2
www.nutraceuticalmag.com March/April 2011 50 regulatory review C hoosing the correct disinfectant depends on the environmental conditions surrounding the manufacturing process. First, you must know what organism you want to eliminate. Not all organisms are of high-risk concern under all circumstances. For example, in a situation when there is limited or no human interaction with the consumable product, but there are raw materials of plant origin, there will be less concern about Streptococcus, Staphylococcus or Shigella because these organisms are typically associated with human skin and excrement and transferred by the improper handling of consumables. However, contamination could come from organisms such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Campylobacter as these organisms are associated with soil, untreated water and livestock, all of which can ultimately be the source of contact for a raw material of botanical origin. The most effective disinfectant would be the one that can effectively kill all organisms and not be affected by the presence of organic matter, hard water or soaps/detergents. Although no single disinfectant can cover all aspects, there are many available that will provide the coverage needed for most scenarios. A very good broad-spectrum group includes aldehyde compounds. This group of disinfectants is effective in destroying many harmful organisms including vegetative bacteria (bacteria in the actively growing state), mycobacterium, bacterial spores, enveloped viruses, non-enveloped viruses and fungi. However, they do show reduced efficacy in the presence of organic matter, hard water or soaps. The aldehyde disinfectants can be carcinogenic and are mucus membrane and tissue irritants. Therefore, they should only be used in well-ventilated areas. The least effective at killing organisms are the biguanide compounds, including chlorhexidine. Biguanide compounds are effective in eliminating vegetative bacteria, but not spores. Their effectiveness is limited against viruses and fungi. Biguanides only function in a limited pH range — 5–7 — which could be a problem in some work environments. Biguanide compounds also have environmental issues: they are toxic to fish. Another good disinfectant with low to moderate cost is the phenolic group. This category of disinfectants is very effective in the presence of organic material and soaps or detergents. They are effective in eliminating vegetative bacteria and enveloped viruses. There is a varied effect on Mycobacteria, non-enveloped viruses and fungi, and it’s non-sporocidal. The environmental concern is its toxicity to animals, especially cats and pigs. The two most cost-effective disinfectants are the halogen group and the quaternary ammonium compounds. The common halogen disinfectants are the hypochlorite compounds (bleach) and iodine compounds. In general, they provide a wide germicidal activity. The hypochlorite compounds are effective in eliminating vegetative bacteria, Mycobacteria, enveloped viruses, non-enveloped viruses and fungi. It has a variable effect on spores. There are some disadvantages with this disinfectant. Care must be taken to shield it from UV light as it denatures the compound and renders it useless. This compound requires frequent application to surfaces and presents another challenge in that it is highly corrosive. Moreover, like aldehyde compounds, they are mucus membrane and tissue irritants so employee safety must be considered before selecting this disinfectant. Iodine has slightly different characteristics. It effectively eliminates vegetative bacteria cells, enveloped viruses and fungi, but has a limited effect on Mycobacteria, non-enveloped viruses and bacterial endospores. The disadvantages of iodine compounds are that they are inactivated by Quaternary Ammonium compounds (Quats), which could pose a problem when iodine and Quats are used in rotation. The next most cost-effective disinfectants are the Quats. These compounds are very stable in storage, do not irritate the skin and are effective at high temperatures and pH (9–10). However, Quats are very effective in eliminating vegetative Gram positive bacteria but have a limited effect on Gram negative bacteria. These might be useful when you are worried about spoilage caused by Gram positives such as Bacillus subtilis and lactobacillus or contamination with pathogenic Gram positives such as Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus and Clostridium. However, Gram negatives such as Pseudomonas, Shigella, Escherichia coli and Salmonella may not be completely eliminated. It has a varied effect on Mycobacteria and enveloped viruses, and no effect on non-enveloped viruses and spores. The remaining categories are the coal tar distillates (cresol), alcohols and oxidizing agents (hydrogen peroxide). All are good broad-spectrum compounds but carry a higher cost than other disinfectants. The oxidizing agents and cresols are corrosive to work areas and the alcohols are highly flammable. The alcohols and oxidizing agents are hindered by the presence of organic matter whereas the cresols are not. The bottom line is to determine what biological hazards might be present or of concern in your plant and, based on these, select the appropriate disinfectant. Furthermore, it is always wise to rotate the disinfectants to prevent one of those organisms that amass on your equipment from mutating and becoming resistant to the disinfectant. WHICH DISINFECTANT IS RIGHT FOR ME? Food safety has made its way to the forefront of the US government’s agenda for the first time in decades because of recent Salmonella outbreaks in peanut butter, eggs and various vegetables. The Food Safety and Modernization Act was signed into law in early January and it is designed to focus on the prevention of food-borne illnesses. Although dietary supplements are regulated by specific cGMPs, these new regulations will apply to dietary supplement manufacturers too. A large portion of this bill requires manufacturers to devise plans such as Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) to locate problematic areas and produce ways to eliminate or reduce the hazard. In doing so, the proper selection of disinfecting agent(s) is an important part of the process as they provide a way to reduce contamination. For more information Dr Cheri Turman and Benny McKee Contact Dr Turman, Director of Chemistry Analytical Food Laboratories Tel. +1 800 242 6494 cheri@afltexas.com www.afltexas.com

Which disinfectant is right for me?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Which disinfectant is right for me in the food industry

Citation preview

  • www.nutraceuticalmag.com March/April 2011

    50regulatory review

    choosing the correct disinfectant

    depends on the environmental

    conditions surrounding the

    manufacturing process. First,

    you must know what organism you want to

    eliminate. Not all organisms are of high-risk

    concern under all circumstances. For example,

    in a situation when there is limited or no human

    interaction with the consumable product, but

    there are raw materials of plant origin, there

    will be less concern about Streptococcus, Staphylococcus or Shigella because these organisms are typically associated with human

    skin and excrement and transferred by the

    improper handling of consumables. However,

    contamination could come from organisms

    such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Campylobacter as these organisms are associated with soil, untreated water and

    livestock, all of which can ultimately be

    the source of contact for a raw material of

    botanical origin. The most effective disinfectant

    would be the one that can effectively kill

    all organisms and not be affected by the

    presence of organic matter, hard water

    or soaps/detergents. Although no single

    disinfectant can cover all aspects, there are

    many available that will provide the coverage

    needed for most scenarios.

