Upload
ethel-dean
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What Happened to Accounting Quality in Eastern Europe after the
Communists Retired Early?
Kozminski University3 Feb 2015
Frederick LindahlGeorge Washington University
Hannu SchadéwitzSatu-Päivi KantolaUniversity of Turku
2
“Landscape” of eastern Europe
• from: autocratic communist rule
• from: planned socialist economy
• to: democracy
• to: free markets
More than half of today’s eastern EU countries were not even countries at the time that communism fell!
Research domain
3
Laws and markets
1990:• No functioning stock markets• No large-scale private enterprises • No legal institutions to govern capitalist markets• Little private wealth• No judiciary or lawyers trained in capitalist law• Little trust by citizens in fairness of legal system
Research domain
4
Laws and markets
During 1990s, early 2000s• Privatization of state enterprises• Attract foreign investors (FDI)• Establish stock markets
Research domain
5
Laws and markets
During 1990s, early 2000s• Privatization of state enterprises• Attract foreign investors (FDI)• Establish stock markets• Development of laws for free markets:
Communist law Common law (help from World Bank)
Civil law (anticipation of EU) EU law, through regulations and
directives
Research domain
6
Baltic countries German/Swedish legal influence; Soviet republics; eurozone
Visegràd countries German legal influence; more autonomy under communism; industrialized; sophisticated manufacture
Southern countries German/French/Ottoman legal influence; lower GDP; late joiners
clustersResearch domain
7
Baltic countries -- Estonia -- Latvia -- Lithuania
Visegràd countries -- Czech Rep -- Hungary -- Poland -- Slovakia
Southern countries -- Bulgaria -- Croatia -- Romania -- Slovenia
ClustersResearch domain
8
Main elements of study
Research question: What is the state of reporting in formerly communist countries in Europe?• Law– How does the law affect accounting quality?
• Methods– New measurement of earnings quality
• Findings
Research
9
Law
• Law– How does the law affect accounting quality?
Legal system corporate governance financial reporting
Research: law
10
Laws and accounting
• Previous research– With accounting quality as the dependent variable,
insert a dummy for “common” or “civil” law.– Alternatively, insert the country score from LLSV (98).
• Limitations– LLSV rely on ADRI, that has nothing to do with financial
reporting• “One share, one vote”• Right to call shareholders meeting, …
– All eastern EU countries are civil law; conceivably they are not all the same.
Research: law
11
Law
• Law– How does the law affect accounting quality?
Legal system corporate governance financial reporting
Research: law
12
Laws and accounting
Conditions that create demand for financial reporting• Providers of capital separate from managers• Foreign investors want accountability• Cost of capital considerations
Research: law
13
Laws and accounting (2)
Activities that fulfill demand for financial reporting• Establishment of securities laws• Establishment of independent securities
regulators• Increasing trust in legal systems– “Trust in legal institutions and legal certainty are
preconditions for a working market economy”– (Fogelklou 2003)
– Slow: in 2005, only in Estonia did more than 50% of citizens think the judiciary was not corrupt.
Research: law
14
Eastern European Union
• Forces toward improved quality in corporate governance– Transnationalization (EU, WTO, treaties, IMF)–Global markets (major stock exchanges)– IFRS
• Forces against–National legal culture–Corruption, lack of professionalism–Distrust of legal system
Research: law
15
Hypothesis
• Periods–1990-1995 Transition: Period of emerging
from communism: privatizing, etc.–1995-2000 Consolidation: Period of
adapting to western civil law and preparing for EU–2000-2005 Accession: Introduction to EU,
adapting to all EU conditions, including IFRS –2005-2010 Integration: EU members
• Hypothesis: earnings quality improves
Research: law
16
Baltic countries -- Estonia -- Latvia -- Lithuania
Visegràd countries -- Czech Rep -- Hungary -- Poland -- Slovakia
Southern countries -- Bulgaria -- Croatia -- Romania -- Slovenia
Clusters
2
1
3
Research: law
17
Measuring accounting quality
• Methods rely on abnormal accruals– Unsuitable for international comparisons, because
accrual rules differ among accounting standards• Methods that rely on stock returns– Unsuitable for international comparisons, because
capital markets not fully developed (efficiency, synchronous trading)
• Methods that rely on discontinuities
Research methods
18
Measurement of quality
• Burgstahler & Dichev (1997): too many small gains compared with small losses–Robust to accounting systems differences–Robust to different capital market conditions– Few, if any, alternative explanationsGood measure for international comparison
Research methods
19
Burgstahler-Dichev (97)
• Burgstahler & Dichev (1997): too many small gains compared with small losses– Assumes “smooth” distribution– Choice of bin width arbitrary
These are inherent weaknesses
Research methods
20
c0
Research methods
21
Censored normal distribution
Y = c if Y* ≤ c andY = Y* if Y* > c
Y is defined as observed values, and c is the censoring point.
