Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Using APFO’s Imagery Archive to Study Land Use Change
Zack Adkins, Nathan PughUSDA/FSA/APFO/Service Center Support SectionUSDA/FSA/APFO/Service Center Support Section
2009 USDA Imagery Planning Meeting
12/17/2009 1
O tliOutline
Introduction and Overview of Projects
h d l Methodology Projects
Sacramento Dallas
Questions
12/17/2009 2
I t d ti d O iIntroduction and Overview
Request from WDC Using FSA data, show what is
h i f d h l d happening to farm and ranch lands as a result of urban sprawl, land use change etcchange, etc.
Six areas of interestChicago Dallas Sacramento Raleigh Chicago, Dallas, Sacramento, Raleigh,
Springfield(MA), Chesapeake Bay area
12/17/2009 3
I t d ti d O iIntroduction and Overview
Resources Data
I CLU f d d t Imagery, CLU, farm records data
SoftwareESRI ERDAS GeoExpressESRI, ERDAS, GeoExpress
Personnel 10 employees in Geospatial Services p y p
Branch
12/17/2009 4
M th d lMethodology
f i i d Area of interest is created Based upon input from FSA Administrator and
further research
Image scans are requested Several years of historical imagery
Scans are georeferenced This process uses tie points which are locations
visible on both images to “Tie” the images visible on both images to Tie the images together so all locations match
Reference imagery varies: NAIP, MDOQ, DRG
12/17/2009 5
M th d lMethodology
Georeferenced images are mosaicked together and then compressedcompressed ERDAS Imagine and GeoExpress
Minimal dodging and color balancing Minimal dodging and color balancing are applied
12/17/2009 6
M th d lMethodology
Imagery analysis Supervised/Unsupervised
Cl ifi tiClassificationAg/Non-ag, crop type, general land
cover typesco e types
Manual ClassificationHeads-up digitizing of agricultural areasHeads-up digitizing to determine land
use for a small area
12/17/2009 7
M th d lMethodology
Oth d t l i Other data analysis DCP and ACRE data CLU
Loss of CLU over time Identifying potential non-agricultural CLU
Farm records dataFarm records data Crop type CRP data
12/17/2009 8
M th d lMethodology
G t fi l d t Generate final products Map layouts (hard and soft copy) Graphs, charts, tables, etc. PowerPoint show Project report
12/17/2009 9
P j t S tProject-Sacramento
Area of Interest along Sacramento River from current airport south to Pocket/GreenhavenPocket/Greenhaven
Study focusL f i lt ti Loss of agriculture over time
Loss of rice growing areas over time L d h f ifi Land use change for a specific area
CLU
12/17/2009 10
P j t S tProject-Sacramento
Imagery 1958, 1964, 1972, 1984, 1998, 2009
Other Data CLU, DCP/ACRE records
Data sources APFO, ESRI, FSA-California
12/17/2009 11
P j t S tProject-Sacramento
Agriculture loss over time Agricultural areas were manually
digitized for all years of imagery digitized for all years of imagery Acreage totals were analyzed for each
yearyear
12/17/2009 12
12/17/2009 13
Total Agriculture Area for Each Year
51,980
60,000
Percent Agricultural Land for Area of Interest
70%
80%
31,710
38,15342,490
47,804
40,000
50,000
s 47.96%
53.42%
60.10%
65.35%
70.85%
60.14%
52.04%
46 58%
50%
60%
70%
23,189
20,000
30,000
Acre
s
29.15%
39.86%
46.58%
39.90%
34.65%
20%
30%
40%Agricultural
Non-Agricultural
0
10,000
1958 1964 1972 1984 1998 20090%
10%
1958 1964 1972 1984 1998 2009
12/17/2009 14
P j t S tProject-Sacramento
Rice cropland loss over time Rice growing areas were manually
digitized for all years of imagery digitized for all years of imagery Acreage totals were analyzed for each
yearyear
12/17/2009 15
12/17/2009 16
Rice Acreage
25,000
Changes in Rice Acreage
8 000
9,000
15,000
20,000
s 5 000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Acreage Gained
10,000
Acre
s
2 000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Acr
es
g
Acreage Lost
0
5,000
1958 1964 1972 1984 1998 20090
1,000
2,000
1958 to 1964 1964 to 1972 1972 to 1984 1984 to 1998 1998 to 2009
12/17/2009 17
P j t S tProject-Sacramento
CLU enrollment in DCP/ACRE Farms enrolled in DCP/ACRE were
extracted from a tabular databaseextracted from a tabular database Farm data joined with CLU for Yolo and
