanded on the latter two grounds Accordingly it vacated thedistrict courts official acknowledgment determination andremanded the case for examination of the documents the in camerasubmissions and any other evidence the parties may bmit onremand
Peterzell Department of State and Central IntelligenceAgency ___F.2d ___ No. 845805 D.C Cir Apr 1985
1452393.
Attorneys Leonard Schaitman Civil Division FTS 6333441Howard Scher Civil Division FTS 6334820
FIRST CIRCUIT HOLDS THERE IS NO FEDERAL JURISDICTIONOVER ACTION TO ENJOIN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR FROM ACTING ASARBITRATOR PURSUANT TO MASS TRANSIT AUTHORITY CONTRACT
This action arose out of claims filed with the Department ofLabor by employees of an independent contractor whose contractto provide elderly and handicapped services was terminated bytwo rural transportation authorities in Massachusetts Theemployees claimed that they were entitled to the benefits of thestandard warranty inserted in all agreements with the Massachu
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 287
setts Department of Transportation that provided federal fundingto local transit authorities The warranty contained disputesresolution clause that named the Department of Labor as fallback arbitrator The employees asserted they had been unable to
agree with plaintiffs on any procedure to settle the dispute and
asked the Department of Labor to assume jurisdiction
The Secretary designated an employee as arbitrator but
plaintiffs challenged the Secretarys jurisdiction in districtcourt action federal magistrate recommended dismissing the
complaint primarily on grounds of arbitral immunity Thedistrict court dismissed the complaint but on the basis that the
Secretarys arbitration was an action committed to agency discretion under law The First Circuit affirmed the dismissal on
different grounds It agreed with our argument that in light of
the Supreme Courts decision in Jackson Transit Authority LocalDivision 1285 ATU 457 U.S 15 1982section 13c agreementsbetween UMTA aid recipients and transit unions are governed bystate law applied in state courts the complaint failed to set
out substantial federal question capable of sustaining federal
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C 1331 This decision helps to establish that all disputes arising from the special warranty should
go to state courts
Greenfield and Montague Transportation Area DonovanF.2d____ No 841547 1st dr Mar 29 1985 D.
T102352
Attorneys John Cordes Civil Division FTS 6333380Christine Whittaker Civil Division FTS 6334096
SEVENTH CIRCUIT GRANTS PETITION FOR MANDAMUS VACATINGORDER REQUIRING PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF SECRETARY OFLABOR IN SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS ....
Following trial of action.brouqht by the Department of Laboragainst former trustees of the Central States Southeast and
Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund for breach of fiduciaryduties the parties indicated that settlement was ossibleAccordingly the district court withheld its decision and presidedover series of settlement discussions Most issues weresettled however the Department of Labor indicated that it could
not accept language that would permit the former and currenttrustees to be reimbursed for their fees in defending the Departments action if there was any -breach of fiduciary duty Thedistrict court was of the view that the .Departments position was
idiotic became exasperated with the Department attorneysincluding the Solicitor of Labor and ordered the personalappearance of the Secretary of Labor on April 23 1985 if -settl-ement was not reached before that time
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 288
We sought stay of that order in the district court topermit us to seek mandamus from the court of appeals. Thedistrict court denied the stay and we sought stay from thecourt of appeals simultaneously with our petition On FridayApril 19 1985 at P.M the court of appeals advised us thatit had granted our petition for mandamus and would issue an orderon Monday April 22 1985 This extraordinary relief will preventwhat might have been an unnecessary constitutional confrontationbetween the Judiciary and the Executive
