Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Using EU financial instruments
European Commission
2
Innovative solutions to the
financing of disaster prevention
1.Use of EU funding
2.Disaster Risk Insurance
3.Risk Transfer Solutions
3
1. Use of EU funding
•Study on EU financial instruments
•Analysis of uptake
•Possible Commission actions
4
Study on EU financing
instruments
•Critical analysis of instruments
-desk analysis, questionnaires, interviews
•Inventory of instruments
•Catalogue of measures
5
Prevention measures
•Risk identification and impact assessment
•Knowledge development
•Awareness raising
•Early warning
•Governance
6
Overview of draft Catalogue
Fo
r r
ese
arch
on
all
do
ma
ins a
nd
fo
r
all
ty
pe
s o
f d
isa
ste
r
FP
7R
ese
arch
on
ris
k a
sse
ssm
en
t
an
d
ma
na
ge
me
nt
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
re
sil
ien
ce
bu
ild
ing
Fo
r f
ore
st f
ire
s m
ain
lyS
tru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
LIF
E +
Info
rm
atio
n o
n
ha
za
rd
an
d r
isk
Kn
ow
led
ge
de
ve
lop
me
nt
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Ha
za
rd
mo
nit
orin
g
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Imp
act a
nd
lo
ss
asse
ssm
en
t
Fo
r p
ro
te
cte
d a
re
as
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Lif
e +
Vu
lne
ra
bil
ity
asse
ssm
en
t
Fo
r r
eg
ion
al
de
ve
lop
me
nt i
n t
he
EU
Fo
r r
eg
ion
al
de
ve
lop
me
nt o
ut o
f E
U
Fo
r r
ura
l d
ev
elo
pm
en
t,
fore
st f
ire
s
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Ha
za
rd
de
te
rm
ina
tio
n
an
d/o
r
ma
pp
ing
Ris
k i
de
ntif
ica
tio
n
an
d i
mp
act
asse
ssm
en
t
Co
mm
en
ts (
*)
Co
nce
rn
ed
EC
fun
d
De
ta
ile
d
me
asu
re
s
(de
ta
ils i
n
An
ne
x)
Ty
pe
of
pre
ve
ntio
n
me
asu
re
s
Fo
r r
ese
arch
on
all
do
ma
ins a
nd
fo
r
all
ty
pe
s o
f d
isa
ste
r
FP
7R
ese
arch
on
ris
k a
sse
ssm
en
t
an
d
ma
na
ge
me
nt
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
re
sil
ien
ce
bu
ild
ing
Fo
r f
ore
st f
ire
s m
ain
lyS
tru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
LIF
E +
Info
rm
atio
n o
n
ha
za
rd
an
d r
isk
Kn
ow
led
ge
de
ve
lop
me
nt
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Ha
za
rd
mo
nit
orin
g
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Imp
act a
nd
lo
ss
asse
ssm
en
t
Fo
r p
ro
te
cte
d a
re
as
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Lif
e +
Vu
lne
ra
bil
ity
asse
ssm
en
t
Fo
r r
eg
ion
al
de
ve
lop
me
nt i
n t
he
EU
Fo
r r
eg
ion
al
de
ve
lop
me
nt o
ut o
f E
U
Fo
r r
ura
l d
ev
elo
pm
en
t,
fore
st f
ire
s
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
Ha
za
rd
de
te
rm
ina
tio
n
an
d/o
r
ma
pp
ing
Ris
k i
de
ntif
ica
tio
n
an
d i
mp
act
asse
ssm
en
t
Co
mm
en
ts (
*)
Co
nce
rn
ed
EC
fun
d
De
ta
ile
d
me
asu
re
s
(de
ta
ils i
n
An
ne
x)
Ty
pe
of
pre
ve
ntio
n
me
asu
re
s
7
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Co
mm
un
ity
-
ba
se
d a
ctio
n
pla
ns
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IIn
te
rn
atio
na
l
co
op
era
tio
n
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IO
rg
an
isa
tio
na
l
de
ve
lop
me
nt
IPA
, E
