Upload
miguel-byrd
View
222
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Updates in IDEA 2004
NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement
From: All children will have universal access to education - 1837-1987 equal educational opportunity – 1954
To: All children will have universal access to education equal educational opportunity, AND universal high achievement (proficiency)
Changes in IDEA ‘04 Private Schools (parentally placed students)
AEAs are required to: Provide direct services (to extent practicable) Provide data on # of students evaluated, found eligible,
and served Conduct timely child-find process as in public schools Not consider costs of child find process Consult with private schools on child find process and
determination of proportional funds
Changes in IDEA ‘04 Highly Qualified Teachers
All special education teachers must be highly qualified no later than the end of this school year (May 2006) In Iowa:
Elementary sped teachers – OK Secondary
Level 1 – endorsement in content area or co-teach Level 2 & 3 – OK, pending approval Iowa’s proposal to
federal government
Changes in IDEA ‘04 IEP – Team Meetings
Allows a member of the IEP team to be excused from a meeting if no changes are being made to that member’s area of curriculum or service OR if the member provides input prior to the meeting Parent and LEA must agree to member being excused
Allows parents and LEAs to agree to participate in meetings via video conferences and conference calls
Changes in IDEA ‘04 Short term objectives or major milestones are
no longer required.
The IEP must now include a statement of measurable goals, including academic and functional goals.
Changes in IDEA ‘04 Evaluations
Parent, SEA, LEA can request an initial evaluation
LEA must gather academic information (PLAAFP: Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance)
Tests administered in “language and form most likely to yield accurate information”
60 day timeline
Changes in IDEA ‘04 Exclusionary factors
Lack of scientifically based instruction in reading Phonics, phonemic awareness, vocabulary,
comprehension, fluency
Lack of instruction in math Limited English proficiency
Changes in IDEA ‘04 Exit evaluations not required when…
Graduation from secondary school with a regular diploma
Exceeding age eligibility for FAPE (age 21 in Iowa)
Changes in IDEA ‘04 Disciplinary Actions
Authorizes schools to order changes of placement (up to 10 days) to an appropriate interim educational setting, another setting, or suspension without a manifestation determination
Authorizes schools to apply, beyond that 10 day period, the same disciplinary procedures for a child without a disability – upon determining that the violation in question was not a manifestation of the child’s disability
Questions
State Performance Plan Iowa’s plan to address/support the success of the 4
priority areas and 34 indicators which provide information on the health of special education throughout the state
Due December 2, 2005 Annual state updates to USDE (Annual Performance
Report) First report due 2/1/2007 Subsequent reports in February of a year
Monitoring Priorities for Part B and C Free/Appropriate Public Education in the
Least Restrictive Environment Disproportionality Early Intervention Services in Natural
Environments Effective General Supervision
State Performance Plan 20 new requirements for every school district
– Part B 14 requirements – Part C Retreat held from July 19-21st in Des Moines
with AEA Sped Directors and Coordinators
Monitoring Priorities and IndicatorsFAPE/LRE Graduation Drop-out Achievement (under NCLB) Suspension/Expulsion LRE ages 6-21 LRE ages 3-5 Early Childhood Outcomes (ages 0-5) Parent Involvement survey
Monitoring Priorities and IndicatorsDISPROPORTIONALITY Disproportionality (district-by-district basis) a. System in place to serve all children b. Settings c. Suspension/expulsion Disproportionate representation of racial and
ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification
Monitoring Priorities and Indicators
CHILD FIND 60 day timeline for evaluation after parental
consent is received
Monitoring Priorities and IndicatorsGENERAL SUPERVISION Identify non-compliance within one year Percent of complaints handled within 60 days. Fully adjudicated due process hearing
requests within 45-days Percent of hearing requests resolved Percent of mediations resulted in agreements State reported data are timely and accurate
MR Targets and Strategies Measurable/Rigorous Targets
Where we want to be as a state in 6 years. The target should be measurable and linked to the Measurement of the Indicator Some are set for us – some we must set
Improvement Strategies The plan or method of “getting to” or obtaining
the 6 year Target. Strategies should be broad in scope, rather than discrete activities
Monitoring Priorities and Indicators
Districts will be held in non-compliance where the AMO has not been met
State can be held non-compliant for two years then 20% funding will be withheld.
Questions