No Child Left Behind

California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress

(AYP)

July 2003

2

Adequate Yearly Progress

• Basics of AYP• Components of AYP• Reporting Timeline

3

Adequate Yearly Progress The Basics• Based on English-language arts

(ELA) and mathematics separately

• All students held to same high academic standards

• Goal: 100% proficiency by 2013-14

4

• Achievement of ELA and math Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs): percent proficient or above

• 95% participation rate

• API for all schools

• Graduation rate for high schools

Adequate Yearly Progress Components

5

AMOsin ELA and

Math

95% Participation

Rate

API

Graduation rate

AA YY PP

6

Goals & Annual Measurable Objectives

Apply to All• Schools

(including alternative and charter schools)• Districts• Numerically significant student

subgroups within schools and districts (ethnic, socioeconomically disadvantaged, English learners, students with disabilities)

7

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

Elementary and Middle Schools

• California Standards Tests (CSTs) in ELA and Math

• California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)

8

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

High Schools

• Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)

• California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)

9

CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB(High Schools Only)

English-Language Arts

• Proficient or above = 387 or above• Not Proficient = Below 387

NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.

10

CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB(High Schools Only)

Math

• Proficient or above = 373 or above• Not Proficient = Below 373

NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.

11

Different AMOs• Elementary schools, middle

schools, and elementary school districts

• High schools and high school districts with grades 9-12

• Unified districts and high school districts with grades 7 and/or 8 (based on a rounded average of #1 and #2 above)

12

2003 AMOs for Schools2003 AMOs for Schools

ELA MathElementary or Middle School

13.6% 16.0%

High School 11.2% 9.6%

13

2003 AMOs for Districts2003 AMOs for DistrictsELA Math

Elementary School District

13.6% 16.0%

High School District(Grades 9-12)

11.2% 9.6%

Unified or High School District (Grades 7-12)

12.0% 12.8%

14

89.2%

100.0%

78.4%

35.2%46.0%

56.8%67.6%

13.6%24.4%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

2001-2

002

2002-2

003

2003-2

004

2004-2

005

2005-2

006

2006-2

007

2007-2

008

2008-2

009

2009-2

010

2010-2

011

2011-2

012

2012-2

013

2013-2

014

AMOs

English-language arts Elementary and Middle Schools Elementary Districts

15

Participation Rates• 95% required on any

assessment used for AYP under NCLB.

• The remaining 5% is the maximum allowable percentage of non-participants, including students who are exempted from testing at parental request.

16

Additional Indicators• The API as the “other”

indicator for all grades• API above the “status bar,” OR• Show growth of at least one point

• Graduation rate an additional indicator for high schools only

• Demonstrate a one-tenth of a percent increase up to 100%

17

The API ‘Status Bar’Defining Progress on the API as the Additional Indicator

770740

710

680

650

620

800

560 590

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-2011

2011

-2012

2012

-2013

2013

-2014

API

Sco

re

18

Graduation Rate

Progress

National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) four-year completion rate.

Increase of one-tenth of one percent per year until the school reaches 100%

19

2003 Reporting Timeline

2002 Base

2002 Base

AYP Report

AYP Report

Decem

ber

Decem

ber

2003 Final

2003 Final

AYP Report

AYP Report

Augus

t 15

Augus

t 15

July

22

July

22

Octobe

r

Octobe

r

2003 Growth

2003 Growth

API Report

API Report

2003 AYP

2003 AYP Report

Report

Sept

embe

r

Sept

embe

r

Novem

ber

Novem

ber

20

2002 AYP Base Report• Starting points for each school

and district.• CDE will post on the Internet on

July 22, 2003.• Districts and schools may

determine whether they are at risk for not meeting AYP criteria when the 2003 report is released in August.

21

2003 AYP Reports• CDE will post 2003 AYP reports

on the Internet on August 15, 2003.

• Reports will include the “percent proficient” and participation rates based on 2003 testing data.

• Will be used to identify districts and schools that are not making AYP for 2003.