USIP Fact Book 2016-10173/22/2018 CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies USIP_FactBook_2016_2017 University Skills Immersion Program USIP Fact Book . 2016-2017. CUNY Office of Undergraduate

3/22/2018 CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies USIP_FactBook_2016_2017

University Skills Immersion ProgramUSIP

Fact Book 2016-2017

CUNY Office of Undergraduate StudiesUniversity Skills Immersion Program (USIP)

March 2018

A fully accessible version of this document is available upon request from the CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies. Please contact Karyna Pryiomka at [email protected].

1


Table of Contents

University Skills Immersion Program (USIP) FactBook2016-2017

PageSection 1.1 Program Overview 3 Figure 1. Initial Remedial Needs of First-Time Freshmen University-Wide(Seats) 3 Section 1.2. USIP Enrollment Trends 4 Figure 2. University-Wide USIP Enrollment Trends (Seats) 4 Table 1. USIP Five-Year Enrollment Trends: Year-Round 5 Table 2. USIP Six-Year Enrollment Trends: Summer 6 Table 3. USIP Five-Year Enrollment Trends: Non-Summer 7Section 2.1 Summer 2015: USIP Enrollment, Retention, and Student Profile 8 Figure 3. Admission Characteristics of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016 8 Figure 4. Race/Ethnicity of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016 9 Figure 5. High School Background of FTF Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016 10 Figure 6. "Other "High School Types of FTF Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016 10 Table 4. Initial Remedial Needs of First-Time Freshmen, by College: Fall 2016 11 Table 5. USIP Participation of First-Time Freshmen with Initial Remedial Need, by College: Fall 2016 12 Table 6. First-Time Freshmen Initial Needs and USIP Participation in Summer 2016 13 Table 7. Fall Retention of Students Enrolled in Summer USIP 2016 14 Table 8. Admission Type and Credit Distribution of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016 15Section 3.1. Types, Characteristics, and Target Population of USIP Offerings 16 Table 9. USIP Enrollment and Offering Types: Summer 2016 17 Table 10. USIP Enrollment and Offering Types: Non-Summer 2016-2017 18 Table 11. USIP Enrollment and Offering Characteristics: Summer 2016 19 Table 12. USIP Enrollment and Offering Characteristics: Non-Summer 2016-2017 20 Table 13. USIP Contact Hours Distribution: Summer 2016 21 Table 14. USIP Contact Hours Distribution: Non-Summer 2016-2017 22 Table 15. USIP Target Population Groups: Summer 2016 23Section 4.1. USIP Subject Enrollment and Pass Rates 24 Figure 7. USIP University-Wide Subject Enrollment 2016-2017 24 Table 16. USIP Subject Enrollment: Summer 2016 25 Table 17. USIP Total Passing Rates: Summer 2016 26 Table 18. USIP Passing Rates in Offerings that Include CUNY Proficiency Exam: Summer 2016 27 Table 19. Post-USIP Subject Enrollment for Students in Remedial Sections: Fall 2016 28 Table 20. USIP Subject Enrollment: Non-Summer 2016-2017 29 Table 21. USIP Total Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2016-2017 30 Table 22. USIP Reading Passing Rates: 2016-2017 31 Table 23. USIP Writing Passing Rates: 2016-2017 32 Table 24. USIP Reading & Writing Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2016-2017 33 Table 25. USIP Math Passing Rates: Summer 2016 34 Table 26. USIP Math Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2016-2017 35 Table 27. USIP ESL Passing Rates: 2016-2017 36 Table 28. USIP Other Subjects Passing Rates: 2016-2017 37

2


Section 1.1 Program OverviewSince its conception in 1985, the University Skills Immersion Program (USIP) provides tuition free opportunities for CUNY students to receive remedial or other types of instruction throughout the academic year. USIP serves a wide range of students, from first-time freshmen to continuing students in advanced standing. In light of recent placement policy changes and continuous emphasis on access and degree completion within current strategic framework, USIP serves as one of the integral pre-matriculation programs whose aim is to help students achieve and maintain academic momentum.

Although USIP offerings have expanded beyond remediation, particularly over the last few years, addressing remedial needs of CUNY students remains one of the program’s primary goals. As presented in Figure 1, between years 2010 and 2016, as many as 58.9% of the entering freshmen class was assessed as having at least one remedial need.

54.258.9 58 56.3 57 56.3 54.2

43.352.9 53.4 51.4 51.7 50.9 49.6

22.318.3 16.5 15.8 15.8 15.2 14.0

33.524.9 21.4 18.8 20.4 22.1 19.2

0

20

40

60

80

100

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

% o

f firs

t-tim

e fre

shm

en ad

mits

Years (Fall Enrollment)

Figure 1. Initial Remedial Needs of First-Time Freshmen University-Wide

any math reading writing

To support students with remedial needs, USIP offers courses and workshops in math, reading, and writing, as well as ESL classes. Non-remedial offerings, which are more typical at senior colleges, support student success in additional subjects, such as psychology, biology, and chemistry. These non-remedial offerings take many forms, including early college orientations and preparatory workshops for gateway courses, such as College Algebra and English Composition. Only non-credit bearing offerings can be offered as part of USIP.

As with many successful education initiatives, USIP represents a coordinated effort among CUNY's Central Office, campus USIP directors, and local faculty and staff. The Central Office, in particular the Office of Undergraduate Studies and the Office of Academic Affairs, provides centralized administrative support in the form of incentive funds, summative and formative program evaluations, and policy oversight. College USIP Directors oversee local coordination of USIP programs, such as scheduling, local funds allocations, design and implementation of student outreach and recruitment strategies, and local data collection and reporting. Faculty and staff working as a part of USIP engage in curriculum development, student assessment and grading, and professional development for faculty and staff members.

3


Section 1.2. USIP Enrollment TrendsObserved changes in USIP enrollment presented in Figure 2 reflect changes in funding, overall university enrollment, changes in placement policies, as well as the addition of non-summer offerings. In the past year, funding priorities shifted from program expansion toward more specific targeted goals. In the early years of USIP, the program operated only during the summer and winter terms. However, since the introduction of incentive funds, program offerings have been expanded to the fall and spring semesters. To better reflect these changes, we have substituted previously used designation of "Winter" offerings with "Non-Summer" offerings. For the purposes of funding and evaluation, the USIP academic year begins with the summer session, while sessions offered between fall and spring are considered non-summer. For instance, year-round enrollment for 2016-2017 consists of summer 2016 and non-summer sessions offered during fall 2016, winter and spring 2017. Tables 1 through 3 (pages 5-7) present campus-level data on USIP year-round, summer, and non-summer enrollment trends, respectively.

18,529 17,941

21,19422,388

20,776

16,69514,726 15,720 16,101

14,861

1,8343,215

5,474 6,287 5,915

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

USIP

Sea

ts

Academic Years

Figure 2. University-Wide USIP Enrollment Trends (Seats)Year-Round Summer Non-Summer

In order to aid program development and to accurately reflect programmatic outcomes, the Office of Undergraduate Studies, in collaboration with the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, continuously refines its reporting methodologies not only to remain consistent with institutional policies but also to identify the best practices in program evaluation. Beginning with the academic year of 2015-2016, we made minor changes to the enrollment calculations for USIP evaluation. Specifically, participants with "WN" grades have been excluded from enrollment counts. Assignment of "WN" indicates that despite registering for an offering, a student never attended. Also, most of the USIP enrollment tables report seat-level data, and only a few report headcount. For seat-level data, a student is counted once for each offering in which they participate. When headcount is reported, a student is counted only once, regardless of how many offerings in which they participate. We consider seat-level enrollment to be the most accurate representation of program's size and performance.

Also, current the Factbook contains five new tables (Tables 6, 8, 10, 12, 19) presenting data on the subject enrollment of first-time freshmen with initial need, USIP participants' fall admissions status, offering types and characteristics of non-summer sessions, and students' enrollment in subject courses in a fall semester following summer USIP participation, respectively.

