27
Mash Development length / Splices Upcoming Standard Changes Stuart Nielsen

Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

MashDevelopment length / Splices

Upcoming Standard Changes

Stuart Nielsen

Page 2: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

BarrierRails

Page 3: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

NCHRP 350 – “Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features”• Publication in 1993• Implementation in 1998 - calculations

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH)• Originally published in 2009 - Second edition published in 2016• All new hardware (barrier rails) must be tested to MASH (not NCHRP 350) starting January 1, 2011

Page 4: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

• Specifically the TL-4 rails have to have a minimum height of 36 inches instead of the current 32 inches.

• Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile.

• Current bridge barrier rails designs are changing because our existing rails do not meet new the MASH requirements.

Page 5: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

• On National Highway System (NHS)• Bridge barriers let after December 31, 2019• New installation or full replacement• Existing systems do not need to be replaced• Full testing is required; finite element analysis alone is insufficient to validate NCHRP 350 devices meets MASH

FHWA/AASHTO Bridge Implementation Plan to meet MASH

Page 6: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

MASH

Page 7: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Significant differences at TL‐4

Page 8: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 9: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 10: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 11: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 12: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Base 1’-1

Page 13: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Base 1’-3 1/2

Page 14: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

General Barrier Shape• Testing currently underway

• 39” Tall• 36” satisfy TL-4

• 3” future overlay

• Single Slope Front Face• Near vertical 1:19.5

• Vehicle stability

• Vertical Back• Sloped back acceptable

• Vertical more critical

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Page 15: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 16: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 17: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 18: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 19: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Development length and lap lengths

AASHTO 7th AASHTO 8th

Page 20: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Splice Lengths

AASHTO 7th three classes A,B and C AASHTO 8th two classes A and B

Page 21: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Example – tension splice#6 epoxy coated bar 60 ksi2” concrete cover6” spacing

OldNew

Class C

Class B

Lap 3’-7Lap 3’-1

ld = 22”1.7*22”=

ld = 54”Ldf =33”1.3*33”=

Page 22: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

5d1 - Spacing > 6”, 2.5” cover, is it a top bar?

New 2’-5 Top Bar 3’-1

TB 2’-11?

Page 23: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Transverse Steel Splice in a bridge deck. Length of splice? Tension?

Page 24: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 25: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge
Page 26: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Future• Projects started after October 1, 2018 shall

use the AASHTO 8th edition• Standards will be updated as fast as possible

for MASH and splices / development lengths• Use standards “AS IS” until new standards

are updated• Non standard designs use new AASHTO 8th

development lengths (projects started after October 1, 2018).

Page 27: Upcoming Standard Changes Mash Training/Updates to Standard ssn.pdf · • Since MASH requires a tested TL-4 rail, Road Design decided to go to a safer rail profile. • Current bridge

Questions?