16
Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski

Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski. Adequate Yearly Progress. Participation - 95% tested MEAP, MME, or MI-Access Achievement - Proficiency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Michigan Department of Education

Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability

Paul Bielawski

Page 2: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

2

Adequate Yearly Progress

• Participation - 95% tested• MEAP, MME, or MI-Access

• Achievement - Proficiency• Meet state objective or “safe harbor” target for improvement

– Participation and Proficiency• Must meet in both Math and English Language Arts• Must meet for whole school and subgroups

• Additional Academic Indicator• Graduation Rate – 80% - high schools• Attendance – 85% - elementary and middle schools

Page 3: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

3

2002-04 2004-07 2007-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Elementary

Mathematics 47% 56% 65% 74% 82% 91% 100%

ELA 38% 48% 59% 69% 79% 90% 100%

Middle School

Mathematics 31% 43% 54% 66% 77% 89% 100%

ELA 31% 43% 54% 66% 77% 89% 100%

High School

Mathematics 33% 44% 55% 67% 78% 89% 100%

ELA 42% 52% 61% 71% 81% 90% 100%

Michigan AYP Targets

Page 4: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

4

Math AYP Goals Over 12 Years

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

School Year

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t

Elementary Middle School High School

Page 5: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

5

50 “cells” for AYP

ELA Math ELA Math

Black or African AmericanAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeAsian American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific IslanderHispanic or LatinoCaucasian or WhiteMultiracial

Additional Indicator -

Attendance or Graduation

Economically Disadvantaged

Whole School

Achievement Participation

Racia

l/E

thnic

Gro

ups

Limited English ProficientStudents With Disabilities

Page 6: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

6

AYP Updates

• New for 2007-08– Growth Model Pilot

– Cohort Graduation Rate

• New for 2008-09– New Graduation Rate Rules

• New in 2009-10– Modified Full Independence

Page 7: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

7

MEAP Progress Value Table

Low Mid High Low Mid High Low Mid High Low Mid HighLow N I I SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SIMid D N I I SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SIHigh D D N I I SI SI SI SI SI SI SILow SD D D N I I SI SI SI SI SI SIMid SD SD D D N I I SI SI SI SI SIHigh SD SD SD D D N I I SI SI SI SILow SD SD SD SD D D N I I SI SI SIMid SD SD SD SD SD D D N I I SI SIHigh SD SD SD SD SD SD D D N I I SILow SD SD SD SD SD SD SD D D N I IMid SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD D D N IHigh SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD D D N

SD = Significant Decline N = No Change I = ImprovementD = Decline SI = Significant Improvement

Grade X MEAP Achievement

Grade X + 1 MEAP AchievementNot Proficient Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced

Advanced

Proficient

Not Proficient

Partially Proficient

Page 8: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

8

“On Trajectory” Toward Proficiency

Fall 2006 AchievementELA

Fall 2007 Achievement ELA

Not Proficient Partially Proficient

Low Mid High Low Mid High

Not Proficient

Low     412 232 180 113

Mid       521  272 150 

High         2,738 1,817

Partially Proficient

Low         4,636  3,996

Mid           6,635

High            

Proficient

Low            

Mid            

High            

Advanced

Low            

Mid            

High            

Page 9: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

9

Growth Model Message

• Focus on “improvement”–Don’t work only with “bubble” students

–Getting from 4-L to 3-L is enough improvement to be “on trajectory”

• The growth models provides modest adjustments

Page 10: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

10

NCLB Graduation Rate

• NCLB requires that AYP include a graduation rate based on the percentage of students that– Receive a REGULAR high school diploma

– In the STANDARD number of years

• AYP (including a graduation rate) is required for ALL schools

Page 11: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

11

Graduation Rates for 2007-08 AYP

• The Graduation/Dropout Review and Comment Application from CEPI provides the graduation rates used for AYP for the class of 2008

• The application will open in January/February of 2009

Page 12: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

12

Graduation Rate Clean-Up

• UIC Linking• Transfers

– Out-of-State– Non-public School– Home School

• Contested Claims• Fifth Year Extensions

Page 13: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

13

Fifth Year Students

• Districts will be able to designate certain students not expected to graduate in four years –Students with disabilities

–English language learners

–Medically Condition or Diagnosis

Page 14: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

14

AYP and Graduation Rate

• The AYP target graduation rate will remain at 80%

• Improvement in the graduation rate will substitute for meeting the target using “safe harbor”

Page 15: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

15

New Graduation Rate Rules

• Published October 29, 2008• Four-year on-time graduation rates must be

published• States may seek federal approval to use 5 or 6

year graduation rates for AYP• Unsure if federal approval is likely for 2008-09

AYP determinations• States must justify graduation rate targets and

improvement goals

Page 16: Update on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

16

Contact Information

Paul Bielawski

Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability

Michigan Department of Education

PO Box 30008

Lansing, MI 48909

(517) 335-5784

[email protected]