4


USIP College 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

N N N N NBaruch 353 306 509 456 506Brooklyn1 313 127 - 130 125City1 413 200 172 385 931Hunter 566 56 405 744 589John Jay 942 633 655 384 343Lehman 200 202 220 230 221Queens 219 175 431 440 313York 1,101 1,326 807 968 689Total Senior Colleges 4,107 3,025 3,199 3,737 3,717Medgar 1,290 1,647 2,111 2,154 1,575NYCCT 1,600 1,532 1,739 1,480 1,480Staten Island 1,804 2,308 2,167 2,104 1,993Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,694 5,487 6,017 5,738 5,048BMCC 1,972 1,942 2,754 3,407 3,380Bronx 1,461 1,198 2,112 1,505 1,738Hostos 1,597 2,231 2,552 2,388 2,238Kingsborough 2,215 1,440 2,199 1,970 1,369LaGuardia 1,215 1,276 1,089 1,045 1,015Queensborough 1,268 1,342 1,272 2,598 2,271Total Community Colleges 9,728 9,429 11,978 12,913 12,011Total University 18,529 17,941 21,194 22,388 20,776

1USIP data for summer 2014 are not available for Brooklyn and City Colleges.

Table 1. USIP Five-Year Enrollment Trends (Seats): Year-Round

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database

5


USIP College Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016

N N N N N NBaruch 457 353 306 424 392 396Brooklyn1 989 313 127 - 130 125City1 424 413 200 - 99 397Hunter 159 566 56 268 475 328John Jay 1,174 942 633 655 374 342Lehman 901 200 202 220 230 221Queens 274 154 125 372 368 313York 1,101 1,101 1,326 537 609 393Total Senior Colleges 5,479 4,042 2,975 2,476 2,677 2,515Medgar 1,510 1,290 1,647 1,590 1,580 1,104NYCCT 1,690 1,600 1,395 1,522 1,320 1,269Staten Island 1,709 1,804 1,738 1,625 1,676 1,603Total Comprehensive Colleges 4,909 4,694 4,780 4,737 4,576 3,976BMCC 1,642 1,899 1,140 1,740 2,551 2,359Bronx 1,540 1,461 1,198 1,779 1,159 1,442Hostos 1,409 882 1,371 1,760 1,516 1,539Kingsborough 1,027 1,648 1,123 1,456 1,266 841LaGuardia 650 866 860 738 720 811Queensborough 919 1,203 1,279 1,034 1,636 1,378Total Community Colleges 7,187 7,959 6,971 8,507 8,848 8,370Total University 17,575 16,695 14,726 15,720 16,101 14,861

Table 2. USIP Six-Year Enrollment Trends (Seats): Summer

1USIP data for summer 2014 are not available for Brooklyn and City Colleges.Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database

6


USIP College 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

N N N N NBaruch 0 0 85 64 110Brooklyn 0 0 0 0 0City 0 0 172 286 534Hunter 0 0 137 269 261John Jay 0 0 0 10 1Lehman 0 0 0 0 0Queens 65 50 59 72 0York 0 0 270 359 296Total Senior Colleges 65 50 723 1,060 1,202Medgar 0 0 521 574 471NYCCT 0 137 217 160 211Staten Island 0 570 542 428 390Total Comprehensive Colleges 0 707 1,280 1,162 1,072BMCC 73 802 1,014 856 1,021Bronx 0 0 333 346 296Hostos 715 860 792 872 699Kingsborough 567 317 743 704 528LaGuardia 349 416 351 325 204Queensborough 65 63 238 962 893Total Community Colleges 1,769 2,458 3,471 4,065 3,641Total University 1,834 3,215 5,474 6,287 5,915

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

Table 3. USIP Five-Year Enrollment Trends (Seats): Non-Summer

7


Section 2.1 Summer 2016: USIP Enrollment, Retention, and Student ProfileIn this section, Table 4 (page 11) presents data on the initial remedial needs for first-time freshmen across individual colleges. Students' remedial needs are determined by their initial CUNY skills proficiency exam results, which could have been taken at a time other than the semester of enrollment. Some students are exempt from taking placement exams. Table 5 (page 12), in turn, shows how many of those with an initial remedial need participated in USIP during the summer 2016. Table 6 (page 13) provides a more detailed account of initial remedial needs of first-time freshmen in USIP and their enrollment in USIP subject offerings that are consistent with their needs. It should be noted that due to the technicalities of institutional data tracking, we can only report student profile data, such as initial need, admission status, race, ethnicity, and gender for the students who were retained in the fall.

A total of 13,297 students participated in USIP summer program in 2016, of which 11,918 (89.6%) students where retained in fall 2016. Table 7 (page 14) presents fall retention of summer USIP participants by college.

University-wide, the majority of retained USIP participants were female (59.8%). At senior colleges, female students accounted for 61.4% of retained USIP participants, while at comprehensive and community colleges, female students accounted for 55.2% and 61.6% of those retained, respectively.

On average, retained USIP participants were 22.1 years old. USIP participants retained at senior (20.1 years old) and comprehensive (20.3 years old) colleges were, on average, slightly younger than those at community (23.6 years old) colleges. University-wide, 19% of retained USIP participants were 25 years old or older. The proportion of retained USIP participants 25 or older at senior colleges was 10.3%, at comprehensive colleges 9.1%, and at community colleges 26.6%.

University-wide, 14.4% of retained USIP students enrolled in the fall semester part-time. The proportion of USIP participants who enrolled in the fall part-time at senior colleges was 11.1%, at comprehensive colleges 7.7%, and at community colleges 18.7%. Figure 3, Table 7 (page 14), and Table 8 (page 15) present admission characteristics of USIP participants enrolled in fall 2016.

FTF without Credits51%

Continuing Freshmen with ≤ 30 Credits

28%

Students with > 30 Credits

10%

Continuing Freshmen without Credits

7%FTF with Credits

4%

Figure 3. Admission Characteristics of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016

8


For the purposes of reporting and USIP evaluation, the term first-time freshman refers to a new degree student who has never before attended any post-secondary institution for degree credit after graduating from high school or earning a GED, including students who earned any number of college credits before graduating from high school,consistent with the Office of Institutional Research's terminology. The term continuing freshmen, in this report, refers to degree students who have earned less than or equal to 30 credits, consistent with the University class standing definition. University-wide, 41.9% of summer USIP participants retained in fall 2016 had earned college credit prior to the beginning of the fall term.

Figure 4 presents race/ethnicity of summer USIP participants retained in the fall, where Black and Hispanic students represent the two largest groups university-wide. Students of American Indian or Alaskan Native descent represented 0.4% of summer USIP participants who enrolled in fall 2016 university-wide, while representing 0.3% of retained USIP students at senior college, 0.4% at comprehensive colleges, and 0.5% at community colleges.

Additionally, 21.4% of retained USIP participants university-wide were born outside of the US territory, while for 40.7% the birthplace is unknown. Community colleges had the largest proportion of retained USIP students born outside of the US territory (25.7%) closely followed by senior (18.2%) and comprehensive (14.6%) colleges.

University-wide, English was not a native language for 25.5% of retained USIP students, while for 37.9% native language was unknown. The proportion of summer USIP participants who are non-Native English speakers at community (30.9%) and senior (22.8%) colleges was higher than it was at comprehensive (16.4%) colleges.

Asian or Pacific Islander15.5% Asian or Pacific Islander

11.1%

Asian or Pacific Islander25.4% Asian or Pacific Islander

16.0%

Black, Non-Hispanic29.8%

Black, Non-Hispanic43.0%

Black, Non-Hispanic21.5% Black, Non-Hispanic

32.0%

Hispanic, Other44.5%

Hispanic, Other26.6% Hispanic, Other

37.9%Hispanic, Other

38.5%

White, Non-Hispanic9.8% White, Non-Hispanic

18.9%White, Non-Hispanic

15.0%White, Non-Hispanic

13.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Community Colleges(N = 6,610)

Comprehensive Colleges(N = 3,243)

Senior Colleges(N = 2, 065)

Total University(N = 11,918)

Figure 4. Race/Ethnicity of Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016

The majority of retained USIP participants graduated from New York City public schools. Figures 5 and 6 present the high school background of first-time freshman summer USIP participants retained in the fall. Overall, 85.8% of all retained USIP participants are considered recent high school graduates, meaning that they graduated from high school within 15 months of the start of the term. This number is the highest for senior colleges (97%), with Comprehensive (91%) and Community (73.4%) colleges having slightly smaller proportions of recent high school graduates among their retained USIP participants. For 4.9% of these students, the number of months since high school graduation is unknown.

9


NYC Public71.9%

NYC Public86.1%

NYC Public87.0% NYC Public

81.0%

Other 20.3%

Other 11.2%

Other 11.5% Other

14.7%

Unknown7.7%

Unknown2.7%

Unknown1.5%

Unknown4.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Community Colleges(N = 2,439)

Comprehensive Colleges(N = 2,517)

Senior College(N = 1,519)

Total University(N = 6,475)

Figure 5. High School Background of First-Time Freshmen Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016

10

Figure 6 presents a more detailed breakdown of high school backgroud for students who did not attend NYC public schools.

