Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
“Where Have All the Dollars Gone?”*. Presentation to the National Meeting on Physician Compensation, “Sustainability of Physician Services” Victoria, B.C. M.L. Barer, R. McKendry, K. McGrail and R.G. Evans Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, UBC October 16, 2008 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
“Where Have All the Dollars Gone?”*
Presentation to the National Meeting on Physician Compensation, “Sustainability of Physician Services”
Victoria, B.C.
M.L. Barer, R. McKendry, K. McGrail and R.G. Evans Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, UBC
October 16, 2008
* SOME SOURCE DATA UPDATED, SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION
Non-FFS payments represent an eclectic mix…..• Benefits
e.g. disability insurance, CME, CMPA, maternity, RSP
• Incentivese.g. rural incentives, isolation allowance,
recruitment/retention, full-service family practice, medical on-call
• Service-relatedSalary, sessional, service agreements
Share of physician compensation by type of remuneration, BC, 1992/93 and 2006/07
Partial Eclipse Maps, 1997 and 2005
Loss of Information during this Transition
• The new alternative payment programs provide less detail on physician activity, and
• Reporting detail on the programs themselves is increasingly incomplete.
• FOR EXAMPLE …:
So …
Three Phases of MSC Spending, • Spending per capita adjusted for fee changes, (an
index of “real” service output), has moved steadily upward for 36 years
• After 1990, however, the mix of forms of payment to physicians began to change
• In the 1990s, FFS payments flattened
• After 1998, alternative payment forms expanded rapidly
BC MSC Expenditure, Total and Components, constant $1991/92 p.c., NPDB Fee Index, 1969/70 to 2007/08
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
MSC Total Exp Medical Care Exp Medical FFS Exp APP Exp FFS+3S
% Growth in B.C. MSC Expenditures per capita per
annum, Fee-Adjusted
69-07 69-90 90-98 98-01 01-07
Total 2.55 3.47 0.53 2.94 1.88Medical 2.63 3.60 0.52 3.82 1.50FFS 1.98 3.51 -0.53 1.15 0.50APP 8.07 5.60 14.35 16.81 4.54S&S&S** 6.01 5.60 7.92 16.24 0.17FFS+3S 2.27 3.60 0.03 2.73 0.45FFS+1/2 3S 2.13 3.56 -0.24 1.99 0.47* Alternative Payment Programs** Salaried, sessional, and service agreements (3S)
But are physicians in APP as “productive” as those paid FFS?
• “FFS+3S” assumes that physicians paid by salary, sessional, and service agreements are equally productive (potential billings)
• “FFS+1/2 3S” assumes (as an extreme) that they are only half as productive
• Either way, the volume of physicians’ services per capita has been rising -- but how fast? Because APP activity is largely undocumented, we do not know
% Growth in B.C. Physician Prices Relative to CPI
69-07 69-90 90-98 98-01 01-07
Fees, -0.32 -0.47 -0.81 2.90 -0.75
APP Gain* 0.35 0.00 0.49 1.06 1.04
Total 0.02 -0.47 -0.32 3.99 0.28
*De facto price increase, from increases in APP not matched by service increases. “3S” activity assumed as productive as FFS.
% Growth in Physician Expenditures p.c.p.a., Fee-
Adjusted, 1999/00 to 2005/06, CIHI sources
B.C. Ten ProvinceTotal, NHexT 3.07 2.11
“Total”, NPDB 2.56 0.89FFS, NPDB 0.54 -0.37APP Clinical, NPDB 16.62 14.54FFS+APPClin NPDB 2.71 1.79Clin-NOC NPDB 1.10* 1.20*Clin-NOC-.5 APPClin NPDB 0.84** 0.47***Northern and On Call payments removed as not service related.**Half of other Clinical APP also removed as possibly less
“productive”
So what do we we know? • Payment to physicians have risen faster than payments for
service programs, and much faster than payments for FFS
• This implies that total prices paid per service have risen significantly faster than fee schedules – the previous slide is a minimum estimate
• The estimated volume of physicians’ services provided, per capita, to British Columbians appears nevertheless to have gone up, but we have no way of being more precise
Implications for management
• Can’t do blind temporal comparisons with head in sand
• Losing increasing amounts of management
information over time
• Information losses vary by region and specialty
• Some of regions and specialties where
information losses are greatest are of critical importance re: e.g. access
Flashlight through the fog….
Challenge is to move back toward origin of management information ‘graph’
Create incentives for provision of accurate shadow billing data where not currently being provided
Advocate for management-friendly EMR (and access for management purposes)
UBC Centre for HealthServices and Policy Research
For more information:
