Upload
vothien
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
• Introduction to Halewood International
• Challenges and Issues in our Supply Chain
• Why we chose SAP SCM?
• The Projects
• Implementation Approach
• Benefits Delivered
• What make our projects a success ?
• Questions and answers
Presentation
Who are we?
• The UK’s Largest Independent Drinks Manufacturer and Distributor
• HQ based on a 30 acre site in Liverpool with overseas operations in Romania, South Africa and China
• Turnover in excess of £250Million and 1500 employees worldwide
• Manufacture and distribute over 400 drinks brands across all sectors of the market – 4 big retailers, wholesalers and on- trade distributors
• Exporting to over 50 countries worldwide
• Company prides itself on innovation and New Product Development is very important to the business
Challenges and Issues
• Poor visibility & consistency across departments
• Forecasting system was not robust and was beginning to creak
• Highly Innovative environment – lots of product change and introductions
• Customers demands increasing and need to be agile
• Promotions – a growing emphasis on promotions which requires flexibility whilst not increasing costs
• Supply chain becoming more complex – multi-site locations
• Production planning not flexible enough to cope with fluctuating demand – offline systems had crept in
• Change to 24-7 production had changed the way in which production was planned – mainly around manning.
Why SCM?
• Already had SAP footprint with ERP and BW • Looked for integration out of the box • Proven solution in use at other companies with similar
products and customers • Needed a robust solution that good “grow” with the
business • SAP provided information and performed a Workshop
to showcase the product to a Senior audience at Halewood starting with Forecasting
• Provided reference sites and we visited these to discuss the use APO and project experiences
Why choose SAP SCM?
Partner Selection
• Needed a proven partner with good understanding of our type of business and the challenges we faced
• Experienced consultants who could engage with all levels of the business
• A company who agreed with our philosophy of knowledge transfer – we like to fully own a system once implemented
• Honest and open approach both in the pre-project phase and throughout the implementation
• A partner with whom we could build a longer term relationship for future developments
• Cost – as with everyone budgets are tight
Partner Selection
Our Partner
• Had good experience on previous APO projects with others in the FMCG arena
• Experienced consultants • Good engagement, especially at Executive level • Approach was to help with the scoping of objectives and
potential business benefits • Ran a business requirements workshop • Built a prototype system with real Halewood data • Played back the output to the business • Provided a good proposal which was well received • Excellent approach through a iterative prototyping model
APO - DP • Replaced in house forecasting system ( built in
Excel/Access and BW)
• Took in 3 years Sales History from BW
• Cleansed history (where possible)
• Built in the capability to record promotions ( as these now more frequent)
• Ability to understand what effect the promotions have had on uplift
Huyton Plant – Liverpool
Bulk Storage & Manufacture
Bottling Storage
Despatch to Customer
External Storage
(Peak Times)
External Supply
Ingredients
External Supply
Dry Goods
External Supply
Cased Goods
Other HIL Company
Manufacturing
I/C Transfers
Our Supply chain 5 years ago
Our Supply chain last year
Huyton Plant – Liverpool
Bulk Storage & Manufacture
Bottling Storage
External Supply
Ingredients
External Supply
Dry Goods External Supply
Cased Goods
External Storage
Subcontract Manufacture
Despatch to Customer
Warehouse Annexe
Warehouse Annexe
Other HIL Company
Manufacturing
APO- SNP
• Reduce number of deliveries in and out/ alleviate pressure on loading bay
• Ensure customer service level of >98% OTIF maintained
• Plan to use the system to assist with planning of stock movements from external vendors and external store to distribution hub
• Use the forecast to drive the stock replenishment rather than a stock controller
• Plan for direct delivery to customer from external storage
Customers
Vendors
Central Warehouse 0100
Ext.Storage 0224
MRP
0001
Huyton Factory
Stock
MRP
0099
Chorley Factory
Net Req.
Net Req.
Current SAP set up for MRP
New set up for MRP
Forecast/ Stock
Net Req.
MRP area:0001-224 MRP area:0001
APO
Vendors
Central Warehouse
Ext. Storage
MRP
0001
Huyton Factory
MRP 0099
Chorley Factory
Net Req.
Net Req.
Forecast/ Stock
Net Req.
Customers Key Customers
New combined process for stock control
Run
SNP
Customer
Service
Demand
Planning
Stocks Central
Run
MRP
Plnd. Ind. Rqts Sales
Orders
Planned Orders
Stocks External
Conversion
to STO’s in
ME21n Transfer Reqs
Delivery
Processing Conversion
to Prd. ords
Process – 3 times daily
Run
MRP
Plan
Production
Planned Orders
ME21N
Alert Monitor
Run
SNP
Stock Transport
Orders
Transfer
Requisitions
Alerts
Planning Book
Production Orders
Material Requirements
05:00
05:30
10:00
10:30
14:00
14:30
Transport Load Builder
• We also took advantage of TLB to assist in the planning of loads
• We have a profile set up for a standard load (28 pallets)
• We then show the requirements and each pallet takes up a floor spot, utilising one of the 28 pallets spaces
• This allows stock control to easily plan mixed loads
Situation
• Production Plan created by Planning – Only using machine capacity
– All lines available 24/7
– No visibility of changeovers ( although built into routing)
• Timeline created by Production – Next 36 hours
– Adapted for number of crews
– Orders and changeovers visible
PPDS
• Set- up matrix defined and built using classification data extracted from ERP
• Verified and extracted data from routings and BOMS
• Defined the capacities for machine and labour
• Currently running in parallel – Go live end of November
Benefits Delivered • DP
• increase in forecast accuracy ( between 9 and 10% points)
• One version of the truth
• Promotions now being captured
• Single point of entry
• SNP • 30 %Reduction in number of vehicle movements
• Loading bay congestion alleviated
• Protected Customer Service levels through peak period
Implementation Approach
• PRINCIPLES:
1. ESTABLISH A ROBUST PROCESS
2. KEEP IT LEAN
3. MAKE IT AGILE
4. MAXIMISE SKILLS TRANSFER
• METHODOLGY:
1. WORKSHOPS WITH BUSINESS TO SCOPE
2. BUILD POC
3. PLAYBACK TO BUSINESS
4. UAT TESTING
5. GO- LIVE & SUPPORT
Process Before Technology
NO PROCESS/NO SYSTEM Our Partner insisted we have a robust business process owned and trusted by the business user, stakeholders and consumers of the demand planning output.
Prepare for New Cycle
Release to MRP
Cleanse Sales History
Execute Statistical Forecasts
Manage Exceptions
Consensus Plan Finalise Plan
DP Process
What made our Project a success ??
• We delivered on time and within budget
• Partner
• Spending time in planning phase
• Executive sponsorship
• Tight scope
• Re-iterative approach
• Good knowledge transfer throughout
• Strong internal team
Key Messages
• SCM (APO) is not as daunting as portrayed
• It doesn’t have to take forever
• It doesn’t need to cost the earth
• Keep it simple
• Short sharp projects worked best for us
• Which parts of the supply chain need improvement?
• Think of SCM as a toolbox