NP
ILe
gis
latio
n,
no
rm
s a
nd
co
de
s
- th
ro
ug
h s
up
po
rt t
o N
GO
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Lif
e +
Po
licy
de
ve
lop
me
nt
- th
ro
ug
h s
up
po
rt t
o N
GO
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Lif
e +
Instit
utio
na
l
fra
me
wo
rk
an
d
arra
ng
em
en
ts
Le
ga
l fr
am
ew
ork
,
instit
utio
na
l a
nd
org
an
isa
tio
na
l
arra
ng
em
en
ts
Fo
r F
ore
st f
ire
s
Fo
r s
om
e h
aza
rd
s
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
CP
FI
Ala
rm
an
d
wa
rn
ing
sy
ste
ms
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IF
ore
ca
stin
g
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IM
on
ito
rin
g
Ea
rly
wa
rn
ing
On
ly p
artly
, sin
ce
pre
pa
re
dn
ess i
s
lim
ite
d t
o c
ris
is m
an
ag
em
en
t
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
CP
FI
Pre
pa
re
dn
ess
Aw
are
ne
ss r
ais
ing
Co
mm
en
ts (
*)
Co
nce
rn
ed
EC
fun
d
De
ta
ile
d
me
asu
re
s
(de
ta
ils i
n
An
ne
x)
Ty
pe
of
pre
ve
ntio
n
me
asu
re
s
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Co
mm
un
ity
-
ba
se
d a
ctio
n
pla
ns
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IIn
te
rn
atio
na
l
co
op
era
tio
n
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IO
rg
an
isa
tio
na
l
de
ve
lop
me
nt
IPA
, E
NP
ILe
gis
latio
n,
no
rm
s a
nd
co
de
s
- th
ro
ug
h s
up
po
rt t
o N
GO
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Lif
e +
Po
licy
de
ve
lop
me
nt
- th
ro
ug
h s
up
po
rt t
o N
GO
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
Lif
e +
Instit
utio
na
l
fra
me
wo
rk
an
d
arra
ng
em
en
ts
Le
ga
l fr
am
ew
ork
,
instit
utio
na
l a
nd
org
an
isa
tio
na
l
arra
ng
em
en
ts
Fo
r F
ore
st f
ire
s
Fo
r s
om
e h
aza
rd
s
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
EA
RD
F
CP
FI
Ala
rm
an
d
wa
rn
ing
sy
ste
ms
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IF
ore
ca
stin
g
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
IM
on
ito
rin
g
Ea
rly
wa
rn
ing
On
ly p
artly
, sin
ce
pre
pa
re
dn
ess i
s
lim
ite
d t
o c
ris
is m
an
ag
em
en
t
Stru
ctu
ra
l fu
nd
s
IPA
, E
NP
I
CP
FI
Pre
pa
re
dn
ess
Aw
are
ne
ss r
ais
ing
Co
mm
en
ts (
*)
Co
nce
rn
ed
EC
fun
d
De
ta
ile
d
me
asu
re
s
(de
ta
ils i
n
An
ne
x)
Ty
pe
of
pre
ve
ntio
n
me
asu
re
s
8
Overview per instrument Lo
cal a
nd
re
gio
na
l
au
tho
riti
es,
Me
mb
er
Stat
es,
NG
Os,
UN
age
nci
es,
In
tern
ati
on
al
Org
an
isa
tio
ns
33
M€
for
pre
pa
red
ne
ss
in 2
01
0
Pre
pa
red
ne
ss,
cris
is
ma
na
gem
en
t a
nd
wa
rnin
g sy
ste
ms,
pre
ven
tio
n a
dvo
cacy
Aw
are
ne
ss
rais
ing,
ea
rly
wa
rnin
g
All
dis
ast
ers
invo
lvin
g ci
vil
pro
tect
ion
CP
FI
Re
sea
rch
ce
nte
rs a
nd
exp
ert
gro
up
s
30
M€
for
20
07
-20
13
Re
sea
rch
in a
ll d
om
ain
s a
nd
fo
r al
l typ
es
of
pre
ven
tio
n m
ea
sure
s
All
FP7
EU
Me
mb
er
Stat
es
?Fo
rest
fir
e p
reve
nti
on
,
aff
ore
sta
tio
n,
adap
ted
lan
d u
se a
nd
agr
icu
ltu
ral p
ract
ice
s
Ris
k
ass
ess
me
nt,
kno
wle
dg
e
de
velo
pm
en
t,
ap
plic
ati
on
s o
f
me
asu
res
Ava
lan
che
s,
sto
rm,
fore
st
fire
s, f
loo
ds
lan
slid
es,
so
il
ero
sio
n,
dro
ugh
t
EA
RD
F
Be
ne
fici
ary
co
un
trie
s?
