Vendor Evaluation Scoring

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    1/52

    Sl.No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor Price

    1 3000 1000 252 3000 2000 25

    3 3000 3000 25

    4 3000 4000 25

    5 3000 5000 25

    Price

    Sl.No PurchasingOrganization

    Vendor Price Level

    1 3000 1000 60

    2 3000 2000 60

    3 3000 3000 60

    4 3000 4000 60

    5 3000 5000 60

    Price Level

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No Effective Price

    1 3000 1000 110

    2 3000 2000 105

    3 3000 3000 100

    4 3000 4000 105

    5 3000 5000 115

    Variance Price Level Score

    0 50

    0.1 to 5 20

    5.1 to 15 10

    15.1 to 99.99 1

    Weighting Factor (%) for Over all Score

    Weighting Factor (%) for Main Criteria Price

    Effective Price for Material M-10

    Score Sheet

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    2/52

    -0.1 to -5 60

    -5.1 to -10 90

    -10.1 to -20 95

    -20.1 to -99.99 100

    Price level variance = ( Effective price - market pric

    vendor 100 :- (( 110 - 105 ) / 105 ) * 100 =

    vendor 200 :- (( 105 - 105 ) / 105 ) * 100 =

    vendor 300 :- (( 100 - 105 ) / 105 ) * 100 =

    vendor 400 :- (( 105 - 105 ) / 105 ) * 100 =

    vendor 500 :- (( 115 - 105 ) / 105 ) * 100 =

    Score For Price LevelSl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Price HistorySl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Score SheetPrice Level

    Variance

    Price Level Score

    Effective Price for Material M-10

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    3/52

    0 50

    0.1 to 5 70

    5.1 to 15 80

    15.1 to 99.99 100

    -0.1 to -5 40-5.1 to -20 20

    -20.1 to -40 10

    -40.1 to -99.99 1

    Variance 1 = ((market price of current year - marke

    vendor 100 :- ((105 - 90 ) / 90 * 100 ) =

    vendor 200 :- ((105 - 90 ) / 90 * 100 ) =

    vendor 300 :- ((105 - 90 ) / 90 * 100 ) =

    vendor 400 :- ((105 - 90 ) / 90 * 100 ) =

    vendor 500 :- ((105 - 90 ) / 90 * 100 ) =

    Calculated effective price = (( variance 1 * effectiv

    vendor 100 :- ((( 16.67 * 100) / 100 ) + 100 ) =vendor 200 :- ((( 16.67 * 90 ) / 100 ) + 90 ) =

    vendor 300 :- ((( 16.67 * 95 ) / 100 ) + 95 ) =

    vendor 400 :- ((( 16.67 * 100) / 100 ) + 100 ) =

    Vendor 500 :- ((( 16.67 * 105) / 100 ) + 105 ) =

    Price History Variance = (( effective price of curre

    vendor 100 :- (( 110 - 116.67) / 116.67 ) * 100 =

    vendor 200 :- (( 105 - 105 ) / 105 ) * 100 =

    vendor 300 :- (( 100 - 110.83) / 110.83 ) * 100 =

    vendor 400 :- (( 105 - 116.67) / 116.67 ) * 100 =

    vendor 500 :- (( 115 - 122.5 ) / 122.5 ) * 100 =

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    4/52

    Score For Price HistorySl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Price

    main criteria of price = (( sub criteria of price leve

    ( sub criteria of price history *

    Vendor 100 :- ((20*60) + (20*40) ) / 100 =

    Vendor 200 :- ((50*60) + (50*40) ) / 100 =

    Vendor 300 :- ((60*60) + (20*40) ) / 100 =

    Vendor 400 :- ((50*60) + (20*40) ) / 100 =

    Vendor 500 :- ((10*60) + (20*40) ) / 100 =

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 10002 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    5/52

    Quality

    Sl.No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor Goods Receipt

    Lots1 3000 1000 40

    2 3000 2000 40

    3 3000 3000 40

    4 3000 4000 40

    5 3000 5000 40

    Goods Receipt Lots

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Shop Floor Complaints

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Audit

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    Weighting Factor (%) for Main Criteria Quality

