Weaver Elementary SchoolSeptember 2011

It is our vision that students and adults at Weaver will be empowered with the

knowledge, skills, and attitudes for success.

What does our data tell us?

NWEA Spring to Spring (Grades 3-5) Percentages of Students Meeting Proficiency:

Reading2006 – 2007 51.1%2007 – 2008 55.0%2008 – 2009 52.2%2009 – 2010 65.2%2010 – 2011 61.5%

MCA - II Percentages of Students Meeting Proficiency:

Reading2006 82.8% 2007 69.6%2008 72.4%2009 75.5%2010 71.8%2011 84.5% (preliminary)

How are we doing with subgroups?

AYP Reading DataX= Did not make AYP

All American Indian Asian Black Female FRP Hispanic LEP Male SPED White

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007 X

2008

2009 X

2010 X X

2011

MCA-II Reading Proficiency % by Subgroup*2011 will be updated in late August

All American Indian

Asian Black Female FRP Hispanic LEP Male SPED White0

20

40

60

80

100

120

200620072008200920102011

2006 82.8 50 81.8 50 85.5 73.8 88.2 80.3 57.9 81.92007 69.6 44.4 64.7 46.2 74.4 53.5 63.2 30.8 65.6 36.6 77.82008 72.4 100 57.4 52.2 78.1 60.4 81 39 66.7 42.4 79.72009 75.5 100 68.7 63.3 76.1 59.7 70.8 45.8 74.8 55 81.72010 71.8 66.7 65.7 48 70.2 53.3 62.5 50 73.2 53.2 81.72011 84.5 100 80.8 72.4 82.2 75.6 76.2 71.7 86.4 66.7 91.7

White Male Asian Female FRP Black LEP SPED Hispanic

Series1 0.871 0.795 0.783 0.781 0.732 0.727 0.611 0.6 0.5

5.0%

15.0%

25.0%

35.0%

45.0%

55.0%

65.0%

75.0%

85.0%

95.0%

MCA II Reading Proficiency Comparisions 2011

MAP - % Meeting Proficiency Spring to Spring Scores

Scores below 55% are highlighted in green.

06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

All 51.1% 53.7% 52.2% 65.2% 61.5%American Indian 37.5% 50.0% 66.7% 50.0% 50.0%Asian 62.0% 50.0% 50.0% 62.1% 60.3%Black 54.5% 76.9% 61.9% 63.6% 56.5%Female 52.4% 50.0% 53.0% 65.8% 54.3%FRP 52.9% 60.7% 52.9% 61.8% 55.3%Hispanic 40.0% 64.7% 57.1% 60.0% 40.0%LEP 42.1% 62.9% 48.7% 59.3% 51.0%Male 50.0% 57.5% 51.4% 64.7% 67.9%SPED 52.8% 64.3% 48.6% 65.1% 55.6%White 49.0% 51.8% 50.4% 68.3% 67.0%

Grade Level Reading Targets

MAP Reading (Fall to Spring)

Grade 2 Percentage Meeting Target2006 75.7%2007 60.2%2008 71.6%2009 69.7%2010 52.8%2011 71.8%

Grade 3 Reading DataMAP % Meeting Target (Spring to Spring)

2006 80.3%2007 64.1%2008 61.5%2009 61.4%2010 62.3%2011

MCA Percent

Proficient

2006 92.5%2007 77.1%2008 80.7%2009 84.0%2010 8l.9%2011 78.8%

Grade 4 Reading DataMAP % Meeting Target (Spring to Spring)

2006 36.8%2007 37.2%2008 45.7%2009 47.0%2010 61.8%2011

MCA Percent

Proficient

2006 69.9%2007 67.3%2008 70.0%2009 72.0%2010 57.5%2011 87.2%

Grade 5 Reading DataMAP % Meeting Target (Spring to Spring)

2006 46.7%2007 55.8%2008 53.0%2009 49.3%2010 70.6%2011

MCA Percent

Proficient

2006 84.8%2007 65.6%2008 66.3%2009 71.3%2010 77.5%2011 86.7%

DISTRICT 622 ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL COMPARISON DATA

Skyview Eagle Point Carver Weaver Castle Cowern Webster Oakdale Richardson

Series1 86.5 79.4 79.3 78.8 75.6 72.7 71.7 69.9 68.4

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

Grade 3 MCA II Reading Proficiency 2011Gr

ade

3

Eagle Point Skyview Weaver Carver Cowern Richardson Castle Oakdale Webster

Series1 89.7 89.1 86.7 86.2 82.1 78.6 75 73.9 61.5

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

Grade 4 MCA II Reading Proficiency 2011Gr

ade

4

Eagle Point Skyview Weaver Carver Cowern Richardson Castle Oakdale Webster

Series1 89.7 89.1 86.7 86.2 82.1 78.6 75 73.9 61.5

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

Grade 5 MCA II Reading Proficiency 2011Gr

ade

5

Now, let’s plan for our 2011-2012 school year…

OUR GOAL

• Increase reading proficiency on the MCA’s from 84% to 90%.

Our Activities

• Monthly Grade Level PLC’s• 3 staff development days – 1-2 hours• One observation/coaching opportunity per

teacher from the literacy coach• Parent training on conference night• Training for our para educator’s on their role

in Reader’s Workshop and Intervention.

Complete Survey

• Please complete the survey I’ve handed out and return to me by September 15th. I will average the answers to the questions and take the bottom three areas for staff training.