GED28.6% GED

19.9%GED1.1%

GED21.0%

NYC Private/Parochial20.2%




NYS, not NYC8.3%

NYS, not NYC7.1%

NYS, not NYC33.7%

NYS, not NYC12.6%

US, not NYS6.5%

US, not NYS13.2%

US, not NYS9.7%

US, not NYS9.0%

Foreign36.5%

Foreign14.9%

Foreign5.7%

Foreign24.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Community Colleges(N = 496)

Comprehensive Colleges(N = 281)

Senior Colleges(N = 175)

Total University(N = 952)

Figure 6. Other HS Types of First-Time Freshmen Summer USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016


Needs Any Needs 1 Needs 2 Needs 3 Needs Math Needs Reading Needs Writing

N N % % % % % % %Baruch 1,404 1,341 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1Brooklyn 1,330 1,244 10.0 9.6 0.4 0.0 8.4 0.6 1.4City 1,827 1,739 2.0 1.8 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.3Hunter 2,208 2,105 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0John Jay 1,523 1,444 15.5 14.8 0.5 0.2 14.3 0.6 1.5Lehman 690 617 26.9 22.9 3.2 0.8 25.1 2.6 4.1Queens 1,481 1,339 6.6 5.2 1.3 0.1 4.1 1.5 2.6York 971 880 36.3 28.4 5.3 2.5 32.3 6.1 8.2Total Senior Colleges 11,434 10,709 9.2 7.9 0.9 0.3 8.0 1.0 1.7Medgar Evers 1,143 1,030 81.9 55.3 16.2 10.4 79.2 18.0 21.7NYCCT 3,217 3,077 57.1 42.3 9.3 5.5 51.5 10.9 14.9Staten Island 2,603 2,480 58.3 42.1 13.2 2.9 53.6 8.5 15.3Total Comprehensive Colleges 6,963 6,587 61.4 44.3 11.9 5.3 56.6 11.1 16.1BMCC 6,580 5,994 81.7 49.3 18.8 13.6 76.1 21.6 30.1Bronx 1,932 1,821 85.9 47.0 22.2 16.7 81.5 25.6 34.3Hostos 1,041 965 89.1 41.1 21.9 26.1 83.8 37.1 42.3Kingsborough 2,113 1,903 78.7 42.5 19.3 16.9 71.0 26.9 33.9LaGuardia 3,094 2,854 80.4 46.0 18.0 16.4 71.7 24.7 34.8Queensborough 3,316 3,040 72.6 45.5 17.9 9.1 64.7 18.7 25.3Total Community Colleges 18,076 16,577 80.4 46.6 19.1 14.7 73.7 23.5 31.7Total University 36,473 33,873 54.2 33.9 11.9 8.3 49.6 14.0 19.2

1Percentages are based on the number of students with known test status.

Table 4. Initial Remedial Need of First-Time Freshmen, by College: Fall 2016

Fall College First-time Freshmen

Remedial Need1

Known Test Status

Source: Office of Institutional Research and Assessment's Institutional Research Database (IRDB).

11


Total Cohort Known Test Status

N N N % N %Baruch 1,404 1,341 17 1.3 17 100.0Brooklyn 1,330 1,244 125 10.0 101 80.8City 1,827 1,739 34 2.0 28 82.4Hunter 2,208 2,105 7 0.3 0 0.0John Jay 1,523 1,444 224 15.5 91 40.6Lehman 690 617 166 26.9 81 48.8Queens 1,481 1,339 89 6.6 40 44.9York 971 880 319 36.3 111 34.8Total Senior Colleges 11,434 10,709 981 9.2 469 47.8Medgar Evers 1,143 1,030 844 81.9 409 48.5NYCCT 3,217 3,077 1,756 57.1 792 45.1Staten Island 2,603 2,480 1,446 58.3 1,089 75.3Total Comprehensive Colleges 6,963 6,587 4,046 61.4 2,290 56.6BMCC 6,580 5,994 4,900 81.7 470 9.6Bronx 1,932 1,821 1,564 85.9 382 24.4Hostos 1,041 965 860 89.1 178 20.7Kingsborough 2,113 1,903 1,498 78.7 316 21.1LaGuardia 3,094 2,854 2,295 80.4 411 17.9Queensborough 3,316 3,040 2,206 72.6 505 22.9Total Community Colleges 18,076 16,577 13,323 80.4 2,262 17.0Total University 36,473 33,873 18,350 54.2 5,021 27.4

1 Percentage and N are based on the number of students with known test status.

Table 5. USIP Participation of First-Time Freshmen with Initial Remedial Need: Fall 2016

Fall CollegeFirst-time Freshmen

First-time Freshmen with Remedial Need

Need Remediation1

Participated in USIP Summer 2016

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database.

12


Need Math

Need Math and Took Math

During USIPNeed

Reading

Need Reading and Took

Reading During USIP

Need Writing

Need Writing and Took

Writing During USIP

N N N % N % N % N %Baruch 128 125 17 13.6 15 100.0 0 -- 2 0.0Brooklyn 119 113 101 89.4 91 100.0 3 0.0 11 100.0City 260 251 28 11.2 23 100.0 1 100.0 5 100.0Hunter 77 74 0 0.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 --John Jay 321 307 91 29.6 76 75.0 8 100.0 17 0.0Lehman 212 188 81 43.1 73 94.5 11 90.9 13 84.6Queens 212 196 40 20.4 24 91.7 7 0.0 16 50.0York 148 131 111 84.7 104 100.0 2 0.0 13 69.2Senior 1,477 1,385 469 33.9 406 93.8 32 59.4 77 57.1Medgar Evers 454 418 409 97.8 397 92.7 69 31.9 98 41.8NYCCT 873 840 792 94.3 734 84.1 136 57.4 182 45.6Staten Island 1,160 1,105 1,089 98.6 1,020 80.1 134 53.0 252 55.6Comprehensive 2,487 2,363 2,290 96.9 2,151 83.8 339 50.4 532 49.6BMCC 532 502 470 93.6 427 86.2 109 33.9 178 18.0Bronx 426 409 382 93.4 376 90.4 71 50.7 91 4.4Hostos 187 183 178 97.3 170 77.1 88 39.8 85 25.9Kingsborough 357 329 316 96.0 270 72.6 117 76.1 147 70.7LaGuardia 437 418 411 98.3 376 92.0 145 47.6 165 6.1Queensborough 556 523 505 96.6 446 80.5 109 68.8 180 73.3Community 2,495 2,364 2,262 95.7 2,065 84.3 639 53.4 846 35.9Total University 6,459 6,112 5,021 82.1 4,622 84.9 1,010 52.6 1,455 42.1Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research DatabaseNote: Statistics based on low N counts may not meaningfully represent the program and should be interpreted with caution.

Table 6. First-Time Freshmen Initial Needs and USIP Participation in Summer 2016

Fall CollegeTotal FTF in

USIP (Headcount)

Known Test Any Need

Math Reading Writing

13


First-Time Freshmen

≤ 30 Cumulative

Credits

Over 30 Cumulative

CreditsN N % % % %

Baruch 362 339 93.6 37.8 38.9 23.3Brooklyn 121 120 99.2 99.2 0.8 0.0City 376 365 97.1 72.3 8.2 19.5Hunter 163 155 95.1 49.7 11.6 38.7John Jay 342 342 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Lehman 217 213 98.2 100.0 0.0 0.0Queens 292 275 94.2 78.5 17.1 4.4York 299 256 85.6 62.5 23.8 13.7Total Senior Colleges 2,172 2,065 95.1 73.6 14.0 12.4Medgar Evers 852 759 89.1 60.3 33.5 6.2NYCCT 1,225 1,111 90.7 79.1 15.8 5.0Staten Island 1,544 1,373 88.9 85.9 12.5 1.5Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,621 3,243 89.6 77.6 18.6 3.8BMCC 2,217 1,967 88.7 25.3 61.7 13.0Bronx 1,344 1,211 90.1 34.7 53.4 11.9Hostos 1,248 1,062 85.1 18.2 66.5 15.3Kingsborough 710 634 89.3 55.7 26.3 18.0LaGuardia 704 594 84.4 72.7 26.6 0.7Queensborough 1,281 1,142 89.1 47.5 44.3 8.1Total Community Colleges 7,504 6,610 88.1 36.9 51.4 11.7Total University 13,297 11,918 89.6 54.3 36.0 9.7

1Students may have completed USIP at a college other than the college of Fall enrollment.