Ford Will F.2d 7th Cir Apr 19 1985145101930
Attorneys Leonard Schaitman Civil Division FTS 6333441Freddi Lipstein Civil Division FTS 6333542
NINTH CIRCUIT IN RESPONSE TO OUR PETITION FOR REHEARINGAND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC WITHDRAWS EARLIERPANEL OPINION CREATING RIGHT TO NOTICE OF THE RIGHTTO APPLY FOR ASYLUM AND ISSUES .A NEW PANEL OPINIONREJECTING THE CLAIMED RIGHT TO SUCH NOTICES
Leonillo and Shirley Durari both natives of the Philippinesentered the United States in 1974 and 1972 respectively andboth illegally overstayed their visas During deportation proceedings in 1981 the Durans conceded their deportability andagreed to voluntary departure Instead of departinq howeverthey hired new counsel and moved to reopen the proceedingsMr Duran based his motion on his belated desire to requestasylum and Mrs Duran based her motion on the theory that herdeportation would cause extreme hardship The immigration judgedenied both motions to reopen and the Board of ImmigrationAppeals affirmed those denials
On petition for reviw the court of appeals in its May 141984 decision reversed and izemanded for further administrativeproceedings In so ruling the court of appeals announced broadnew statutory right to notice of the right to apply for asylumIn addition the court faulted the immigration judge for failingto inform Mrs Durari of her apparent eligibility to seek suspension of deportation on the ground of possible extreme hardship
The government filed petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en bane in view of the potentially disastrousconsequenes of rule that would require specific notice in alleases of the right to apply for asylum After considering thematter for nine months the panel has now withdrawn its originalopinion and has issued new decision affirming the denial of MrDurans motion to reopen his deportation proceeding in order toseek asylum The panel however continued to adhere to its
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 289
earlier rulingon Mrs Durans motion to reopen insisting thatshe be given an opportunity to show extreme hardship and chidingthe immigration judge for failing to advise her of her apparenteligibility to pursue such claim
The panels withdrawal of its initial decision creatingduty to notify all aliens of their right to apply for asylum is
substantial victory for the government Although we are still
considering whether further appellate review is appropriate withregard to the courts reopening of Mrs Durans claim this decision nO longer threatens to impose massive burdens 011 and disruptions of the asylum process
Duran INS ____F.2d ____ No 827193 9th Cir Apr1985 3912C1648
Attorneys Barbara Herwig Civil Division FTS 6335425Michael Jay Singer Civil Division FTS 6334815
CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
COURT ORDERS APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN CASEINVOLVING MENTALLY RETARDED
The court ordered that the final settlement agreement in this
case be approved ruling that the settlement agreement which had
been signed by all parties and followed more than ten years of
active litigation was fair adequate and reasonable The agreement will affect all mentally retarded persons who resided at
Pennhurst State School and Hospital on and after May 30 1974 as
well as all retarded persons on the Pennhurst waiting list as of
that date who had received habilitative services in the communitypursuant to prior orders of the district court Under the termsof the settlement Pennsylvania and several of its counties have
agreed to provide community living arrangements to members of the
plaintiff class for whom such placement is deemed appropriate bythe individual planning process together with such communityservices as are necessary to provide each person with minimallyadequate habilitation until such time as the retarded individualno longer is in need of such living arrangement and/or communityservices Each member of the plaintiff class is also entitled to
an individualized habilitation plan and program with appropriatereview and monitoring of the services to be providedAdditionally all class members are to be afforded protection from