All
me
asu
res
ap
art
fro
m r
ese
arc
h
All
All
IPA
, E
NP
I
Re
gio
ns,
EU
Me
mb
ers
Stat
es
6 8
00
M€
for
pre
ven
tio
n f
or
20
07
-20
13
All
me
asu
res
ap
art
fro
m r
ese
arc
h a
nd
sup
po
rt f
or
po
licy,
inst
itu
tio
na
l an
d le
gal
issu
es
All
All
Stru
ctu
ral
fun
ds
an
d
coh
esi
on
fun
d
Typ
es
of
ap
pli
can
tP
rovi
sio
ns
De
tail
ed
me
asu
res
Do
ma
ins
or
typ
es
of
pre
ven
tio
n
me
asu
res
Typ
e o
f
dis
ast
er
EC
Fin
an
cia
l
Inst
rum
en
t
Loca
l an
d r
egi
on
al
au
tho
riti
es,
Me
mb
er
Stat
es,
NG
Os,
UN
age
nci
es,
In
tern
ati
on
al
Org
an
isa
tio
ns
33
M€
for
pre
pa
red
ne
ss
in 2
01
0
Pre
pa
red
ne
ss,
cris
is
ma
na
gem
en
t a
nd
wa
rnin
g sy
ste
ms,
pre
ven
tio
n a
dvo
cacy
Aw
are
ne
ss
rais
ing,
ea
rly
wa
rnin
g
All
dis
ast
ers
invo
lvin
g ci
vil
pro
tect
ion
CP
FI
Re
sea
rch
ce
nte
rs a
nd
exp
ert
gro
up
s
30
M€
for
20
07
-20
13
Re
sea
rch
in a
ll d
om
ain
s a
nd
fo
r al
l typ
es
of
pre
ven
tio
n m
ea
sure
s
All
FP7
EU
Me
mb
er
Stat
es
?Fo
rest
fir
e p
reve
nti
on
,
aff
ore
sta
tio
n,
adap
ted
lan
d u
se a
nd
agr
icu
ltu
ral p
ract
ice
s
Ris
k
ass
ess
me
nt,
kno
wle
dg
e
de
velo
pm
en
t,
ap
plic
ati
on
s o
f
me
asu
res
Ava
lan
che
s,
sto
rm,
fore
st
fire
s, f
loo
ds
lan
slid
es,
so
il
ero
sio
n,
dro
ugh
t
EA
RD
F
Be
ne
fici
ary
co
un
trie
s?
All
me
asu
res
ap
art
fro
m r
ese
arc
h
All
All
IPA
, E
NP
I
Re
gio
ns,
EU
Me
mb
ers
Stat
es
6 8
00
M€
for
pre
ven
tio
n f
or
20
07
-20
13
All
me
asu
res
ap
art
fro
m r
ese
arc
h a
nd
sup
po
rt f
or
po
licy,
inst
itu
tio
na
l an
d le
gal
issu
es
All
All
Stru
ctu
ral
fun
ds
an
d
coh
esi
on
fun
d
Typ
es
of
ap
pli
can
tP
rovi
sio
ns
De
tail
ed
me
asu
res
Do
ma
ins
or
typ
es
of
pre
ven
tio
n
me
asu
res
Typ
e o
f
dis
ast
er
EC
Fin
an
cia
l
Inst
rum
en
t
9
Examples
Hyd
ro-m
ete
oro
log
ica
l g
au
ge
s to
ela
bo
rate
da
tab
ase
s o
n m
ea
sure
d
pa
ram
ete
rs (
for
pro
ba
bilis
tic
an
aly
sis
an
d m
od
el
cali
bra
tio
n)
Ha
zard
mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
ba
bili
stic
co
nse
qu
en
ce
ass
ess
me
nt
(co
sts
an
d l
ife
lo
sse
s)
fro
m e
xpo
sure
an
d v
uln
era
bil
ity
fun
ctio
n in
da
ng
ero
us
zon
es
Imp
act
an
d l
oss
ass
ess
me
nt
Exp
osu
re a
sse
ssm
en
t in
da
ng
ero
us
zon
es,
fu
nct
ion
s o
f in
du
ced
da
ma
ge
de
pe
nd
ing
on
th
e in
ten
sity
of
the
dis
ast
er
(flo
od
, e
art
hq
ua
ke
…)
Vu
lne
rab
ilit
y a
sse
ssm
en
t
Flo
od
ha
zard
ma
pp
ing
fro
m h
ydra
uli
c
mo
de
ls,
loca
tio
n o
f p
ast
fo
rest
fir