Table 7. Fall Retention of Students Enrolled in Summer USIP: 2016

Source: Office of Undergraduae Studies and Institutional Research Database.

USIP College

Students Enrolled in

Summer 2016 USIP

(Headcount)

USIP Participants Enrolled in Fall 20161

Admission Characteristics of USIP Participants Enrolled in Fall 2016

14


USIP College # of FTF FTF with Credit

Mean Credits SD Credits

# of Continuing Freshmen

CF with Credit


# of Students with > 30 Credits


N N % N % NBaruch 339 128 3.1 6.3 4.7 132 12.9 17.4 7.5 79 73.2 24.2Brooklyn 120 119 55.5 2.0 0.2 1 * * * 0 -- --City 365 264 1.9 4.2 1.6 30 83.3 22.1 6.5 71 72.4 30.1Hunter 155 77 9.1 8.3 5.3 18 77.8 19.3 7.9 60 76.7 26.5John Jay 342 342 7.3 6.1 4.4 0 -- -- -- 0 -- --Lehman 213 213 7.5 5.9 3.0 0 -- -- -- 0 -- --Queens 275 216 3.2 4.3 1.9 47 14.9 15.1 10.0 12 88.6 34.0York 256 160 6.3 3.8 1.8 61 55.7 20.7 8.2 35 64.1 26.6Senior Total 2,065 1,519 9.2 3.9 3.3 289 33.6 19.9 7.9 257 73.3 27.5Medgar Evers 759 458 7.6 3.0 0.7 254 81.5 13.2 7.1 47 50.7 16.0NYCCT 1,111 879 8.0 5.3 3.1 176 85.8 12.5 7.1 56 61.2 34.2Staten Island 1,373 1,180 2.2 3.9 2.3 172 65.7 13.2 7.9 21 46.1 17.8Comprehensive 3,243 2,517 5.2 4.4 2.7 602 78.2 13.0 7.3 124 54.7 26.6BMCC 1,967 498 4.4 4.4 2.8 1,213 83.3 13.9 7.9 256 43.9 10.2Bronx 1,211 420 3.3 3.0 1.9 647 85.6 12.1 7.4 144 47.7 11.7Hostos 1,062 193 1.0 3.0 0.0 706 88.7 13.5 7.3 163 44.6 10.4Kingsborough 634 353 17.0 4.8 2.4 167 86.8 19.4 7.2 114 48.3 14.1LaGuardia 594 432 4.9 3.9 1.9 158 46.8 9.2 7.1 4 * *Queensborough 1,142 543 8.1 3.9 2.2 506 84.4 13.0 7.6 93 44.7 9.8Community 6,610 2,439 6.7 4.2 2.3 3,397 83.5 13.5 7.7 774 45.5 11.3Total University 11,918 6,475 6.7 4.2 2.8 4,288 79.4 13.6 7.7 1,155 52.6 21.4Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database* to protect students' privacy and to ensure meaningful interpretation of data, average credit counts are not reported for student groups with N less than 10

Students with > 30 creditsTable 8. Admission Type and Credit Distribution of Summer 2016 USIP Participants Retained in Fall 2016

Enrolled in Fall After USIP

(Headcount)

First-Time Freshman Students with ≤ 30 credits

15


Section 3.1. Types, Characteristics, and Target Populations of USIP Offerings

Offering Types (Definitions)USIP provides a wide range of offering types as presented in Tables 9 and 10 (pages 17-18). The most common offerings are courses, workshops, and bridge interventions. An offering is considered a course if its curriculum mirrors or is identical to a course taught during a traditional full academic semester. Such offerings typically require more homework than any other type. A workshop denotes an offering with a more flexible curriculum than a course. Its content may focus on a targeted or general review and includes little to no homework. Primarily offered at senior colleges, a bridge is usually a non-remedial offering, targeting entering freshmen and transfer students. Such offerings usually provide an early introduction to college-level courses and general college experience orientations. On a lesser scale, some colleges offer bootcamps and intensives, offerings that do not fit any of the definitions presented above.

Offering CharacteristicsMost USIP offerings have multiple characteristics as presented in Tables 11 and 12 (pages 19-20). Remedial offerings are designed to help students complete developmental education in reading, writing, and math. Some offerings include CUNY skill proficiency exams. Students enrolled in these offerings are required to take an official CUNY skill proficiency exam at some point during their participation in a program or upon its completion. CUNY skill proficiency exams, such as the CUNY Elementary Algebra Final Exam (CEAFE) and the CUNY Assessment Testing in Writing (CATW), are part of the criteria used by the university to determine students' eligibility to enroll in credit-bearing courses. Individual departmental and other local exams do NOT fall into this category. Additionally, some offerings include in-class or outside-of-class tutoring, or both. These interventions either have a tutor placed in a classroom assisting students throughout the intervention or require verified tutoring center attendance.

Contact HoursUSIP offerings also vary in their duration. Table 13 (page 21) and Table 14 (page 22) present the number of seats across a range of offering lengths for summer and non-summer sessions, respectively. We estimate intervention hours using the official CUNYfirst schedule. Calculated hours may differ slightly from the actual hours since, for example, our methodology does not account for times students do not meet in order to take a proficiency exam in a testing center. These categories should be understood as estimates that are not always directly related to offering types. Fully online sections are excluded from these calculations.

Target Populations (Definitions)To maximize program effectiveness and better address students’ needs, USIP directors, faculty, and staff often design interventions to target specific groups of students. Table 15 (page 23) presents the seat enrollment in offerings identified by program directors as targeting entering freshmen, continuing students, repeating students, entering transfer students, or near-passing students. For the purpose of this report, entering freshmen are new degree students who have never before attended any post-secondary institution for degree credit after graduating from high school or earning a GED, including students who earned any number of college credits before graduating from high school. Continuing students are students who have attended the college before. Near-passing students are those who were nearly successful on their most recent attempt to address a remedial need. Near-passing status of students is determined locally. Repeating students have participated in an offering or a course designed to address the same need before, but did not successfully pass it. Entering transfer students are those who are entering college as transfer from another college at the time of their USIP enrollment. These categories are not mutually exclusive, and a given offering may target multiple groups. Some offerings are explicitly open to all students and are designated with the category of Any. It should be noted that target population categories are reported by program directors at the section level and are NOT verified student-level attributes.

16


USIP College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) Course Workshop Bridge Other

N % % % %Baruch 396 75.5 24.5 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 125 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0City 397 16.9 51.4 31.7 0.0Hunter 328 7.3 22.3 70.4 0.0John Jay1 342 74.0 21.9 0.0 0.0Lehman 221 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Queens 313 37.4 0.0 0.0 62.6York 393 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Total Senior Colleges 2,515 30.2 47.2 14.2 7.8Medgar Evers 1,104 2.3 80.8 0.0 16.9NYCCT 1,269 84.8 15.2 0.0 0.0Staten Island 1,603 86.2 13.8 0.0 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,976 62.4 32.9 0.0 4.7BMCC 2,359 0.0 93.5 0.0 6.5Bronx 1,442 61.7 38.3 0.0 0.0Hostos 1,539 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 841 80.1 14.7 0.0 5.1LaGuardia 811 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Queensborough 1,378 35.1 64.9 0.0 0.0Total Community Colleges 8,370 34.2 63.5 0.0 2.4Total University 14,861 41.1 52.5 2.4 3.9

1 Approximately 4% of John Jay's USIP seats have unknown intervention type status as per CUNYfirst coding.Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database

Table 9. USIP Enrollment and Offering Types: Summer 2016

17


USIP College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) Course Workshop Bridge Other

N % % % %Baruch 110 14.5 72.7 0.0 12.7Brooklyn 0 -- -- -- --City 534 61.6 4.3 34.1 0.0Hunter 261 0.0 52.5 47.5 0.0John Jay1 1 * * * *Lehman 0 -- -- -- --Queens 0 -- -- -- --York 296 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Total Senior Colleges 1,202 28.7 44.7 25.5 1.2Medgar Evers 471 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0NYCCT 211 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Staten Island 390 75.4 24.6 0.0 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,072 27.4 72.6 0.0 0.0BMCC 1,021 0.0 85.6 0.0 14.4Bronx 296 6.8 93.2 0.0 0.0Hostos 699 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 528 34.7 18.8 0.0 46.6LaGuardia 204 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Queensborough 893 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0Total Community Colleges 3,641 11.2 78.0 0.0 10.8Total University 5,915 17.7 70.3 5.2 6.9