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    6/52

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Quality

    main criteria of Quality= ((sub criteria of Goods R

    ( sub criteria of Shop Floor Co

    ( sub criteria of Audit * weigh

    Vendor 100 :- ((50*40) + (69*40) + (40*20)) / 100 =

    Vendor 200 :- ((45*40) + (56*40) + (48*20)) / 100 =Vendor 300 :- ((46*40) + (23*40) + (89*20)) / 100 =

    Vendor 400 :- ((89*40) + (45*40) + (56*20)) / 100 =

    Vendor 500 :- ((16*40) + (78*40) + (78*20)) / 100 =

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 30004 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Delivery

    Sl.No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor On-Time

    Delivery

    1 3000 1000 302 3000 2000 30

    3 3000 3000 30

    4 3000 4000 30

    5 3000 5000 30

    Weighting Factor (%) for Main Criteria Delivery

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    7/52

    On-Time Delivery

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No days

    1 3000 1000 10

    2 3000 2000 12

    3 3000 3000 7

    4 3000 4000 9

    5 3000 5000 13

    Variance Score

    0 100

    0.1 to 5 705.1 to 15 60

    15.1 to 50 40

    50.1 to 99.99 1

    Standard delivery Date Variance =

    Variance = (difference between delivery dates / Sta

    Vendor 100 :- (10 / 20 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 200 :- (12 / 20 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 300 :- (7 / 20 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 400 :- (9 / 20 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 500 :- (13 / 20 ) * 100 =

    Score For On-Time DeliverySl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    difference Between GR date and purchase ord

    Score Sheet

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    8/52

    Quantity reliability

    Sl. No PurchasingOrganization

    Vendor No Order Quantity

    1 3000 1000 100

    2 3000 2000 100

    3 3000 3000 100

    4 3000 4000 100

    5 3000 5000 100

    Variance Score

    0 100-0.1 to -10 90

    -10.1 to -30 70

    30.1 to 50 40

    50.1 to 99.99 1

    variance = ( Delivery Quantity - Order Quantity / O

    Vendor 100 :- ((70 - 100) / 100 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 200 :- ((80 - 100) / 100 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 300 :- ((95 - 100) / 100 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 400 :- ((90 - 100) / 100 ) * 100 =

    Vendor 500 :- ((75 - 100) / 100 ) * 100 =

    Score For Quantity reliabilitySl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Order Quantity and Deliver Quantity

    Score Sheet

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    9/52

    Shipping Instructions

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Notification Reliability (OR) Confirm

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Deliverymain criteria of Delivery= ((sub criteria of On-Time

    ( sub criteria of Quantity Relia

    ( sub criteria of Shipping Instr

    ( sub criteria of Notification R

    Vendor 100 :- ((40*30) + (70*40) + (40*10) + (20*20))

    Vendor 200 :- ((1 *30) + (70*40) + (54*10) + (15*20))Vendor 300 :- ((40*30) + (90*40) + (76*10) + (78*20))

    Vendor 400 :- ((40*30) + (90*40) + (46*10) + (85*20))

    Vendor 500 :- ((1 *30) + (70*40) + (45*10) + (45*20))

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    10/52

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 30004 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Service

    Reliability

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 2000

    3 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

    Overall ScoresOverall Score = ((Main criteria of Price * weightin

    ( Main criteria of Quantity * w

    ( Main criteria of Delivery * w

    ( Main criteria of Service * w

    Vendor 100 :- ((18*25) + (48.20*25) + (48.0*25) + (47

    Vendor 200 :- ((45*25) + (41.08*25) + (36.7*25) + (45

    Vendor 300 :- ((42*25) + (28.69*25) + (71.2*25) + (23Vendor 400 :- ((36*25) + (54.36*25) + (69.6*25) + (56

