View
218
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 1
Slides for the US Si Tracker Institutional Group Leaders Meeting
J. Incandela
March 1, 2005
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 2
US CMS Tracker Group
• Brown University• R. Hooper, G. Landsberg, C. Nguyen, H. Nguyen
• University of California, Riverside (UCR)• P. Gartung, G. Hanson, G.Y. Jeng, G. Pasztor
• University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)• A. Affolder, S. Burke, C. Campagnari, F. Garberson, D. Hale, J. Incandela, • P. Kalavase, S. Kyre, J. Lamb, R. Taylor, D. Stuart, D. White + technicians
• University of Illinois, Chicago (UIC)• E. Chabalina, C. Gerber, L. Nigra, T. Ten
• Fermilab (FNAL)• M. Demarteau, A. Ronzhin, K. Sogut, L. Spiegel, S. Tkaczyk + technicians
• University of Kansas (KU)• P. Baringer, A. Bean, L. Christofek, D. Coppage
• Mexican Consortium: • Cinvestav: H. Castilla, R. Perez, A. Sanchez• Puebla: E. Medel, H. Salazar• San Luis Potosi: A. Morelos
• University of Rochester (UR)• R.Demina, R. Eusebi, E. Halkiadakis, A. Hocker, S. Korjenevski, P. Tipton
20 joined group this past year – few more needed at both sites10 left the group (includes KSU)
20 joined group this past year – few more needed at both sites10 left the group (includes KSU)
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 3
US Group Activity
• US Group Leaders Meeting – monthly or as needed• Discuss resources, planning, etc.
• US Production Meeting – Weekly• Keep track of quality, schedule, problems
• All major tasks report.
• Experts understood to be meeting regularly.
• One expert representative for each task will make summary report in the Production meeting.
• Will start next week.
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 4
SST Schedule
Completion: Jan. 2006
An aggressive schedule
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 5
Schedule Outlook
• Parts• Sensor: HPK – yields very high – quality excellent
• Fairly confident all Sensors will arrive by November – even if we increase order from 16400 to ~18000
• Hybrids: Cicorel – quality good – yields rising• Recent batches were very good
• Went from slightly behind the original schedule to slightly ahead• The exceptionally good new batches included TOB
• Looks like all TOB hybrids could be in hand before Europe closes for August
• Module Production• Open issues: Approval of Ag epoxy fix, Encapsulation• Start now: 6-9 per day (30 per site this week) • Following 4 weeks: ~50/w/site• Following 4 weeks: ~75/w/site• Steady state after that: ~100/w/site
• Cannot exceed ~ 60-70/w/site until multi-rod burn-in is going. • Without rods, need overnight cycling in Wien box for thermal check. • Gives us 5 to 8 weeks to get the rod production up to snuff.
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 6
Planning
• We will focus heavily on TOB initially, with the possibility of completing all rods by early Autumn being considered.
• Then, UCSB will be full time TEC module production.
• Meanwhile, we build a team up at CERN for I&C
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 7
UCSB Assembly Plate/Capacity
Total of 24 plates(#) = plates added in 2004
Module type Completed Plates
Plates In Process Total Daily Capacity
(# modules)
TOB r-phi 7 (2) 7 21
TOB stereo 3 (1) 3 9
TEC R5P 2 (2) 1 3 9
TEC R5S 2 (2) 1 3 9
TEC R6 5 (4) 5 15
TEC R7 2 (2) 1 3 9
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 8
TEC R7
TEC R6 TEC R5P TEC R5S
TOB r-phi TOB stereo
Module Types Built in US
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 9
Tracker Management Structure
Proposed Solution to Management Structure• Must involve all Talented People in the Success of the Project
• Propose to Manage the Project with a Management Board
• Each Member with assigned Specific Responsibility
• Propose the Management Board meets ~ once each Month
• Management Board meets at different Tracker Institutions :• Visit labs, Meets people doing the work, understands Problems/Common
Solutions
• Receive Reports, Technical Status, Financial Status, Anticipate Future Problems
• Manage the Project to meet Schedule and Budget
• Develop the CMS Tracker Management Team
Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 10
Tracker Management Structure
Tracker Management Board
1 Peter Sharp Project Manager
2 Didier Contardo TEC - France
3 Geoff Hall Head of the Project Office UK
4 Roland Horisberger Pixels Switzerland
5 Joe Incandela TOB USA
6 Marcello Mannelli QA and Schedules
7 Stefan Schael TEC + Germany
8 Roberto Tenchini Resources (Finance & People)
9 Guido Tonelli TIB / TID Italy
10 Guenter Flugge Tracker Institution Board
Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 11
Tracker Management Structure
Proposed Project Structure
Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 12
Tracker Management Structure
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Slide taken from Peter Sharp’s presentation
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 13
Management
• Tracker Construction Board• Currently 2D
• Columns: TIB/TOB/TEC/PIXELS
• Rows: Module Production, Integration: Tracker/Electronics/Software
• May add more technical rows
• Names not settled