Table 10. USIP Enrollment and Offering Types: Non-Summer 2016-2017


18


USIP CollegeTotal Students

Enrolled (Seats)

Enrolled in Remedial Offerings

Enrolled in Offerings Leading

to CUNY Proficiency Exams

In-Class Tutoring

Outside-of-Class Tutoring

N % % % %Baruch 396 41.7 31.1 44.9 55.1Brooklyn 125 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0City 397 12.3 12.3 68.3 0.0Hunter 328 5.2 7.3 22.3 87.5John Jay1 342 21.9 21.9 63.7 95.9Lehman2 221 6.8 59.3 100.0 0.0Queens 313 100.0 100.0 72.5 62.6York 393 76.1 54.2 0.0 0.0Total Senior Colleges 2,515 42.1 41.9 47.2 45.9Medgar Evers 1,104 100.0 62.4 100.0 0.0NYCCT 1,269 91.5 89.9 8.5 0.0Staten Island 1,603 100.0 88.7 53.3 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,976 97.3 81.8 52.0 0.0BMCC 2,359 100.0 68.0 0.0 0.0Bronx 1,442 100.0 64.6 0.0 100.0Hostos 1,539 100.0 71.0 27.9 0.0Kingsborough 841 100.0 65.5 0.0 0.0LaGuardia 811 100.0 36.6 100.0 0.0Queensborough 1,378 100.0 100.0 32.9 23.5Total Community Colleges 8,370 100.0 69.9 20.2 21.1Total University 14,861 89.5 68.4 33.3 19.6

1 Approximately 4% of John Jay's USIP seats have unknown intervention type status as per CUNYfirst coding.2 Approximately 52.9% of Lehman seats have unknown remedial status.


Table 11. USIP Enrollment and Offering Characteristics: Summer 2016

NOTE: While senior colleges do not enroll students with remedial needs, they provide summer remedial offerings for provisionally admitted students. Students who otherwise satisfy senior college’s admission criteria but do not initially pass CUNY skill proficiency exam can enroll in remedial offerings at that senior college to address their need. If a student achieves proficiency at the end of the offering, they are allowed to continue their enrollment at the senior college.If a student is not able to address their need, they cannot enroll and are usually offered admission to a comprehensive or community college, where they can complete their developmental education.

In Summer 2016, 100% of all USIP offerings at all colleges except York were offered in-person. At York, 22% of USIP students (seats) participated in online offerings.

19


USIP CollegeTotal Students

Enrolled (Seats)

Enrolled in Remedial Offerings

Enrolled in Offerings Leading

to CUNY Proficiency Exams

In-Class Tutoring

Outside-of-Class Tutoring

N % % % %Baruch 110 85.5 85.5 100.0 0.0Brooklyn 0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0City 534 0.9 0.9 65.9 0.0Hunter 261 0.0 0.0 100.0 52.5John Jay 1 * * * *Lehman 0 6.8 59.3 100.0 0.0Queens 0 100.0 100.0 72.5 62.6York 296 57.1 52.0 0.0 0.0Total Senior Colleges 1,202 22.4 21.1 60.2 11.5Medgar Evers 471 100.0 69.9 98.9 0.0NYCCT 211 65.4 62.1 34.6 0.0Staten Island 390 100.0 29.7 39.7 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,072 93.2 53.7 64.7 0.0BMCC 1,021 100.0 66.8 0.0 0.0Bronx 296 100.0 86.5 6.8 93.2Hostos 699 100.0 70.1 23.7 0.0Kingsborough 528 100.0 17.6 4.5 4.5LaGuardia 204 100.0 84.8 100.0 0.0Queensborough 893 100.0 100.0 0.0 39.1Total Community Colleges 3,641 100.0 71.1 11.4 17.8Total University 5,915 83.0 57.8 31.0 13.3

Table 12. USIP Enrollment and Offering Characteristics: Non-Summer 2016-2017


NOTE: While senior colleges do not enroll students with remedial needs, they provide summer remedial offerings for provisionally admitted students. Students who otherwise satisfy senior college’s admission criteria but do not initially passCUNY skill proficiency exam can enroll in remedial offerings at that senior college to address their need. If a student achieves proficiency at the end of the offering, they are allowed to continue their enrollment at the senior college. If a student is not able to address their need, they cannot enroll and are usually offered admission to a comprehensive or community college, where they can complete their developmental education.

During the non-summer 2016-2017 USIP, approximately 21.7% of students (seats) at City College participated in hybrid offerings. Furthermore, approximately 1.1% of Hostos USIP students (seats) and 5% of York USIP students (seats) have participated in online USIP offerings. All other USIP students (seats) participated in the program in person.

20


USIP College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) 0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 90+ Unknown

N % % % % % % % %Baruch 396 0.0 2.8 19.7 60.9 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 125 0.0 0.0 63.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8City 397 4.8 24.9 67.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Hunter 328 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0John Jay 342 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 32.2 0.0 41.8 0.0Lehman 221 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Queens 313 0.0 62.6 0.0 15.3 3.5 12.1 6.4 0.0York 307 0.0 62.9 16.6 17.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Senior Colleges 2,429 0.8 20.5 28.7 18.2 8.1 1.6 6.7 15.4Medgar Evers 1,104 0.0 0.0 27.6 15.9 49.4 3.4 3.8 0.0NYCCT 1,269 8.5 5.0 12.8 0.0 48.5 18.7 4.2 2.4Staten Island 1603 0.0 0.6 13.3 34.4 49.2 2.6 0.0 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,976 2.7 1.8 17.1 18.3 49.0 7.9 2.4 0.8BMCC 2,359 0.0 0.0 22.6 0.4 22.9 19.1 28.2 6.7Bronx 1,442 1.2 35.4 1.2 16.2 0.0 46.1 0.0 0.0Hostos 1,539 0.0 13.6 42.6 40.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4Kingsborough 841 22.6 38.0 0.0 39.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LaGuardia 811 0.0 0.0 23.4 59.4 11.0 6.2 0.0 0.0Queensborough 1,378 0.0 25.1 37.9 2.2 5.3 26.3 1.4 1.9Total Community Colleges 8,370 2.5 16.6 22.9 20.4 8.4 18.2 8.2 2.8Total University 14,775 2.3 13.2 22.3 19.5 19.3 12.7 6.4 4.3

Table 13. USIP Contact Hours: Summer 2016

Source: Contact hours are calculated based on CUNYfirst schedule data Note: online courses are excluded from this analysis.

21


USIP College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) 0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 90+ Unknown

N % % % % % % % %Baruch 110 0.0 0.0 63.6 21.8 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 0 - - - - - - - -City 534 0.0 4.5 74.7 12.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4Hunter 261 0.0 0.0 47.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.5John Jay 1 * * * * * * * *Lehman 0 - - - - - - - -Queens 0 - - - - - - - -York 296 0.0 22.6 31.4 31.4 3.4 4.7 0.0 1.4Total Senior Colleges 1,202 0.0 7.6 57.1 15.2 2.2 1.2 0.0 15.5Medgar Evers 471 0.0 0.0 9.8 21.4 65.4 3.4 0.0 0.0NYCCT 211 37.9 52.1 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Staten Island 390 0.0 5.1 19.5 42.8 32.6 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,072 7.5 12.1 13.3 25.0 40.6 1.5 0.0 0.0BMCC 1,021 0.0 19.1 2.4 63.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 14.4Bronx 296 0.0 89.5 3.7 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Hostos 699 0.0 3.1 50.6 45.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1Kingsborough 528 20.3 14.2 0.0 28.6 34.7 2.3 0.0 0.0LaGuardia 204 0.0 0.0 12.3 36.3 0.0 51.5 0.0 0.0Queensborough 893 6.6 46.7 25.0 8.1 9.9 1.8 0.0 2.0Total Community Colleges 3,641 4.6 26.8 17.5 35.1 7.4 3.9 0.0 4.8Total University 5,915 4.2 20.2 24.8 29.2 12.4 2.9 0.0 6.1

Table 14. USIP Contact Hours: Non-Summer 2016-2017

Source: Contact hours are calculated based on CUNYfirst schedule data Note: online courses are excluded from this analysis.