harm safe conditions adequate shelter and clothing medicalhealthrelated and dental care protection from physical and
psychological abuse neglect or mistreatment protection from
unreasonable restraint and the use of seclusion and protection
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 290
from the administration of excessive or unnecessary medicationUnder the terms of the agreement Perinhurst is scheduled to close
by July 1986 with the court retaining jurisdiction over the
case until July 1989 The United States plaintiffintervenorin this case signed the agreement and requested the courtsapproval of the settlement at hearing on December 1984
Pennhurst State School and Hospital Halderinan F.2dC.A 741345 Apr 1985 144621085
Attorneys Mitchell Dale Civil Rights Division FTS
2726055 Larry Goldberg Civil Rights Division FTS2726052
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 291
JURIS DATA BASE LISTINGRevised May 1985
CASELAW
U.S Supreme Court 178 U.S 1900 SlipsFederal Reporter 2d Series 300 F.2d 1962 SlipsFederal Supplement 332 F.Supp 1970 SlipsCourt of Claims 134 Ct Cl 223 Ct Cl
1956 April 30 1980Federal Rules Decisions 73 F.R.D 1976 SlipsCourt of Military Review C.M.R 50 C.M.R
19511975Military Justice Reporter M.J.R Slips
1974 PresentAtlantic 2d Reporter 370 A.2d 1977 Present
D.C cases onlyBankruptcy Reporter B.R 1979 SlipsClaims Court Cl.Ct 1982 Slips
STATLAW STATUTORY LAW
Public Laws 93rd 98th Congress1149 and 473
United States Code 1976 Edition Includina
SuppExecutive Orders 12/31/47 2/12/85Civil Works Laws Vols 14 8/1790
11/1966 and SelectedPublic Laws to 7/1 983
Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 Pub No 98473 CCCAPub No 98573 TariffAct Pub No 98596Fine Enforcement Act and
Criminal Division Handbookon the Comprehensive CrimeControl Act of 1984
ADMIN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Published Comptroller General Decisions Vols 163 1921November1983
Unpublished Comptroller General Decisions 1/5/51 6/30/84Opinions of the Attorney General Vols 143 17911980O.L.C Memorandums Vols 13 19771979
New JURIS File
Major File Additions
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 292
Board of Contract Appeals Vols 562 to 8327/5611/83
Federal Labor Relations Authority Vols 114 1/795/84Decisions Reports on Rulings of the
Asst Sec of Labor for Labor A/SLMR A/SLMRManagement Relations 1/7312/78
Federal Labor Relations Council Vols 16 1/7012/78Rulings on Requests of the Asst Sec
of Labor for Labor Management Relations Volume 2/706/75HJD Administrative Law Decisions Selected DecisionsMerit Systems Protection Board Vols 111 2/79 9/82Board of Imrigration Appeals Decisions Vols 14 197218 1984
and slips
REGS FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Code of Federal Regulations 1982 Edition Titles845 50
1983 Edition Titles and
48
1984 Edition Titles 145750
Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations October 1984 Edition
DIGEST WEST HEADNOTES
Supreme Court Reporter 1961 advance sheetsFederal Reporter 2d Series 1960 advance sheetsFederal Supplement 1960 advance sheetsFederal Rules Decisions 1960 advance sheets
Regional Reporters State Cases 1967 advance sheets
TAX
U.S Tax Court Decisions Vols 166 11/42 9/76U.S Board of Tax Appeals Decisions Vols 19 47 2/3011/42Enforcement Decisions Tax Divisions Summons
Enforcement DecisionsCurrent to 3/1/84
Tax Protesters Tax Division Tax ProtesterDecision List
FORENSIC SCIENCE MidAtlantic Association of Forensic ScientistsNewsletter
Scientific Sleuthing Newsletter July 1976 Winter 1985
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 293
SHEPARDS CITATIONS
United States Reports 1944 Present
Supreme Court Reporter 1944 Present
Lawyers Edition 1st 2d Series 1944 PresentFederal Reporter 1970 PresentFederal Reporter Second Series 1970 PresentFederal Supplement 1970 PresentFederal Rules Decisions 1970 PresentCourt of Claims 1970 PresentCourt Martial Reports 1951 PresentMilitary JusticeReporter 1975 Present
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
Bevans Treaties and Other International
Agreements of the United States Vols 112 17761949United States Treaties and Other