Y* is the reference distribution of unmanaged earnings.
Research methods
22
Hypothesis test
p1 = estimated value of small lossesP2 = observed frequency of small losses
Test statistic: p2/p1Null hypothesis p2 = p1; i.e., test statistic =
1
Research methods
23
Hypothesis tests apply to:
• H1: there is no earnings management in eastern EU in 2005 (accession)
• H2: accounting quality has not improved from 2005 to 2010.
• H3: accounting quality– Visegràd > Baltic– Baltic > southern– Visegràd > southern
Research methods
24
Data
• Years of interest:–1995–2000–2005 –2010
• Compustat database of financial reports
Research findings
25
2000, all east countries
BUL 0 CRO 3CZE 2
EST 5 HUN 6 LAT 1
LTU 1 POL 40ROM 0
SLV 6 SVK 2
Compustat
Research findings
Eliminating firms with sales < $50,000.
26
1995, all east countries
N=4
Compustat
Research findings
27
2005, all east countries, n=279
-0.15-0.14
-0.13-0.12
-0.11-0.1
-0.0899999999999999
-0.0799999999999999
-0.0699999999999999
-0.0599999999999999-0.05
-0.04-0.03
-0.02
-0.00999999999999998 00.01
0.020.03
0.040.05
0.060.07
0.080.09 0.1
0.110.12
0.130.14
0.150
3
6
9
12
15
18
Change in Earnings Interval
Freq
uenc
y
Research findings: Hypothesis 1: no earnings management.
28
“new method”
p1 = estimated value of small lossesP2 = observed frequency of small losses
Test statistic: p2/p1Null hypothesis p2 = p1; i.e., test statistic = 1
Test statistic = 0.431; standard error = 0.148 Null hypothesis rejected at p < 0.01,
for year 2005.
Research findings: Hypothesis 1: no earnings management.
29
2010 West East Total Chi-square (probability)
Small losses 41 6 47 Small gains 110 44 154 All other 1924 404 2328 13.2Total 2075 454 2529 (p=0.001)
Research findings: Hypothesis 1: no more earnings management in the east than in the west
Null hypothesis rejected at p = 0.001
30
“New method” comparison with western EU
p1 = estimated value of small losses, 2005p2 = observed frequency of small losses, 2005
q1 = estimated value of small losses, 2010q2 = observed frequency of small losses, 2010
Test statistic: (q2/q1) – (p2/p1) = 0.056standard error: 0.182
Null hypothesis not rejected at p = 0.05
Research findings: Hypothesis 2: accounting quality not improving
31
-0.15-0.13
-0.11
-0.0899999999999999
-0.0699999999999999-0.05
-0.03
-0.009999999999999980.01
0.030.05
0.070.09
0.110.13
0.1506
1218
Change in Earnings Interval
Freq
uenc
y
-0.15-0.13
-0.11
-0.0899999999999999
-0.0699999999999999-0.05
-0.03
-0.009999999999999980.01
0.030.05
0.070.09
0.110.13
0.1506
1218
Change in Earnings Interval
Freq
uenc
y
-0.15-0.13
-0.11
-0.0899999999999999
-0.0699999999999999-0.05
-0.03
-0.009999999999999980.01
0.030.05
0.070.09
0.110.13
0.1506
1218
Change in Earnings Interval
Freq
uenc
y2005
“Peel the onion”:
clusters
Baltic
Visegràd
southern
Research findings: Hypothesis 3: no cluster differences
32
Contributions and conclusions
• Analysis of 20 years of eastern European legal history gives basis for cross-sectional and time series hypotheses of earnings quality.
• Data show evidence of earnings management, perhaps declining (work in progress).– Evidence of more earnings management in
eastern than in western Europe.• A new method of analyzing data gives better
statistical evidence to support results.