22


USIP College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) Freshmen Continuing Repeating Transfer Near Passing Any

N % % % % % %Baruch 396 86.1 28.3 44.9 60.9 0.0 0.0Brooklyn 125 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0City 397 48.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.1Hunter 328 94.8 29.6 24.4 7.3 7.3 24.4John Jay 342 95.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lehman 221 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Queens 313 62.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4York 393 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0Total Senior Colleges 2,515 68.2 8.3 10.3 10.5 1.0 31.5Medgar Evers 1,104 15.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.1NYCCT 1,269 74.9 19.5 19.5 0.0 4.3 9.2Staten Island 1,603 90.7 68.9 68.9 79.4 5.7 100.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,976 64.9 34.0 34.0 32.0 3.7 66.6BMCC 2,359 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0Bronx 1,442 61.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 61.7 38.3Hostos 1,539 73.9 89.9 89.9 73.9 87.5 83.5Kingsborough 841 79.7 37.3 20.3 15.1 20.3 10.6LaGuardia 811 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0Queensborough 1,378 73.0 73.0 13.0 48.1 40.1 29.2Total Community Colleges 8,370 53.9 32.3 20.7 23.0 35.5 56.0Total University 14,861 59.3 28.7 22.5 23.3 21.2 54.7

1 Approximately 4% of John Jay's USIP seats have unknown target population as per CUNYfirst coding.

Table 15. USIP Target Population Groups: Summer 2016

Note: Presented categories are not mutually exclusive.


23


Section 4.1 USIP Subject Enrollment and Passing Rates

Subject EnrollmentUSIP is offered primarily in the three main subjects of skill proficiency: reading, writing, and math. Some campuses offer combined reading and writing sections as part of USIP. Additionally, most campuses provide separate ESL offerings. As presented in Figure 6, math had the highest enrollment throughout the year, reflecting the highest proportion of remedial need across colleges presented earlier in Figure 1. Other subjects may include introductory workshops into college-level psychology, chemistry, biology or other subjects, depending on the locally determined need for such offerings. Table 16 (page 25) and Table 20 (page 29) presents subject enrollment by college for summer and non-summer offerings, respectively. Table 19 (page 28) presents data on students' momentum, reporting students' enrollment in subject courses in a fall.

Pass RatesIt is important to note that while it might be true for some offerings; passing USIP does not always mean achieving proficiency. Within USIP, grades are assigned by the instructor or grading staff. Passing signifies that the student has met the passing criteria determined by the instructor or program. Passing an intervention may be required for a student to advance to the next-in-sequence course. Pass rates presented in this FactBook are calculated consistent with university grading policies. Various types of withdrawal rates are reported separately. W, WA and WD grades are considered official withdrawal grades and are excluded from students’ GPAs. WU represents an unofficial withdrawal and is counted by the university as failure. Table 17 (page 26) and Table 21 (page 30) show overall pass rates for summer and non-summer sessions, respectively. Table 18 (page 27) presents pass rates for those offerings that include CUNY skill proficiency exams. Tables 22 through 28 (pages 31-37) present subject level pass rates for colleges with reported enrollment in a given subject offering.

Math66%

Writing 13%

Reading7%

Reading & Writing5%

ESL 6%

Other3%

Figure 7. USIP University-Wide Subject Enrollment 2016-2017

24


USIP College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) Reading Writing Reading &

Writing Math ESL Other

N % % % % % %Baruch 396 0.0 0.0 0.0 91.2 8.8 0.0Brooklyn 125 0.0 10.4 0.0 89.6 0.0 0.0City 397 0.0 16.4 5.0 71.3 0.0 7.3Hunter 328 0.0 8.8 23.5 45.7 7.3 14.6John Jay1 342 2.9 28.7 0.0 32.2 0.0 32.2Lehman 221 0.0 0.0 6.8 52.5 0.0 40.7Queens 313 31.3 10.5 0.0 30.7 27.5 0.0York 393 0.0 5.1 0.0 74.6 0.0 20.4Total Senior Colleges 2,515 4.3 10.3 4.5 60.5 5.8 14.2Medgar Evers 1,104 5.4 11.1 0.0 83.5 0.0 0.0NYCCT 1,269 8.4 10.2 0.0 75.3 6.1 0.0Staten Island 1,603 5.9 11.9 1.0 67.6 13.6 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,976 6.6 11.1 0.4 74.5 7.4 0.0BMCC 2,359 13.0 6.8 0.0 67.3 12.9 0.0Bronx 1,442 12.3 8.3 0.0 75.4 2.6 1.3Hostos 1,539 6.8 7.9 13.2 72.1 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 841 15.3 19.0 8.0 56.1 1.5 0.0LaGuardia 811 16.4 3.5 0.0 71.3 8.9 0.0Queensborough 1,378 3.5 25.7 24.9 45.9 0.0 0.0Total Community Colleges 8,370 10.7 11.3 7.3 65.3 5.1 0.2Total University 14,861 8.5 11.1 5.0 66.9 5.8 2.5

1 Approximately 4% of John Jay's USIP seats have unknown target population as per CUNYfirst coding.

Table 16. USIP Subject Enrollment: Summer 2016


25


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 396 395 10 19 285 72.0 77.7Brooklyn 125 125 0 0 118 94.4 94.4City 397 84 13 0 48 12.1 12.5Hunter 328 314 7 0 307 93.6 95.6John Jay 342 313 1 0 290 84.8 85.0Lehman 221 211 0 0 208 94.1 94.1Queens 313 313 1 19 225 71.9 76.8York 393 393 0 0 363 92.4 92.4Total Senior Colleges 2,515 2,148 32 38 1,844 73.3 75.4Medgar Evers 1,104 1,102 0 15 862 78.1 79.2NYCCT 1,269 1,261 0 116 719 56.7 62.4Staten Island 1,603 1,603 134 0 1,135 70.8 77.3Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,976 3,966 134 131 2,716 68.3 73.2BMCC 2,359 2,357 301 6 1,385 58.7 67.5Bronx 1,442 1,162 0 124 819 56.8 62.1Hostos 1,539 1,539 366 0 569 37.0 48.5Kingsborough 841 795 3 13 536 63.7 65.0LaGuardia 811 794 7 4 557 68.7 69.6Queensborough 1,378 1,377 25 105 717 52.0 57.5Total Community Colleges 8,370 8,024 702 252 4,583 54.8 61.8Total University 14,861 14,138 868 421 9,143 61.5 67.4

* No seats with known outcomes

Table 17. USIP Total Passing Rates: Summer 2016

Withdrawal Rate

USIP College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

% Passed of Total Seats


Total Enrolled (Seats)

NOTE: Because of a recent transition to a new reporting system, not all grades for USIP interventions offered this year have been captured. Pass rates reported in this FactBook are based on the actual enrollment numbers, with the number of known outcomes reported as a reference point. Pass rates that include withdrawals are calculated with withdrawal grades included in the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/Total Enrolled). Pass rates that exclude withdrawals are calculated excluding ALL withdrawal grades from the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/(Total Enrolled-(W, WA, WD, WU))).

26


Enrolled Passed Enrolled Passed Enrolled Passed Enrolled Passed Enrolled PassedN % N % N % N % N % N %

Baruch 123 66.7 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 88 62.5 35 77.1Brooklyn 125 94.4 0 -- 13 100.0 0 -- 112 93.8 0 --City 49 0.0 0 -- 0 -- 10 0.0 39 0.0 0 --Hunter 24 100.0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 24 100.0John Jay 75 82.7 10 80.0 0 -- 0 -- 65 83.1 0 --Lehman 131 97.7 0 -- 0 -- 15 100.0 116 97.4 0 --Queens 313 71.9 98 90.8 33 87.9 0 -- 96 80.2 86 34.9York 213 85.9 0 -- 20 60.0 0 -- 193 88.6 0 --Total Senior Colleges 1,053 78.1 108 89.8 66 81.8 25 60.0 709 81.1 145 55.9Medgar Evers 689 71.8 60 70.0 122 66.4 0 -- 507 73.4 0 --NYCCT 1,141 53.2 106 56.6 130 62.3 0 -- 848 49.8 57 77.2Staten Island 1,422 68.3 95 77.9 191 56.0 16 56.3 902 75.5 218 45.9Total Comprehensive Colleges 3,252 63.7 261 67.4 443 60.7 16 56.3 2,257 65.4 275 52.4BMCC 1,603 57.9 245 44.1 125 56.8 0 -- 1,004 65.0 229 41.9Bronx 932 56.7 158 64.6 92 37.0 0 -- 664 56.9 18 77.8Hostos 1,092 35.4 104 31.7 122 31.1 203 30.0 663 38.5 0 --Kingsborough 551 65.7 129 48.8 160 48.1 67 80.6 195 86.2 0 --LaGuardia 297 57.2 0 -- 28 35.7 0 -- 226 58.4 43 65.1Queensborough 1,378 52.0 48 52.1 354 53.4 343 20.4 633 68.4 0 --Total Community Colleges 5,853 52.8 684 48.4 881 47.6 613 30.2 3,385 59.6 290 47.6Total University 10,158 58.9 1,053 57.4 1,390 53.4 654 32.0 6,351 64.1 710 51.1

Table 18. USIP Passing Rates in Classes that Include CUNY Proficiency Exam: Summer 2016ESL


Reading and Writing MathWritingTotal Pass Rate USIP College Total

EnrolledReading

Pass rates for sections that include CUNY proficiency exams (PE) are based on the total number of enrolled students, where withdrawal rates are counted as failure. Passing an intervention which includes CUNY PE currently signals skill proficiency or advancement to the next-in-sequence developmental course for Math interventions. Pending planned policy changes, similar interpretations will be attributed to the Reading and Writing pass rates.

