GCSE Geography Independent Study Restless Earth Kobe & Haiti Name Target Grade Grade Assignment Create a one side A4 report comparing the earthquake at Port au Prince, Haiti in 2010 with the 1995 Kobe, Japan earthquake. Contrast the causes, primary effects, secondary effects, immediate responses and long-term responses of the earthquakes. Outline how the effects and responses were so different, and explain why the effects and responses to earthquakes are different in countries at different stages of development. Grades & success criteria Achieved? Grade D Case studies named, but not fully located. Only general causes, effects and responses mentioned. Key words may be used but not in correct context. Little comparison of the effects and responses. Sentences may lack structure. Poor QWC. Grade C Case studies named, and located simply. Causes, effects and responses mentioned. Key words may be used, often in the correct context. Outlines effects and responses, with some evidence of comparison between the two quakes. Some evidence of the understanding of the effects of development on earthquake damage and response. Sentences ordered. Better QWC. Grade B Case studies named, located and referred to throughout. Causes, effects and responses explained. Key words used correctly. Outlines distinction between primary and secondary effects, alongside immediate and long term responses. Clear distinction between the effects and responses to both quakes, with explicit differences and reasons for these differences given. Sentences ordered, clear structure. Good QWC. Grade A case studies named, located and referred to throughout. Causes, effects and responses explained. Key words used correctly. Clear distinction between primary and secondary effects, and compares the immediate and long term responses. Contrasts the two quakes in depth, with explicit reference to differences in effects and responses. Good understanding of the effect of development on quake effects and responses. Detailed reasons given for differences. Sentences ordered, clear structure. Excellent QWC. Grade A* Case studies named, located and referred to in detail throughout. Causes, effects and responses explained. Key words used correctly throughout. Clear, detailed distinction between primary and secondary effects, and compares the immediate and long term responses. Contrasts the two quakes in depth, with explicit reference to differences in effects and responses. Clear understanding of the effect of development on quake effects and responses. Detailed reasons given for differences. Sentences ordered, clear structure. Outstanding QWC. Reflection How much effort did you put in? What will you do next time?

stkathshumanities.files.wordpress.com€¦ · Web viewOutlines effects and responses, with some evidence of comparison between the two quakes. Some evidence of the understanding

Download DOC Report

Upload
others
View
1
Download
0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: stkathshumanities.files.wordpress.com€¦ · Web viewOutlines effects and responses, with some evidence of comparison between the two quakes. Some evidence of the understanding

GCSEGeography Independent Study

Restless Earth Kobe & HaitiName

Target Grade

Grade

AssignmentCreate a one side A4 report comparing the earthquake at Port au Prince, Haiti in 2010 with the 1995 Kobe, Japan earthquake. Contrast the causes, primary effects, secondary effects, immediate responses and long-term responses of the earthquakes. Outline how the effects and responses were so different, and explain why the effects and responses to earthquakes are different in countries at different stages of development.

Grades & success criteria Achieved?Grade D Case studies named, but not fully located. Only general causes, effects and responses mentioned. Key words may be used but not in correct context. Little comparison of the effects and responses. Sentences may lack structure. Poor QWC.Grade C Case studies named, and located simply. Causes, effects and responses mentioned. Key words may be used, often in the correct context. Outlines effects and responses, with some evidence of comparison between the two quakes. Some evidence of the understanding of the effects of development on earthquake damage and response. Sentences ordered. Better QWC.Grade B Case studies named, located and referred to throughout. Causes, effects and responses explained. Key words used correctly. Outlines distinction between primary and secondary effects, alongside immediate and long term responses. Clear distinction between the effects and responses to both quakes, with explicit differences and reasons for these differences given. Sentences ordered, clear structure. Good QWC.Grade A case studies named, located and referred to throughout. Causes, effects and responses explained. Key words used correctly. Clear distinction between primary and secondary effects, and compares the immediate and long term responses. Contrasts the two quakes in depth, with explicit reference to differences in effects and responses. Good understanding of the effect of development on quake effects and responses. Detailed reasons given for differences. Sentences ordered, clear structure. Excellent QWC.Grade A* Case studies named, located and referred to in detail throughout. Causes, effects and responses explained. Key words used correctly throughout. Clear, detailed distinction between primary and secondary effects, and compares the immediate and long term responses. Contrasts the two quakes in depth, with explicit reference to differences in effects and responses. Clear understanding of the effect of development on quake effects and responses. Detailed reasons given for differences. Sentences ordered, clear structure. Outstanding QWC.

Reflection How much effort did you put in? What will you do next time?

Effort

Target

1 2 3 4 5