es…
Ha
zard
de
term
ina
tio
n
an
d/o
r m
ap
pin
g
Ris
k i
de
nti
fica
tio
n
an
d i
mp
act
ass
ess
me
nt
Ex
am
ple
s o
f m
ea
sure
sD
eta
ile
d m
ea
sure
sT
yp
e o
f
pre
ve
nti
on
me
asu
res
Hyd
ro-m
ete
oro
log
ica
l g
au
ge
s to
ela
bo
rate
da
tab
ase
s o
n m
ea
sure
d
pa
ram
ete
rs (
for
pro
ba
bilis
tic
an
aly
sis
an
d m
od
el
cali
bra
tio
n)
Ha
zard
mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
ba
bili
stic
co
nse
qu
en
ce
ass
ess
me
nt
(co
sts
an
d l
ife
lo
sse
s)
fro
m e
xpo
sure
an
d v
uln
era
bil
ity
fun
ctio
n in
da
ng
ero
us
zon
es
Imp
act
an
d l
oss
ass
ess
me
nt
Exp
osu
re a
sse
ssm
en
t in
da
ng
ero
us
zon
es,
fu
nct
ion
s o
f in
du
ced
da
ma
ge
de
pe
nd
ing
on
th
e in
ten
sity
of
the
dis
ast
er
(flo
od
, e
art
hq
ua
ke
…)
Vu
lne
rab
ilit
y a
sse
ssm
en
t
Flo
od
ha
zard
ma
pp
ing
fro
m h
ydra
uli
c
mo
de
ls,
loca
tio
n o
f p
ast
fo
rest
fir
es…
Ha
zard
de
term
ina
tio
n
an
d/o
r m
ap
pin
g
Ris
k i
de
nti
fica
tio
n
an
d i
mp
act
ass
ess
me
nt
Ex
am
ple
s o
f m
ea
sure
sD
eta
ile
d m
ea
sure
sT
yp
e o
f
pre
ve
nti
on
me
asu
res
10
WISE-RTD
11
FLOODsite
12
Main financing
instruments at EU
level
•Cohesion Policy funding
(ERDF, ESF, CF)
•Civil Protection (CPFI)
•Pre-Accession (IPA) and
Neighbourhood Policy (ENPI)
•Rural Development (EARDF)
•Environment (Life+)
•Research & Development (FP7)
13
•Civil Protection responders in Member States
•Enhance preparedness of the public in case of
emergencies in the Member States
•Information sharing of project results
Preparedness–cooperation projects
�Lo
ng
-te
rm p
reve
nti
on
an
d m
itig
ati
on
by i
mp
rovin
g r
isk
ass
ess
me
nt
an
d m
an
ag
em
en
t
�P
rom
ote
're
spo
nse
-pre
pa
red
ne
ss-p
reve
nti
on
-
rem
ed
iati
on
' ch
ain
Prevention –cooperation projects
�2007: 6 projects
�€1.5 million
�2009: 12 projects
�€4 million
14
Co
mm
un
ity
Me
cha
nis
m
Ind
uct
ion
Te
chn
ica
l E
xpe
rts
Me
dia
an
d
Se
curi
ty
Aw
are
ne
ss
Sta
ff
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Hig
h-l
ev
el
Co
-
ord
ina
tio
n
Inte
rna
tio
na
l
Co
ord
ina
tio
n
Ass
ess
me
nt
Mis
sio
n
Op
era
tio
na
l
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Mo
du
les
Ba
sic
�Some 1.500
experts already
trained
�Sub-contracted
Training centres
in various
locations
Experts trained in EU
civil protection can be
deployed
Preparedness –training courses
Exc
ha
ng
e o
f
exp
ert
s
pro
gra
mm
e
15
Eurosot2005, Italy
Escex2004, Finland
What kind of exercises?