27


Focused on sustained academic momentum, data presented in Table 19 speaks directly to the Access and Completion Pillar of the Univesity Strategic Framework. Table 19 presents data on summer USIP participants' consistent enrollment in a subject of assinged need immediately following USIP participantion.

Table 19. Post-USIP Subject Enrollment for Students in Remedial Sections: Fall 2016 1

USIP College

Math Reading and WritingEnrolled in Fall 2016

(Headcount)

Took Any2 Math/QR Course in Fall 2016

Enrolled in Fall 2016

(Headcount)

Took Any2 English Course in Fall 2016

BaruchN N % N N %

101 66 65.3 -- -- --Brooklyn 108 77 71.3 13 13 100.0City 36 11 30.6 10 10 100.0Hunter -- -- -- -- -- --John Jay 65 54 83.1 10 8 80.0Lehman -- -- -- 14 12 85.7Queens 78 60 76.9 129 127 98.4York 139 108 77.7 12 12 100.0Total Senior Colleges 527 376 71.3 188 182 96.8Medgar Evers 658 471 71.6 130 115 88.5NYCCT 743 701 94.3 178 169 94.9Staten Island 967 625 64.6 238 220 92.4Total Comprehensive Colleges 2,368 1,797 75.9 546 504 92.3BMCC 1,384 923 66.7 358 274 76.5Bronx 968 746 77.1 225 152 67.6Hostos 806 478 59.3 295 205 69.5Kingsborough 371 226 60.9 283 243 85.9LaGuardia 452 349 77.2 130 120 92.3Queensborough 574 429 74.7 595 395 66.4Total Community Colleges 4,555 3,151 69.2 1,886 1,389 73.6Total University 7,450 5,324 71.5 2,620 2,075 79.2

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database1 This table reports data for students who participated in a remedial section of math and/or reading/writing during Summer 2016 USIP and enrolled in Fall 2016 at the same college of their USIP participation.2 Any refers to any level of subject, including remedial, compensatory, and Pathways Core courses. Fall English courses also include developmental Reading and ESL courses.

28


USIP College Total Students Enrolled (Seats) Reading Writing Reading &

Writing Math ESL Other

N % % % % % %Baruch 110 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.6 16.4 0.0Brooklyn 0 - - - - - -City 534 0.0 0.0 0.0 91.4 0.0 8.6Hunter 261 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0John Jay 1 * * * * * *Lehman 0 - - - - - -Queens 0 - - - - - -York 296 0.0 10.1 0.0 48.3 0.0 41.6Total Senior Colleges 1,202 0.0 2.6 0.0 81.9 1.5 14.1Medgar Evers 471 6.4 10.8 0.0 82.8 0.0 0.0NYCCT 211 10.0 27.5 0.0 62.6 0.0 0.0Staten Island 390 2.8 12.1 0.0 57.2 27.9 0.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,072 5.8 14.6 0.0 69.5 10.2 0.0BMCC 1,021 12.0 20.0 0.0 60.3 7.6 0.0Bronx 296 8.1 28.0 0.0 55.7 8.1 0.0Hostos 699 1.4 11.2 11.2 76.3 0.0 0.0Kingsborough 528 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.3 34.7 0.0LaGuardia 204 12.3 0.0 0.0 61.8 26.0 0.0Queensborough 893 5.4 55.5 23.5 15.6 0.0 0.0Total Community Colleges 3,641 6.3 23.6 7.9 52.8 9.3 0.0Total University 5,915 4.9 17.7 4.9 61.8 7.9 2.9

Table 20. USIP Subject Enrollment: Non-Summer 2016-2017


29


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

WithdrawalsN N N N N % %

Baruch 110 109 1 7 77 70.0 75.5Brooklyn 0 - - - - - -City 534 448 22 2 292 54.7 57.3Hunter 261 239 18 0 202 77.4 83.1John Jay 1 1 * * * * *Lehman 0 - - - - - -Queens 0 - - - - - -York 296 296 0 0 252 85.1 85.1Total Senior Colleges 1,202 1,093 41 9 823 68.5 71.4Medgar Evers 471 471 34 8 341 72.4 79.5NYCCT 211 178 7 3 131 62.1 65.2Staten Island 390 390 30 0 239 61.3 66.4Total Comprehensive Colleges 1,072 1,039 71 11 711 66.3 71.8BMCC 1,021 1,021 146 0 629 61.6 71.9Bronx 296 280 1 15 174 58.8 62.1Hostos 699 698 113 0 319 45.6 54.4Kingsborough 528 526 4 9 482 91.3 93.6LaGuardia 204 204 0 0 139 68.1 68.1Queensborough 893 888 40 74 410 45.9 52.6Total Community Colleges 3,641 3,617 304 98 2,153 59.1 66.5Total University 5,915 5,749 416 118 3,687 62.3 68.5

* No seats with known outcomes

Table 21. USIP Total Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2016-2017

Withdrawal RateUSIP College

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

% Passed of Total Seats


Total Enrolled (Seats)

NOTE: Because of a recent transition to a new reporting system, not all grades for USIP interventions offered this year have been captured. Pass rates reported in this FactBook are based on the actual enrollment numbers, with the number of known outcomes reported as a reference point. Pass rates that include withdrawals are calculated with withdrawal grades included in the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/Total Enrolled). Pass rates that exclude withdrawals are calculated excluding ALL withdrawal grades from the denominator (e.g. Number Passed/(Total Enrolled-(W, WA, WD, WU))).

30


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

WithdrawalsN N N N N % %

John Jay 10 10 0 0 8 80.0 80.0 Queens 98 98 0 0 89 90.8 90.8 Total Senior Colleges 108 108 0 0 97 89.8 89.8

Medgar Evers 60 60 0 0 42 70.0 70.0NYCCT 106 106 0 4 60 56.6 58.8Staten Island 83 83 8 0 57 68.7 76.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 249 249 8 4 159 63.9 67.1BMCC 306 306 33 0 144 47.1 52.7Bronx 178 134 0 14 115 64.6 70.1Hostos 104 104 20 0 33 31.7 39.3Kingsborough 129 127 0 5 63 48.8 50.8LaGuardia 133 133 1 0 102 76.7 77.3Queensborough 48 48 0 0 25 52.1 52.1Total Community Colleges 898 852 54 19 482 53.7 58.4Total University 1,147 1,101 62 23 641 55.9 60.4

N N N N N % %Total Senior Colleges 0 0 * * * * *Medgar Evers 30 30 0 0 26 86.7 86.7NYCCT 21 14 1 0 12 57.1 60.0Staten Island 11 11 1 0 7 63.6 70.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 62 55 2 0 45 72.6 75.0BMCC 123 123 12 0 83 67.5 74.8Bronx 24 24 1 0 23 95.8 100.0Hostos 10 10 1 0 6 60.0 66.7LaGuardia 25 25 0 0 24 96.0 96.0Queensborough 48 48 1 2 19 39.6 42.2Total Community Colleges 230 230 15 2 155 67.4 72.8Total University 292 285 17 2 200 68.5 73.3

Sum

mer

2016

Non-

Sum

mer

2016

-201

7

Source: CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies and Institutional Research Database* No seats with known outcomes

Table 22. USIP Reading Passing Rates

USIP CollegeTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Withdrawal Rate % Passed of Total Seats

