18
Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond Evidence for the Effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment

Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evidence for the Effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment. Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond. Expressed Interest in Employment Reported in 8 Surveys. Need. 2/3 clients with severe mental illness want to work, but only ~10% employed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Evidence for the Effectiveness of

Individual Placement and Support Model of

Supported Employment

Page 2: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Expressed Interest in Employment

Reported in 8 Surveys

Page 3: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Need

2/3 clients with severe mental illness want to work, but only ~10% employed.

Until the 1990s, no effective models for helping clients achieve stable competitive employment.

Page 4: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Day Treatment Conversions to IPS: Common Study Design

Discontinued day treatment Reassigned day treatment staff to

new positions Implemented new IPS program Compared to 3 sites not converting

Sources: Drake and Becker

Page 5: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Day Treatment Conversion Studies: 6 Sites Converting to IPS

vs. 4 Control Sites (Not Converting)

13.4% 12.4%

37.5%

15.2%

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%

Sites Converting toIPS (n = 317)

Control Sites (n = 184)

Percentage Competitively

Employed

Before

After

Page 6: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Similar Results in All Day Treatment Conversions

Large increase in employment rates No negative outcomes (e.g., relapses) Clients, families, staff liked change Most former day treatment clients spent

more time in community, even those not working

Resulted in cost savings

Page 7: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

22 Randomized Controlled Trials of Individual

Placement and Support (IPS) Best evidence available on

effectiveness RCTs are gold standard in medical

research

Page 8: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond
Page 9: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Competitive Employment Rates in 22 Randomized Controlled Trials of IPS

Page 10: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Overall Findings for 22 RCTs All 22 studies showed a significant

advantage for IPS Mean competitive employment rates for

the 22 studies:56% for IPS23% for controls

(Each study weighted equally in calculating mean rates)

Page 11: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Four Measurement Domains of Employment Outcomes Job acquisition (% employed) Hours worked per week Total hours worked/earnings Job duration (months worked)

(Bond, Campbell, & Drake, 2012)

Page 12: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

18-Month Competitive Employment Outcomes in 4 Controlled Trials of IPS

(Bond, Drake & Campbell, 2012)

Page 13: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Mean Tenure of Longest-Held Jobin Two IPS Studies

Job tenure for IPS was triple that for usual services in Hoffman study.

Page 14: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Steady Worker Rate in Three Long-Term Follow-up Studies

Page 15: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

IPS Is Effective in a Wide Variety of Target Populations

PTSD diagnosis Frequently

hospitalized Mental illness +

substance use Older adults

Homeless Criminal justice

history On disability benefits African American Hispanic

Page 16: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

Johnson & Johnson-Dartmouth IPS Learning Collaborative

16 states/regions in US (over 150 sites)

3 European countries

(as of August 2014)

Page 17: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond
Page 18: Updated 8/13/14 by Gary Bond

IPS Fidelity and Outcomes IPS Fidelity and Outcomes in 88 Sites in Learning Collaborativein 88 Sites in Learning Collaborative

(Bond et al., 2012)