30 exercises financed since
2002Large-scale pan-European
simulation exercises
2009 �
€1.65 million
Aims
Accelerate response decision-
making procedures
Enhance interoperability
Identify further training needs
Preparedness –Simulation exercises
EULUX 2007, Luxembourg
EUDANEX 2006,
Denmark/Sweden
16
Addressing Natural Hazards:
Addressing Natural Hazards:
European Framework Programmes
European Framework Programmes
••F
P5
FP
5 ––
Overa
ll s
up
po
rt (
1998
Overa
ll s
up
po
rt (
1998
-- 20
02)
20
02): 48 Mio Euro
••F
P6
FP
6 ––
Overa
ll s
up
po
rt (
2002
Overa
ll s
up
po
rt (
2002
-- 20
06)
20
06): 58,2 Mio
•FP7-(2007)
: 13 Mio
•FP7-(2008) : 14 Mio
•FP7-(2009)
: 13 Mio
•FP7-(2010)
: 11.5 Mio
•FP7-(2011)
: 18 Mio
17
Main core areas of
Main core areas of ««Natural
Natural
Hazards
Hazards»»
in the Work programme
in the Work programme
•H
aza
rd a
ss
es
sm
en
t, t
rig
ge
rin
g f
ac
tors
an
d
fore
ca
sti
ng
•V
uln
era
bil
ity a
ss
es
sm
en
t a
nd
so
cie
tal
imp
ac
ts
•R
isk
as
se
ss
me
nt
an
d m
an
ag
em
en
t
•M
ult
i-ri
sk
a
ss
es
sm
en
t a
nd
mit
iga
tio
n
str
ate
gie
s
18
Su
b A
cti
vit
y
Natu
ral H
azard
s
Main areas covered by the work programme calls for proposals
Hazard assessment, triggering factors and forecasting:
•2007:
-European storm risk (MICORE)
•2008:
-Methodology and tools for earthquake hazards in Europe
(SHARE)
•2009:
-Forest fires in the context of climate and social changes (FUME)
•2010:
-no call
•2011:
-Towards real-time earthquake risk reduction
Vulnerability assessment and Societal impacts
•2007:
-Frame for better vulnerability assessment (MOVE; ENSURE)
-Investigating Europe's risks from drought (XEROCHORE)
•2008:
-Social perception, behaviour and response to
risks (CapHazNet)
•2009:
-Costs of natural hazards (ConHaz)
-Vulnerability of buildings, lifelines related to
earthquakes (Syner-G)
•2010:
-Building a culture of risk preventionin Europe (in negotiation)
•2011:
-Building societal resilience to disasters in Europe
-Vulnerability and increased drought in Europe
19
Su
b A
cti
vit
y -
Natu
ral H
azard
s
Main areas covered by the work programme
calls for proposals
Risks assessment and management
•2007: -Assessment and management of volcanic threat (MIAVITA)
-Avalanche forecasting and risk mapping
•2008: -Prediction of triggering and risk assessment for landslides (SAFELAND)
-Risk management for flash floods and debris flow (IMPRINTS)
•2009: -Risk prevention and management of urban floods (CORFU)
•2010:
-Early warning and drought risks in Africa
(in
neg
oti
ati
on
)
•2011: -Risk prevention and management before volcanic eruptions
Multi risk evaluation and mitigation
•2007: -European multi-hazard database
•2008: -Coordinated research strategy between European and national levels
•2009: -no open call
•2010: -New methods for multi-hazard and multi-risk assessments
(in
neg
oti
ati
on
)
-Social science, natural hazards and decision making process
•2011: -Capacity building in natural hazards risks reduction
20
Cohesion Policy -Programming
•2007-2013: planned co-financing of €6.5
billion on ‘risk prevention’
–Focus on ‘prevention/preparedness’
–Large scope of interventions eligible
–Priority under territorial cooperation (Interreg)
•MS select & implement projects (principle
of shared management)
•20 MS planned use of Cohesion Policy
funding on ‘risk prevention’
21
2007-13 allocation to risk
prevention & uptake by end 2009
0,0
200,0
400,0
600,0
800,0
1000,0
1200,0
1400,0
HU
PL
ES
PT
GR
DE
CB
IT
RO
CZ
FR
SK
EE
SI
MT
BG
LV
FI
AT
NL
UKEU
27
0,0%
5,0%
10,0%
15,0%
20,0%
25,0%
30,0%
35,0%
40,0%
45,0%
50,0%
Decided allocation (m€)
% Project selected
22
Cohesion Policy -Uptake
•Uptake of Cohesion Policy funding for risk
prevention by 09/2010 (‘Strategic report
2010’):
Currently rate of uptake at about 20%
•Large amounts of funds still available for
investments in natural disaster prevention
23