Sacramento CountiesSacramento Counties
Identifying CLU enrolled in programs that may no longer be p g y gagricultural
12/17/2009 18
12/17/2009 19
CLU Enrolled in DCP
433,558450,000
500,000
238 341
282,305300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
es Sacramento238,341
100 000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Acr
e Sacramento
Yolo
52,109
0
50,000
100,000
Total CLU Total Enrolled in DCP or ACRE
Total AcresTotal Acres
12/17/2009 20
P j t S tProject-Sacramento
Land use change over time Area of interest in Pocket/Greenhaven
1 3 il 1.3 square miles
10 land cover class types Farmland water road railroad Farmland, water, road, railroad,
residential, commercial/industrial, forest/woodland, recreational, farm, otherClass t pes man all digiti ed Class types manually digitized
1958 and 2009
12/17/2009 21
12/17/2009 22
12/17/2009 23
Land Use as a Percent of the Total Area of Interest
70%
80%
40%
50%
60%
70%
19582009
0%
10%
20%
30%
farm
land
resid
entia
l
wat
er
road
s
railr
oads
omm
ercia
l/ind
ustri
alfo
rest
/woo
dlan
d
farm
s
othe
r
recr
eatio
n
com
12/17/2009 24
Total Change in Land Use: 1958-2009
500
600
farm th
forest/woodlandf l d
100
200
300
400
water
farm other
recreationalcommercial/industrial
woodlandfarmland
residential road railroad
-300
-200
-100
0
Acre
s
700
-600
-500
-400
300
-700
12/17/2009 25
P j t D llProject-Dallas
Area of Interest near Plano Study focus
Loss of agricultural land over time Land use change for a specific area CLU – DCP – CRP – Farm Records
12/17/2009 2612/17/2009 26
12/17/2009 2712/17/2009 27
12/17/2009 2812/17/2009 28
P j t D llProject-Dallas
Imagery 1964, 1972, 1980, 1990, 1998, 2008
Other Data CLU, DCP/ACRE records, CRP, Farm
RecordsRecords
Data sourcesAPFO ESRI FSA Texas FSA APFO, ESRI, FSA-Texas, FSA-Washington, DC
12/17/2009 2912/17/2009 29
P j t D llProject-Dallas
Agriculture loss over time Agricultural areas were manually
digitized for all years of imagery digitized for all years of imagery Acreage totals were analyzed for each
yearyear
12/17/2009 3012/17/2009 30
12/17/2009 3112/17/2009 31
12/17/2009 3212/17/2009 32
P j t D llProject-Dallas
Example of CRP enrollment with Imagery
Ch k CRP ith t d Check CRP program with current and historical imagery
12/17/2009 3312/17/2009 33
12/17/2009 3412/17/2009 34
P j t D llProject-Dallas
CLU enrollment in DCP Farms enrolled in DCP were extracted
from a tabular databasefrom a tabular database DCP data joined with CLU for Collin
County, TexasCounty, Texas Identifying Urban CLU potentially
enrolled in agricultural programs
12/17/2009 3512/17/2009 35
12/17/2009 3612/17/2009 36
P j t D llProject-Dallas
d h i Land use change over time Area of interest in Plano
9 square miles 9 square miles 10 land cover class types
Farmland, water, road, railroad, residential, commercial/industrial forest/woodland commercial/industrial, forest/woodland, recreational, Farm Facilities, other
Class types manually digitizedP R lt ith A t t d Cl ifi ti Poor Results with Automated Classification
1964 and 2008
12/17/2009 3712/17/2009 37
Project-Dallas-1964
Commercial/Industrial
F F ilitiFarm Facilities
Farmland
Forest/Woodland
Grassland/Pasture
Other
Railroad
Recreational
Residential
Roads
Water
12/17/2009 3812/17/2009 38
Project-Dallas-2008
Commercial/Industrial
F F ilitiFarm Facilities
Farmland
Forest/Woodland
Grassland/Pasture
Other
Railroad
Recreational
Residential
Roads
Water
12/17/2009 3912/17/2009 39
90%100%
50%
60%70%
80%
2008 Land Use
10%
20%30%
40%2008 Land Use1964 Land Use
0%10%
rcial/In
dustr
ialFarm
Facilitie
sFarm
landes
t/Woo
dland
sland
/Pasture
Other
Railroa
dRec
reatio
nal
Reside
ntial
Road
Water
Commerc Fa
ForesGras
sl R
12/17/2009 4012/17/2009 40
523 270
59
1,067
1,062
C i l/I d t i l
253
230
23
F
4,836
4,566
270
F l d
157
98 F t/W dl dCommercial/Industrial Farm ,Farmland 98 Forest/Woodland
465
14
54
6
8 489
Facilities
465
451Grassland/Pasture
54
48 Other
8
Railroad
489
489Recreational
145 305 2
3,086
145
2 941
1,121
305
47
2
45
1964 Land Use 2008 Land Use
2,941
Residential 816 Road45
Water
12/17/2009 4112/17/2009 41
Q ti ?Questions?
12/17/2009 4212/17/2009 42