    Vendor 500 :- ((12*25) + (38.58*25) + (41.8*25) + (48

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    11/52

    Sl. No Purchasing

    Organization

    Vendor No

    1 3000 1000

    2 3000 20003 3000 3000

    4 3000 4000

    5 3000 5000

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    12/52

    Quality Delivery Service

    25 25 2525 25 25

    25 25 25

    25 25 25

    25 25 25

    Price History

    40

    40

    40

    40

    40

    Market Price

    105

    105

    105

    105

    105

    Market Price for Material M-10

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    13/52

    / market price ) * 100

    4.761904762

    0-4.761904762

    09.523809524

    Price Level

    Score

    20

    50

    60

    50

    10

    Effective

    Price on 2008

    Effective Price on

    2009

    100 110

    90 105

    95 100

    100 105

    105 115

    Mark

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    14/52

    t price of previous yr ) / market price of previous

    Variance 1

    16.66666667

    16.66666667

    16.66666667

    16.66666667

    16.66666667

    price of previous yr ) / 100 ) + effective price ofCalculated Effective

    Price

    116.6666667105

    110.8333333

    116.6666667

    122.5

    t yr - calculated effective price ) / calculated effePrice History

    Variance

    -5.714285714

    0

    -9.77443609

    -10

    -6.12244898

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    15/52

    Price History

    Score

    20

    50

    20

    20

    20

    * weighting factor of price level ) +

    weighting factor of price history) / 100 )

    20

    50

    44

    38

    14

    Score

    2050

    44

    38

    14

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    16/52

    Shop Floor

    Complaints

    Audit

    40 20

    40 20

    40 20

    40 20

    40 20

    Score

    50

    45

    46

    89

    16

    Score

    69

    56

    23

    45

    78

    Score

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    17/52

    40

    48

    89

    56

    78

    ceipt Lots * weighting factor of Goods Receip

    mplaints * weighting factor of Shop Floor Com

    ting factor of Audit) / 100 )

    48.2

    41.0828.69

    54.36

    38.58

    Score

    48.2

    41.08

    28.6954.36

    38.58

    Quantity

    Reliability

    Shipping

    instructions

    Notification

    Reliability

    40 10 2040 10 20

    40 10 20

    40 10 20

    40 10 20

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    18/52

    20 days

    ndard Delivery date Variance ) * 100Variance

    50

    60

    35

    45

    65

    Score

    40

    1

    40

    40

    1

    r date

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    19/52

    DeliveryQuantity

    70

    80

    95

    90

    75

    rder Quantity ) * 100Variance

    -30

    -20

    -5

    -10

    -25

    Score

    70

    70

    90

    90

    70

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    20/52

    Score

    40

    54

    76

    46

    45

    tion Date

    Score

    20

    15

    78

    85

    45

    Delivery * weighting factor ofOn-Time Delivery)

    ility * weighting factor of Quantity Reliability)

    ction * weighting factor of Shipping Instructio

    liability * weighting factor of Notification Relia

    / 100 =

    / 100 =/ 100 =

    / 100 =

    / 100 =

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    21/52

    Score

    48

    36.7

    71.269.6

    41.8

    Score

    47

    45

    23

    56

    48

    factor of Price) +

    ighting factor of Quantity) +

    ighting factor of Delivery) +

    ighting factor of Service) / 100 )

    *25)) / 100 =

    *25)) / 100 =

    *25)) / 100 =*25)) / 100 =

    *25)) / 100 =

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    22/52

    Score Rank

    40.8 4

    43.195 241.7225 3

    54.49 1

    35.595 5

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    23/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    24/52

    Market Price on 2008 Market

    Price on

    200990 105

    90 105

    90 105

    90 105

    90 105

    t Price for Material M-10

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    25/52

    year) * 100

    revious yr

    tive price ) * 100

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    26/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    27/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    28/52

    Lots) +

    laints) +

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    29/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    30/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    31/52

    +

    ) +

    ility) / 100 )

    SCORE

    48

    36.771.2

    69.6

    41.8

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    32/52

    SCORE

    40.8

    43.195

    41.722554.49

    35.595

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    33/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    34/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    35/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    36/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    37/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    38/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    39/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    40/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    41/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    42/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    43/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    44/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    45/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    46/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    47/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    48/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    49/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    50/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    51/52

  • 7/31/2019 Vendor Evaluation Scoring

    52/52