    A very good broad-spectrum group

    includes aldehyde compounds. This group

    of disinfectants is effective in destroying

    many harmful organisms including vegetative

    bacteria (bacteria in the actively growing state),

    mycobacterium, bacterial spores, enveloped

    viruses, non-enveloped viruses and fungi.

    However, they do show reduced efficacy in

    the presence of organic matter, hard water

    or soaps. The aldehyde disinfectants can be

    carcinogenic and are mucus membrane and

    tissue irritants. Therefore, they should only

    be used in well-ventilated areas. The least

    effective at killing organisms are the biguanide

    compounds, including chlorhexidine.

    Biguanide compounds are effective in

    eliminating vegetative bacteria, but not spores.

    Their effectiveness is limited against viruses

    and fungi. Biguanides only function in a limited

    pH range 57 which could be a problem

    in some work environments. Biguanide

    compounds also have environmental issues:

    they are toxic to fish.

    Another good disinfectant with low to

    moderate cost is the phenolic group. This

    category of disinfectants is very effective in

    the presence of organic material and soaps

    or detergents. They are effective in eliminating

    vegetative bacteria and enveloped viruses.

    There is a varied effect on Mycobacteria,

    non-enveloped viruses and fungi, and its

    non-sporocidal. The environmental concern

    is its toxicity to animals, especially cats

    and pigs. The two most cost-effective

    disinfectants are the halogen group and

    the quaternary ammonium compounds.

    The common halogen disinfectants are

    the hypochlorite compounds (bleach) and

    iodine compounds. In general, they provide

    a wide germicidal activity. The hypochlorite

    compounds are effective in eliminating

    vegetative bacteria, Mycobacteria, enveloped

    viruses, non-enveloped viruses and fungi.

    It has a variable effect on spores. There are

    some disadvantages with this disinfectant.

    Care must be taken to shield it from UV

    light as it denatures the compound and

    renders it useless. This compound requires

    frequent application to surfaces and presents

    another challenge in that it is highly corrosive.

    Moreover, like aldehyde compounds, they

    are mucus membrane and tissue irritants

    so employee safety must be considered

    before selecting this disinfectant. Iodine has

    slightly different characteristics. It effectively

    eliminates vegetative bacteria cells, enveloped

    viruses and fungi, but has a limited effect on

    Mycobacteria, non-enveloped viruses and

    bacterial endospores. The disadvantages of

    iodine compounds are that they are inactivated

    by Quaternary Ammonium compounds

    (Quats), which could pose a problem when

    iodine and Quats are used in rotation.

    The next most cost-effective disinfectants

    are the Quats. These compounds are very

    stable in storage, do not irritate the skin

    and are effective at high temperatures

    and pH (910). However, Quats are very

    effective in eliminating vegetative Gram

    positive bacteria but have a limited effect

    on Gram negative bacteria. These might

    be useful when you are worried about

    spoilage caused by Gram positives such

    as Bacillus subtilis and lactobacillus or contamination with pathogenic Gram

    positives such as Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus and Clostridium. However, Gram negatives such as Pseudomonas, Shigella, Escherichia coli and Salmonella may not be completely eliminated. It has a varied effect on

    Mycobacteria and enveloped viruses, and no effect on non-enveloped viruses and

    spores. The remaining categories are the

    coal tar distillates (cresol), alcohols and

    oxidizing agents (hydrogen peroxide). All are

    good broad-spectrum compounds but carry

    a higher cost than other disinfectants. The

    oxidizing agents and cresols are corrosive

    to work areas and the alcohols are highly

    flammable. The alcohols and oxidizing agents

    are hindered by the presence of organic

    matter whereas the cresols are not.

    The bottom line is to determine what

    biological hazards might be present or

    of concern in your plant and, based on

    these, select the appropriate disinfectant.

    Furthermore, it is always wise to rotate the

    disinfectants to prevent one of those organisms

    that amass on your equipment from mutating

    and becoming resistant to the disinfectant.

    which diSinfEctant iS right for ME?Food safety has made its way to the forefront of the US governments agenda for the first time in decades because of recent Salmonella outbreaks in peanut butter, eggs and various vegetables. The Food Safety and Modernization Act was signed into law in early January and it is designed to focus on the prevention of food-borne illnesses. Although dietary supplements are regulated by specific cGMPs, these new regulations will apply to dietary supplement manufacturers too. A large portion of this bill requires manufacturers to devise plans such as Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) to locate problematic areas and produce ways to eliminate or reduce the hazard. In doing so, the proper selection of disinfecting agent(s) is an important part of the process as they provide a way to reduce contamination.

    For more informationDr Cheri Turman and Benny McKeeContact Dr Turman, Director of ChemistryAnalytical Food LaboratoriesTel. +1 800 242 [email protected]

  • Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.