International Agreements Vols 132 1/50 12/81
Department of Defense UnpublishedInternational Agreements 6/47 1/84
WRKPRDT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WORK PRODUCTS
Criminal Division Monographs Selected Monographs
BRIEFS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BRIEFS
Office of the Solicitor General Briefs Briefs since the 10/1982Term
Civil Division Briefs Selected Appellate Briefs
11/81 PresentCivil Division Trial Briefs Selected Trial Briefs 1977
PresentCivil Rights Division Briefs Selected Appellate Briefs
1/80 PresentLand and Natural Resources Selected Appellate Briefs
Division Briefs 12/83 Present
INDLAW INDIAN LAW
Opinions of the Solicitor Interior Vols and 1917 1974Ratified Treaties 1778 1880
Unratified Treaties 1801 1868
Presidential Proclamations 1879 1968
Executive Orders and Other Orders
Pertaining to Indians 1871 1971
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 294
FOIA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
FOIA Update Newsletter Vol No VolNo Fall 1979
Fall 1984FOIA Short Guide FOIA Case List Publication
September 1984 Edition
REFERENZ TRAINING AIDS FOR JURIS USERS
JURIS Reference Manual Parts IV November 1984 Edition
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 295
TELETYPES
042485 From Madison Brewer Director Office of ManagementInformation Systems and Support by Tim MurphyAssistant Director Debt Collection Staff re DirectDeposit System
042485 From Richard Kidwell Assistant DirectorFacilities Management and Support Services Staff reNew District Assignments
042985 From Madison Brewer Director Office of ManagementInformation Systems and Support re 1985 Annual Word
Processing Report
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 296
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS LIST
DISTRICT U.S ATTORNEY
Alabama Frank Donaldson
Alabama John Bell
Alabama Sessions III
Alaska Michael SpaanArizona Stephen McNarree
Arkansas George Proctor
Arkansas Asa Hutchinson
California Joseph Russoniello
California Donald AyerCalifornia Robert Bonner
California Peter Nunez
Colorado Robert Miller
Connecticut Alan Nevas
Delaware Joseph Farnan JrDistrict of Colunibia Joseph diGenova
Florida Thomas Dillard
Florida Robert Merkle
Florida Stanley Marcus
Georgia Larry Thompson
Georgia Joe Whitley
Georgia Hinton Pierce
Guam David Wood
Hawaii Daniel Bent
Idaho William Vanhole
Illinois Anton Valukus
Illinois Frederick Hess
Illinois Gerald Fines
Indiana Lawrence Steele JrIndiana John Tinder
Iowa Evan Huitman
Iowa Richard Turner
Kansas Benjamin Burgess JrKentucky Louis DeFalaise
Kentucky Ronald Meredith
Louisiana John Volz
Louisiana Stanford Bardwell JrLouisiana Joseph Cage JrMaine Richard Cohen
Maryland Frederick Motz
Massachusetts William Weld
Michigan Joel Shere
Michigan John Smietanka
Minnesota James Rosenbaurn
Mississippi Glen Davidson
Mississippi George PhillisMissouri Thomas Dittmeier
Missouri Robert Ulrich
VOL 33 NO 10 MAY 24 1985 PAGE 297
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
DISTRICT U.S ATTORNEYMontana Byron DunbarNebraska Ronald LahnersNevada William MaddoxNew Hampshire Bruce KennaNew Jersey Hunt DumontNew Mexico William Lutz
New York Frederick Scullin JrNew York Rudolph GiulianiNew York Raymond DeaneNew York Salvatore MartocheNorth Carolina Samuel CurrinNorth Carolina Kenneth McAllisterNorth Carolina Charles BrewerNorth Dakota Rodney WebbOhio Patrick McLaughlinOhio Christopher BarnesOklahoma Layn PhillipsOklahoma Roger HilfigerOklahoma William PriceOregon Charles TurnerPennsylvania Edward Dennis JrPennsylvania James WestPennsylvania Alan JohnsonPuerto Rico Daniel LopezRornoRhode Island Lincoln AlmondSouth Carolina Henry Dargan McMasterSouth Dakota Philip HogenTennessee John Gill JrTennessee Joe BrownTennessee Hickman Ewing JrTexas James RolfeTexas Henry OnckenTexas Robert WorthamTexas Helen EversberqUtah Brent WardVermont George Cook
Virgin Islands James DiehmVirginia Elsie MunsellVirginia John AldermanWashington John LampWashington Gene AndersonWest Virginia William KolibashWest Virginia David Faber
Wisconsin Joseph StadtmuellerWisconsin John ByrnesWyoming Richard StacyNorth Mariana Islands David Wood