31


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % % Brooklyn 13 13 0 0 13 100.0 100.0 City 65 0 * * * * * Hunter 29 29 0 0 29 100.0 100.0 John Jay 98 98 1 0 95 96.9 97.9

Queens 33 33 1 1 29 87.9 93.5York 20 20 0 0 12 60.0 60.0Total Senior Colleges 258 193 2 1 178 69.0 69.8Medgar Evers 122 121 0 1 81 66.4 66.9NYCCT 130 130 0 3 81 62.3 63.8Staten Island 191 191 29 0 107 56.0 66.0Total Comprehensive Colleges 443 442 29 4 269 60.7 65.6BMCC 161 161 13 6 95 59.0 66.9Bronx 120 65 0 8 47 39.2 42.0Hostos 122 122 22 0 38 31.1 38.0Kingsborough 160 160 0 4 77 48.1 49.4LaGuardia 28 25 4 0 10 35.7 41.7Queensborough 354 353 0 40 189 53.4 60.2Total Community Colleges 945 886 39 58 456 48.3 53.8Total University 1,646 1,521 70 63 903 54.9 59.7

N N N N N % %York 30 30 0 0 19 63.3 63.3Total Senior Colleges 30 30 0 0 19 63.3 63.3Medgar Evers 51 51 5 2 36 70.6 81.8NYCCT 58 58 1 1 29 50.0 51.8Staten Island 47 47 4 0 24 51.1 55.8Total Comprehensive Colleges 156 156 10 3 89 57.1 62.2BMCC 204 204 34 0 100 49.0 58.8Bronx 83 67 0 6 26 31.3 33.8Hostos 78 78 9 0 24 30.8 34.8Queensborough 496 494 27 60 262 52.8 64.1Total Community Colleges 861 843 70 66 412 47.9 56.8Total University 1,047 1,029 80 69 520 49.7 57.9

Sum

mer

2016

Non-

Sum

mer

2016

-201

7


Table 23. USIP Writing Passing Rates

USIP CollegeTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)


32


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %City 20 10 1 0 5 25.0 26.3Hunter 77 77 0 0 77 100.0 100.0Lehman 15 15 0 0 15 100.0 100.0Total Senior Colleges 112 102 1 0 97 86.6 87.4Staten Island 16 16 3 0 9 56.3 69.2Total Comprehensive Colleges 16 16 3 0 9 56.3 69.2Hostos 203 203 41 0 61 30.0 37.7Kingsborough 67 67 0 0 54 80.6 80.6Queensborough 343 343 3 12 70 20.4 21.3Total Community Colleges 613 613 44 12 185 30.2 33.2Total University 741 731 48 12 291 39.3 42.7

N N N N N % %Hostos 78 78 17 0 17 21.8 27.9Queensborough 210 207 8 9 33 15.7 17.1Total Community Colleges 288 285 25 9 50 17.4 19.7Total University 288 285 25 9 50 17.4 19.7

Sum

mer

2016

Non-

Sum

mer

20

16-2

017


Table 24. USIP Reading and Writing Passing Rates

USIP CollegeTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)


33


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 361 360 7 19 258 71.5 77.0Brooklyn 112 112 0 0 105 93.8 93.8City 283 73 11 0 43 15.2 15.8Hunter 150 137 7 0 130 86.7 90.9John Jay 110 110 0 0 97 88.2 88.2Lehman 116 116 0 0 113 97.4 97.4Queens 96 96 0 8 77 80.2 87.5York 293 293 0 0 271 92.5 92.5Total Senior Colleges 1,521 1,297 25 27 1,094 71.9 74.5Medgar Evers 922 921 0 14 739 80.2 81.4NYCCT 956 948 0 108 521 54.5 61.4Staten Island 1,083 1083 74 0 845 78.0 83.7Total Comprehensive Colleges 2,961 2,952 74 122 2,105 71.1 76.1BMCC 1,587 1585 230 0 1020 64.3 75.2Bronx 1,087 918 0 98 626 57.6 63.3Hostos 1,110 1110 283 0 437 39.4 52.8Kingsborough 472 428 3 4 330 69.9 71.0LaGuardia 578 567 2 4 406 70.2 71.0Queensborough 633 633 22 53 433 68.4 77.6Total Community Colleges 5,467 5,241 540 159 3,252 59.5 68.2Total University 9,949 9,490 639 308 6,451 64.8 71.7


Table 25. USIP Math Passing Rates: Summer 2016

USIP CollegeTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)


34


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 92 92 1 6 65 70.7 76.5Brooklyn 0 - - - - - -City 488 448 22 2 292 59.8 62.9Hunter 261 239 18 0 202 77.4 83.1John Jay 0 - - - - - -Lehman 0 - - - - - -Queens 0 - - - - - -York 143 143 0 0 111 77.6 77.6Total Senior Colleges 984 922 41 8 670 68.1 71.7Medgar Evers 390 390 29 6 279 71.5 78.6NYCCT 132 106 5 2 90 68.2 72.0Staten Island 223 223 21 0 174 78.0 86.1Total Comprehensive Colleges 745 719 55 8 543 72.9 79.6BMCC 616 616 86 0 421 68.3 79.4Bronx 165 165 0 6 114 69.1 71.7Hostos 533 532 86 0 272 51.0 60.9Kingsborough 345 343 1 0 311 90.1 90.4LaGuardia 126 126 0 0 79 62.7 62.7Queensborough 139 139 4 3 96 69.1 72.7Total Community Colleges 1,924 1,921 177 9 1,293 67.2 74.4Total University 3,653 3,562 273 25 2,506 68.6 74.7


Table 26. USIP Math Passing Rates: Non-Summer 2016-2017

USIP CollegeTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)


35


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % %Baruch 35 35 3 0 27 77.1 84.4Hunter 24 24 0 0 24 100.0 100.0Queens 86 86 0 10 30 34.9 39.5Total Senior Colleges 145 145 3 10 81 55.9 61.4NYCCT 77 77 0 1 57 74.0 75.0Staten Island 218 218 20 0 100 45.9 50.5Total Comprehensive Colleges 295 295 20 1 157 53.2 57.3BMCC 305 305 25 0 126 41.3 45.0Bronx 38 26 0 4 16 42.1 47.1Kingsborough 13 13 0 0 12 92.3 92.3LaGuardia 72 69 0 0 39 54.2 54.2Total Community Colleges 428 413 25 4 193 45.1 48.4Total University 868 853 48 15 431 49.7 53.5

N N N N N % %Baruch 18 17 0 1 12 66.7 70.6Total Senior Colleges 18 17 0 1 12 66.7 70.6Staten Island 109 109 4 0 34 31.2 32.4Total Comprehensive Colleges 109 109 4 0 34 31.2 32.4BMCC 78 78 14 0 25 32.1 39.1Bronx 24 24 0 3 11 45.8 52.4Kingsborough 183 183 3 9 171 93.4 100.0LaGuardia 53 53 0 0 36 67.9 67.9Total Community Colleges 338 338 17 12 243 71.9 78.6Total University 465 464 21 13 289 62.2 67.1

Sum

mer

2016

Non-

Sum

mer

2016

-201

7


Table 27. USIP ESL Passing Rates

USIP CollegeTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Withdrawal Rate Passing Rate

36


W, WA, WD WU Number

PassedIncludes

WithdrawalsExcludes

Withdrawals

N N N N N % % City 29 1 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 Hunter 48 47 0 0 47 97.9 97.9

John Jay 110 81 0 0 81 73.6 73.6Lehman 90 80 0 0 80 88.9 88.9York 80 80 0 0 80 100.0 100.0Total Senior Colleges 357 289 1 0 288 80.7 80.9Total Comprehensive Colleges 0 0 * * * * *Bronx 19 19 0 0 15 78.9 78.9Total Community Colleges 19 19 0 0 15 78.9 78.9Total University 376 308 1 0 303 80.6 80.8

N N N N N % %City 46 0 * * * * *York 123 123 0 0 122 99.2 99.2Total Senior Colleges 169 123 0 0 122 72.2 72.2Total University 169 123 0 0 122 72.2 72.2

Sum

mer

2016

Non-

Sum

mer

20

16-2

017


Table 28. USIP Other Subjects Passing Rates

USIP CollegeTotal

Enrolled (Seats)

Total with Known

Outcomes (Seats)

Withdrawal Rate Passing Rate

37

Documents

USIP Fact Book 2016-10173/22/2018 CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies USIP_FactBook_2016_2017 University Skills Immersion Program USIP Fact Book . 2016-2017. CUNY Office of Undergraduate