Cohesion Policy -Issues
•Awareness among stakeholders /
authorities of availability of Cohesion
Policy for risk prevention
•Capacities of responsible authorities to
design/deliver such projects
•Economic crises: access to national
funding part
24
ELBE-LABE: adaptation to flood risk in the
Elbe basin
•InterregIV Project
•€3.3 M ERDF of €4.2 M
•20 partners from 4 countries
•09/2008 until 02/2012
•Continuation of 03-06 Interreg
project ‘ELLA’:
–flood hazard maps + basic
action plan for future flood
mitigation
•Implementing actions to improve
methods & instruments of flood
risk management:
–standardization of methods
and instruments;
–awareness-raising;
–adaptation of land uses;
25
Further examples of implemented
projects (co-)financed by EU
funding
•Floods: elaboration of the national flood risk management strategy for
ROMANIA and application to three river basins (PHARE project, finalised in
2009)
•Forest fires: the SPREAD project relates to forest fire prevention and
mitigation, with application in Spain in particular (Joint Research Centre)
•Earthquakes and tsunami: NEAREST (Integrated Observation from Near
Shore sources of Tsunami), TRANSFER (Tsunami Risk and Strategiesfor
the European Region), SEAHELLARC (Seismic risk assessment and
mitigation scenarios in western Hellenic Arc), SAFER (Seismic Early
Warning for Europe)
•Oil spills: a three-year EU-funded POP&C project (Pollution Prevention and
Control –safe transportation of hazardous goods by tankers) with three
main objectives: to develop a methodology by which tanker ownerscan
calculate the spill risk posed by their ships; to assess and provide advice on
ways to reduce these risks; and to advise tanker crews on how tomitigate
pollution damage once a spill has occurred.
•Multi-risks: the FLAGSHIP Initiative in countries eligible for ENPI funding
26
Flo
od
pre
ven
tio
n o
n t
he T
isza r
iver
(Hu
ng
ary
)•Construction of 7 flood
reservoirs along the river in
2007-2013 (Operational
Programme ‘Environment’of
Hungary)
•Investment of €290 M by
Cohesion Policy out of €
400 M
•1 flood plain already co-
financed in 2000-2006
27
Ben
efi
cia
ries:
•Candidate Countries & Potential Candidate Countries CC/PCC:
Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, as well as Kosovo under
UNSCR 1244/99, and Turkey.
Overa
ll o
bje
cti
ve:
Reducethe vulnerabilityof IPA Beneficiariesto naturaland man-made
disastersatlocal, national, and regionallevels
Ob
jecti
ves:
•Strengthening civil protection capacities of CC/PCC
•Preparing CC/PCC for participation in the CP Mechanism
Bu
dg
et:€4 million
Du
rati
on
:2 years (01/2011 –12/2012)
IPA Programme –
Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance
28
Tra
inin
g P
rog
ram
me
:
1)
basic training (6 day-long) ~ CMI
2)
operational management training (6 day-long) ~ OPM
3)
advanced training (5 day-long) ~ HLC
•272 participantsin total –34 experts / beneficiary
Ex
ch
an
ge
of
ex
pert
s:
•civil protection experts of the beneficiariesto gain and pass
knowledge from and to services of other beneficiaries or the
Mechanism Participating States
•minimum 5 days to up to 2 weeks
•80 experts in total –10 experts / beneficiary
Lot 1
Tra
inin
g p
rog
ram
me
&
ex
ch
an
ge
s o
f e
xp
ert
s
29
2 R
eg
ion
al e
xe
rcis
es
:
•2 different scenarios
•at least 3 full days & 1 night duration
•at least 120 participants: min 5 intervention teams x 20 staff +
equipment, observers, evaluators
•activation of the Mechanism
•deployment of Mechanism/MIC assessment and coordination
expert team
•involvement of the National Civil Protection Authorities of
beneficiary countries
Lot 2
Re
gio
na
l e
xe
rcis
es
&
Me
ch
an
ism
ex
erc
ise
s
30
Mech
an
ism
exerc
ises:
•1 team per beneficiary to play along in the
Mechanism exercises in 2011 and 2012
2011:
Lot 2
Re
gio
na
l e
xe
rcis
es
&
Me
ch
an
ism
ex
erc
ise
s
31
12
Wo
rksh
op
s o
n k
ey is
su
es
:
1.
