12
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores

Report to the Superintendent Roundtable

February 23, 2011

Page 2: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Agenda

•Background on Raising Cut Scores

•Impact of Cut Scores

•MI-SAAS Overview

•Questions…

Page 3: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011
Page 4: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011
Page 5: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011
Page 6: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Statewide Preliminary Cut Scores Study Results -- Reading

9084 85 88

82 83

65

39

4844

35 36 38 38

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8 11

Actual Percentages in 2009-10 (with current cut scores)

Projected Percentages in 2009-10 (with projected college ready cut scores)Grade

Perc

entP

rofic

ient

Page 7: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Statewide Preliminary Cut Scores Study Results -- Mathematics

95 92

80 82 82

70

50

3438 40 38 39 39

29

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 4 5 6 7 8 11

Actual Percentages in 2009 (with current cut scores)

Projected Percentages in 2009 (with projected college ready cut scores)

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

Grade

Page 8: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011
Page 9: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

Current AYP Calculation

•Aggregate and subgroups:▫Percent proficient – annual targets▫Percent tested (95% target)

•Attendance (90% target) for elementary and middle schools

•Graduation (80% target) for high schools

Page 10: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability (MI-SAAS) Components

Approved at February 2011 State Board Meeting

• Statewide Top to Bottom Ranking▫ Student Achievement and Improvement▫ Student Graduation Rates and Improvement

• Appearance on the List of Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools

• Additional Factors (compliance with state statute, board policy)

• Additional School, District, Community and State Information

• Sunset Clause

Page 11: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Statewide Percentile Rank Not On PLA List Met Target on Nine Additional Factors

Accreditation Result

High Y Y Accredited

High Y N Interim

Mid Y Y Interim

High N N Unaccredited

High N Y Unaccredited

Low N N Unaccredited

Low N Y Unaccredited

Low Y N Unaccredited

Low Y Y Unaccredited

Mid N N Unaccredited

Mid N Y Unaccredited

Mid Y N Unaccredited

Determination of Accreditation Status in MI-SAAS

Low = ranking less than 5th percentile

Mid = ranking greater than or equal to 5th percentile, but less than 20th percentile

High = ranking greater than or equal to 20th percentile

Page 12: Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011

Questions…

•Contact Information▫Kelly Trout▫517-244-1261▫[email protected]