Provision of assistance during disasters and host-nation support;
2.
Early warning systems (EWS);
3.
Development of '112' systems and centres;
4.
Sharing the best practices in the field of civil protection and
developing lessons-learned systems and culture;
5.
Instrument of Pre-accession Assistance (IPA) and accessing
national IPA programmes for civil protection projects; and
6.
The Community Civil Protection Mechanism.
Ta
rge
t g
rou
p: top-level managers, decision makers and senior staff
in the field of civil protection, key national contact point staff
Lot 3
Wo
rks
ho
ps
32
•S
tee
rin
g G
rou
pfor each Lot:
-to provide general directions on the Programme implementation
-1 representative from the national civil protection authoritiesof
each beneficiary
•A network of beneficiaries' N
ati
on
al
Co
rre
sp
on
de
nts
-the first contact point and permanent partners in the Programme
-National Training Coordinators, who nominate the experts
•R
ole
in
th
e e
xe
rcis
es
-N
ati
on
al
Civ
il P
rote
cti
on
Au
tho
rityof each beneficiary will be
deploying intervention teams and will p
ay a
lon
gwith the MIC
Ac
tiv
e i
nv
olv
em
en
t o
f th
e b
en
efi
cia
ry
co
un
trie
s n
ee
de
d:
33
PPRD East Programme
•One of the 6 Flagship initiatives under the Eastern
Partnership (Belarus, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia,
Moldova and Ukraine)
•Programme launchedin December2009 in Gothenburg
•Programme willstartrunning early2011
•Target groups: civil protection and disastermanagement
authorities, researchinstitutions, civil society, private
sectorand the generalpublic
•Prevention, preparedness, mitigation, and response
•Results:
–Improved knowledge base
–Strengthened capacities at local, regional, and national level
–Wider information and awareness
34
PPRD East Programme-Specific activities
•Electronic Regional Risk atlas as a tool
facilitating cooperation
•Civil Protection CapacityBuilding
Programme
•Awareness-raisingcampaign
•Coordination via the PPRD East Steering
Committee
35
Disasterriskinsurance
•Prevention incentives to many actors
•Pre-event financing versus ex post action
•Premiums based on actual risks
•Insurance involved in entire risk
management cycle
36
•Through cooperation with policymakers
and other stakeholders, insurance can:
–Assist in enhanced land-use planning
–Development/ enforcement of building codes
–Risk assessment, modelling, mapping
–Awareness raising and education
37
3. Risk Transfer Solutions
•Innovative financial products to raise
capital on the world capital markets
•Objective: Lower costs of (re-)insurance
•Catastrophe bonds 2009 turnover €7 bn.
•Possible due to improved prediction tools
•EU context: Possibly useful for industry,
infrastructure, i.e. to foster primary market
38
Example: Mexico ILS 2009
•Insurance linked securities (ILS)
•By World Bank /IBRD
•Parametric insurance to
Mexico’s Fund for Natural
Disasters (FONDEN), for:
–Earthquake risk
–Pacific/ Atlantic hurricane risks
•Issuance US$290 million
39
Possible actions
•Publish Catalogue of Prevention Measures
•growth & regional policy highlighting risk prevention
•Additional tools that could be developed, e.g.:
–More assistance in project definition and preparation
–Clearer definition of the concept of “prevention”
–Definition of success indicators
–Specific funding expertise -prevention help desk
–Targeted funding meetings
•More support for dissemination of results of projects
•Mainstreaming of prevention into EU instruments
•Preventionfinancingin international fora
•Foster collaboration and knowledge transfer among MS
–good practice, technical assistance, seminars, workshops, …
–Furtherworkin the area of insuranceand risktransfersolutions